How Blackness Matters in White Lives

Since the birth of “Black Lives Matter” in 2013 there has emerged a broad spectrum of public discourse about, and scholarship examining, the movement. Within this diverse conversation, some have concentrated on the supposed growth of White support for racial equality in general and Black Lives Matte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Symbolic interaction 2021-05, Vol.44 (2), p.412-448
1. Verfasser: Hughey, Matthew W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 448
container_issue 2
container_start_page 412
container_title Symbolic interaction
container_volume 44
creator Hughey, Matthew W.
description Since the birth of “Black Lives Matter” in 2013 there has emerged a broad spectrum of public discourse about, and scholarship examining, the movement. Within this diverse conversation, some have concentrated on the supposed growth of White support for racial equality in general and Black Lives Matter in specific. Yet,within this scholarly corpus, there is no examination of White engagement with Black Lives Matter from a symbolic interactionist lens. Moreover, while there is focus on a seemingly mounting chorus of White voices who loudly proclaim support for the movement, few have examined how varied White expectations, silences, and actions speak louder than these words. Based on ethnographic observation, in-depth interviews, and content analysis data collected over 2014–2020 from two different all-White groups in the New England region of the United States, the relationship between White identity formation and White interpretations of the Black Lives Matter movement is analyzed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/symb.552
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2529816774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27084987</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27084987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-f2b66783a2a9ff8377e537febe97436b259937d25945fa4d97e287b19bcc203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1LwzAABfAgCtYq-A8IBT146cxH83V0Q53Q4WGCeApJl2Brt86kc_S_N6PizdO7_HgPHgCXCE4QhPguDGszoRQfgQRRQnLBGD0GCUSS5gwKdgrOQmhgpAUSCbiZd_ts2urqc2NDyBa6760PWb3J3j7q3mZl_W3DOThxug324jdTsHx8eJ3N8_Ll6Xl2X-YVQRTnDhvGuCAaa-mcIJxbSrizxkpeEGYwlZLwVYyCOl2sJLdYcIOkqSoMSQqux9at7752NvSq6XZ-EwcVplgKxHisScHtqCrfheCtU1tfr7UfFILq8IA6PKDiA5HmI93XrR3-dWr5vpiO_mr0Teg7_-cxh6KQgpMfG61kQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2529816774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Blackness Matters in White Lives</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hughey, Matthew W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughey, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><description>Since the birth of “Black Lives Matter” in 2013 there has emerged a broad spectrum of public discourse about, and scholarship examining, the movement. Within this diverse conversation, some have concentrated on the supposed growth of White support for racial equality in general and Black Lives Matter in specific. Yet,within this scholarly corpus, there is no examination of White engagement with Black Lives Matter from a symbolic interactionist lens. Moreover, while there is focus on a seemingly mounting chorus of White voices who loudly proclaim support for the movement, few have examined how varied White expectations, silences, and actions speak louder than these words. Based on ethnographic observation, in-depth interviews, and content analysis data collected over 2014–2020 from two different all-White groups in the New England region of the United States, the relationship between White identity formation and White interpretations of the Black Lives Matter movement is analyzed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6086</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8665</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/symb.552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, US: Wiley</publisher><subject>black lives matter ; Black Lives Matter movement ; Black people ; Black white relations ; Content analysis ; EDITOR’S INVITATION ; identity ; Identity formation ; race ; Racial identity ; Racial inequality ; racism ; social movements ; whiteness</subject><ispartof>Symbolic interaction, 2021-05, Vol.44 (2), p.412-448</ispartof><rights>2020 Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction (SSSI)</rights><rights>2021 Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction (SSSI)</rights><rights>2021 Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-f2b66783a2a9ff8377e537febe97436b259937d25945fa4d97e287b19bcc203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-f2b66783a2a9ff8377e537febe97436b259937d25945fa4d97e287b19bcc203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsymb.552$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsymb.552$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,33753,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughey, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><title>How Blackness Matters in White Lives</title><title>Symbolic interaction</title><description>Since the birth of “Black Lives Matter” in 2013 there has emerged a broad spectrum of public discourse about, and scholarship examining, the movement. Within this diverse conversation, some have concentrated on the supposed growth of White support for racial equality in general and Black Lives Matter in specific. Yet,within this scholarly corpus, there is no examination of White engagement with Black Lives Matter from a symbolic interactionist lens. Moreover, while there is focus on a seemingly mounting chorus of White voices who loudly proclaim support for the movement, few have examined how varied White expectations, silences, and actions speak louder than these words. Based on ethnographic observation, in-depth interviews, and content analysis data collected over 2014–2020 from two different all-White groups in the New England region of the United States, the relationship between White identity formation and White interpretations of the Black Lives Matter movement is analyzed.</description><subject>black lives matter</subject><subject>Black Lives Matter movement</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Black white relations</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>EDITOR’S INVITATION</subject><subject>identity</subject><subject>Identity formation</subject><subject>race</subject><subject>Racial identity</subject><subject>Racial inequality</subject><subject>racism</subject><subject>social movements</subject><subject>whiteness</subject><issn>0195-6086</issn><issn>1533-8665</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1LwzAABfAgCtYq-A8IBT146cxH83V0Q53Q4WGCeApJl2Brt86kc_S_N6PizdO7_HgPHgCXCE4QhPguDGszoRQfgQRRQnLBGD0GCUSS5gwKdgrOQmhgpAUSCbiZd_ts2urqc2NDyBa6760PWb3J3j7q3mZl_W3DOThxug324jdTsHx8eJ3N8_Ll6Xl2X-YVQRTnDhvGuCAaa-mcIJxbSrizxkpeEGYwlZLwVYyCOl2sJLdYcIOkqSoMSQqux9at7752NvSq6XZ-EwcVplgKxHisScHtqCrfheCtU1tfr7UfFILq8IA6PKDiA5HmI93XrR3-dWr5vpiO_mr0Teg7_-cxh6KQgpMfG61kQw</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Hughey, Matthew W.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>How Blackness Matters in White Lives</title><author>Hughey, Matthew W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3152-f2b66783a2a9ff8377e537febe97436b259937d25945fa4d97e287b19bcc203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>black lives matter</topic><topic>Black Lives Matter movement</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Black white relations</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>EDITOR’S INVITATION</topic><topic>identity</topic><topic>Identity formation</topic><topic>race</topic><topic>Racial identity</topic><topic>Racial inequality</topic><topic>racism</topic><topic>social movements</topic><topic>whiteness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughey, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Symbolic interaction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughey, Matthew W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Blackness Matters in White Lives</atitle><jtitle>Symbolic interaction</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>412</spage><epage>448</epage><pages>412-448</pages><issn>0195-6086</issn><eissn>1533-8665</eissn><abstract>Since the birth of “Black Lives Matter” in 2013 there has emerged a broad spectrum of public discourse about, and scholarship examining, the movement. Within this diverse conversation, some have concentrated on the supposed growth of White support for racial equality in general and Black Lives Matter in specific. Yet,within this scholarly corpus, there is no examination of White engagement with Black Lives Matter from a symbolic interactionist lens. Moreover, while there is focus on a seemingly mounting chorus of White voices who loudly proclaim support for the movement, few have examined how varied White expectations, silences, and actions speak louder than these words. Based on ethnographic observation, in-depth interviews, and content analysis data collected over 2014–2020 from two different all-White groups in the New England region of the United States, the relationship between White identity formation and White interpretations of the Black Lives Matter movement is analyzed.</abstract><cop>Malden, US</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/symb.552</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6086
ispartof Symbolic interaction, 2021-05, Vol.44 (2), p.412-448
issn 0195-6086
1533-8665
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2529816774
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects black lives matter
Black Lives Matter movement
Black people
Black white relations
Content analysis
EDITOR’S INVITATION
identity
Identity formation
race
Racial identity
Racial inequality
racism
social movements
whiteness
title How Blackness Matters in White Lives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A02%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Blackness%20Matters%20in%20White%20Lives&rft.jtitle=Symbolic%20interaction&rft.au=Hughey,%20Matthew%20W.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=412&rft.epage=448&rft.pages=412-448&rft.issn=0195-6086&rft.eissn=1533-8665&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/symb.552&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27084987%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2529816774&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27084987&rfr_iscdi=true