Electronic records management – a state of the art review
Purpose This paper aims to examine the state of the art in electronic records management (ERM) with the goal of identifying the prevailing research topics, gaps and issues in the field. Design/methodology/approach First, a wide search was performed on academic research databases, limited to the peri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Records management journal (London, England) England), 2021-05, Vol.31 (1), p.74-88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 88 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 74 |
container_title | Records management journal (London, England) |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Oladejo, Babatunde Hadžidedić, Sunčica |
description | Purpose
This paper aims to examine the state of the art in electronic records management (ERM) with the goal of identifying the prevailing research topics, gaps and issues in the field.
Design/methodology/approach
First, a wide search was performed on academic research databases, limited to the period between 2008–2018. Second, the search results were reviewed for relevance and duplicates. Finally, the study sources were checked against the list of journals and conferences ranked by computing research and education and JourQual. The final sample of 55 selected studies was analyzed in depth.
Findings
ERM has lost some research momentum due to being deeply embedded in affiliate information systems areas and the changing records management landscape. Additionally, the requirement models specified by Governmental/National Archives might have constrained technology innovation in ERM. A lack of application was identified for the social media research area.
Research limitations/implications
Limitations were encountered in available search tool functionality and keyword confusion leading to inflated search results. While effort has been made to obtain optimal search results, some relevant articles may have been omitted.
Originality/value
The last ERM state-of-the-art review was in 1997. A lot has changed since then. This paper will help researchers understand the current state of ERM research, its understudied areas and identify gaps for future studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0059 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2528729017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528729017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-5f00096861c3cc95fb1fadf18e7986450567fbab896a77e2a681029ee315b7c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1KQzEQRoMoWKt7lwHXsZN7mz9cSalVqQii65CbTrSlvbcmqeLOd_ANfRJT6kZwNZvzzTdzCDnlcM456MHD3S0DwyrghgEIs0d6XAnNlNRmn_TACMmENPqQHKW0AIDKDIc9cjFeos-xa-eeRvRdnCW6cq17xhW2mX5_flFHU3YZaRdofkHqYi7k2xzfj8lBcMuEJ7-zT56uxo-jaza9n9yMLqfM16LOTITSZqSW3NfeGxEaHtwscI3KaDkUIKQKjWu0kU4prJzUvFyHWHPRKG_qPjnb7V3H7nWDKdtFt4ltqbSVqLSqDHBVKNhRPnYpRQx2HecrFz8sB7tVZIsiC8ZuFdmtohIZ7CLl2eiWs_8Sf6TWP8RJZsY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528729017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic records management – a state of the art review</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Oladejo, Babatunde ; Hadžidedić, Sunčica</creator><creatorcontrib>Oladejo, Babatunde ; Hadžidedić, Sunčica</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
This paper aims to examine the state of the art in electronic records management (ERM) with the goal of identifying the prevailing research topics, gaps and issues in the field.
Design/methodology/approach
First, a wide search was performed on academic research databases, limited to the period between 2008–2018. Second, the search results were reviewed for relevance and duplicates. Finally, the study sources were checked against the list of journals and conferences ranked by computing research and education and JourQual. The final sample of 55 selected studies was analyzed in depth.
Findings
ERM has lost some research momentum due to being deeply embedded in affiliate information systems areas and the changing records management landscape. Additionally, the requirement models specified by Governmental/National Archives might have constrained technology innovation in ERM. A lack of application was identified for the social media research area.
Research limitations/implications
Limitations were encountered in available search tool functionality and keyword confusion leading to inflated search results. While effort has been made to obtain optimal search results, some relevant articles may have been omitted.
Originality/value
The last ERM state-of-the-art review was in 1997. A lot has changed since then. This paper will help researchers understand the current state of ERM research, its understudied areas and identify gaps for future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-5698</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7689</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Access control ; Archivists ; Case studies ; Collaboration ; Digital archives ; Digital curation ; Electronic records ; Enterprise content management ; Forensic sciences ; Government archives ; Information management ; Knowledge management ; Literature reviews ; Professional relationships ; Records management</subject><ispartof>Records management journal (London, England), 2021-05, Vol.31 (1), p.74-88</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-5f00096861c3cc95fb1fadf18e7986450567fbab896a77e2a681029ee315b7c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-5f00096861c3cc95fb1fadf18e7986450567fbab896a77e2a681029ee315b7c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0059/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,964,11622,27911,27912,52676</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oladejo, Babatunde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadžidedić, Sunčica</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic records management – a state of the art review</title><title>Records management journal (London, England)</title><description>Purpose
This paper aims to examine the state of the art in electronic records management (ERM) with the goal of identifying the prevailing research topics, gaps and issues in the field.
Design/methodology/approach
First, a wide search was performed on academic research databases, limited to the period between 2008–2018. Second, the search results were reviewed for relevance and duplicates. Finally, the study sources were checked against the list of journals and conferences ranked by computing research and education and JourQual. The final sample of 55 selected studies was analyzed in depth.
Findings
ERM has lost some research momentum due to being deeply embedded in affiliate information systems areas and the changing records management landscape. Additionally, the requirement models specified by Governmental/National Archives might have constrained technology innovation in ERM. A lack of application was identified for the social media research area.
Research limitations/implications
Limitations were encountered in available search tool functionality and keyword confusion leading to inflated search results. While effort has been made to obtain optimal search results, some relevant articles may have been omitted.
Originality/value
The last ERM state-of-the-art review was in 1997. A lot has changed since then. This paper will help researchers understand the current state of ERM research, its understudied areas and identify gaps for future studies.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Archivists</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Digital archives</subject><subject>Digital curation</subject><subject>Electronic records</subject><subject>Enterprise content management</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Government archives</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Professional relationships</subject><subject>Records management</subject><issn>0956-5698</issn><issn>1758-7689</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1KQzEQRoMoWKt7lwHXsZN7mz9cSalVqQii65CbTrSlvbcmqeLOd_ANfRJT6kZwNZvzzTdzCDnlcM456MHD3S0DwyrghgEIs0d6XAnNlNRmn_TACMmENPqQHKW0AIDKDIc9cjFeos-xa-eeRvRdnCW6cq17xhW2mX5_flFHU3YZaRdofkHqYi7k2xzfj8lBcMuEJ7-zT56uxo-jaza9n9yMLqfM16LOTITSZqSW3NfeGxEaHtwscI3KaDkUIKQKjWu0kU4prJzUvFyHWHPRKG_qPjnb7V3H7nWDKdtFt4ltqbSVqLSqDHBVKNhRPnYpRQx2HecrFz8sB7tVZIsiC8ZuFdmtohIZ7CLl2eiWs_8Sf6TWP8RJZsY</recordid><startdate>20210520</startdate><enddate>20210520</enddate><creator>Oladejo, Babatunde</creator><creator>Hadžidedić, Sunčica</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210520</creationdate><title>Electronic records management – a state of the art review</title><author>Oladejo, Babatunde ; Hadžidedić, Sunčica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-5f00096861c3cc95fb1fadf18e7986450567fbab896a77e2a681029ee315b7c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Archivists</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Digital archives</topic><topic>Digital curation</topic><topic>Electronic records</topic><topic>Enterprise content management</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Government archives</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Professional relationships</topic><topic>Records management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oladejo, Babatunde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadžidedić, Sunčica</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Records management journal (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oladejo, Babatunde</au><au>Hadžidedić, Sunčica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electronic records management – a state of the art review</atitle><jtitle>Records management journal (London, England)</jtitle><date>2021-05-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>74</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>74-88</pages><issn>0956-5698</issn><eissn>1758-7689</eissn><abstract>Purpose
This paper aims to examine the state of the art in electronic records management (ERM) with the goal of identifying the prevailing research topics, gaps and issues in the field.
Design/methodology/approach
First, a wide search was performed on academic research databases, limited to the period between 2008–2018. Second, the search results were reviewed for relevance and duplicates. Finally, the study sources were checked against the list of journals and conferences ranked by computing research and education and JourQual. The final sample of 55 selected studies was analyzed in depth.
Findings
ERM has lost some research momentum due to being deeply embedded in affiliate information systems areas and the changing records management landscape. Additionally, the requirement models specified by Governmental/National Archives might have constrained technology innovation in ERM. A lack of application was identified for the social media research area.
Research limitations/implications
Limitations were encountered in available search tool functionality and keyword confusion leading to inflated search results. While effort has been made to obtain optimal search results, some relevant articles may have been omitted.
Originality/value
The last ERM state-of-the-art review was in 1997. A lot has changed since then. This paper will help researchers understand the current state of ERM research, its understudied areas and identify gaps for future studies.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0059</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-5698 |
ispartof | Records management journal (London, England), 2021-05, Vol.31 (1), p.74-88 |
issn | 0956-5698 1758-7689 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2528729017 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Academic disciplines Access control Archivists Case studies Collaboration Digital archives Digital curation Electronic records Enterprise content management Forensic sciences Government archives Information management Knowledge management Literature reviews Professional relationships Records management |
title | Electronic records management – a state of the art review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T10%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20records%20management%20%E2%80%93%20a%20state%20of%20the%20art%20review&rft.jtitle=Records%20management%20journal%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Oladejo,%20Babatunde&rft.date=2021-05-20&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=74&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=74-88&rft.issn=0956-5698&rft.eissn=1758-7689&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2528729017%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528729017&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |