Dietary analysis of two sympatric marine turtle species in the eastern Mediterranean
Dietary studies provide key insights into threats and changes within ecosystems and subsequent impacts on focal species. Diet is particularly challenging to study within marine environments and therefore is often poorly understood. Here, we examined the diet of stranded and bycaught loggerhead ( Car...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine biology 2021-06, Vol.168 (6), Article 94 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Marine biology |
container_volume | 168 |
creator | Palmer, Josie L. Beton, Damla Çiçek, Burak A. Davey, Sophie Duncan, Emily M. Fuller, Wayne J. Godley, Brendan J. Haywood, Julia C. Hüseyinoğlu, Mehmet F. Omeyer, Lucy C. M. Schneider, M. Jesse Snape, Robin T. E. Broderick, Annette C. |
description | Dietary studies provide key insights into threats and changes within ecosystems and subsequent impacts on focal species. Diet is particularly challenging to study within marine environments and therefore is often poorly understood. Here, we examined the diet of stranded and bycaught loggerhead (
Caretta caretta
) and green turtles (
Chelonia mydas
) in North Cyprus (35.33° N, 33.47° E) between 2011 and 2019. A total of 129 taxa were recorded in the diet of loggerhead turtles (
n
= 45), which were predominantly carnivorous (on average 72.1% of dietary biomass), foraging on a large variety of invertebrates, macroalgae, seagrasses and bony fish in low frequencies. Despite this opportunistic foraging strategy, one species was particularly dominant, the sponge
Chondrosia reniformis
(21.5%). Consumption of this sponge decreased with increasing turtle size. A greater degree of herbivory was found in green turtles (
n
= 40) which predominantly consumed seagrasses and macroalgae (88.8%) with a total of 101 taxa recorded. The most dominant species was a Lessepsian invasive seagrass,
Halophila stipulacea
(31.1%). This is the highest percentage recorded for this species in green turtle diet in the Mediterranean thus far. With increasing turtle size, the percentage of seagrass consumed increased with a concomitant decrease in macroalgae. Seagrass was consumed year-round. Omnivory occurred in all green turtle size classes but reduced in larger turtles (> 75 cm CCL) suggesting a slow ontogenetic dietary shift. Macroplastic ingestion was more common in green (31.6% of individuals) than loggerhead turtles (5.7%). This study provides the most complete dietary list for marine turtles in the eastern Mediterranean. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00227-021-03895-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2531850759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A665844673</galeid><sourcerecordid>A665844673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c7f16b05c45520b65e85cc0f4ff0bb3cdbb16a6276adac7852cb0cda1c26cc353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rHCEUhqW00G3aP5Arodcmfow6exmStA0k5Ca9FufMcWuYdbbqEubfx3QDIbAUL44en0c4voScCn4mOLfnhXMpLeNSMK76tWbLB7ISnZJM2LX6SFbtXjMljPxMvpTyyNvZSrUiD1cRq88L9clPS4mFzoHWp5mWZbvzNUegW59jQlr3uU5Iyw4hYqEx0foHKfpSMSd6h2Nsm-wT-vSVfAp-KvjttZ6Q3z-uHy5_sdv7nzeXF7cMtOoqAxuEGbiGTmvJB6Ox1wA8dCHwYVAwDoMw3khr_OjB9lrCwGH0AqQBUFqdkO-Hd3d5_rvHUt3jvM9tkOKkVqLX3Or1G7XxE7qYwlyzh20s4C6M0X3XGasaxY5QG0yY_TQnDLG13_FnR_i2RtxGOCrIgwB5LiVjcLsc298uTnD3EqI7hOhaiO5fiG5pkjpIpcFpg_ltwv9Yz5c6n3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531850759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dietary analysis of two sympatric marine turtle species in the eastern Mediterranean</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Palmer, Josie L. ; Beton, Damla ; Çiçek, Burak A. ; Davey, Sophie ; Duncan, Emily M. ; Fuller, Wayne J. ; Godley, Brendan J. ; Haywood, Julia C. ; Hüseyinoğlu, Mehmet F. ; Omeyer, Lucy C. M. ; Schneider, M. Jesse ; Snape, Robin T. E. ; Broderick, Annette C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Josie L. ; Beton, Damla ; Çiçek, Burak A. ; Davey, Sophie ; Duncan, Emily M. ; Fuller, Wayne J. ; Godley, Brendan J. ; Haywood, Julia C. ; Hüseyinoğlu, Mehmet F. ; Omeyer, Lucy C. M. ; Schneider, M. Jesse ; Snape, Robin T. E. ; Broderick, Annette C.</creatorcontrib><description>Dietary studies provide key insights into threats and changes within ecosystems and subsequent impacts on focal species. Diet is particularly challenging to study within marine environments and therefore is often poorly understood. Here, we examined the diet of stranded and bycaught loggerhead (
Caretta caretta
) and green turtles (
Chelonia mydas
) in North Cyprus (35.33° N, 33.47° E) between 2011 and 2019. A total of 129 taxa were recorded in the diet of loggerhead turtles (
n
= 45), which were predominantly carnivorous (on average 72.1% of dietary biomass), foraging on a large variety of invertebrates, macroalgae, seagrasses and bony fish in low frequencies. Despite this opportunistic foraging strategy, one species was particularly dominant, the sponge
Chondrosia reniformis
(21.5%). Consumption of this sponge decreased with increasing turtle size. A greater degree of herbivory was found in green turtles (
n
= 40) which predominantly consumed seagrasses and macroalgae (88.8%) with a total of 101 taxa recorded. The most dominant species was a Lessepsian invasive seagrass,
Halophila stipulacea
(31.1%). This is the highest percentage recorded for this species in green turtle diet in the Mediterranean thus far. With increasing turtle size, the percentage of seagrass consumed increased with a concomitant decrease in macroalgae. Seagrass was consumed year-round. Omnivory occurred in all green turtle size classes but reduced in larger turtles (> 75 cm CCL) suggesting a slow ontogenetic dietary shift. Macroplastic ingestion was more common in green (31.6% of individuals) than loggerhead turtles (5.7%). This study provides the most complete dietary list for marine turtles in the eastern Mediterranean.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-021-03895-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algae ; Analysis ; Aquatic reptiles ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Caretta caretta ; Carnivorous animals ; Chelonia mydas ; Diet ; Dominant species ; Fish ; Food and nutrition ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Green turtle ; Growth ; Herbivory ; Ingestion ; Invasive species ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Loggerhead turtle ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Marine biology ; Marine environment ; Microbiology ; Oceanography ; Ontogeny ; Original Paper ; Predators ; Reptiles & amphibians ; Sea grasses ; Seagrasses ; Seaweeds ; Sympatric populations ; Taxa ; Turtles ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2021-06, Vol.168 (6), Article 94</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c7f16b05c45520b65e85cc0f4ff0bb3cdbb16a6276adac7852cb0cda1c26cc353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c7f16b05c45520b65e85cc0f4ff0bb3cdbb16a6276adac7852cb0cda1c26cc353</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0694-4689</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00227-021-03895-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00227-021-03895-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Josie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beton, Damla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çiçek, Burak A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Wayne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godley, Brendan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Julia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hüseyinoğlu, Mehmet F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omeyer, Lucy C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, M. Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snape, Robin T. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broderick, Annette C.</creatorcontrib><title>Dietary analysis of two sympatric marine turtle species in the eastern Mediterranean</title><title>Marine biology</title><addtitle>Mar Biol</addtitle><description>Dietary studies provide key insights into threats and changes within ecosystems and subsequent impacts on focal species. Diet is particularly challenging to study within marine environments and therefore is often poorly understood. Here, we examined the diet of stranded and bycaught loggerhead (
Caretta caretta
) and green turtles (
Chelonia mydas
) in North Cyprus (35.33° N, 33.47° E) between 2011 and 2019. A total of 129 taxa were recorded in the diet of loggerhead turtles (
n
= 45), which were predominantly carnivorous (on average 72.1% of dietary biomass), foraging on a large variety of invertebrates, macroalgae, seagrasses and bony fish in low frequencies. Despite this opportunistic foraging strategy, one species was particularly dominant, the sponge
Chondrosia reniformis
(21.5%). Consumption of this sponge decreased with increasing turtle size. A greater degree of herbivory was found in green turtles (
n
= 40) which predominantly consumed seagrasses and macroalgae (88.8%) with a total of 101 taxa recorded. The most dominant species was a Lessepsian invasive seagrass,
Halophila stipulacea
(31.1%). This is the highest percentage recorded for this species in green turtle diet in the Mediterranean thus far. With increasing turtle size, the percentage of seagrass consumed increased with a concomitant decrease in macroalgae. Seagrass was consumed year-round. Omnivory occurred in all green turtle size classes but reduced in larger turtles (> 75 cm CCL) suggesting a slow ontogenetic dietary shift. Macroplastic ingestion was more common in green (31.6% of individuals) than loggerhead turtles (5.7%). This study provides the most complete dietary list for marine turtles in the eastern Mediterranean.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Caretta caretta</subject><subject>Carnivorous animals</subject><subject>Chelonia mydas</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food and nutrition</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Green turtle</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Loggerhead turtle</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Marine environment</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>Sea grasses</subject><subject>Seagrasses</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Sympatric populations</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rHCEUhqW00G3aP5Arodcmfow6exmStA0k5Ca9FufMcWuYdbbqEubfx3QDIbAUL44en0c4voScCn4mOLfnhXMpLeNSMK76tWbLB7ISnZJM2LX6SFbtXjMljPxMvpTyyNvZSrUiD1cRq88L9clPS4mFzoHWp5mWZbvzNUegW59jQlr3uU5Iyw4hYqEx0foHKfpSMSd6h2Nsm-wT-vSVfAp-KvjttZ6Q3z-uHy5_sdv7nzeXF7cMtOoqAxuEGbiGTmvJB6Ox1wA8dCHwYVAwDoMw3khr_OjB9lrCwGH0AqQBUFqdkO-Hd3d5_rvHUt3jvM9tkOKkVqLX3Or1G7XxE7qYwlyzh20s4C6M0X3XGasaxY5QG0yY_TQnDLG13_FnR_i2RtxGOCrIgwB5LiVjcLsc298uTnD3EqI7hOhaiO5fiG5pkjpIpcFpg_ltwv9Yz5c6n3g</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Palmer, Josie L.</creator><creator>Beton, Damla</creator><creator>Çiçek, Burak A.</creator><creator>Davey, Sophie</creator><creator>Duncan, Emily M.</creator><creator>Fuller, Wayne J.</creator><creator>Godley, Brendan J.</creator><creator>Haywood, Julia C.</creator><creator>Hüseyinoğlu, Mehmet F.</creator><creator>Omeyer, Lucy C. M.</creator><creator>Schneider, M. Jesse</creator><creator>Snape, Robin T. E.</creator><creator>Broderick, Annette C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0694-4689</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Dietary analysis of two sympatric marine turtle species in the eastern Mediterranean</title><author>Palmer, Josie L. ; Beton, Damla ; Çiçek, Burak A. ; Davey, Sophie ; Duncan, Emily M. ; Fuller, Wayne J. ; Godley, Brendan J. ; Haywood, Julia C. ; Hüseyinoğlu, Mehmet F. ; Omeyer, Lucy C. M. ; Schneider, M. Jesse ; Snape, Robin T. E. ; Broderick, Annette C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-c7f16b05c45520b65e85cc0f4ff0bb3cdbb16a6276adac7852cb0cda1c26cc353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Caretta caretta</topic><topic>Carnivorous animals</topic><topic>Chelonia mydas</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food and nutrition</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Green turtle</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Loggerhead turtle</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Marine environment</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>Sea grasses</topic><topic>Seagrasses</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Sympatric populations</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Josie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beton, Damla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çiçek, Burak A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Wayne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godley, Brendan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haywood, Julia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hüseyinoğlu, Mehmet F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omeyer, Lucy C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, M. Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snape, Robin T. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broderick, Annette C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palmer, Josie L.</au><au>Beton, Damla</au><au>Çiçek, Burak A.</au><au>Davey, Sophie</au><au>Duncan, Emily M.</au><au>Fuller, Wayne J.</au><au>Godley, Brendan J.</au><au>Haywood, Julia C.</au><au>Hüseyinoğlu, Mehmet F.</au><au>Omeyer, Lucy C. M.</au><au>Schneider, M. Jesse</au><au>Snape, Robin T. E.</au><au>Broderick, Annette C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dietary analysis of two sympatric marine turtle species in the eastern Mediterranean</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><stitle>Mar Biol</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>168</volume><issue>6</issue><artnum>94</artnum><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><abstract>Dietary studies provide key insights into threats and changes within ecosystems and subsequent impacts on focal species. Diet is particularly challenging to study within marine environments and therefore is often poorly understood. Here, we examined the diet of stranded and bycaught loggerhead (
Caretta caretta
) and green turtles (
Chelonia mydas
) in North Cyprus (35.33° N, 33.47° E) between 2011 and 2019. A total of 129 taxa were recorded in the diet of loggerhead turtles (
n
= 45), which were predominantly carnivorous (on average 72.1% of dietary biomass), foraging on a large variety of invertebrates, macroalgae, seagrasses and bony fish in low frequencies. Despite this opportunistic foraging strategy, one species was particularly dominant, the sponge
Chondrosia reniformis
(21.5%). Consumption of this sponge decreased with increasing turtle size. A greater degree of herbivory was found in green turtles (
n
= 40) which predominantly consumed seagrasses and macroalgae (88.8%) with a total of 101 taxa recorded. The most dominant species was a Lessepsian invasive seagrass,
Halophila stipulacea
(31.1%). This is the highest percentage recorded for this species in green turtle diet in the Mediterranean thus far. With increasing turtle size, the percentage of seagrass consumed increased with a concomitant decrease in macroalgae. Seagrass was consumed year-round. Omnivory occurred in all green turtle size classes but reduced in larger turtles (> 75 cm CCL) suggesting a slow ontogenetic dietary shift. Macroplastic ingestion was more common in green (31.6% of individuals) than loggerhead turtles (5.7%). This study provides the most complete dietary list for marine turtles in the eastern Mediterranean.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-021-03895-y</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0694-4689</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-3162 |
ispartof | Marine biology, 2021-06, Vol.168 (6), Article 94 |
issn | 0025-3162 1432-1793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2531850759 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algae Analysis Aquatic reptiles Biomedical and Life Sciences Caretta caretta Carnivorous animals Chelonia mydas Diet Dominant species Fish Food and nutrition Foraging Foraging behavior Freshwater & Marine Ecology Green turtle Growth Herbivory Ingestion Invasive species Invertebrates Life Sciences Loggerhead turtle Marine & Freshwater Sciences Marine biology Marine environment Microbiology Oceanography Ontogeny Original Paper Predators Reptiles & amphibians Sea grasses Seagrasses Seaweeds Sympatric populations Taxa Turtles Zoology |
title | Dietary analysis of two sympatric marine turtle species in the eastern Mediterranean |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T06%3A57%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dietary%20analysis%20of%20two%20sympatric%20marine%20turtle%20species%20in%20the%20eastern%20Mediterranean&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=Palmer,%20Josie%20L.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=168&rft.issue=6&rft.artnum=94&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-021-03895-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA665844673%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531850759&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A665844673&rfr_iscdi=true |