Amplification and Tuning of Ground Motion at the Outer Cascadia Accretionary Prism
Ground‐motion amplification in the outer Cascadia subduction zone accretionary prism has been documented previously by comparing earthquake and microseismic vertical ground‐motion and pressure records from an ONC/NEPTUNE Canada cabled observatory site on the outer prism to those from a site on the f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2021-05, Vol.126 (5), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Davis, Earl E. Farrugia, Joseph J. |
description | Ground‐motion amplification in the outer Cascadia subduction zone accretionary prism has been documented previously by comparing earthquake and microseismic vertical ground‐motion and pressure records from an ONC/NEPTUNE Canada cabled observatory site on the outer prism to those from a site on the flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Since then, four additional instruments became operational, and data, now spanning 10 years, include more than 100 large (Mw > 7) distant earthquakes. Well‐tuned response at the outer prism sites is observed in both vertical and horizontal components, with peaks in the spectral ratio of vertical velocity relative to nearby ocean crustal and continental bedrock sites (V/Vref) at 9 s, and in the intra‐site horizontal to vertical spectral ratio horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratio at 14 s, both with band widths of ±10% to 15% at half amplitude. The vertical response is consistent with ¼ wavelength compressional wave reinforcement, while the horizontal motion tuning most likely reflects the effects of the low velocity prism sediments on surface‐wave propagation. At the periods of maximum relative motion, outer prism surface‐wave vertical and horizontal accelerations are enhanced by factors of up to 15 and 25, respectively. Similar behaviour is seen in microseismic records from these sites, and, to a lesser extent, in earthquake records from temporarily deployed Cascadia Initiative seismometers along the outer Cascadia prism to the south. Such tuning and amplification must be accounted for when assessing the dynamic behavior of the prism and its basal fault at the time of large local earthquakes.
Plain Language Summary
Sedimentary basins are known to amplify ground motions, a behavior that must be considered in the assessment of seismic hazards. The same is true for subduction zone accretionary prisms, where enhanced seismic shaking can lead to enhanced dynamic stressing at the plate interface of the subduction zone, weakening of the accretionary prism sediments, and triggering of submarine slope failures. Here we examine data from seafloor seismometers deployed on, seaward of, and landward of the outer Cascadia accretionary prism, spanning up to 10 years and including signals from more than 100 large earthquakes. Response of the outer prism to seismic waves shows amplification and tuning, with peaks in anomalous vertical‐ and horizontal‐motion centered at 9 and 14 s periods. At these wave periods, accelerations at the outer prism can |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2020JB020950 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2532117515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2532117515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3300-eaf4f220f17e128c7e8907f6403821044433b697102c9982d6e4928bdf7d8b7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGpv_oCAV1cnH7ubHNui1VKplHpe0myiKe2mJrtI_70pK-LJOcwM7zzMF0LXBO4IUHlPgcJ8kpzM4QwNKClkJllenP_mhF2iUYxbSCaSRPgArcb7w85Zp1XrfINVU-N117jmHXuLZ8F3SXjxfa3F7YfBy641AU9V1Kp2Co-1DuZUV-GIX4OL-yt0YdUumtFPHKK3x4f19ClbLGfP0_EiU4wBZEZZbikFS0pDqNClERJKW3BgghLgnDO2KWSZjtNSCloXhksqNrUta7EpNRuim77vIfjPzsS22vouNGlkRXNGCSlzkifqtqd08DEGY6tDcPu0bEWgOj2u-vu4hLMe_3I7c_yXreaz1STnAoB9A9KubGE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2532117515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amplification and Tuning of Ground Motion at the Outer Cascadia Accretionary Prism</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Davis, Earl E. ; Farrugia, Joseph J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Earl E. ; Farrugia, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><description>Ground‐motion amplification in the outer Cascadia subduction zone accretionary prism has been documented previously by comparing earthquake and microseismic vertical ground‐motion and pressure records from an ONC/NEPTUNE Canada cabled observatory site on the outer prism to those from a site on the flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Since then, four additional instruments became operational, and data, now spanning 10 years, include more than 100 large (Mw > 7) distant earthquakes. Well‐tuned response at the outer prism sites is observed in both vertical and horizontal components, with peaks in the spectral ratio of vertical velocity relative to nearby ocean crustal and continental bedrock sites (V/Vref) at 9 s, and in the intra‐site horizontal to vertical spectral ratio horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratio at 14 s, both with band widths of ±10% to 15% at half amplitude. The vertical response is consistent with ¼ wavelength compressional wave reinforcement, while the horizontal motion tuning most likely reflects the effects of the low velocity prism sediments on surface‐wave propagation. At the periods of maximum relative motion, outer prism surface‐wave vertical and horizontal accelerations are enhanced by factors of up to 15 and 25, respectively. Similar behaviour is seen in microseismic records from these sites, and, to a lesser extent, in earthquake records from temporarily deployed Cascadia Initiative seismometers along the outer Cascadia prism to the south. Such tuning and amplification must be accounted for when assessing the dynamic behavior of the prism and its basal fault at the time of large local earthquakes.
Plain Language Summary
Sedimentary basins are known to amplify ground motions, a behavior that must be considered in the assessment of seismic hazards. The same is true for subduction zone accretionary prisms, where enhanced seismic shaking can lead to enhanced dynamic stressing at the plate interface of the subduction zone, weakening of the accretionary prism sediments, and triggering of submarine slope failures. Here we examine data from seafloor seismometers deployed on, seaward of, and landward of the outer Cascadia accretionary prism, spanning up to 10 years and including signals from more than 100 large earthquakes. Response of the outer prism to seismic waves shows amplification and tuning, with peaks in anomalous vertical‐ and horizontal‐motion centered at 9 and 14 s periods. At these wave periods, accelerations at the outer prism can be over 20 times those at nearby bedrock sites. Vertical and horizontal seafloor motions caused by oceanographic pressure variations are similarly enhanced.
Key Points
Narrow frequency band seismic response is observed in horizontal‐ and vertical‐component motions at multiple sites on the outer Cascadia accretionary prism
Peak seismic and microseismic accelerations of the outer prism are commonly 10 and up to 25 times those at nearby continental and ocean crustal reference sites
The periods of maximum relative vertical and horizontal motion are inferred to be the consequences of modifications to body and surface waves propagating through the low velocity prism</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020JB020950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accretion ; accretionary prisms ; Amplification ; Bedrock ; Earthquakes ; Geological hazards ; Geophysics ; Ground motion ; Hazard assessment ; Horizontal motion ; Instruments ; Microseisms ; Ocean floor ; Oceanic crust ; P-waves ; Pressure variations ; Prisms ; Records ; Sediment ; Sedimentary basins ; Sediments ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; seismic resonance ; Seismic response ; Seismic waves ; Seismographs ; seismology ; Seismometers ; Shaking ; site response ; Spectra ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Subduction zones ; Tuning ; Velocity ; Vertical velocities ; Vp/Vs ratio ; Wave period ; Wave propagation ; Wavelength</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-05, Vol.126 (5), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3300-eaf4f220f17e128c7e8907f6403821044433b697102c9982d6e4928bdf7d8b7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3300-eaf4f220f17e128c7e8907f6403821044433b697102c9982d6e4928bdf7d8b7c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4516-217X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2020JB020950$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2020JB020950$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Earl E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrugia, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><title>Amplification and Tuning of Ground Motion at the Outer Cascadia Accretionary Prism</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>Ground‐motion amplification in the outer Cascadia subduction zone accretionary prism has been documented previously by comparing earthquake and microseismic vertical ground‐motion and pressure records from an ONC/NEPTUNE Canada cabled observatory site on the outer prism to those from a site on the flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Since then, four additional instruments became operational, and data, now spanning 10 years, include more than 100 large (Mw > 7) distant earthquakes. Well‐tuned response at the outer prism sites is observed in both vertical and horizontal components, with peaks in the spectral ratio of vertical velocity relative to nearby ocean crustal and continental bedrock sites (V/Vref) at 9 s, and in the intra‐site horizontal to vertical spectral ratio horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratio at 14 s, both with band widths of ±10% to 15% at half amplitude. The vertical response is consistent with ¼ wavelength compressional wave reinforcement, while the horizontal motion tuning most likely reflects the effects of the low velocity prism sediments on surface‐wave propagation. At the periods of maximum relative motion, outer prism surface‐wave vertical and horizontal accelerations are enhanced by factors of up to 15 and 25, respectively. Similar behaviour is seen in microseismic records from these sites, and, to a lesser extent, in earthquake records from temporarily deployed Cascadia Initiative seismometers along the outer Cascadia prism to the south. Such tuning and amplification must be accounted for when assessing the dynamic behavior of the prism and its basal fault at the time of large local earthquakes.
Plain Language Summary
Sedimentary basins are known to amplify ground motions, a behavior that must be considered in the assessment of seismic hazards. The same is true for subduction zone accretionary prisms, where enhanced seismic shaking can lead to enhanced dynamic stressing at the plate interface of the subduction zone, weakening of the accretionary prism sediments, and triggering of submarine slope failures. Here we examine data from seafloor seismometers deployed on, seaward of, and landward of the outer Cascadia accretionary prism, spanning up to 10 years and including signals from more than 100 large earthquakes. Response of the outer prism to seismic waves shows amplification and tuning, with peaks in anomalous vertical‐ and horizontal‐motion centered at 9 and 14 s periods. At these wave periods, accelerations at the outer prism can be over 20 times those at nearby bedrock sites. Vertical and horizontal seafloor motions caused by oceanographic pressure variations are similarly enhanced.
Key Points
Narrow frequency band seismic response is observed in horizontal‐ and vertical‐component motions at multiple sites on the outer Cascadia accretionary prism
Peak seismic and microseismic accelerations of the outer prism are commonly 10 and up to 25 times those at nearby continental and ocean crustal reference sites
The periods of maximum relative vertical and horizontal motion are inferred to be the consequences of modifications to body and surface waves propagating through the low velocity prism</description><subject>Accretion</subject><subject>accretionary prisms</subject><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Horizontal motion</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>Microseisms</subject><subject>Ocean floor</subject><subject>Oceanic crust</subject><subject>P-waves</subject><subject>Pressure variations</subject><subject>Prisms</subject><subject>Records</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sedimentary basins</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>seismic resonance</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismic waves</subject><subject>Seismographs</subject><subject>seismology</subject><subject>Seismometers</subject><subject>Shaking</subject><subject>site response</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Subduction zones</subject><subject>Tuning</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Vertical velocities</subject><subject>Vp/Vs ratio</subject><subject>Wave period</subject><subject>Wave propagation</subject><subject>Wavelength</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGpv_oCAV1cnH7ubHNui1VKplHpe0myiKe2mJrtI_70pK-LJOcwM7zzMF0LXBO4IUHlPgcJ8kpzM4QwNKClkJllenP_mhF2iUYxbSCaSRPgArcb7w85Zp1XrfINVU-N117jmHXuLZ8F3SXjxfa3F7YfBy641AU9V1Kp2Co-1DuZUV-GIX4OL-yt0YdUumtFPHKK3x4f19ClbLGfP0_EiU4wBZEZZbikFS0pDqNClERJKW3BgghLgnDO2KWSZjtNSCloXhksqNrUta7EpNRuim77vIfjPzsS22vouNGlkRXNGCSlzkifqtqd08DEGY6tDcPu0bEWgOj2u-vu4hLMe_3I7c_yXreaz1STnAoB9A9KubGE</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Davis, Earl E.</creator><creator>Farrugia, Joseph J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-217X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Amplification and Tuning of Ground Motion at the Outer Cascadia Accretionary Prism</title><author>Davis, Earl E. ; Farrugia, Joseph J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3300-eaf4f220f17e128c7e8907f6403821044433b697102c9982d6e4928bdf7d8b7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accretion</topic><topic>accretionary prisms</topic><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Horizontal motion</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>Microseisms</topic><topic>Ocean floor</topic><topic>Oceanic crust</topic><topic>P-waves</topic><topic>Pressure variations</topic><topic>Prisms</topic><topic>Records</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sedimentary basins</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>seismic resonance</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismic waves</topic><topic>Seismographs</topic><topic>seismology</topic><topic>Seismometers</topic><topic>Shaking</topic><topic>site response</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Subduction zones</topic><topic>Tuning</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Vertical velocities</topic><topic>Vp/Vs ratio</topic><topic>Wave period</topic><topic>Wave propagation</topic><topic>Wavelength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Earl E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrugia, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Earl E.</au><au>Farrugia, Joseph J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amplification and Tuning of Ground Motion at the Outer Cascadia Accretionary Prism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>5</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>Ground‐motion amplification in the outer Cascadia subduction zone accretionary prism has been documented previously by comparing earthquake and microseismic vertical ground‐motion and pressure records from an ONC/NEPTUNE Canada cabled observatory site on the outer prism to those from a site on the flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Since then, four additional instruments became operational, and data, now spanning 10 years, include more than 100 large (Mw > 7) distant earthquakes. Well‐tuned response at the outer prism sites is observed in both vertical and horizontal components, with peaks in the spectral ratio of vertical velocity relative to nearby ocean crustal and continental bedrock sites (V/Vref) at 9 s, and in the intra‐site horizontal to vertical spectral ratio horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratio at 14 s, both with band widths of ±10% to 15% at half amplitude. The vertical response is consistent with ¼ wavelength compressional wave reinforcement, while the horizontal motion tuning most likely reflects the effects of the low velocity prism sediments on surface‐wave propagation. At the periods of maximum relative motion, outer prism surface‐wave vertical and horizontal accelerations are enhanced by factors of up to 15 and 25, respectively. Similar behaviour is seen in microseismic records from these sites, and, to a lesser extent, in earthquake records from temporarily deployed Cascadia Initiative seismometers along the outer Cascadia prism to the south. Such tuning and amplification must be accounted for when assessing the dynamic behavior of the prism and its basal fault at the time of large local earthquakes.
Plain Language Summary
Sedimentary basins are known to amplify ground motions, a behavior that must be considered in the assessment of seismic hazards. The same is true for subduction zone accretionary prisms, where enhanced seismic shaking can lead to enhanced dynamic stressing at the plate interface of the subduction zone, weakening of the accretionary prism sediments, and triggering of submarine slope failures. Here we examine data from seafloor seismometers deployed on, seaward of, and landward of the outer Cascadia accretionary prism, spanning up to 10 years and including signals from more than 100 large earthquakes. Response of the outer prism to seismic waves shows amplification and tuning, with peaks in anomalous vertical‐ and horizontal‐motion centered at 9 and 14 s periods. At these wave periods, accelerations at the outer prism can be over 20 times those at nearby bedrock sites. Vertical and horizontal seafloor motions caused by oceanographic pressure variations are similarly enhanced.
Key Points
Narrow frequency band seismic response is observed in horizontal‐ and vertical‐component motions at multiple sites on the outer Cascadia accretionary prism
Peak seismic and microseismic accelerations of the outer prism are commonly 10 and up to 25 times those at nearby continental and ocean crustal reference sites
The periods of maximum relative vertical and horizontal motion are inferred to be the consequences of modifications to body and surface waves propagating through the low velocity prism</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2020JB020950</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4516-217X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-05, Vol.126 (5), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2532117515 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Accretion accretionary prisms Amplification Bedrock Earthquakes Geological hazards Geophysics Ground motion Hazard assessment Horizontal motion Instruments Microseisms Ocean floor Oceanic crust P-waves Pressure variations Prisms Records Sediment Sedimentary basins Sediments Seismic activity Seismic hazard seismic resonance Seismic response Seismic waves Seismographs seismology Seismometers Shaking site response Spectra Subduction Subduction (geology) Subduction zones Tuning Velocity Vertical velocities Vp/Vs ratio Wave period Wave propagation Wavelength |
title | Amplification and Tuning of Ground Motion at the Outer Cascadia Accretionary Prism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A10%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amplification%20and%20Tuning%20of%20Ground%20Motion%20at%20the%20Outer%20Cascadia%20Accretionary%20Prism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Davis,%20Earl%20E.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=5&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020JB020950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2532117515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2532117515&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |