The Effectiveness of Pump Techniques and Pompages: A Systematic Review
Featured Application Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques; however, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions. Background: Osteopathic manual procedures called pump techniques include thoracic, abdominal, an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied sciences 2021-05, Vol.11 (9), p.4150, Article 4150 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 4150 |
| container_title | Applied sciences |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Vanti, Carla Golfari, Matteo Pellegrini, Giacomo Panizzolo, Alice Turone, Luca Giagio, Silvia Pillastrini, Paolo |
| description | Featured Application
Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques; however, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions.
Background: Osteopathic manual procedures called pump techniques include thoracic, abdominal, and pedal pumps. Similar techniques, called pompages, are also addressed to joints and muscles. Despite their widespread use, no systematic review has been published on their effectiveness. (2) Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, ISI Web of Science, PEDro, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched until July 2020. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on adults were included. Subjective (e.g., pain, physical function) and objective (e.g., pulmonary function, blood collection) outcomes were considered. The Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) and the GRADE instrument were used to evaluate the quality of evidence. (3) Results: 25 RCTs were included: 20 concerning the pump techniques and five concerning pompages. Due to the extensive heterogeneity of such studies, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis. The risk of bias resulted from moderate to high and the quality of the evidence was from very low to high. Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques on pain and length of hospitalization. Pompage seems also to help improve walking distance and balance. (4) Conclusions: Although several studies have been published on manual pump techniques, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions of their effectiveness. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/app11094150 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2528274311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_29da784a3fe943cbbe5d77ca7359a18b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2528274311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-898ddd090dc4c239f8c241778e35ee74dcc6182e9e324ada18dcc619605f59a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxRdRsGhPfoGAR1nNv90k3kqpWigo2ntIk4lu6W7WzbbSb29qpfZoLhOGl9-8ecmyK4JvGVP4zrQtIVhxUuCTbECxKHPGiTg9up9nwxiXOB1FmCR4kD3MPwBNvAfbVxtoIEYUPHpZ1y2ag_1oqs81RGQah15C3Zp3iPdohN62sYfa9JVFr7Cp4OsyO_NmFWH4Wy-y-cNkPn7KZ8-P0_FolltW8j6XSjrnsMLOckuZ8tLSZEtIYAWA4M7akkgKChjlxhkifzqqxIUvlGEX2XSPdcEsddtVtem2OphK_zRC965Nl1ytQFPljJDcMA-KM7tYQOGEsEawBCJykVjXe1bbhd2SvV6Gddck95oWVFLBGSFJdbNX2S7E2IE_TCVY72LXR7H_qb9gEXy0FTQWDi9S7CVXioty9wM7tvy_elz1Ke_QjMO66dk3DkqUbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528274311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effectiveness of Pump Techniques and Pompages: A Systematic Review</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Vanti, Carla ; Golfari, Matteo ; Pellegrini, Giacomo ; Panizzolo, Alice ; Turone, Luca ; Giagio, Silvia ; Pillastrini, Paolo</creator><creatorcontrib>Vanti, Carla ; Golfari, Matteo ; Pellegrini, Giacomo ; Panizzolo, Alice ; Turone, Luca ; Giagio, Silvia ; Pillastrini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><description>Featured Application
Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques; however, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions.
Background: Osteopathic manual procedures called pump techniques include thoracic, abdominal, and pedal pumps. Similar techniques, called pompages, are also addressed to joints and muscles. Despite their widespread use, no systematic review has been published on their effectiveness. (2) Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, ISI Web of Science, PEDro, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched until July 2020. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on adults were included. Subjective (e.g., pain, physical function) and objective (e.g., pulmonary function, blood collection) outcomes were considered. The Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) and the GRADE instrument were used to evaluate the quality of evidence. (3) Results: 25 RCTs were included: 20 concerning the pump techniques and five concerning pompages. Due to the extensive heterogeneity of such studies, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis. The risk of bias resulted from moderate to high and the quality of the evidence was from very low to high. Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques on pain and length of hospitalization. Pompage seems also to help improve walking distance and balance. (4) Conclusions: Although several studies have been published on manual pump techniques, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions of their effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app11094150</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BASEL: Mdpi</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Bias ; Biomedical materials ; Chemistry ; Chemistry, Multidisciplinary ; Connective tissue ; Dosage ; Engineering ; Engineering, Multidisciplinary ; Heterogeneity ; Intervention ; manipulation ; Manipulative therapy ; manual therapy ; Materials Science ; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary ; Meta-analysis ; Muscles ; Osteopathic medicine ; osteopathy ; Pain ; Physical Sciences ; physical therapy ; Physics ; Physics, Applied ; Pulmonary functions ; Questionnaires ; Respiratory function ; Risk analysis ; Science & Technology ; Systematic review ; Technology ; Thorax</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2021-05, Vol.11 (9), p.4150, Article 4150</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>1</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000649947600001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-898ddd090dc4c239f8c241778e35ee74dcc6182e9e324ada18dcc619605f59a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-898ddd090dc4c239f8c241778e35ee74dcc6182e9e324ada18dcc619605f59a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8583-9435</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,2103,2115,27929,27930,39263</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vanti, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golfari, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrini, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panizzolo, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turone, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giagio, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillastrini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><title>The Effectiveness of Pump Techniques and Pompages: A Systematic Review</title><title>Applied sciences</title><addtitle>APPL SCI-BASEL</addtitle><description>Featured Application
Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques; however, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions.
Background: Osteopathic manual procedures called pump techniques include thoracic, abdominal, and pedal pumps. Similar techniques, called pompages, are also addressed to joints and muscles. Despite their widespread use, no systematic review has been published on their effectiveness. (2) Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, ISI Web of Science, PEDro, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched until July 2020. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on adults were included. Subjective (e.g., pain, physical function) and objective (e.g., pulmonary function, blood collection) outcomes were considered. The Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) and the GRADE instrument were used to evaluate the quality of evidence. (3) Results: 25 RCTs were included: 20 concerning the pump techniques and five concerning pompages. Due to the extensive heterogeneity of such studies, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis. The risk of bias resulted from moderate to high and the quality of the evidence was from very low to high. Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques on pain and length of hospitalization. Pompage seems also to help improve walking distance and balance. (4) Conclusions: Although several studies have been published on manual pump techniques, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions of their effectiveness.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Connective tissue</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>manipulation</subject><subject>Manipulative therapy</subject><subject>manual therapy</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Osteopathic medicine</subject><subject>osteopathy</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>physical therapy</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics, Applied</subject><subject>Pulmonary functions</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Respiratory function</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxRdRsGhPfoGAR1nNv90k3kqpWigo2ntIk4lu6W7WzbbSb29qpfZoLhOGl9-8ecmyK4JvGVP4zrQtIVhxUuCTbECxKHPGiTg9up9nwxiXOB1FmCR4kD3MPwBNvAfbVxtoIEYUPHpZ1y2ag_1oqs81RGQah15C3Zp3iPdohN62sYfa9JVFr7Cp4OsyO_NmFWH4Wy-y-cNkPn7KZ8-P0_FolltW8j6XSjrnsMLOckuZ8tLSZEtIYAWA4M7akkgKChjlxhkifzqqxIUvlGEX2XSPdcEsddtVtem2OphK_zRC965Nl1ytQFPljJDcMA-KM7tYQOGEsEawBCJykVjXe1bbhd2SvV6Gddck95oWVFLBGSFJdbNX2S7E2IE_TCVY72LXR7H_qb9gEXy0FTQWDi9S7CVXioty9wM7tvy_elz1Ke_QjMO66dk3DkqUbQ</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Vanti, Carla</creator><creator>Golfari, Matteo</creator><creator>Pellegrini, Giacomo</creator><creator>Panizzolo, Alice</creator><creator>Turone, Luca</creator><creator>Giagio, Silvia</creator><creator>Pillastrini, Paolo</creator><general>Mdpi</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-9435</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>The Effectiveness of Pump Techniques and Pompages: A Systematic Review</title><author>Vanti, Carla ; Golfari, Matteo ; Pellegrini, Giacomo ; Panizzolo, Alice ; Turone, Luca ; Giagio, Silvia ; Pillastrini, Paolo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-898ddd090dc4c239f8c241778e35ee74dcc6182e9e324ada18dcc619605f59a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Connective tissue</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>manipulation</topic><topic>Manipulative therapy</topic><topic>manual therapy</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Osteopathic medicine</topic><topic>osteopathy</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>physical therapy</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics, Applied</topic><topic>Pulmonary functions</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Respiratory function</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vanti, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golfari, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrini, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panizzolo, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turone, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giagio, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillastrini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vanti, Carla</au><au>Golfari, Matteo</au><au>Pellegrini, Giacomo</au><au>Panizzolo, Alice</au><au>Turone, Luca</au><au>Giagio, Silvia</au><au>Pillastrini, Paolo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effectiveness of Pump Techniques and Pompages: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><stitle>APPL SCI-BASEL</stitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4150</spage><pages>4150-</pages><artnum>4150</artnum><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>Featured Application
Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques; however, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions.
Background: Osteopathic manual procedures called pump techniques include thoracic, abdominal, and pedal pumps. Similar techniques, called pompages, are also addressed to joints and muscles. Despite their widespread use, no systematic review has been published on their effectiveness. (2) Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, ISI Web of Science, PEDro, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched until July 2020. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on adults were included. Subjective (e.g., pain, physical function) and objective (e.g., pulmonary function, blood collection) outcomes were considered. The Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) and the GRADE instrument were used to evaluate the quality of evidence. (3) Results: 25 RCTs were included: 20 concerning the pump techniques and five concerning pompages. Due to the extensive heterogeneity of such studies, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis. The risk of bias resulted from moderate to high and the quality of the evidence was from very low to high. Singular studies suggested some effectiveness of pump techniques on pain and length of hospitalization. Pompage seems also to help improve walking distance and balance. (4) Conclusions: Although several studies have been published on manual pump techniques, the differences for population, modalities, dosage, and outcome measures do not allow definite conclusions of their effectiveness.</abstract><cop>BASEL</cop><pub>Mdpi</pub><doi>10.3390/app11094150</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-9435</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2076-3417 |
| ispartof | Applied sciences, 2021-05, Vol.11 (9), p.4150, Article 4150 |
| issn | 2076-3417 2076-3417 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2528274311 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Abdomen Bias Biomedical materials Chemistry Chemistry, Multidisciplinary Connective tissue Dosage Engineering Engineering, Multidisciplinary Heterogeneity Intervention manipulation Manipulative therapy manual therapy Materials Science Materials Science, Multidisciplinary Meta-analysis Muscles Osteopathic medicine osteopathy Pain Physical Sciences physical therapy Physics Physics, Applied Pulmonary functions Questionnaires Respiratory function Risk analysis Science & Technology Systematic review Technology Thorax |
| title | The Effectiveness of Pump Techniques and Pompages: A Systematic Review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T19%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effectiveness%20of%20Pump%20Techniques%20and%20Pompages:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Vanti,%20Carla&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4150&rft.pages=4150-&rft.artnum=4150&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app11094150&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2528274311%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528274311&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_29da784a3fe943cbbe5d77ca7359a18b&rfr_iscdi=true |