The Bureaucratic Burden of Identifying your Rapist and Remaining “Cooperative”: What the Sexual Assault Kit Initiative Tells us about Sexual Assault Case Attrition and Outcomes
We analyzed a large sample of sexual assaults over almost two decades in one urban U.S. jurisdiction with previously untested sexual assault kits that were initially not successfully adjudicated ( n = 717). We explored patterns of attrition through descriptive statistics and predictors of attrition...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of criminal justice 2021-06, Vol.46 (3), p.528-553 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 553 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 528 |
| container_title | American journal of criminal justice |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Lovell, Rachel Overman, Laura Huang, Duoduo Flannery, Daniel J. |
| description | We analyzed a large sample of sexual assaults over almost two decades in one urban U.S. jurisdiction with previously untested sexual assault kits that were initially not successfully adjudicated (
n
= 717). We explored patterns of attrition through descriptive statistics and predictors of attrition through continuation-ratio modeling. Findings provide a more comprehensive framework for examining attrition, exploring the bureaucratic burden placed on victims to identify who sexually assaulted them and to remain engaged in an often harmful process and system. Implications suggest this burden could be eased via increased trauma-informed victim support and protocols and increased use of forensic evidence. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12103-020-09573-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2530775903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2530775903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-251b9db619161f6e5dac67bc5f21e714b8a0e2cf8f1928ebabb920a9e5869b213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9qGzEQxpfSQtMkL9CToOdNNVKktXpzTf6YBgKJQ45CWs8mCuuVoz_BvuVBmrfoE-VJKtuFQA49zQzz-76B-arqK9AjoLT5HoEB5TVltKZKNLxefaj2QHFZAxfwsfRUyppxkJ-rLzE-UAqCHqu96s_sHsnPHNDkNpjk2s0wx4H4jkxLTa5bu-GOrH0O5MosXUzEDHNyhQvjhs3m9fn3xPslbtRP-Pr88oPc3ptEUjG-xlU2PRnHaHKfyC-XyHRwyW1RMsO-jyRHYqzP6T08MRHJOKVQeD9sj17m1PoFxoPqU2f6iIf_6n51c3oym5zXF5dn08n4om45qFQzAVbNrQQFEjqJYm5a2dhWdAywgWM7MhRZ2406UGyE1lirGDUKxUgqy4DvV992vsvgHzPGpB_KG4ZyUjPBadMIRXmh2I5qg48xYKeXwS1MWGugepOO3qWjSzp6m45eFRHfiWKBhzsMb9b_Uf0FYoyYQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2530775903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Bureaucratic Burden of Identifying your Rapist and Remaining “Cooperative”: What the Sexual Assault Kit Initiative Tells us about Sexual Assault Case Attrition and Outcomes</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lovell, Rachel ; Overman, Laura ; Huang, Duoduo ; Flannery, Daniel J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lovell, Rachel ; Overman, Laura ; Huang, Duoduo ; Flannery, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><description>We analyzed a large sample of sexual assaults over almost two decades in one urban U.S. jurisdiction with previously untested sexual assault kits that were initially not successfully adjudicated (
n
= 717). We explored patterns of attrition through descriptive statistics and predictors of attrition through continuation-ratio modeling. Findings provide a more comprehensive framework for examining attrition, exploring the bureaucratic burden placed on victims to identify who sexually assaulted them and to remain engaged in an often harmful process and system. Implications suggest this burden could be eased via increased trauma-informed victim support and protocols and increased use of forensic evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1066-2316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-1351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12103-020-09573-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Evidence ; Forensic medicine ; Law and Criminolgy ; Rape ; Sex crimes ; Trauma ; Victims</subject><ispartof>American journal of criminal justice, 2021-06, Vol.46 (3), p.528-553</ispartof><rights>Southern Criminal Justice Association 2020</rights><rights>Southern Criminal Justice Association 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-251b9db619161f6e5dac67bc5f21e714b8a0e2cf8f1928ebabb920a9e5869b213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-251b9db619161f6e5dac67bc5f21e714b8a0e2cf8f1928ebabb920a9e5869b213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8998-6173</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12103-020-09573-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12103-020-09573-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27343,27923,27924,33773,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lovell, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Duoduo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flannery, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Bureaucratic Burden of Identifying your Rapist and Remaining “Cooperative”: What the Sexual Assault Kit Initiative Tells us about Sexual Assault Case Attrition and Outcomes</title><title>American journal of criminal justice</title><addtitle>Am J Crim Just</addtitle><description>We analyzed a large sample of sexual assaults over almost two decades in one urban U.S. jurisdiction with previously untested sexual assault kits that were initially not successfully adjudicated (
n
= 717). We explored patterns of attrition through descriptive statistics and predictors of attrition through continuation-ratio modeling. Findings provide a more comprehensive framework for examining attrition, exploring the bureaucratic burden placed on victims to identify who sexually assaulted them and to remain engaged in an often harmful process and system. Implications suggest this burden could be eased via increased trauma-informed victim support and protocols and increased use of forensic evidence.</description><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Forensic medicine</subject><subject>Law and Criminolgy</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Victims</subject><issn>1066-2316</issn><issn>1936-1351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9qGzEQxpfSQtMkL9CToOdNNVKktXpzTf6YBgKJQ45CWs8mCuuVoz_BvuVBmrfoE-VJKtuFQA49zQzz-76B-arqK9AjoLT5HoEB5TVltKZKNLxefaj2QHFZAxfwsfRUyppxkJ-rLzE-UAqCHqu96s_sHsnPHNDkNpjk2s0wx4H4jkxLTa5bu-GOrH0O5MosXUzEDHNyhQvjhs3m9fn3xPslbtRP-Pr88oPc3ptEUjG-xlU2PRnHaHKfyC-XyHRwyW1RMsO-jyRHYqzP6T08MRHJOKVQeD9sj17m1PoFxoPqU2f6iIf_6n51c3oym5zXF5dn08n4om45qFQzAVbNrQQFEjqJYm5a2dhWdAywgWM7MhRZ2406UGyE1lirGDUKxUgqy4DvV992vsvgHzPGpB_KG4ZyUjPBadMIRXmh2I5qg48xYKeXwS1MWGugepOO3qWjSzp6m45eFRHfiWKBhzsMb9b_Uf0FYoyYQQ</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Lovell, Rachel</creator><creator>Overman, Laura</creator><creator>Huang, Duoduo</creator><creator>Flannery, Daniel J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8998-6173</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>The Bureaucratic Burden of Identifying your Rapist and Remaining “Cooperative”: What the Sexual Assault Kit Initiative Tells us about Sexual Assault Case Attrition and Outcomes</title><author>Lovell, Rachel ; Overman, Laura ; Huang, Duoduo ; Flannery, Daniel J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-251b9db619161f6e5dac67bc5f21e714b8a0e2cf8f1928ebabb920a9e5869b213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Forensic medicine</topic><topic>Law and Criminolgy</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Victims</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lovell, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Duoduo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flannery, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>American journal of criminal justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lovell, Rachel</au><au>Overman, Laura</au><au>Huang, Duoduo</au><au>Flannery, Daniel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Bureaucratic Burden of Identifying your Rapist and Remaining “Cooperative”: What the Sexual Assault Kit Initiative Tells us about Sexual Assault Case Attrition and Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>American journal of criminal justice</jtitle><stitle>Am J Crim Just</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>528</spage><epage>553</epage><pages>528-553</pages><issn>1066-2316</issn><eissn>1936-1351</eissn><abstract>We analyzed a large sample of sexual assaults over almost two decades in one urban U.S. jurisdiction with previously untested sexual assault kits that were initially not successfully adjudicated (
n
= 717). We explored patterns of attrition through descriptive statistics and predictors of attrition through continuation-ratio modeling. Findings provide a more comprehensive framework for examining attrition, exploring the bureaucratic burden placed on victims to identify who sexually assaulted them and to remain engaged in an often harmful process and system. Implications suggest this burden could be eased via increased trauma-informed victim support and protocols and increased use of forensic evidence.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12103-020-09573-x</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8998-6173</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1066-2316 |
| ispartof | American journal of criminal justice, 2021-06, Vol.46 (3), p.528-553 |
| issn | 1066-2316 1936-1351 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2530775903 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Criminology and Criminal Justice Evidence Forensic medicine Law and Criminolgy Rape Sex crimes Trauma Victims |
| title | The Bureaucratic Burden of Identifying your Rapist and Remaining “Cooperative”: What the Sexual Assault Kit Initiative Tells us about Sexual Assault Case Attrition and Outcomes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A02%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Bureaucratic%20Burden%20of%20Identifying%20your%20Rapist%20and%20Remaining%20%E2%80%9CCooperative%E2%80%9D:%20What%20the%20Sexual%20Assault%20Kit%20Initiative%20Tells%20us%20about%20Sexual%20Assault%20Case%20Attrition%20and%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20criminal%20justice&rft.au=Lovell,%20Rachel&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=528&rft.epage=553&rft.pages=528-553&rft.issn=1066-2316&rft.eissn=1936-1351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12103-020-09573-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2530775903%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2530775903&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |