Development of a Low-Cost Biomass Furnace for Greenhouse Heating
The energy crisis and increasing fossil fuel prices due to increasing demands, controlled supplies, and global political unrest have adversely affected agricultural productivity and farm profitability across the globe and Pakistan is not an exception. To cope with this issue of energy deficiency in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2021-05, Vol.13 (9), p.5152 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 5152 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Ali, Asif Iqbal, Tahir Cheema, Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud Afzal, Arslan Yasin, Muhammad Haq, Zia ul Malik, Arshad Mahmood Khan, Khalid Saifullah |
description | The energy crisis and increasing fossil fuel prices due to increasing demands, controlled supplies, and global political unrest have adversely affected agricultural productivity and farm profitability across the globe and Pakistan is not an exception. To cope with this issue of energy deficiency in agriculture, the best alternate strategy is to take advantage of biomass and solid waste potential. In low-income countries such as Pakistan, the greenhouse heating system mostly relies on fossil fuels such as diesel, gasoline, and LPG. Farmers are reluctant to adopt greenhouse farming due to the continuously rising prices of the fossil fuels. To reduce reliance on fossil fuel energy, the objective of this study was to utilize biomass from crop residues to develop an efficient and economical biomass furnace that could heat greenhouses to protect the crop from seasonal temperature effects. Modifications made to the biomass furnace, such as the incorporation of insulation around the walls of the furnace, providing turbulators in fire tubes, and a secondary heat exchanger (heat recovery system) in the chimney, have increased the thermal efficiency of the biomass furnace by about 21.7%. A drastic reduction in hazardous elements of flue gases was observed due to the addition of a water scrubber smoke filter in the exit line of the flue. The efficiency of the biomass furnace ranged from 50.42% to 54.18%, whereas the heating efficiency of the diesel-fired heater was 71.19%. On the basis of the equal heating value of the fuels, the unit material and operating costs of the biomass furnace for wood, cotton stalks, corn cobs, and cow dung were USD 2.04, 1.86, 1.78, and 2.00 respectively against USD 4.67/h for the diesel heater. The capital and operating costs of the biomass furnace were about 50% and 43.7% of the diesel heater respectively, resulting in a seasonal saving of about 1573 USD. The produced smoke was tested as environmental friendly under the prescribed limits of the National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS), which shows potential for its large-scale adoption and wider applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su13095152 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2530174628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2530174628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-e136c5cfad04ec3cae767d46d89c177075c2f8a13a0f43fb3b97cf2bfea0f4583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMFKxDAUDKLgsu7FLwh4E6pJXtO0N7W6u0LBi55Dmr5ol7ZZk1bx77WsoHOZYRiGYQg55-wKoGDXceLACsmlOCILwRRPOJPs-J8-JasYd-wHALzg2YLc3OMHdn7f4zBS76ihlf9MSh9Hetf63sRI11MYjEXqfKCbgDi8-Ski3aIZ2-H1jJw400Vc_fKSvKwfnsttUj1tHsvbKrFCyDFBDpmV1pmGpWjBGlSZatKsyQvLlWJKWuFyw8Ewl4KroS6UdaJ2OBsyhyW5OPTug3-fMI565-dhXdRCAuMqzcScujykbPAxBnR6H9rehC_NmZ5P0n8nwTe_71ia</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2530174628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a Low-Cost Biomass Furnace for Greenhouse Heating</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ali, Asif ; Iqbal, Tahir ; Cheema, Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud ; Afzal, Arslan ; Yasin, Muhammad ; Haq, Zia ul ; Malik, Arshad Mahmood ; Khan, Khalid Saifullah</creator><creatorcontrib>Ali, Asif ; Iqbal, Tahir ; Cheema, Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud ; Afzal, Arslan ; Yasin, Muhammad ; Haq, Zia ul ; Malik, Arshad Mahmood ; Khan, Khalid Saifullah</creatorcontrib><description>The energy crisis and increasing fossil fuel prices due to increasing demands, controlled supplies, and global political unrest have adversely affected agricultural productivity and farm profitability across the globe and Pakistan is not an exception. To cope with this issue of energy deficiency in agriculture, the best alternate strategy is to take advantage of biomass and solid waste potential. In low-income countries such as Pakistan, the greenhouse heating system mostly relies on fossil fuels such as diesel, gasoline, and LPG. Farmers are reluctant to adopt greenhouse farming due to the continuously rising prices of the fossil fuels. To reduce reliance on fossil fuel energy, the objective of this study was to utilize biomass from crop residues to develop an efficient and economical biomass furnace that could heat greenhouses to protect the crop from seasonal temperature effects. Modifications made to the biomass furnace, such as the incorporation of insulation around the walls of the furnace, providing turbulators in fire tubes, and a secondary heat exchanger (heat recovery system) in the chimney, have increased the thermal efficiency of the biomass furnace by about 21.7%. A drastic reduction in hazardous elements of flue gases was observed due to the addition of a water scrubber smoke filter in the exit line of the flue. The efficiency of the biomass furnace ranged from 50.42% to 54.18%, whereas the heating efficiency of the diesel-fired heater was 71.19%. On the basis of the equal heating value of the fuels, the unit material and operating costs of the biomass furnace for wood, cotton stalks, corn cobs, and cow dung were USD 2.04, 1.86, 1.78, and 2.00 respectively against USD 4.67/h for the diesel heater. The capital and operating costs of the biomass furnace were about 50% and 43.7% of the diesel heater respectively, resulting in a seasonal saving of about 1573 USD. The produced smoke was tested as environmental friendly under the prescribed limits of the National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS), which shows potential for its large-scale adoption and wider applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su13095152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Biomass ; Calorific value ; Cattle manure ; Cotton ; Crop residues ; Diesel fuels ; Dung ; Economics ; Energy ; Environmental quality ; Environmental testing ; Flue gas ; Fossil fuels ; Gasoline ; Greenhouses ; Heat recovery ; Insulation ; Manufacturing ; Operating costs ; Plant protection ; Quality standards ; Smoke ; Solid wastes ; Temperature effects ; Thermodynamic efficiency ; Water purification</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2021-05, Vol.13 (9), p.5152</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-e136c5cfad04ec3cae767d46d89c177075c2f8a13a0f43fb3b97cf2bfea0f4583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-e136c5cfad04ec3cae767d46d89c177075c2f8a13a0f43fb3b97cf2bfea0f4583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7911-7548 ; 0000-0002-8358-1992 ; 0000-0001-5028-7482</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ali, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Tahir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheema, Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afzal, Arslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasin, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haq, Zia ul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Arshad Mahmood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Khalid Saifullah</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a Low-Cost Biomass Furnace for Greenhouse Heating</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The energy crisis and increasing fossil fuel prices due to increasing demands, controlled supplies, and global political unrest have adversely affected agricultural productivity and farm profitability across the globe and Pakistan is not an exception. To cope with this issue of energy deficiency in agriculture, the best alternate strategy is to take advantage of biomass and solid waste potential. In low-income countries such as Pakistan, the greenhouse heating system mostly relies on fossil fuels such as diesel, gasoline, and LPG. Farmers are reluctant to adopt greenhouse farming due to the continuously rising prices of the fossil fuels. To reduce reliance on fossil fuel energy, the objective of this study was to utilize biomass from crop residues to develop an efficient and economical biomass furnace that could heat greenhouses to protect the crop from seasonal temperature effects. Modifications made to the biomass furnace, such as the incorporation of insulation around the walls of the furnace, providing turbulators in fire tubes, and a secondary heat exchanger (heat recovery system) in the chimney, have increased the thermal efficiency of the biomass furnace by about 21.7%. A drastic reduction in hazardous elements of flue gases was observed due to the addition of a water scrubber smoke filter in the exit line of the flue. The efficiency of the biomass furnace ranged from 50.42% to 54.18%, whereas the heating efficiency of the diesel-fired heater was 71.19%. On the basis of the equal heating value of the fuels, the unit material and operating costs of the biomass furnace for wood, cotton stalks, corn cobs, and cow dung were USD 2.04, 1.86, 1.78, and 2.00 respectively against USD 4.67/h for the diesel heater. The capital and operating costs of the biomass furnace were about 50% and 43.7% of the diesel heater respectively, resulting in a seasonal saving of about 1573 USD. The produced smoke was tested as environmental friendly under the prescribed limits of the National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS), which shows potential for its large-scale adoption and wider applications.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Calorific value</subject><subject>Cattle manure</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Diesel fuels</subject><subject>Dung</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Environmental testing</subject><subject>Flue gas</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Heat recovery</subject><subject>Insulation</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Plant protection</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Solid wastes</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Thermodynamic efficiency</subject><subject>Water purification</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMFKxDAUDKLgsu7FLwh4E6pJXtO0N7W6u0LBi55Dmr5ol7ZZk1bx77WsoHOZYRiGYQg55-wKoGDXceLACsmlOCILwRRPOJPs-J8-JasYd-wHALzg2YLc3OMHdn7f4zBS76ihlf9MSh9Hetf63sRI11MYjEXqfKCbgDi8-Ski3aIZ2-H1jJw400Vc_fKSvKwfnsttUj1tHsvbKrFCyDFBDpmV1pmGpWjBGlSZatKsyQvLlWJKWuFyw8Ewl4KroS6UdaJ2OBsyhyW5OPTug3-fMI565-dhXdRCAuMqzcScujykbPAxBnR6H9rehC_NmZ5P0n8nwTe_71ia</recordid><startdate>20210505</startdate><enddate>20210505</enddate><creator>Ali, Asif</creator><creator>Iqbal, Tahir</creator><creator>Cheema, Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud</creator><creator>Afzal, Arslan</creator><creator>Yasin, Muhammad</creator><creator>Haq, Zia ul</creator><creator>Malik, Arshad Mahmood</creator><creator>Khan, Khalid Saifullah</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7911-7548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-1992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5028-7482</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210505</creationdate><title>Development of a Low-Cost Biomass Furnace for Greenhouse Heating</title><author>Ali, Asif ; Iqbal, Tahir ; Cheema, Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud ; Afzal, Arslan ; Yasin, Muhammad ; Haq, Zia ul ; Malik, Arshad Mahmood ; Khan, Khalid Saifullah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-e136c5cfad04ec3cae767d46d89c177075c2f8a13a0f43fb3b97cf2bfea0f4583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Calorific value</topic><topic>Cattle manure</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Diesel fuels</topic><topic>Dung</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Environmental testing</topic><topic>Flue gas</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Heat recovery</topic><topic>Insulation</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Plant protection</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Solid wastes</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Thermodynamic efficiency</topic><topic>Water purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ali, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Tahir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheema, Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afzal, Arslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasin, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haq, Zia ul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Arshad Mahmood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Khalid Saifullah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ali, Asif</au><au>Iqbal, Tahir</au><au>Cheema, Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud</au><au>Afzal, Arslan</au><au>Yasin, Muhammad</au><au>Haq, Zia ul</au><au>Malik, Arshad Mahmood</au><au>Khan, Khalid Saifullah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a Low-Cost Biomass Furnace for Greenhouse Heating</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2021-05-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>5152</spage><pages>5152-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The energy crisis and increasing fossil fuel prices due to increasing demands, controlled supplies, and global political unrest have adversely affected agricultural productivity and farm profitability across the globe and Pakistan is not an exception. To cope with this issue of energy deficiency in agriculture, the best alternate strategy is to take advantage of biomass and solid waste potential. In low-income countries such as Pakistan, the greenhouse heating system mostly relies on fossil fuels such as diesel, gasoline, and LPG. Farmers are reluctant to adopt greenhouse farming due to the continuously rising prices of the fossil fuels. To reduce reliance on fossil fuel energy, the objective of this study was to utilize biomass from crop residues to develop an efficient and economical biomass furnace that could heat greenhouses to protect the crop from seasonal temperature effects. Modifications made to the biomass furnace, such as the incorporation of insulation around the walls of the furnace, providing turbulators in fire tubes, and a secondary heat exchanger (heat recovery system) in the chimney, have increased the thermal efficiency of the biomass furnace by about 21.7%. A drastic reduction in hazardous elements of flue gases was observed due to the addition of a water scrubber smoke filter in the exit line of the flue. The efficiency of the biomass furnace ranged from 50.42% to 54.18%, whereas the heating efficiency of the diesel-fired heater was 71.19%. On the basis of the equal heating value of the fuels, the unit material and operating costs of the biomass furnace for wood, cotton stalks, corn cobs, and cow dung were USD 2.04, 1.86, 1.78, and 2.00 respectively against USD 4.67/h for the diesel heater. The capital and operating costs of the biomass furnace were about 50% and 43.7% of the diesel heater respectively, resulting in a seasonal saving of about 1573 USD. The produced smoke was tested as environmental friendly under the prescribed limits of the National Environmental Quality Standards (NEQS), which shows potential for its large-scale adoption and wider applications.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su13095152</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7911-7548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-1992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5028-7482</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2021-05, Vol.13 (9), p.5152 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2530174628 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural production Agriculture Biomass Calorific value Cattle manure Cotton Crop residues Diesel fuels Dung Economics Energy Environmental quality Environmental testing Flue gas Fossil fuels Gasoline Greenhouses Heat recovery Insulation Manufacturing Operating costs Plant protection Quality standards Smoke Solid wastes Temperature effects Thermodynamic efficiency Water purification |
title | Development of a Low-Cost Biomass Furnace for Greenhouse Heating |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A07%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20Low-Cost%20Biomass%20Furnace%20for%20Greenhouse%20Heating&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Ali,%20Asif&rft.date=2021-05-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=5152&rft.pages=5152-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su13095152&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2530174628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2530174628&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |