Flowering phenology and reproduction of a forest understorey plant species in response to the local environment
Temperate forest understorey plants are subjected to a strong seasonality in their optimal growing conditions. In winter and early spring, low temperatures are suboptimal for plant growth while light becomes limited later in spring season. We can thus expect that differences in plant phenology in re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant ecology 2021-06, Vol.222 (6), p.749-760 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 760 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 749 |
container_title | Plant ecology |
container_volume | 222 |
creator | Sercu, Bram K. Moeneclaey, Iris Goeminne, Birgit Bonte, Dries Baeten, Lander |
description | Temperate forest understorey plants are subjected to a strong seasonality in their optimal growing conditions. In winter and early spring, low temperatures are suboptimal for plant growth while light becomes limited later in spring season. We can thus expect that differences in plant phenology in relation to spatiotemporal environmental variation will lead to differences in reproductive output, and hence selection. We specifically studied whether early flowering, a paradoxical pattern that is observed in many plant species, is an adaptive strategy, and whether selection for early flowering was confounded with selection for flower duration or was attributable to environmental variables. We used
Geum urbanum
as a study species to investigate the effect of relevant environmental factors on the species’ flowering phenology and the consequences for plant reproductive output. We monitored the phenology of four to six plants in each of ten locations in a temperate deciduous forest (Belgium). We first quantified variation in flowering time within individuals and related this temporal variation to individual flower reproductive output. Then, we studied inter-individual variation here-in and linked this to reproduction at the plant level, hence studying the selection differential. We found that flowering within individual plants of
Geum urbanum
was spread over a long period from June to October. Reproductive output of individual flowers, measured as total seed mass per flower, declined during the season. We found no indication for selection for early flowering but rather for longer flower duration. Larger plants had an earlier flowering onset and a higher seed mass, which suggests that these factors covary and are condition dependent. None of the studied environmental variables could explain plant size, although soil pH and to a lesser extent light availability had a positive direct effect on seed mass per plant. Finally, we suggest that the high intra-individual variation in flowering time, which might be a risk spreading strategy of the plant in the presence of seed predation, limits the potential for selection on flowering phenology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11258-020-01104-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2530598067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A662708462</galeid><sourcerecordid>A662708462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-98bab665a427c5a05717d1eec1f1d719bf00ee99fc84dc746932ed6da58b63573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vHCEMhkdVIuWj-QM5IeU8qYEBZo5RlI9KkXppz4gFsyGahSmwqfbfh81U6q3iYLD9GNtv111TuKUA6luhlImxBwY9UApDz75051Qo3gsQ7KTd-ShamKuz7qKUN4CGcXHepcc5_cEc4pYsrxjTnLYHYqIjGZec3N7WkCJJnhjiU8ZSyT46zKW2x4Ess4mVlAVtwEJCbFRZUixIaiL1FcmcrJkJxveQU9xhrF-7U2_mgld_7WX36_Hh5_1z__Lj6fv93UtvuRhrP40bs5FSmIEpKwwIRZWjiJZ66hSdNh4AcZq8HQdn1SAnztBJZ8S4kbzNfdndrHXbFL_3rW_9lvY5ti81ExzENII8Zt2uWVszow7Rp5qNbcfhLtgU0Yfmv5OSKRgHyRrAVsDmVEpGr5ccdiYfNAV9VEKvSuimhP5UQh8hvkJlOS4a879e_kN9AJ1VjVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2530598067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flowering phenology and reproduction of a forest understorey plant species in response to the local environment</title><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Sercu, Bram K. ; Moeneclaey, Iris ; Goeminne, Birgit ; Bonte, Dries ; Baeten, Lander</creator><creatorcontrib>Sercu, Bram K. ; Moeneclaey, Iris ; Goeminne, Birgit ; Bonte, Dries ; Baeten, Lander</creatorcontrib><description>Temperate forest understorey plants are subjected to a strong seasonality in their optimal growing conditions. In winter and early spring, low temperatures are suboptimal for plant growth while light becomes limited later in spring season. We can thus expect that differences in plant phenology in relation to spatiotemporal environmental variation will lead to differences in reproductive output, and hence selection. We specifically studied whether early flowering, a paradoxical pattern that is observed in many plant species, is an adaptive strategy, and whether selection for early flowering was confounded with selection for flower duration or was attributable to environmental variables. We used
Geum urbanum
as a study species to investigate the effect of relevant environmental factors on the species’ flowering phenology and the consequences for plant reproductive output. We monitored the phenology of four to six plants in each of ten locations in a temperate deciduous forest (Belgium). We first quantified variation in flowering time within individuals and related this temporal variation to individual flower reproductive output. Then, we studied inter-individual variation here-in and linked this to reproduction at the plant level, hence studying the selection differential. We found that flowering within individual plants of
Geum urbanum
was spread over a long period from June to October. Reproductive output of individual flowers, measured as total seed mass per flower, declined during the season. We found no indication for selection for early flowering but rather for longer flower duration. Larger plants had an earlier flowering onset and a higher seed mass, which suggests that these factors covary and are condition dependent. None of the studied environmental variables could explain plant size, although soil pH and to a lesser extent light availability had a positive direct effect on seed mass per plant. Finally, we suggest that the high intra-individual variation in flowering time, which might be a risk spreading strategy of the plant in the presence of seed predation, limits the potential for selection on flowering phenology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-0237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11258-020-01104-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Applied Ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Community & Population Ecology ; Deciduous forests ; Ecology ; Environmental factors ; Flowering ; Flowers ; Flowers & plants ; Geum urbanum ; Life Sciences ; Low temperature ; Phenology ; Plant Ecology ; Plant growth ; Plant species ; Plants (botany) ; Predation ; Reproduction (biology) ; Risk sharing ; Seasonal variations ; Seed predation ; Seeds ; Soil chemistry ; Soil pH ; Species ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; Strategy ; Temperate forests ; Temporal variations ; Terrestial Ecology</subject><ispartof>Plant ecology, 2021-06, Vol.222 (6), p.749-760</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-98bab665a427c5a05717d1eec1f1d719bf00ee99fc84dc746932ed6da58b63573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-98bab665a427c5a05717d1eec1f1d719bf00ee99fc84dc746932ed6da58b63573</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4037-1677</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11258-020-01104-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11258-020-01104-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sercu, Bram K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeneclaey, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goeminne, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonte, Dries</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baeten, Lander</creatorcontrib><title>Flowering phenology and reproduction of a forest understorey plant species in response to the local environment</title><title>Plant ecology</title><addtitle>Plant Ecol</addtitle><description>Temperate forest understorey plants are subjected to a strong seasonality in their optimal growing conditions. In winter and early spring, low temperatures are suboptimal for plant growth while light becomes limited later in spring season. We can thus expect that differences in plant phenology in relation to spatiotemporal environmental variation will lead to differences in reproductive output, and hence selection. We specifically studied whether early flowering, a paradoxical pattern that is observed in many plant species, is an adaptive strategy, and whether selection for early flowering was confounded with selection for flower duration or was attributable to environmental variables. We used
Geum urbanum
as a study species to investigate the effect of relevant environmental factors on the species’ flowering phenology and the consequences for plant reproductive output. We monitored the phenology of four to six plants in each of ten locations in a temperate deciduous forest (Belgium). We first quantified variation in flowering time within individuals and related this temporal variation to individual flower reproductive output. Then, we studied inter-individual variation here-in and linked this to reproduction at the plant level, hence studying the selection differential. We found that flowering within individual plants of
Geum urbanum
was spread over a long period from June to October. Reproductive output of individual flowers, measured as total seed mass per flower, declined during the season. We found no indication for selection for early flowering but rather for longer flower duration. Larger plants had an earlier flowering onset and a higher seed mass, which suggests that these factors covary and are condition dependent. None of the studied environmental variables could explain plant size, although soil pH and to a lesser extent light availability had a positive direct effect on seed mass per plant. Finally, we suggest that the high intra-individual variation in flowering time, which might be a risk spreading strategy of the plant in the presence of seed predation, limits the potential for selection on flowering phenology.</description><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Community & Population Ecology</subject><subject>Deciduous forests</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Geum urbanum</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Low temperature</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Reproduction (biology)</subject><subject>Risk sharing</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seed predation</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil pH</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Terrestial Ecology</subject><issn>1385-0237</issn><issn>1573-5052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vHCEMhkdVIuWj-QM5IeU8qYEBZo5RlI9KkXppz4gFsyGahSmwqfbfh81U6q3iYLD9GNtv111TuKUA6luhlImxBwY9UApDz75051Qo3gsQ7KTd-ShamKuz7qKUN4CGcXHepcc5_cEc4pYsrxjTnLYHYqIjGZec3N7WkCJJnhjiU8ZSyT46zKW2x4Ess4mVlAVtwEJCbFRZUixIaiL1FcmcrJkJxveQU9xhrF-7U2_mgld_7WX36_Hh5_1z__Lj6fv93UtvuRhrP40bs5FSmIEpKwwIRZWjiJZ66hSdNh4AcZq8HQdn1SAnztBJZ8S4kbzNfdndrHXbFL_3rW_9lvY5ti81ExzENII8Zt2uWVszow7Rp5qNbcfhLtgU0Yfmv5OSKRgHyRrAVsDmVEpGr5ccdiYfNAV9VEKvSuimhP5UQh8hvkJlOS4a879e_kN9AJ1VjVk</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Sercu, Bram K.</creator><creator>Moeneclaey, Iris</creator><creator>Goeminne, Birgit</creator><creator>Bonte, Dries</creator><creator>Baeten, Lander</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4037-1677</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Flowering phenology and reproduction of a forest understorey plant species in response to the local environment</title><author>Sercu, Bram K. ; Moeneclaey, Iris ; Goeminne, Birgit ; Bonte, Dries ; Baeten, Lander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-98bab665a427c5a05717d1eec1f1d719bf00ee99fc84dc746932ed6da58b63573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Community & Population Ecology</topic><topic>Deciduous forests</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Geum urbanum</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Low temperature</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Reproduction (biology)</topic><topic>Risk sharing</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seed predation</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil pH</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Terrestial Ecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sercu, Bram K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeneclaey, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goeminne, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonte, Dries</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baeten, Lander</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sercu, Bram K.</au><au>Moeneclaey, Iris</au><au>Goeminne, Birgit</au><au>Bonte, Dries</au><au>Baeten, Lander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flowering phenology and reproduction of a forest understorey plant species in response to the local environment</atitle><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle><stitle>Plant Ecol</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>222</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>749</spage><epage>760</epage><pages>749-760</pages><issn>1385-0237</issn><eissn>1573-5052</eissn><abstract>Temperate forest understorey plants are subjected to a strong seasonality in their optimal growing conditions. In winter and early spring, low temperatures are suboptimal for plant growth while light becomes limited later in spring season. We can thus expect that differences in plant phenology in relation to spatiotemporal environmental variation will lead to differences in reproductive output, and hence selection. We specifically studied whether early flowering, a paradoxical pattern that is observed in many plant species, is an adaptive strategy, and whether selection for early flowering was confounded with selection for flower duration or was attributable to environmental variables. We used
Geum urbanum
as a study species to investigate the effect of relevant environmental factors on the species’ flowering phenology and the consequences for plant reproductive output. We monitored the phenology of four to six plants in each of ten locations in a temperate deciduous forest (Belgium). We first quantified variation in flowering time within individuals and related this temporal variation to individual flower reproductive output. Then, we studied inter-individual variation here-in and linked this to reproduction at the plant level, hence studying the selection differential. We found that flowering within individual plants of
Geum urbanum
was spread over a long period from June to October. Reproductive output of individual flowers, measured as total seed mass per flower, declined during the season. We found no indication for selection for early flowering but rather for longer flower duration. Larger plants had an earlier flowering onset and a higher seed mass, which suggests that these factors covary and are condition dependent. None of the studied environmental variables could explain plant size, although soil pH and to a lesser extent light availability had a positive direct effect on seed mass per plant. Finally, we suggest that the high intra-individual variation in flowering time, which might be a risk spreading strategy of the plant in the presence of seed predation, limits the potential for selection on flowering phenology.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11258-020-01104-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4037-1677</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1385-0237 |
ispartof | Plant ecology, 2021-06, Vol.222 (6), p.749-760 |
issn | 1385-0237 1573-5052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2530598067 |
source | SpringerNature Complete Journals |
subjects | Applied Ecology Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Community & Population Ecology Deciduous forests Ecology Environmental factors Flowering Flowers Flowers & plants Geum urbanum Life Sciences Low temperature Phenology Plant Ecology Plant growth Plant species Plants (botany) Predation Reproduction (biology) Risk sharing Seasonal variations Seed predation Seeds Soil chemistry Soil pH Species Spring Spring (season) Strategy Temperate forests Temporal variations Terrestial Ecology |
title | Flowering phenology and reproduction of a forest understorey plant species in response to the local environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A22%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flowering%20phenology%20and%20reproduction%20of%20a%20forest%20understorey%20plant%20species%20in%20response%20to%20the%20local%20environment&rft.jtitle=Plant%20ecology&rft.au=Sercu,%20Bram%20K.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=749&rft.epage=760&rft.pages=749-760&rft.issn=1385-0237&rft.eissn=1573-5052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11258-020-01104-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA662708462%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2530598067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A662708462&rfr_iscdi=true |