L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition
Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Formation, emploi emploi, 2020-07 (151), p.7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | fre |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 151 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | Formation, emploi |
container_volume | |
creator | Rivière, Joachim Benet Moreau, Gilles |
description | Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard, 1989, p. 193); moreover, it is much more so than education and vocational training, on which a renewal of research can be observed (Tanguy, 2000; Bodé, 2005; Marchand, 2005). In 2019, agricultural education trained nearly 130,000 pupils, more than 35,000 students and as many apprentices. The hegemony of training establishments under associative status providing work-study education, with rural family education and guidance centers numbering 367, is one of the original features of agricultural education. There are also 211 private agricultural high schools and 216 public agricultural high schools. Agricultural education also includes 18 agronomic, veterinary and landscaping higher education establishments, most of them public. Most of these establishments are affiliated with national federations: the Federation for the Promotion of Public Agricultural Education (APREFA), the National Union of Rural Family Education and Guidance Centers (UNMFREO), the National Council for Private Agricultural Education (CNEAP), the National Rural Union for Education and Promotion (UNREP) and the Federation of Agricultural Engineering Colleges (FESIA). These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status1 . They have developed apprenticeship courses that have experienced strong growth in rec |
doi_str_mv | 10.4000/formationemploi.8382 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2528884795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528884795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25288847953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjb0OgjAURhujiUR5A4cmDi6CF8pPmY3GwdGdNORCSqAXW3guH8IXExMfwOkbzjn5GNtFECYAcKrJ9mrUZLAfOtKhFDJeMC-OIA-gSLIl8yBPiyATCayZ71w7VyAiIQvwWH4_oHGomzlHM3LVWF1Rh0c-GeQ9OfV-PSfkaLjFivqBnP6ebdmqVp1D_7cbtr9eHudbMFiafTeWLU3WzKiM01hKmeRFKv6zPuhqQZo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528884795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><source>Cairn.info Free Access Journals-Revues en accès libre</source><creator>Rivière, Joachim Benet ; Moreau, Gilles</creator><creatorcontrib>Rivière, Joachim Benet ; Moreau, Gilles</creatorcontrib><description>Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard, 1989, p. 193); moreover, it is much more so than education and vocational training, on which a renewal of research can be observed (Tanguy, 2000; Bodé, 2005; Marchand, 2005). In 2019, agricultural education trained nearly 130,000 pupils, more than 35,000 students and as many apprentices. The hegemony of training establishments under associative status providing work-study education, with rural family education and guidance centers numbering 367, is one of the original features of agricultural education. There are also 211 private agricultural high schools and 216 public agricultural high schools. Agricultural education also includes 18 agronomic, veterinary and landscaping higher education establishments, most of them public. Most of these establishments are affiliated with national federations: the Federation for the Promotion of Public Agricultural Education (APREFA), the National Union of Rural Family Education and Guidance Centers (UNMFREO), the National Council for Private Agricultural Education (CNEAP), the National Rural Union for Education and Promotion (UNREP) and the Federation of Agricultural Engineering Colleges (FESIA). These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status1 . They have developed apprenticeship courses that have experienced strong growth in recent decades. Its numbers, compared to the general school population, certainly appear marginal, but agricultural education nevertheless constitutes an original place for observing the dynamics specific to the agricultural and rural worlds. Indeed, it is not its simple “receptacle”, but attempts, through the curricula and teaching content that are specific to it, to “play” on social reality. This is what this dossier seeks to show, by studying the confrontation of agricultural education with three social issues: equality between the sexes, the professional dynamics of agriculture and the school question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0759-6340</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2107-0946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/formationemploi.8382</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>Paris: CAIRN</publisher><subject>Agrarian structures ; Agricultural education ; Agricultural research ; Agricultural technology ; Apprenticeship ; Educational systems ; Engineering ; Equality ; Federations ; Hegemony ; Higher education ; Marriage and family education ; Private schools ; Public schools ; Rural schools ; Secondary schools ; Social dynamics ; Social reality ; Social science education ; Students ; Teaching ; Training ; Vocational education</subject><ispartof>Formation, emploi, 2020-07 (151), p.7</ispartof><rights>Copyright CAIRN Jul 2020</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rivière, Joachim Benet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau, Gilles</creatorcontrib><title>L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition</title><title>Formation, emploi</title><description>Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard, 1989, p. 193); moreover, it is much more so than education and vocational training, on which a renewal of research can be observed (Tanguy, 2000; Bodé, 2005; Marchand, 2005). In 2019, agricultural education trained nearly 130,000 pupils, more than 35,000 students and as many apprentices. The hegemony of training establishments under associative status providing work-study education, with rural family education and guidance centers numbering 367, is one of the original features of agricultural education. There are also 211 private agricultural high schools and 216 public agricultural high schools. Agricultural education also includes 18 agronomic, veterinary and landscaping higher education establishments, most of them public. Most of these establishments are affiliated with national federations: the Federation for the Promotion of Public Agricultural Education (APREFA), the National Union of Rural Family Education and Guidance Centers (UNMFREO), the National Council for Private Agricultural Education (CNEAP), the National Rural Union for Education and Promotion (UNREP) and the Federation of Agricultural Engineering Colleges (FESIA). These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status1 . They have developed apprenticeship courses that have experienced strong growth in recent decades. Its numbers, compared to the general school population, certainly appear marginal, but agricultural education nevertheless constitutes an original place for observing the dynamics specific to the agricultural and rural worlds. Indeed, it is not its simple “receptacle”, but attempts, through the curricula and teaching content that are specific to it, to “play” on social reality. This is what this dossier seeks to show, by studying the confrontation of agricultural education with three social issues: equality between the sexes, the professional dynamics of agriculture and the school question.</description><subject>Agrarian structures</subject><subject>Agricultural education</subject><subject>Agricultural research</subject><subject>Agricultural technology</subject><subject>Apprenticeship</subject><subject>Educational systems</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Federations</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Marriage and family education</subject><subject>Private schools</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>Rural schools</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Social dynamics</subject><subject>Social reality</subject><subject>Social science education</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Vocational education</subject><issn>0759-6340</issn><issn>2107-0946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjb0OgjAURhujiUR5A4cmDi6CF8pPmY3GwdGdNORCSqAXW3guH8IXExMfwOkbzjn5GNtFECYAcKrJ9mrUZLAfOtKhFDJeMC-OIA-gSLIl8yBPiyATCayZ71w7VyAiIQvwWH4_oHGomzlHM3LVWF1Rh0c-GeQ9OfV-PSfkaLjFivqBnP6ebdmqVp1D_7cbtr9eHudbMFiafTeWLU3WzKiM01hKmeRFKv6zPuhqQZo</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Rivière, Joachim Benet</creator><creator>Moreau, Gilles</creator><general>CAIRN</general><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition</title><author>Rivière, Joachim Benet ; Moreau, Gilles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25288847953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agrarian structures</topic><topic>Agricultural education</topic><topic>Agricultural research</topic><topic>Agricultural technology</topic><topic>Apprenticeship</topic><topic>Educational systems</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Federations</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Marriage and family education</topic><topic>Private schools</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>Rural schools</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Social dynamics</topic><topic>Social reality</topic><topic>Social science education</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Vocational education</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rivière, Joachim Benet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau, Gilles</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Formation, emploi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rivière, Joachim Benet</au><au>Moreau, Gilles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition</atitle><jtitle>Formation, emploi</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issue>151</issue><spage>7</spage><pages>7-</pages><issn>0759-6340</issn><eissn>2107-0946</eissn><abstract>Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard, 1989, p. 193); moreover, it is much more so than education and vocational training, on which a renewal of research can be observed (Tanguy, 2000; Bodé, 2005; Marchand, 2005). In 2019, agricultural education trained nearly 130,000 pupils, more than 35,000 students and as many apprentices. The hegemony of training establishments under associative status providing work-study education, with rural family education and guidance centers numbering 367, is one of the original features of agricultural education. There are also 211 private agricultural high schools and 216 public agricultural high schools. Agricultural education also includes 18 agronomic, veterinary and landscaping higher education establishments, most of them public. Most of these establishments are affiliated with national federations: the Federation for the Promotion of Public Agricultural Education (APREFA), the National Union of Rural Family Education and Guidance Centers (UNMFREO), the National Council for Private Agricultural Education (CNEAP), the National Rural Union for Education and Promotion (UNREP) and the Federation of Agricultural Engineering Colleges (FESIA). These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status1 . They have developed apprenticeship courses that have experienced strong growth in recent decades. Its numbers, compared to the general school population, certainly appear marginal, but agricultural education nevertheless constitutes an original place for observing the dynamics specific to the agricultural and rural worlds. Indeed, it is not its simple “receptacle”, but attempts, through the curricula and teaching content that are specific to it, to “play” on social reality. This is what this dossier seeks to show, by studying the confrontation of agricultural education with three social issues: equality between the sexes, the professional dynamics of agriculture and the school question.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>CAIRN</pub><doi>10.4000/formationemploi.8382</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0759-6340 |
ispartof | Formation, emploi, 2020-07 (151), p.7 |
issn | 0759-6340 2107-0946 |
language | fre |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2528884795 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts; OpenEdition Journals; Cairn.info Free Access Journals-Revues en accès libre |
subjects | Agrarian structures Agricultural education Agricultural research Agricultural technology Apprenticeship Educational systems Engineering Equality Federations Hegemony Higher education Marriage and family education Private schools Public schools Rural schools Secondary schools Social dynamics Social reality Social science education Students Teaching Training Vocational education |
title | L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A03%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=L'enseignement%20agricole,%20une%20mosa%C3%AFque%20en%20recomposition&rft.jtitle=Formation,%20emploi&rft.au=Rivi%C3%A8re,%20Joachim%20Benet&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.issue=151&rft.spage=7&rft.pages=7-&rft.issn=0759-6340&rft.eissn=2107-0946&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/formationemploi.8382&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2528884795%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528884795&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |