Comparative effects of ascobin and glutathione on copper homeostasis and oxidative stress metabolism in mitigation of copper toxicity in rice
Copper (Cu) pollution of agricultural land is a major threat to crop production. Exogenous chemical treatment is an easily accessible and rapid approach to remediate metal toxicity, including Cu toxicity in plants. We compared the effects of ascobin (ASC; ascorbic acid:citric acid at 2:1) and glutat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) Germany), 2021-05, Vol.23 (S1), p.162-169 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 169 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S1 |
| container_start_page | 162 |
| container_title | Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Tahjib‐Ul‐Arif, M. Sohag, A. A. M. Mostofa, M. G. Polash, M. A. S. Mahamud, A. G. M. S. U. Afrin, S. Hossain, M. A. Hossain, M. A. Murata, Y. Tran, L.‐S. P. Hu, Y. |
| description | Copper (Cu) pollution of agricultural land is a major threat to crop production. Exogenous chemical treatment is an easily accessible and rapid approach to remediate metal toxicity, including Cu toxicity in plants.
We compared the effects of ascobin (ASC; ascorbic acid:citric acid at 2:1) and glutathione (GSH) in mitigation of Cu toxicity in rice.
Plants subjected to Cu stress displayed growth inhibition and biomass reduction, which were connected to reduced levels of chlorophylls, RWC, total phenolic compounds, carotenoids and Mg2+. Increased accumulation of ROS and malondialdehyde indicated oxidative stress in Cu‐stressed plants. However, application of ASC or GSH minimized the inhibitory effects of Cu stress on rice plants by restricting Cu2+ uptake and improving mineral balance, chlorophyll content and RWC. Both ASC and GSH pretreatments reduced levels of ROS and malondialdehyde and improved activities of antioxidant enzymes, suggesting their roles in alleviating oxidative damage. A comparison on the effects of ASC and GSH under Cu stress revealed that ASC was more effective in restricting Cu2+ accumulation (69.5% by ASC and 57.1% by GSH), Ca2+ and Mg2+ homeostasis, protection of photosynthetic pigments and activation of antioxidant defence mechanisms [catalase (110.4%), ascorbate peroxidase (76.5%) and guaiacol peroxidase (39.0%) by ASC, and catalase (58.9%) and ascorbate peroxidase (59.9%) by GSH] in rice than GSH, eventually resulting in better protection of ASC‐pretreated plants against Cu stress.
In conclusion, although ASC and GSH differed in induction of stress protective mechanisms, both were effective in improving rice performance in response to Cu phytotoxicity.
Exposure of rice plants to excessive copper results in growth inhibition, whereas rice tolerance to copper stress is significantly enhanced by application of exogenous ascobin or glutathione, with ascobin providing better protection. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/plb.13222 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2532144786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2532144786</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-10af5216955d9896047bf11eee231ad52e0d8c1f38325aa29102f4bc931bf2573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EomU58ALIEicOab1kPULFJlWCA5wjxxm3rpI42C7Qh-CdcZvCjbnMSPPNN9KP0AUlExpq2jfVhHLG2AEa05jnUZ5m2eFuTsJM-AidOLcihMYFocdoxDnjKc_ZGH3PTNsLK7z-AAxKgfQOG4WFk6bSHRZdjRfN2gu_1KYDbDosTd-DxUvTgnFeOO12lPnS9aBx3oJzuAUvKtNo1-IgarXXi7APgqDfO3w4ktpvtoDVEs7QkRKNg_N9P0Vv93evs8do_vzwNLuZR5InnEWUCJUwmhZJUhd5kZI4qxSlAMA4FXXCgNS5pIrnnCVCsIISpuJKFpxWiiUZP0VXg7e35n0Nzpcrs7ZdeFmy8IDGcZangboeKGmNcxZU2VvdCrspKSm3wZch-HIXfGAv98Z11UL9R_4mHYDpAHzqBjb_m8qX-e2g_AFaDo7X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2532144786</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative effects of ascobin and glutathione on copper homeostasis and oxidative stress metabolism in mitigation of copper toxicity in rice</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tahjib‐Ul‐Arif, M. ; Sohag, A. A. M. ; Mostofa, M. G. ; Polash, M. A. S. ; Mahamud, A. G. M. S. U. ; Afrin, S. ; Hossain, M. A. ; Hossain, M. A. ; Murata, Y. ; Tran, L.‐S. P. ; Hu, Y.</creator><contributor>Hu, Y.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tahjib‐Ul‐Arif, M. ; Sohag, A. A. M. ; Mostofa, M. G. ; Polash, M. A. S. ; Mahamud, A. G. M. S. U. ; Afrin, S. ; Hossain, M. A. ; Hossain, M. A. ; Murata, Y. ; Tran, L.‐S. P. ; Hu, Y. ; Hu, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Copper (Cu) pollution of agricultural land is a major threat to crop production. Exogenous chemical treatment is an easily accessible and rapid approach to remediate metal toxicity, including Cu toxicity in plants.
We compared the effects of ascobin (ASC; ascorbic acid:citric acid at 2:1) and glutathione (GSH) in mitigation of Cu toxicity in rice.
Plants subjected to Cu stress displayed growth inhibition and biomass reduction, which were connected to reduced levels of chlorophylls, RWC, total phenolic compounds, carotenoids and Mg2+. Increased accumulation of ROS and malondialdehyde indicated oxidative stress in Cu‐stressed plants. However, application of ASC or GSH minimized the inhibitory effects of Cu stress on rice plants by restricting Cu2+ uptake and improving mineral balance, chlorophyll content and RWC. Both ASC and GSH pretreatments reduced levels of ROS and malondialdehyde and improved activities of antioxidant enzymes, suggesting their roles in alleviating oxidative damage. A comparison on the effects of ASC and GSH under Cu stress revealed that ASC was more effective in restricting Cu2+ accumulation (69.5% by ASC and 57.1% by GSH), Ca2+ and Mg2+ homeostasis, protection of photosynthetic pigments and activation of antioxidant defence mechanisms [catalase (110.4%), ascorbate peroxidase (76.5%) and guaiacol peroxidase (39.0%) by ASC, and catalase (58.9%) and ascorbate peroxidase (59.9%) by GSH] in rice than GSH, eventually resulting in better protection of ASC‐pretreated plants against Cu stress.
In conclusion, although ASC and GSH differed in induction of stress protective mechanisms, both were effective in improving rice performance in response to Cu phytotoxicity.
Exposure of rice plants to excessive copper results in growth inhibition, whereas rice tolerance to copper stress is significantly enhanced by application of exogenous ascobin or glutathione, with ascobin providing better protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-8603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/plb.13222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33236382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural pollution ; Agricultural production ; Antioxidant enzymes ; Antioxidants ; ascobin ; Ascorbic acid ; Calcium homeostasis ; Calcium ions ; Carotenoids ; Catalase ; Chemical treatment ; Chlorophyll ; Citric acid ; Copper ; copper pollution ; Crop production ; Glutathione ; Guaiacol ; Homeostasis ; L-Ascorbate peroxidase ; Land pollution ; Magnesium ; Malondialdehyde ; mineral homeostasis ; Mitigation ; Oxidative metabolism ; Oxidative stress ; Peroxidase ; Phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Photosynthesis ; Photosynthetic pigments ; Phytotoxicity ; Pigments ; Rice ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2021-05, Vol.23 (S1), p.162-169</ispartof><rights>2020 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands</rights><rights>2020 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.</rights><rights>2021 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-10af5216955d9896047bf11eee231ad52e0d8c1f38325aa29102f4bc931bf2573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-10af5216955d9896047bf11eee231ad52e0d8c1f38325aa29102f4bc931bf2573</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9883-9768</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fplb.13222$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fplb.13222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33236382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hu, Y.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tahjib‐Ul‐Arif, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohag, A. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostofa, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polash, M. A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahamud, A. G. M. S. U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afrin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossain, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossain, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, L.‐S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative effects of ascobin and glutathione on copper homeostasis and oxidative stress metabolism in mitigation of copper toxicity in rice</title><title>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)</title><addtitle>Plant Biol (Stuttg)</addtitle><description>Copper (Cu) pollution of agricultural land is a major threat to crop production. Exogenous chemical treatment is an easily accessible and rapid approach to remediate metal toxicity, including Cu toxicity in plants.
We compared the effects of ascobin (ASC; ascorbic acid:citric acid at 2:1) and glutathione (GSH) in mitigation of Cu toxicity in rice.
Plants subjected to Cu stress displayed growth inhibition and biomass reduction, which were connected to reduced levels of chlorophylls, RWC, total phenolic compounds, carotenoids and Mg2+. Increased accumulation of ROS and malondialdehyde indicated oxidative stress in Cu‐stressed plants. However, application of ASC or GSH minimized the inhibitory effects of Cu stress on rice plants by restricting Cu2+ uptake and improving mineral balance, chlorophyll content and RWC. Both ASC and GSH pretreatments reduced levels of ROS and malondialdehyde and improved activities of antioxidant enzymes, suggesting their roles in alleviating oxidative damage. A comparison on the effects of ASC and GSH under Cu stress revealed that ASC was more effective in restricting Cu2+ accumulation (69.5% by ASC and 57.1% by GSH), Ca2+ and Mg2+ homeostasis, protection of photosynthetic pigments and activation of antioxidant defence mechanisms [catalase (110.4%), ascorbate peroxidase (76.5%) and guaiacol peroxidase (39.0%) by ASC, and catalase (58.9%) and ascorbate peroxidase (59.9%) by GSH] in rice than GSH, eventually resulting in better protection of ASC‐pretreated plants against Cu stress.
In conclusion, although ASC and GSH differed in induction of stress protective mechanisms, both were effective in improving rice performance in response to Cu phytotoxicity.
Exposure of rice plants to excessive copper results in growth inhibition, whereas rice tolerance to copper stress is significantly enhanced by application of exogenous ascobin or glutathione, with ascobin providing better protection.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural pollution</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Antioxidant enzymes</subject><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>ascobin</subject><subject>Ascorbic acid</subject><subject>Calcium homeostasis</subject><subject>Calcium ions</subject><subject>Carotenoids</subject><subject>Catalase</subject><subject>Chemical treatment</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Citric acid</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>copper pollution</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Glutathione</subject><subject>Guaiacol</subject><subject>Homeostasis</subject><subject>L-Ascorbate peroxidase</subject><subject>Land pollution</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Malondialdehyde</subject><subject>mineral homeostasis</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Oxidative metabolism</subject><subject>Oxidative stress</subject><subject>Peroxidase</subject><subject>Phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Photosynthetic pigments</subject><subject>Phytotoxicity</subject><subject>Pigments</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>1435-8603</issn><issn>1438-8677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EomU58ALIEicOab1kPULFJlWCA5wjxxm3rpI42C7Qh-CdcZvCjbnMSPPNN9KP0AUlExpq2jfVhHLG2AEa05jnUZ5m2eFuTsJM-AidOLcihMYFocdoxDnjKc_ZGH3PTNsLK7z-AAxKgfQOG4WFk6bSHRZdjRfN2gu_1KYDbDosTd-DxUvTgnFeOO12lPnS9aBx3oJzuAUvKtNo1-IgarXXi7APgqDfO3w4ktpvtoDVEs7QkRKNg_N9P0Vv93evs8do_vzwNLuZR5InnEWUCJUwmhZJUhd5kZI4qxSlAMA4FXXCgNS5pIrnnCVCsIISpuJKFpxWiiUZP0VXg7e35n0Nzpcrs7ZdeFmy8IDGcZangboeKGmNcxZU2VvdCrspKSm3wZch-HIXfGAv98Z11UL9R_4mHYDpAHzqBjb_m8qX-e2g_AFaDo7X</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Tahjib‐Ul‐Arif, M.</creator><creator>Sohag, A. A. M.</creator><creator>Mostofa, M. G.</creator><creator>Polash, M. A. S.</creator><creator>Mahamud, A. G. M. S. U.</creator><creator>Afrin, S.</creator><creator>Hossain, M. A.</creator><creator>Hossain, M. A.</creator><creator>Murata, Y.</creator><creator>Tran, L.‐S. P.</creator><creator>Hu, Y.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-9768</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Comparative effects of ascobin and glutathione on copper homeostasis and oxidative stress metabolism in mitigation of copper toxicity in rice</title><author>Tahjib‐Ul‐Arif, M. ; Sohag, A. A. M. ; Mostofa, M. G. ; Polash, M. A. S. ; Mahamud, A. G. M. S. U. ; Afrin, S. ; Hossain, M. A. ; Hossain, M. A. ; Murata, Y. ; Tran, L.‐S. P. ; Hu, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-10af5216955d9896047bf11eee231ad52e0d8c1f38325aa29102f4bc931bf2573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural pollution</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Antioxidant enzymes</topic><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>ascobin</topic><topic>Ascorbic acid</topic><topic>Calcium homeostasis</topic><topic>Calcium ions</topic><topic>Carotenoids</topic><topic>Catalase</topic><topic>Chemical treatment</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Citric acid</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>copper pollution</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Glutathione</topic><topic>Guaiacol</topic><topic>Homeostasis</topic><topic>L-Ascorbate peroxidase</topic><topic>Land pollution</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Malondialdehyde</topic><topic>mineral homeostasis</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Oxidative metabolism</topic><topic>Oxidative stress</topic><topic>Peroxidase</topic><topic>Phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Photosynthetic pigments</topic><topic>Phytotoxicity</topic><topic>Pigments</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tahjib‐Ul‐Arif, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohag, A. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostofa, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polash, M. A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahamud, A. G. M. S. U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afrin, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossain, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossain, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, L.‐S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tahjib‐Ul‐Arif, M.</au><au>Sohag, A. A. M.</au><au>Mostofa, M. G.</au><au>Polash, M. A. S.</au><au>Mahamud, A. G. M. S. U.</au><au>Afrin, S.</au><au>Hossain, M. A.</au><au>Hossain, M. A.</au><au>Murata, Y.</au><au>Tran, L.‐S. P.</au><au>Hu, Y.</au><au>Hu, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative effects of ascobin and glutathione on copper homeostasis and oxidative stress metabolism in mitigation of copper toxicity in rice</atitle><jtitle>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Biol (Stuttg)</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>162-169</pages><issn>1435-8603</issn><eissn>1438-8677</eissn><abstract>Copper (Cu) pollution of agricultural land is a major threat to crop production. Exogenous chemical treatment is an easily accessible and rapid approach to remediate metal toxicity, including Cu toxicity in plants.
We compared the effects of ascobin (ASC; ascorbic acid:citric acid at 2:1) and glutathione (GSH) in mitigation of Cu toxicity in rice.
Plants subjected to Cu stress displayed growth inhibition and biomass reduction, which were connected to reduced levels of chlorophylls, RWC, total phenolic compounds, carotenoids and Mg2+. Increased accumulation of ROS and malondialdehyde indicated oxidative stress in Cu‐stressed plants. However, application of ASC or GSH minimized the inhibitory effects of Cu stress on rice plants by restricting Cu2+ uptake and improving mineral balance, chlorophyll content and RWC. Both ASC and GSH pretreatments reduced levels of ROS and malondialdehyde and improved activities of antioxidant enzymes, suggesting their roles in alleviating oxidative damage. A comparison on the effects of ASC and GSH under Cu stress revealed that ASC was more effective in restricting Cu2+ accumulation (69.5% by ASC and 57.1% by GSH), Ca2+ and Mg2+ homeostasis, protection of photosynthetic pigments and activation of antioxidant defence mechanisms [catalase (110.4%), ascorbate peroxidase (76.5%) and guaiacol peroxidase (39.0%) by ASC, and catalase (58.9%) and ascorbate peroxidase (59.9%) by GSH] in rice than GSH, eventually resulting in better protection of ASC‐pretreated plants against Cu stress.
In conclusion, although ASC and GSH differed in induction of stress protective mechanisms, both were effective in improving rice performance in response to Cu phytotoxicity.
Exposure of rice plants to excessive copper results in growth inhibition, whereas rice tolerance to copper stress is significantly enhanced by application of exogenous ascobin or glutathione, with ascobin providing better protection.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33236382</pmid><doi>10.1111/plb.13222</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-9768</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1435-8603 |
| ispartof | Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2021-05, Vol.23 (S1), p.162-169 |
| issn | 1435-8603 1438-8677 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2532144786 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Accumulation Agricultural land Agricultural pollution Agricultural production Antioxidant enzymes Antioxidants ascobin Ascorbic acid Calcium homeostasis Calcium ions Carotenoids Catalase Chemical treatment Chlorophyll Citric acid Copper copper pollution Crop production Glutathione Guaiacol Homeostasis L-Ascorbate peroxidase Land pollution Magnesium Malondialdehyde mineral homeostasis Mitigation Oxidative metabolism Oxidative stress Peroxidase Phenolic compounds Phenols Photosynthesis Photosynthetic pigments Phytotoxicity Pigments Rice Toxicity |
| title | Comparative effects of ascobin and glutathione on copper homeostasis and oxidative stress metabolism in mitigation of copper toxicity in rice |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A31%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20effects%20of%20ascobin%20and%20glutathione%20on%20copper%20homeostasis%20and%20oxidative%20stress%20metabolism%20in%20mitigation%20of%20copper%20toxicity%20in%20rice&rft.jtitle=Plant%20biology%20(Stuttgart,%20Germany)&rft.au=Tahjib%E2%80%90Ul%E2%80%90Arif,%20M.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=162-169&rft.issn=1435-8603&rft.eissn=1438-8677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/plb.13222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2532144786%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2532144786&rft_id=info:pmid/33236382&rfr_iscdi=true |