Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool that can help to quantify the impacts of different processes to facilitate comparison and decision making. There are many potential methods for managing plastic waste, but it can be difficult to determine which methods are preferable in terms of environmental im...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2021-05, Vol.13 (10), p.5340
Hauptverfasser: Alhazmi, Hatem, Almansour, Faris H., Aldhafeeri, Zaid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 5340
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 13
creator Alhazmi, Hatem
Almansour, Faris H.
Aldhafeeri, Zaid
description Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool that can help to quantify the impacts of different processes to facilitate comparison and decision making. There are many potential methods for managing plastic waste, but it can be difficult to determine which methods are preferable in terms of environmental impact. Suitable existing LCA studies are identified through a screening process and the methodologies used and their outputs are compared. When undertaking an LCA, the researchers must define their scope and select their parameters, according to their aims and context, which leads to a wide variation in the approach taken. In this study, six parameters have been considered to analyze research progress in these fields regarding LCA, i.e., goals and scope, functional units, impact assessment categories, system boundaries, geographical context, and uncertainty analysis. These studies include the similar type of different studies considering plastic waste recycling, each taking a different approach to defining the system boundaries, revealing how the decision to include or exclude factors such as transport can have a significant impact on the outcomes. Additionally, compared to these similar studies on mixed-plastic waste management, different available options are used to quantitatively compare the impact outcomes, revealing how the context and parameter selection can affect the results. This review aims to highlight the prospect of LCA during the development of a waste management framework as an efficient waste recycling tool and recommend a research gap for the development of an improved management framework in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su13105340
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2533036263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2533036263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1dd8f017083e3a2978e7e1e057af9c20d5832e648ff912520d1b03e57ae7b5603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFtLw0AQhRdRsNS--AsWfBOiMzvNzbdSahUiihd8DNtktqS0Sc0kav-9WyrovJy5fJyBo9Q5whVRCtfSIyGENIYjNTAQY-AnOP7Xn6qRyAp8EWGK0UBlT2srXVXody-sH2xtl7zhurvRE_3MnxV_6cbp2XflqXqps8qxnu6KNeuJCIvsWf3S9WXFcqZOnF0Lj351qN5uZ6_TuyB7nN9PJ1lQUIRdgGWZOMAYEmKyJo0TjhkZwti6tDBQhgkZjsaJcyma0C9wAcT-zPEijICG6uLgu22bj56ly1dN39b-ZW5CIqDIROSpywNVtI1Iyy7fttXGtrscId8Hlv8FRj_WqltH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533036263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Alhazmi, Hatem ; Almansour, Faris H. ; Aldhafeeri, Zaid</creator><creatorcontrib>Alhazmi, Hatem ; Almansour, Faris H. ; Aldhafeeri, Zaid</creatorcontrib><description>Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool that can help to quantify the impacts of different processes to facilitate comparison and decision making. There are many potential methods for managing plastic waste, but it can be difficult to determine which methods are preferable in terms of environmental impact. Suitable existing LCA studies are identified through a screening process and the methodologies used and their outputs are compared. When undertaking an LCA, the researchers must define their scope and select their parameters, according to their aims and context, which leads to a wide variation in the approach taken. In this study, six parameters have been considered to analyze research progress in these fields regarding LCA, i.e., goals and scope, functional units, impact assessment categories, system boundaries, geographical context, and uncertainty analysis. These studies include the similar type of different studies considering plastic waste recycling, each taking a different approach to defining the system boundaries, revealing how the decision to include or exclude factors such as transport can have a significant impact on the outcomes. Additionally, compared to these similar studies on mixed-plastic waste management, different available options are used to quantitatively compare the impact outcomes, revealing how the context and parameter selection can affect the results. This review aims to highlight the prospect of LCA during the development of a waste management framework as an efficient waste recycling tool and recommend a research gap for the development of an improved management framework in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su13105340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Boundaries ; Consumption ; Decision making ; Environmental impact assessment ; Landfill ; Plastic debris ; Plastics ; Polymers ; Recycling ; Sustainability ; Uncertainty analysis ; Waste management</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2021-05, Vol.13 (10), p.5340</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1dd8f017083e3a2978e7e1e057af9c20d5832e648ff912520d1b03e57ae7b5603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1dd8f017083e3a2978e7e1e057af9c20d5832e648ff912520d1b03e57ae7b5603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8762-0055</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alhazmi, Hatem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almansour, Faris H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldhafeeri, Zaid</creatorcontrib><title>Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool that can help to quantify the impacts of different processes to facilitate comparison and decision making. There are many potential methods for managing plastic waste, but it can be difficult to determine which methods are preferable in terms of environmental impact. Suitable existing LCA studies are identified through a screening process and the methodologies used and their outputs are compared. When undertaking an LCA, the researchers must define their scope and select their parameters, according to their aims and context, which leads to a wide variation in the approach taken. In this study, six parameters have been considered to analyze research progress in these fields regarding LCA, i.e., goals and scope, functional units, impact assessment categories, system boundaries, geographical context, and uncertainty analysis. These studies include the similar type of different studies considering plastic waste recycling, each taking a different approach to defining the system boundaries, revealing how the decision to include or exclude factors such as transport can have a significant impact on the outcomes. Additionally, compared to these similar studies on mixed-plastic waste management, different available options are used to quantitatively compare the impact outcomes, revealing how the context and parameter selection can affect the results. This review aims to highlight the prospect of LCA during the development of a waste management framework as an efficient waste recycling tool and recommend a research gap for the development of an improved management framework in the future.</description><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Plastic debris</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Waste management</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFtLw0AQhRdRsNS--AsWfBOiMzvNzbdSahUiihd8DNtktqS0Sc0kav-9WyrovJy5fJyBo9Q5whVRCtfSIyGENIYjNTAQY-AnOP7Xn6qRyAp8EWGK0UBlT2srXVXody-sH2xtl7zhurvRE_3MnxV_6cbp2XflqXqps8qxnu6KNeuJCIvsWf3S9WXFcqZOnF0Lj351qN5uZ6_TuyB7nN9PJ1lQUIRdgGWZOMAYEmKyJo0TjhkZwti6tDBQhgkZjsaJcyma0C9wAcT-zPEijICG6uLgu22bj56ly1dN39b-ZW5CIqDIROSpywNVtI1Iyy7fttXGtrscId8Hlv8FRj_WqltH</recordid><startdate>20210511</startdate><enddate>20210511</enddate><creator>Alhazmi, Hatem</creator><creator>Almansour, Faris H.</creator><creator>Aldhafeeri, Zaid</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8762-0055</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210511</creationdate><title>Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies</title><author>Alhazmi, Hatem ; Almansour, Faris H. ; Aldhafeeri, Zaid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1dd8f017083e3a2978e7e1e057af9c20d5832e648ff912520d1b03e57ae7b5603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Plastic debris</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Waste management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alhazmi, Hatem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almansour, Faris H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldhafeeri, Zaid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alhazmi, Hatem</au><au>Almansour, Faris H.</au><au>Aldhafeeri, Zaid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2021-05-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5340</spage><pages>5340-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool that can help to quantify the impacts of different processes to facilitate comparison and decision making. There are many potential methods for managing plastic waste, but it can be difficult to determine which methods are preferable in terms of environmental impact. Suitable existing LCA studies are identified through a screening process and the methodologies used and their outputs are compared. When undertaking an LCA, the researchers must define their scope and select their parameters, according to their aims and context, which leads to a wide variation in the approach taken. In this study, six parameters have been considered to analyze research progress in these fields regarding LCA, i.e., goals and scope, functional units, impact assessment categories, system boundaries, geographical context, and uncertainty analysis. These studies include the similar type of different studies considering plastic waste recycling, each taking a different approach to defining the system boundaries, revealing how the decision to include or exclude factors such as transport can have a significant impact on the outcomes. Additionally, compared to these similar studies on mixed-plastic waste management, different available options are used to quantitatively compare the impact outcomes, revealing how the context and parameter selection can affect the results. This review aims to highlight the prospect of LCA during the development of a waste management framework as an efficient waste recycling tool and recommend a research gap for the development of an improved management framework in the future.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su13105340</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8762-0055</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2021-05, Vol.13 (10), p.5340
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2533036263
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Boundaries
Consumption
Decision making
Environmental impact assessment
Landfill
Plastic debris
Plastics
Polymers
Recycling
Sustainability
Uncertainty analysis
Waste management
title Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A21%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plastic%20Waste%20Management:%20A%20Review%20of%20Existing%20Life%20Cycle%20Assessment%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Alhazmi,%20Hatem&rft.date=2021-05-11&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5340&rft.pages=5340-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su13105340&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2533036263%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533036263&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true