Variegated forms of embeddedness: home-grown neoliberal authoritarianism in Tunisia under Ben Ali
This article aims to analyse the impact of structural adjustment programmes, widely known as the ‘neoliberal model’, on the resilience of authoritarianism during Ben Ali’s regime in Tunisia, to uncover the possible outcomes of the embedded neoliberal and the authoritarian blending. To do this, it en...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of international relations and development 2021-06, Vol.24 (2), p.408-429 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 429 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 408 |
container_title | Journal of international relations and development |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Görmüş, Evrim Akçalı, Emel |
description | This article aims to analyse the impact of structural adjustment programmes, widely known as the ‘neoliberal model’, on the resilience of authoritarianism during Ben Ali’s regime in Tunisia, to uncover the possible outcomes of the embedded neoliberal and the authoritarian blending. To do this, it engages with two sets of broad questions. How did the Ben Ali regime continue to maintain the regime’s tight grip on power in Tunisia during a ‘neoliberal’ transformation which in theory aims at reducing state influence? What does the Tunisian example tell us about the nature of embedded neoliberalism and its links with authoritarianism in general? The article answers these questions through the analysis of the novel social policy institutions of economic restructuring that took place during the Ben Ali era, namely the National Solidarity Fund, the Tunisian Solidarity Bank and the National Employment Fund. It concludes that these new tools under ‘neoliberal’ transformation increased state intervention in both politics and the economy, and reproduced the societal dependence on the state. Such form of neoliberalism has helped to sustain authoritarianism, but at the same time led to its demise when the social contract in which selective social benefits were provided in exchange for political loyalty failed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/s41268-020-00196-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2527706529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2527706529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-f5b34d713200105dd2a38743803e3d14b7fc0bd9e98e0a88ef792abb90ab2a503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhiMEEqXwB5gsMRvOdhI7bKXiS6rEUlgtp760qRK72IkQ_x5DkNiY7h3e5-70ZNklg2sGhbyJOeOlosCBArCqpPIom7FCMcoqBccp56BomfJpdhbjPpWkADXLzJsJLW7NgJY0PvSR-IZgX6O1aB3GeEt2vke6Df7DEYe-a2sMpiNmHHY-tEPCjWtjT1pH1mNKrSGjsxjIHTqy6Nrz7KQxXcSL3znPXh_u18snunp5fF4uVnQjSjHQpqhFbiUTPP0GhbXcCCVzoUCgsCyvZbOB2lZYKQSjFDay4qauKzA1NwWIeXY17T0E_z5iHPTej8Glk5oXXEooC16lFp9am-BjDNjoQ2h7Ez41A_2tUk8qdVKpf1RqmSAxQTGV3RbD3-p_qC9e53dZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2527706529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variegated forms of embeddedness: home-grown neoliberal authoritarianism in Tunisia under Ben Ali</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Springer journals</source><creator>Görmüş, Evrim ; Akçalı, Emel</creator><creatorcontrib>Görmüş, Evrim ; Akçalı, Emel</creatorcontrib><description>This article aims to analyse the impact of structural adjustment programmes, widely known as the ‘neoliberal model’, on the resilience of authoritarianism during Ben Ali’s regime in Tunisia, to uncover the possible outcomes of the embedded neoliberal and the authoritarian blending. To do this, it engages with two sets of broad questions. How did the Ben Ali regime continue to maintain the regime’s tight grip on power in Tunisia during a ‘neoliberal’ transformation which in theory aims at reducing state influence? What does the Tunisian example tell us about the nature of embedded neoliberalism and its links with authoritarianism in general? The article answers these questions through the analysis of the novel social policy institutions of economic restructuring that took place during the Ben Ali era, namely the National Solidarity Fund, the Tunisian Solidarity Bank and the National Employment Fund. It concludes that these new tools under ‘neoliberal’ transformation increased state intervention in both politics and the economy, and reproduced the societal dependence on the state. Such form of neoliberalism has helped to sustain authoritarianism, but at the same time led to its demise when the social contract in which selective social benefits were provided in exchange for political loyalty failed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1408-6980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1581-1980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41268-020-00196-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Area Studies ; Authoritarianism ; Development Studies ; Economic restructuring ; Embeddedness ; Employment ; International Relations ; Local politics ; Loyalty ; Neoliberalism ; Original Article ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Politics ; Resilience ; Social cohesion ; Social contract ; Social policy ; State intervention ; Structural adjustment ; Transformation</subject><ispartof>Journal of international relations and development, 2021-06, Vol.24 (2), p.408-429</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-f5b34d713200105dd2a38743803e3d14b7fc0bd9e98e0a88ef792abb90ab2a503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-f5b34d713200105dd2a38743803e3d14b7fc0bd9e98e0a88ef792abb90ab2a503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41268-020-00196-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41268-020-00196-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12826,27325,27847,27905,27906,33755,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Görmüş, Evrim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçalı, Emel</creatorcontrib><title>Variegated forms of embeddedness: home-grown neoliberal authoritarianism in Tunisia under Ben Ali</title><title>Journal of international relations and development</title><addtitle>J Int Relat Dev</addtitle><description>This article aims to analyse the impact of structural adjustment programmes, widely known as the ‘neoliberal model’, on the resilience of authoritarianism during Ben Ali’s regime in Tunisia, to uncover the possible outcomes of the embedded neoliberal and the authoritarian blending. To do this, it engages with two sets of broad questions. How did the Ben Ali regime continue to maintain the regime’s tight grip on power in Tunisia during a ‘neoliberal’ transformation which in theory aims at reducing state influence? What does the Tunisian example tell us about the nature of embedded neoliberalism and its links with authoritarianism in general? The article answers these questions through the analysis of the novel social policy institutions of economic restructuring that took place during the Ben Ali era, namely the National Solidarity Fund, the Tunisian Solidarity Bank and the National Employment Fund. It concludes that these new tools under ‘neoliberal’ transformation increased state intervention in both politics and the economy, and reproduced the societal dependence on the state. Such form of neoliberalism has helped to sustain authoritarianism, but at the same time led to its demise when the social contract in which selective social benefits were provided in exchange for political loyalty failed.</description><subject>Area Studies</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Economic restructuring</subject><subject>Embeddedness</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>Local politics</subject><subject>Loyalty</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Social cohesion</subject><subject>Social contract</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>State intervention</subject><subject>Structural adjustment</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><issn>1408-6980</issn><issn>1581-1980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhiMEEqXwB5gsMRvOdhI7bKXiS6rEUlgtp760qRK72IkQ_x5DkNiY7h3e5-70ZNklg2sGhbyJOeOlosCBArCqpPIom7FCMcoqBccp56BomfJpdhbjPpWkADXLzJsJLW7NgJY0PvSR-IZgX6O1aB3GeEt2vke6Df7DEYe-a2sMpiNmHHY-tEPCjWtjT1pH1mNKrSGjsxjIHTqy6Nrz7KQxXcSL3znPXh_u18snunp5fF4uVnQjSjHQpqhFbiUTPP0GhbXcCCVzoUCgsCyvZbOB2lZYKQSjFDay4qauKzA1NwWIeXY17T0E_z5iHPTej8Glk5oXXEooC16lFp9am-BjDNjoQ2h7Ez41A_2tUk8qdVKpf1RqmSAxQTGV3RbD3-p_qC9e53dZ</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Görmüş, Evrim</creator><creator>Akçalı, Emel</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Variegated forms of embeddedness: home-grown neoliberal authoritarianism in Tunisia under Ben Ali</title><author>Görmüş, Evrim ; Akçalı, Emel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-f5b34d713200105dd2a38743803e3d14b7fc0bd9e98e0a88ef792abb90ab2a503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Area Studies</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Economic restructuring</topic><topic>Embeddedness</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>Local politics</topic><topic>Loyalty</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Social cohesion</topic><topic>Social contract</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>State intervention</topic><topic>Structural adjustment</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Görmüş, Evrim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akçalı, Emel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of international relations and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Görmüş, Evrim</au><au>Akçalı, Emel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variegated forms of embeddedness: home-grown neoliberal authoritarianism in Tunisia under Ben Ali</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international relations and development</jtitle><stitle>J Int Relat Dev</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>408-429</pages><issn>1408-6980</issn><eissn>1581-1980</eissn><abstract>This article aims to analyse the impact of structural adjustment programmes, widely known as the ‘neoliberal model’, on the resilience of authoritarianism during Ben Ali’s regime in Tunisia, to uncover the possible outcomes of the embedded neoliberal and the authoritarian blending. To do this, it engages with two sets of broad questions. How did the Ben Ali regime continue to maintain the regime’s tight grip on power in Tunisia during a ‘neoliberal’ transformation which in theory aims at reducing state influence? What does the Tunisian example tell us about the nature of embedded neoliberalism and its links with authoritarianism in general? The article answers these questions through the analysis of the novel social policy institutions of economic restructuring that took place during the Ben Ali era, namely the National Solidarity Fund, the Tunisian Solidarity Bank and the National Employment Fund. It concludes that these new tools under ‘neoliberal’ transformation increased state intervention in both politics and the economy, and reproduced the societal dependence on the state. Such form of neoliberalism has helped to sustain authoritarianism, but at the same time led to its demise when the social contract in which selective social benefits were provided in exchange for political loyalty failed.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41268-020-00196-7</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1408-6980 |
ispartof | Journal of international relations and development, 2021-06, Vol.24 (2), p.408-429 |
issn | 1408-6980 1581-1980 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2527706529 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Springer journals |
subjects | Area Studies Authoritarianism Development Studies Economic restructuring Embeddedness Employment International Relations Local politics Loyalty Neoliberalism Original Article Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Politics Resilience Social cohesion Social contract Social policy State intervention Structural adjustment Transformation |
title | Variegated forms of embeddedness: home-grown neoliberal authoritarianism in Tunisia under Ben Ali |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T13%3A46%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variegated%20forms%20of%20embeddedness:%20home-grown%20neoliberal%20authoritarianism%20in%20Tunisia%20under%20Ben%20Ali&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20relations%20and%20development&rft.au=G%C3%B6rm%C3%BC%C5%9F,%20Evrim&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=408-429&rft.issn=1408-6980&rft.eissn=1581-1980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41268-020-00196-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2527706529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2527706529&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |