Strategic spatial planning and efficacy: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach in Lyon and Copenhagen
Strategic spatial planning has been a key planning practice at the urban regional level to support the implementation of local spatial transformations. Previously, qualitative comparative research has revealed the complexity that characterizes strategic spatial planning processes; it is multi-facete...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European planning studies 2021-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1174-1192 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1192 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1174 |
| container_title | European planning studies |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Palka, Gaëtan Oliveira, Eduardo Pagliarin, Sofia Hersperger, Anna M. |
| description | Strategic spatial planning has been a key planning practice at the urban regional level to support the implementation of local spatial transformations. Previously, qualitative comparative research has revealed the complexity that characterizes strategic spatial planning processes; it is multi-faceted, highly context-dependent and embedded in multi-level governance configurations. However, to date, little effort has been made to quantitatively evaluate the 'planning efficacy' of strategic spatial planning processes comparatively, i.e. to investigate the extent to which strategic spatial plans facilitate or hinder the local implementation of concrete development strategies in different contexts. In this paper, we evaluate the planning efficacy of strategic spatial planning processes by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the urban regions of Lyon, France and Copenhagen, Denmark. Analytically, we employ a set of components capturing the governance performance and the impact of external forces that are assumed to contextually influence the efficacy of strategic planning. Our analysis shows that a quantitative approach such as the AHP, is a useful way to compare strategic spatial planning across urban regions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09654313.2020.1828291 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2529619559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2529619559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-d59043cc67aaa87c31fd2b11c42684541997c13def6dadcdff8324f2206b88633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-BCHgxT30mv-TeHIYdEcYUFDPoTadTGfpTdqkV-lvb3pn9SgUFPX41aOKh9BrSq4o0eQdMUoKTvkVI6xJmmlm6BO0oUKZThohnqLNynQr9By9qPWWEMqkVBs0fpsLzP4UHa4TzBFGPI2QUkwnDKnHPoTowC3v29QKxmVu6BB9geKGBU8lO18rfrs7fL3EMLUZ3IBjwsclpweLfZ58GuDk00v0LMBY_avHfoF-fPr4fX_ojl-uP-93x84Jauaul4YI7pzaAoDeOk5Dz24odYIpLWRjzNZR3vugeuhdH4LmTATGiLrRWnF-gS7PvgOMdirxDspiM0R72B3tqhEuiNDE_KKNfXNm2-U_732d7W2-L-3RaplkRlEjpWmUPFOu5FqLD_9sKbFrCPZvCHYNwT6G0PY-nPdiCrncwe9cxt7OsIy5hALJxWr5_y3-AHXTjN4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2529619559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategic spatial planning and efficacy: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach in Lyon and Copenhagen</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Palka, Gaëtan ; Oliveira, Eduardo ; Pagliarin, Sofia ; Hersperger, Anna M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palka, Gaëtan ; Oliveira, Eduardo ; Pagliarin, Sofia ; Hersperger, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><description>Strategic spatial planning has been a key planning practice at the urban regional level to support the implementation of local spatial transformations. Previously, qualitative comparative research has revealed the complexity that characterizes strategic spatial planning processes; it is multi-faceted, highly context-dependent and embedded in multi-level governance configurations. However, to date, little effort has been made to quantitatively evaluate the 'planning efficacy' of strategic spatial planning processes comparatively, i.e. to investigate the extent to which strategic spatial plans facilitate or hinder the local implementation of concrete development strategies in different contexts. In this paper, we evaluate the planning efficacy of strategic spatial planning processes by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the urban regions of Lyon, France and Copenhagen, Denmark. Analytically, we employ a set of components capturing the governance performance and the impact of external forces that are assumed to contextually influence the efficacy of strategic planning. Our analysis shows that a quantitative approach such as the AHP, is a useful way to compare strategic spatial planning across urban regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-4313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1828291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Analytic hierarchy process ; Comparative analysis ; Development strategies ; Efficacy ; external forces ; Flood control ; Geography ; Governance ; Hierarchies ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Mathematical analysis ; Planning ; Regional planning ; spatial planning comparison ; Strategic planning ; Strategic spatial planning ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>European planning studies, 2021-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1174-1192</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-d59043cc67aaa87c31fd2b11c42684541997c13def6dadcdff8324f2206b88633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-d59043cc67aaa87c31fd2b11c42684541997c13def6dadcdff8324f2206b88633</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0521-107X ; 0000-0003-4846-6072 ; 0000-0001-5407-533X ; 0000-0001-8838-2493</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03404809$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palka, Gaëtan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagliarin, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hersperger, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><title>Strategic spatial planning and efficacy: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach in Lyon and Copenhagen</title><title>European planning studies</title><description>Strategic spatial planning has been a key planning practice at the urban regional level to support the implementation of local spatial transformations. Previously, qualitative comparative research has revealed the complexity that characterizes strategic spatial planning processes; it is multi-faceted, highly context-dependent and embedded in multi-level governance configurations. However, to date, little effort has been made to quantitatively evaluate the 'planning efficacy' of strategic spatial planning processes comparatively, i.e. to investigate the extent to which strategic spatial plans facilitate or hinder the local implementation of concrete development strategies in different contexts. In this paper, we evaluate the planning efficacy of strategic spatial planning processes by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the urban regions of Lyon, France and Copenhagen, Denmark. Analytically, we employ a set of components capturing the governance performance and the impact of external forces that are assumed to contextually influence the efficacy of strategic planning. Our analysis shows that a quantitative approach such as the AHP, is a useful way to compare strategic spatial planning across urban regions.</description><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Development strategies</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>external forces</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>spatial planning comparison</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Strategic spatial planning</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0965-4313</issn><issn>1469-5944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-BCHgxT30mv-TeHIYdEcYUFDPoTadTGfpTdqkV-lvb3pn9SgUFPX41aOKh9BrSq4o0eQdMUoKTvkVI6xJmmlm6BO0oUKZThohnqLNynQr9By9qPWWEMqkVBs0fpsLzP4UHa4TzBFGPI2QUkwnDKnHPoTowC3v29QKxmVu6BB9geKGBU8lO18rfrs7fL3EMLUZ3IBjwsclpweLfZ58GuDk00v0LMBY_avHfoF-fPr4fX_ojl-uP-93x84Jauaul4YI7pzaAoDeOk5Dz24odYIpLWRjzNZR3vugeuhdH4LmTATGiLrRWnF-gS7PvgOMdirxDspiM0R72B3tqhEuiNDE_KKNfXNm2-U_732d7W2-L-3RaplkRlEjpWmUPFOu5FqLD_9sKbFrCPZvCHYNwT6G0PY-nPdiCrncwe9cxt7OsIy5hALJxWr5_y3-AHXTjN4</recordid><startdate>20210603</startdate><enddate>20210603</enddate><creator>Palka, Gaëtan</creator><creator>Oliveira, Eduardo</creator><creator>Pagliarin, Sofia</creator><creator>Hersperger, Anna M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis (Routledge)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-107X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4846-6072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5407-533X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8838-2493</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210603</creationdate><title>Strategic spatial planning and efficacy: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach in Lyon and Copenhagen</title><author>Palka, Gaëtan ; Oliveira, Eduardo ; Pagliarin, Sofia ; Hersperger, Anna M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-d59043cc67aaa87c31fd2b11c42684541997c13def6dadcdff8324f2206b88633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Development strategies</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>external forces</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>spatial planning comparison</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Strategic spatial planning</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palka, Gaëtan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagliarin, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hersperger, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>European planning studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palka, Gaëtan</au><au>Oliveira, Eduardo</au><au>Pagliarin, Sofia</au><au>Hersperger, Anna M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategic spatial planning and efficacy: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach in Lyon and Copenhagen</atitle><jtitle>European planning studies</jtitle><date>2021-06-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1174</spage><epage>1192</epage><pages>1174-1192</pages><issn>0965-4313</issn><eissn>1469-5944</eissn><abstract>Strategic spatial planning has been a key planning practice at the urban regional level to support the implementation of local spatial transformations. Previously, qualitative comparative research has revealed the complexity that characterizes strategic spatial planning processes; it is multi-faceted, highly context-dependent and embedded in multi-level governance configurations. However, to date, little effort has been made to quantitatively evaluate the 'planning efficacy' of strategic spatial planning processes comparatively, i.e. to investigate the extent to which strategic spatial plans facilitate or hinder the local implementation of concrete development strategies in different contexts. In this paper, we evaluate the planning efficacy of strategic spatial planning processes by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the urban regions of Lyon, France and Copenhagen, Denmark. Analytically, we employ a set of components capturing the governance performance and the impact of external forces that are assumed to contextually influence the efficacy of strategic planning. Our analysis shows that a quantitative approach such as the AHP, is a useful way to compare strategic spatial planning across urban regions.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09654313.2020.1828291</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-107X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4846-6072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5407-533X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8838-2493</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0965-4313 |
| ispartof | European planning studies, 2021-06, Vol.29 (6), p.1174-1192 |
| issn | 0965-4313 1469-5944 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2529619559 |
| source | PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Analytic hierarchy process Comparative analysis Development strategies Efficacy external forces Flood control Geography Governance Hierarchies Humanities and Social Sciences Mathematical analysis Planning Regional planning spatial planning comparison Strategic planning Strategic spatial planning Urban areas |
| title | Strategic spatial planning and efficacy: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach in Lyon and Copenhagen |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A15%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategic%20spatial%20planning%20and%20efficacy:%20an%20analytic%20hierarchy%20process%20(AHP)%20approach%20in%20Lyon%20and%20Copenhagen&rft.jtitle=European%20planning%20studies&rft.au=Palka,%20Ga%C3%ABtan&rft.date=2021-06-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1174&rft.epage=1192&rft.pages=1174-1192&rft.issn=0965-4313&rft.eissn=1469-5944&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09654313.2020.1828291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2529619559%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2529619559&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |