Cooperation against all predictions

In Binary Threshold Public Good (BTPG) games, n players have binary choices: cooperation or non-cooperation. If at least k players cooperate, a public good is produced. The case k = n is the Stag Hunt game with the two pure strategy equilibria E1 (all players cooperate) and E0 (no player cooperates)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economic inquiry 2021-07, Vol.59 (3), p.904-924
Hauptverfasser: Bolle, Friedel, Spiller, Jörg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 924
container_issue 3
container_start_page 904
container_title Economic inquiry
container_volume 59
creator Bolle, Friedel
Spiller, Jörg
description In Binary Threshold Public Good (BTPG) games, n players have binary choices: cooperation or non-cooperation. If at least k players cooperate, a public good is produced. The case k = n is the Stag Hunt game with the two pure strategy equilibria E1 (all players cooperate) and E0 (no player cooperates). In four rather diverse examples of four-player Stag Hunt games, three prominent concepts of equilibrium selection favor E0. Experiments, however, result in cooperation frequencies between 70.3% and 99.7%. Also for k < n, the selected equilibria clearly differ from experimental behavior. We interpret our observations by suggesting the concept Behavioral Equilibrium Selection.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ecin.12976
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2533019853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2533019853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3926-60143aa87d250efb447e43be7f7df47b851ed27f6a420c6dfe7913138c54361d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFYv3oVCb0Lqfm9ylNBqoehFz8tmMytbYjbupkj_exOj4Mm5vGH4vZnhIXRN8IoMdQfWtytCCyVP0IxwKTJFC3H6pz9HFyntMcZMCjFDyzKEDqLpfWgX5s34NvUL0zSLLkLt7ThOl-jMmSbB1Y_O0etm_VI-Zrvnh215v8ssK6jMJCacGZOrmgoMruJcAWcVKKdqx1WVCwI1VU4aTrGVtQNVEEZYbgVnktRsjpbT3i6GjwOkXu_DIbbDSU0FY5gU-SBzdDtRNoaUIjjdRf9u4lETrMcQ9BiC_g5hgMkEf_oGjv-Qel1un349N5MHbGh90qOkPkRNh78xZV8x82b2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533019853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cooperation against all predictions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Bolle, Friedel ; Spiller, Jörg</creator><creatorcontrib>Bolle, Friedel ; Spiller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><description>In Binary Threshold Public Good (BTPG) games, n players have binary choices: cooperation or non-cooperation. If at least k players cooperate, a public good is produced. The case k = n is the Stag Hunt game with the two pure strategy equilibria E1 (all players cooperate) and E0 (no player cooperates). In four rather diverse examples of four-player Stag Hunt games, three prominent concepts of equilibrium selection favor E0. Experiments, however, result in cooperation frequencies between 70.3% and 99.7%. Also for k &lt; n, the selected equilibria clearly differ from experimental behavior. We interpret our observations by suggesting the concept Behavioral Equilibrium Selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1465-7295</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0095-2583</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Cooperation ; Equilibrium ; equilibrium selection ; experiments ; Games ; global games ; payoff dominance ; Public good ; quantal response equilibria ; risk dominance ; Stag Hunt games</subject><ispartof>Economic inquiry, 2021-07, Vol.59 (3), p.904-924</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Western Economic Association International.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3926-60143aa87d250efb447e43be7f7df47b851ed27f6a420c6dfe7913138c54361d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3926-60143aa87d250efb447e43be7f7df47b851ed27f6a420c6dfe7913138c54361d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecin.12976$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecin.12976$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bolle, Friedel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><title>Cooperation against all predictions</title><title>Economic inquiry</title><description>In Binary Threshold Public Good (BTPG) games, n players have binary choices: cooperation or non-cooperation. If at least k players cooperate, a public good is produced. The case k = n is the Stag Hunt game with the two pure strategy equilibria E1 (all players cooperate) and E0 (no player cooperates). In four rather diverse examples of four-player Stag Hunt games, three prominent concepts of equilibrium selection favor E0. Experiments, however, result in cooperation frequencies between 70.3% and 99.7%. Also for k &lt; n, the selected equilibria clearly differ from experimental behavior. We interpret our observations by suggesting the concept Behavioral Equilibrium Selection.</description><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>equilibrium selection</subject><subject>experiments</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>global games</subject><subject>payoff dominance</subject><subject>Public good</subject><subject>quantal response equilibria</subject><subject>risk dominance</subject><subject>Stag Hunt games</subject><issn>1465-7295</issn><issn>0095-2583</issn><issn>1465-7295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFYv3oVCb0Lqfm9ylNBqoehFz8tmMytbYjbupkj_exOj4Mm5vGH4vZnhIXRN8IoMdQfWtytCCyVP0IxwKTJFC3H6pz9HFyntMcZMCjFDyzKEDqLpfWgX5s34NvUL0zSLLkLt7ThOl-jMmSbB1Y_O0etm_VI-Zrvnh215v8ssK6jMJCacGZOrmgoMruJcAWcVKKdqx1WVCwI1VU4aTrGVtQNVEEZYbgVnktRsjpbT3i6GjwOkXu_DIbbDSU0FY5gU-SBzdDtRNoaUIjjdRf9u4lETrMcQ9BiC_g5hgMkEf_oGjv-Qel1un349N5MHbGh90qOkPkRNh78xZV8x82b2</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Bolle, Friedel</creator><creator>Spiller, Jörg</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Western Economic Association</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Cooperation against all predictions</title><author>Bolle, Friedel ; Spiller, Jörg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3926-60143aa87d250efb447e43be7f7df47b851ed27f6a420c6dfe7913138c54361d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>equilibrium selection</topic><topic>experiments</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>global games</topic><topic>payoff dominance</topic><topic>Public good</topic><topic>quantal response equilibria</topic><topic>risk dominance</topic><topic>Stag Hunt games</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bolle, Friedel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bolle, Friedel</au><au>Spiller, Jörg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cooperation against all predictions</atitle><jtitle>Economic inquiry</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>924</epage><pages>904-924</pages><issn>1465-7295</issn><issn>0095-2583</issn><eissn>1465-7295</eissn><abstract>In Binary Threshold Public Good (BTPG) games, n players have binary choices: cooperation or non-cooperation. If at least k players cooperate, a public good is produced. The case k = n is the Stag Hunt game with the two pure strategy equilibria E1 (all players cooperate) and E0 (no player cooperates). In four rather diverse examples of four-player Stag Hunt games, three prominent concepts of equilibrium selection favor E0. Experiments, however, result in cooperation frequencies between 70.3% and 99.7%. Also for k &lt; n, the selected equilibria clearly differ from experimental behavior. We interpret our observations by suggesting the concept Behavioral Equilibrium Selection.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ecin.12976</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1465-7295
ispartof Economic inquiry, 2021-07, Vol.59 (3), p.904-924
issn 1465-7295
0095-2583
1465-7295
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2533019853
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Cooperation
Equilibrium
equilibrium selection
experiments
Games
global games
payoff dominance
Public good
quantal response equilibria
risk dominance
Stag Hunt games
title Cooperation against all predictions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A36%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cooperation%20against%20all%20predictions&rft.jtitle=Economic%20inquiry&rft.au=Bolle,%20Friedel&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=924&rft.pages=904-924&rft.issn=1465-7295&rft.eissn=1465-7295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecin.12976&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2533019853%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533019853&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true