Binding and differentiation in multisensory object perception
Cognitive scientists have long known that the modalities interact during perceptual processing. Cross-modal illusions like the ventriloquism effect show that the course of processing in one modality can alter the course of processing in another. But how do the modalities interact in the specific dom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Synthese (Dordrecht) 2021-05, Vol.198 (5), p.4457-4491 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4491 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 4457 |
container_title | Synthese (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 198 |
creator | Green, E. J. |
description | Cognitive scientists have long known that the modalities interact during perceptual processing. Cross-modal illusions like the ventriloquism effect show that the course of processing in one modality can alter the course of processing in another. But how do the modalities interact in the specific domain of object perception? This paper distinguishes and analyzes two kinds of multisensory interaction in object perception. First, the modalities may bind features to a single object or event. Second, the modalities may cooperate when differentiating an object or event from its surroundings. I critically evaluate evidence for various forms of multisensory binding. I then consider the case for multisensory differentiation. I argue that existing evidence for multisensory differentiation is inconclusive. I highlight ways that the issue might be empirically resolved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11229-019-02351-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2529597591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2529597591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-1981b42f1493ec941e60cbe9d88f4c0cbb3bbc4479732346196648904a8040423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoWFf_gKeC5-hMkibNwYMufsGCFz2HNk2XlN20Ju1h_71dK3jzMMwcnvcdeAi5RrhFAHWXEBnTFHAexgukeEIyLBSnoKU4JRkA11SVhTonFyl1AIhSQEbuH31ofNjmVWjyxretiy6Mvhp9H3If8v20G31yIfXxkPd15-yYDy5aNxyJS3LWVrvkrn73inw-P32sX-nm_eVt_bChlks-UtQl1oK1KDR3Vgt0EmztdFOWrbDzWfO6tkIorTjjQqKWUpQaRFWCAMH4itwsvUPsvyaXRtP1UwzzS8MKpgutCo0zxRbKxj6l6FozRL-v4sEgmKMms2gysybzo8kcQ3wJpRkOWxf_qv9JfQNOpWln</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2529597591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Binding and differentiation in multisensory object perception</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Green, E. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Green, E. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive scientists have long known that the modalities interact during perceptual processing. Cross-modal illusions like the ventriloquism effect show that the course of processing in one modality can alter the course of processing in another. But how do the modalities interact in the specific domain of object perception? This paper distinguishes and analyzes two kinds of multisensory interaction in object perception. First, the modalities may bind features to a single object or event. Second, the modalities may cooperate when differentiating an object or event from its surroundings. I critically evaluate evidence for various forms of multisensory binding. I then consider the case for multisensory differentiation. I argue that existing evidence for multisensory differentiation is inconclusive. I highlight ways that the issue might be empirically resolved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02351-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Binding ; Education ; Epistemology ; Evidence ; Logic ; Memory ; Metaphysics ; Perceptions ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science ; Structure of Perceptual Objects</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2021-05, Vol.198 (5), p.4457-4491</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-1981b42f1493ec941e60cbe9d88f4c0cbb3bbc4479732346196648904a8040423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-1981b42f1493ec941e60cbe9d88f4c0cbb3bbc4479732346196648904a8040423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-019-02351-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-019-02351-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Green, E. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Binding and differentiation in multisensory object perception</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>Cognitive scientists have long known that the modalities interact during perceptual processing. Cross-modal illusions like the ventriloquism effect show that the course of processing in one modality can alter the course of processing in another. But how do the modalities interact in the specific domain of object perception? This paper distinguishes and analyzes two kinds of multisensory interaction in object perception. First, the modalities may bind features to a single object or event. Second, the modalities may cooperate when differentiating an object or event from its surroundings. I critically evaluate evidence for various forms of multisensory binding. I then consider the case for multisensory differentiation. I argue that existing evidence for multisensory differentiation is inconclusive. I highlight ways that the issue might be empirically resolved.</description><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Structure of Perceptual Objects</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoWFf_gKeC5-hMkibNwYMufsGCFz2HNk2XlN20Ju1h_71dK3jzMMwcnvcdeAi5RrhFAHWXEBnTFHAexgukeEIyLBSnoKU4JRkA11SVhTonFyl1AIhSQEbuH31ofNjmVWjyxretiy6Mvhp9H3If8v20G31yIfXxkPd15-yYDy5aNxyJS3LWVrvkrn73inw-P32sX-nm_eVt_bChlks-UtQl1oK1KDR3Vgt0EmztdFOWrbDzWfO6tkIorTjjQqKWUpQaRFWCAMH4itwsvUPsvyaXRtP1UwzzS8MKpgutCo0zxRbKxj6l6FozRL-v4sEgmKMms2gysybzo8kcQ3wJpRkOWxf_qv9JfQNOpWln</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Green, E. J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Binding and differentiation in multisensory object perception</title><author>Green, E. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-1981b42f1493ec941e60cbe9d88f4c0cbb3bbc4479732346196648904a8040423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Structure of Perceptual Objects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Green, E. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Green, E. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Binding and differentiation in multisensory object perception</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>4457</spage><epage>4491</epage><pages>4457-4491</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>Cognitive scientists have long known that the modalities interact during perceptual processing. Cross-modal illusions like the ventriloquism effect show that the course of processing in one modality can alter the course of processing in another. But how do the modalities interact in the specific domain of object perception? This paper distinguishes and analyzes two kinds of multisensory interaction in object perception. First, the modalities may bind features to a single object or event. Second, the modalities may cooperate when differentiating an object or event from its surroundings. I critically evaluate evidence for various forms of multisensory binding. I then consider the case for multisensory differentiation. I argue that existing evidence for multisensory differentiation is inconclusive. I highlight ways that the issue might be empirically resolved.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-019-02351-1</doi><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-7857 |
ispartof | Synthese (Dordrecht), 2021-05, Vol.198 (5), p.4457-4491 |
issn | 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2529597591 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Binding Education Epistemology Evidence Logic Memory Metaphysics Perceptions Philosophy Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Science Structure of Perceptual Objects |
title | Binding and differentiation in multisensory object perception |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T04%3A02%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Binding%20and%20differentiation%20in%20multisensory%20object%20perception&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Green,%20E.%20J.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=4457&rft.epage=4491&rft.pages=4457-4491&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-019-02351-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2529597591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2529597591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |