L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition

Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Formation, emploi emploi, 2020-07 (151), p.7
Hauptverfasser: Rivière, Joachim Benet, Moreau, Gilles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 151
container_start_page 7
container_title Formation, emploi
container_volume
creator Rivière, Joachim Benet
Moreau, Gilles
description Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard, 1989, p. 193); moreover, it is much more so than education and vocational training, on which a renewal of research can be observed (Tanguy, 2000; Bodé, 2005; Marchand, 2005). In 2019, agricultural education trained nearly 130,000 pupils, more than 35,000 students and as many apprentices. The hegemony of training establishments under associative status providing work-study education, with rural family education and guidance centers numbering 367, is one of the original features of agricultural education. There are also 211 private agricultural high schools and 216 public agricultural high schools. Agricultural education also includes 18 agronomic, veterinary and landscaping higher education establishments, most of them public. Most of these establishments are affiliated with national federations: the Federation for the Promotion of Public Agricultural Education (APREFA), the National Union of Rural Family Education and Guidance Centers (UNMFREO), the National Council for Private Agricultural Education (CNEAP), the National Rural Union for Education and Promotion (UNREP) and the Federation of Agricultural Engineering Colleges (FESIA). These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status1 . They have developed apprenticeship courses that have experienced strong growth in rec
doi_str_mv 10.4000/formationemploi.8382
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2528884795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528884795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25288847953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjb0OgjAURhujiUR5A4cmDi6CF8pPmY3GwdGdNORCSqAXW3guH8IXExMfwOkbzjn5GNtFECYAcKrJ9mrUZLAfOtKhFDJeMC-OIA-gSLIl8yBPiyATCayZ71w7VyAiIQvwWH4_oHGomzlHM3LVWF1Rh0c-GeQ9OfV-PSfkaLjFivqBnP6ebdmqVp1D_7cbtr9eHudbMFiafTeWLU3WzKiM01hKmeRFKv6zPuhqQZo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528884795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>OpenEdition Journals</source><source>Cairn.info Free Access Journals-Revues en accès libre</source><creator>Rivière, Joachim Benet ; Moreau, Gilles</creator><creatorcontrib>Rivière, Joachim Benet ; Moreau, Gilles</creatorcontrib><description>Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard, 1989, p. 193); moreover, it is much more so than education and vocational training, on which a renewal of research can be observed (Tanguy, 2000; Bodé, 2005; Marchand, 2005). In 2019, agricultural education trained nearly 130,000 pupils, more than 35,000 students and as many apprentices. The hegemony of training establishments under associative status providing work-study education, with rural family education and guidance centers numbering 367, is one of the original features of agricultural education. There are also 211 private agricultural high schools and 216 public agricultural high schools. Agricultural education also includes 18 agronomic, veterinary and landscaping higher education establishments, most of them public. Most of these establishments are affiliated with national federations: the Federation for the Promotion of Public Agricultural Education (APREFA), the National Union of Rural Family Education and Guidance Centers (UNMFREO), the National Council for Private Agricultural Education (CNEAP), the National Rural Union for Education and Promotion (UNREP) and the Federation of Agricultural Engineering Colleges (FESIA). These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status1 . They have developed apprenticeship courses that have experienced strong growth in recent decades. Its numbers, compared to the general school population, certainly appear marginal, but agricultural education nevertheless constitutes an original place for observing the dynamics specific to the agricultural and rural worlds. Indeed, it is not its simple “receptacle”, but attempts, through the curricula and teaching content that are specific to it, to “play” on social reality. This is what this dossier seeks to show, by studying the confrontation of agricultural education with three social issues: equality between the sexes, the professional dynamics of agriculture and the school question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0759-6340</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2107-0946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/formationemploi.8382</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>Paris: CAIRN</publisher><subject>Agrarian structures ; Agricultural education ; Agricultural research ; Agricultural technology ; Apprenticeship ; Educational systems ; Engineering ; Equality ; Federations ; Hegemony ; Higher education ; Marriage and family education ; Private schools ; Public schools ; Rural schools ; Secondary schools ; Social dynamics ; Social reality ; Social science education ; Students ; Teaching ; Training ; Vocational education</subject><ispartof>Formation, emploi, 2020-07 (151), p.7</ispartof><rights>Copyright CAIRN Jul 2020</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rivière, Joachim Benet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau, Gilles</creatorcontrib><title>L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition</title><title>Formation, emploi</title><description>Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard, 1989, p. 193); moreover, it is much more so than education and vocational training, on which a renewal of research can be observed (Tanguy, 2000; Bodé, 2005; Marchand, 2005). In 2019, agricultural education trained nearly 130,000 pupils, more than 35,000 students and as many apprentices. The hegemony of training establishments under associative status providing work-study education, with rural family education and guidance centers numbering 367, is one of the original features of agricultural education. There are also 211 private agricultural high schools and 216 public agricultural high schools. Agricultural education also includes 18 agronomic, veterinary and landscaping higher education establishments, most of them public. Most of these establishments are affiliated with national federations: the Federation for the Promotion of Public Agricultural Education (APREFA), the National Union of Rural Family Education and Guidance Centers (UNMFREO), the National Council for Private Agricultural Education (CNEAP), the National Rural Union for Education and Promotion (UNREP) and the Federation of Agricultural Engineering Colleges (FESIA). These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status1 . They have developed apprenticeship courses that have experienced strong growth in recent decades. Its numbers, compared to the general school population, certainly appear marginal, but agricultural education nevertheless constitutes an original place for observing the dynamics specific to the agricultural and rural worlds. Indeed, it is not its simple “receptacle”, but attempts, through the curricula and teaching content that are specific to it, to “play” on social reality. This is what this dossier seeks to show, by studying the confrontation of agricultural education with three social issues: equality between the sexes, the professional dynamics of agriculture and the school question.</description><subject>Agrarian structures</subject><subject>Agricultural education</subject><subject>Agricultural research</subject><subject>Agricultural technology</subject><subject>Apprenticeship</subject><subject>Educational systems</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Federations</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Marriage and family education</subject><subject>Private schools</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>Rural schools</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Social dynamics</subject><subject>Social reality</subject><subject>Social science education</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Vocational education</subject><issn>0759-6340</issn><issn>2107-0946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjb0OgjAURhujiUR5A4cmDi6CF8pPmY3GwdGdNORCSqAXW3guH8IXExMfwOkbzjn5GNtFECYAcKrJ9mrUZLAfOtKhFDJeMC-OIA-gSLIl8yBPiyATCayZ71w7VyAiIQvwWH4_oHGomzlHM3LVWF1Rh0c-GeQ9OfV-PSfkaLjFivqBnP6ebdmqVp1D_7cbtr9eHudbMFiafTeWLU3WzKiM01hKmeRFKv6zPuhqQZo</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Rivière, Joachim Benet</creator><creator>Moreau, Gilles</creator><general>CAIRN</general><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition</title><author>Rivière, Joachim Benet ; Moreau, Gilles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25288847953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agrarian structures</topic><topic>Agricultural education</topic><topic>Agricultural research</topic><topic>Agricultural technology</topic><topic>Apprenticeship</topic><topic>Educational systems</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Federations</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Marriage and family education</topic><topic>Private schools</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>Rural schools</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Social dynamics</topic><topic>Social reality</topic><topic>Social science education</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Vocational education</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rivière, Joachim Benet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreau, Gilles</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Formation, emploi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rivière, Joachim Benet</au><au>Moreau, Gilles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition</atitle><jtitle>Formation, emploi</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issue>151</issue><spage>7</spage><pages>7-</pages><issn>0759-6340</issn><eissn>2107-0946</eissn><abstract>Research on agricultural education, an integral part of the French school system, constitutes a blind spot in social science work in the field of education. To use Pierre Gaspard's expression about technical education, we can also qualify agricultural education as a “ deserted site ” (Gaspard, 1989, p. 193); moreover, it is much more so than education and vocational training, on which a renewal of research can be observed (Tanguy, 2000; Bodé, 2005; Marchand, 2005). In 2019, agricultural education trained nearly 130,000 pupils, more than 35,000 students and as many apprentices. The hegemony of training establishments under associative status providing work-study education, with rural family education and guidance centers numbering 367, is one of the original features of agricultural education. There are also 211 private agricultural high schools and 216 public agricultural high schools. Agricultural education also includes 18 agronomic, veterinary and landscaping higher education establishments, most of them public. Most of these establishments are affiliated with national federations: the Federation for the Promotion of Public Agricultural Education (APREFA), the National Union of Rural Family Education and Guidance Centers (UNMFREO), the National Council for Private Agricultural Education (CNEAP), the National Rural Union for Education and Promotion (UNREP) and the Federation of Agricultural Engineering Colleges (FESIA). These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status These different “families” of agricultural education welcome pupils from the fourth class and apprentices in CAP (certificate of professional aptitude) and train their public up to the engineering diploma and the doctorate; however, they mainly provide level 3 and 4 training on a work-study basis and under school status1 . They have developed apprenticeship courses that have experienced strong growth in recent decades. Its numbers, compared to the general school population, certainly appear marginal, but agricultural education nevertheless constitutes an original place for observing the dynamics specific to the agricultural and rural worlds. Indeed, it is not its simple “receptacle”, but attempts, through the curricula and teaching content that are specific to it, to “play” on social reality. This is what this dossier seeks to show, by studying the confrontation of agricultural education with three social issues: equality between the sexes, the professional dynamics of agriculture and the school question.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>CAIRN</pub><doi>10.4000/formationemploi.8382</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0759-6340
ispartof Formation, emploi, 2020-07 (151), p.7
issn 0759-6340
2107-0946
language fre
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2528884795
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts; OpenEdition Journals; Cairn.info Free Access Journals-Revues en accès libre
subjects Agrarian structures
Agricultural education
Agricultural research
Agricultural technology
Apprenticeship
Educational systems
Engineering
Equality
Federations
Hegemony
Higher education
Marriage and family education
Private schools
Public schools
Rural schools
Secondary schools
Social dynamics
Social reality
Social science education
Students
Teaching
Training
Vocational education
title L'enseignement agricole, une mosaïque en recomposition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A03%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=L'enseignement%20agricole,%20une%20mosa%C3%AFque%20en%20recomposition&rft.jtitle=Formation,%20emploi&rft.au=Rivi%C3%A8re,%20Joachim%20Benet&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.issue=151&rft.spage=7&rft.pages=7-&rft.issn=0759-6340&rft.eissn=2107-0946&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/formationemploi.8382&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2528884795%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528884795&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true