Institutional Quality and Development: On the Role of Informality
It is well understood that developing countries have large informal sectors. The informal sector, however, has a theoretically ambiguous effect on development. Some view informality as one aspect that comes from lacking full development, while others see informal activity as a restraint to growth. W...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of developing areas 2021-06, Vol.55 (3), p.343-363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 363 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 343 |
container_title | The Journal of developing areas |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Callais, Justin T Jahan, Israt Pavlik, Jamie Bologna |
description | It is well understood that developing countries have large informal sectors. The informal sector, however, has a theoretically ambiguous effect on development. Some view informality as one aspect that comes from lacking full development, while others see informal activity as a restraint to growth. We argue that this ambiguity is because its impact is conditional on both the size of the locale and the existing institutional environment. Good institutions facilitate productive activity and voluntary exchange when informal networks are insufficient. Informal activity facilitates economic growth most effectively in smaller communities. We explore how the conditional effects vary across different population sizes. This diverges with the view that informality and formal activity are substitutes. We hypothesize that instead they can be complimentary in certain aspects. Using data from 5,505 Brazilian municipalities, we analyze the relationship between (formal) institutions, informality, and development. We use three separate measures for institutional quality: governance quality, de facto law provisions, and distribution of political power. In a previous study, these indicators were found to be positively associated with economic performance. Following the previous literature, we define the informal sector as those that do not contribute to the country's social security. In our baseline results, we find inconsistent results between the conditionality of institutional quality and informality. Only once we include the conditionality of population size do we find that formal institutions and informal production tend to be substitutable in areas with large populations, and complementary in small municipalities. We emphasize our differential effects, which have less potential endogeneity concerns. However, we stress that our results should not be interpreted as causal. Our results do highlight the importance of informal networks to economic development, especially in small locales. Future research may be warranted to address causality, as well as exploring the cultural aspect associated with informal networks and population size. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/jda.2021.0068 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2527614185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A662132113</galeid><sourcerecordid>A662132113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-189704e8fd05ab90f650c7b094f4f0b8bf8dbf6337ad4ed0851a11990dbe54493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoMoOK5eel8QvLLjyUfT1Lth_RpYWHZV8C6k7clshjYZm1Tcf2_qyu4ODIGEhOecvBweQl5TWFNe8ff73qwZMLoGkOoJWdFKqJKxWj0lKwDGSuD1z-fkRYz7fK25oCuy2fqYXJqTC94MxdVsBpduC-P74iP-xiEcRvTpQ3Hpi3SDxXUYsAi22HobpvEf-5I8s2aI-Or_eUZ-fP70_fxreXH5ZXu-uSg7LqksqWpqEKhsD5VpG7Cygq5uoRFWWGhVa1XfWsl5bXqBPaiKGkqbBvoWKyEafkbe3PU9TOHXjDHpfZinHDpqVrFaUkFV9UDtzIDa5ZhpMt3oYqc3UjLKGaU8U-UJaoceJzMEj9bl5yN-fYLPq8fRdScL3h4VZCbhn7Qzc4z6GHz3CGzn6DzGvEW3u0nxjj8VvJtCjBNafZjcaKZbTUEvEugsgV4k0IsEmRf3Q9tjl8Y54sPc6oZKqPW3RZTFk_wLwDLFvxCSsFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2527614185</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional Quality and Development: On the Role of Informality</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Callais, Justin T ; Jahan, Israt ; Pavlik, Jamie Bologna</creator><creatorcontrib>Callais, Justin T ; Jahan, Israt ; Pavlik, Jamie Bologna</creatorcontrib><description>It is well understood that developing countries have large informal sectors. The informal sector, however, has a theoretically ambiguous effect on development. Some view informality as one aspect that comes from lacking full development, while others see informal activity as a restraint to growth. We argue that this ambiguity is because its impact is conditional on both the size of the locale and the existing institutional environment. Good institutions facilitate productive activity and voluntary exchange when informal networks are insufficient. Informal activity facilitates economic growth most effectively in smaller communities. We explore how the conditional effects vary across different population sizes. This diverges with the view that informality and formal activity are substitutes. We hypothesize that instead they can be complimentary in certain aspects. Using data from 5,505 Brazilian municipalities, we analyze the relationship between (formal) institutions, informality, and development. We use three separate measures for institutional quality: governance quality, de facto law provisions, and distribution of political power. In a previous study, these indicators were found to be positively associated with economic performance. Following the previous literature, we define the informal sector as those that do not contribute to the country's social security. In our baseline results, we find inconsistent results between the conditionality of institutional quality and informality. Only once we include the conditionality of population size do we find that formal institutions and informal production tend to be substitutable in areas with large populations, and complementary in small municipalities. We emphasize our differential effects, which have less potential endogeneity concerns. However, we stress that our results should not be interpreted as causal. Our results do highlight the importance of informal networks to economic development, especially in small locales. Future research may be warranted to address causality, as well as exploring the cultural aspect associated with informal networks and population size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-037X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1548-2278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-2278</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/jda.2021.0068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: Tennessee State University College of Business</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Analysis ; Causality ; Censuses ; Developing countries ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economic indicators ; Economic performance ; Employees ; Governance ; Informal economy ; Institutions ; LDCs ; Networks ; Political power ; Population ; Rule of law ; Self employment ; Social security</subject><ispartof>The Journal of developing areas, 2021-06, Vol.55 (3), p.343-363</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Tennessee State University.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Tennessee State University</rights><rights>Copyright Journal of Developing Areas Summer 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-189704e8fd05ab90f650c7b094f4f0b8bf8dbf6337ad4ed0851a11990dbe54493</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Callais, Justin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahan, Israt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlik, Jamie Bologna</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional Quality and Development: On the Role of Informality</title><title>The Journal of developing areas</title><description>It is well understood that developing countries have large informal sectors. The informal sector, however, has a theoretically ambiguous effect on development. Some view informality as one aspect that comes from lacking full development, while others see informal activity as a restraint to growth. We argue that this ambiguity is because its impact is conditional on both the size of the locale and the existing institutional environment. Good institutions facilitate productive activity and voluntary exchange when informal networks are insufficient. Informal activity facilitates economic growth most effectively in smaller communities. We explore how the conditional effects vary across different population sizes. This diverges with the view that informality and formal activity are substitutes. We hypothesize that instead they can be complimentary in certain aspects. Using data from 5,505 Brazilian municipalities, we analyze the relationship between (formal) institutions, informality, and development. We use three separate measures for institutional quality: governance quality, de facto law provisions, and distribution of political power. In a previous study, these indicators were found to be positively associated with economic performance. Following the previous literature, we define the informal sector as those that do not contribute to the country's social security. In our baseline results, we find inconsistent results between the conditionality of institutional quality and informality. Only once we include the conditionality of population size do we find that formal institutions and informal production tend to be substitutable in areas with large populations, and complementary in small municipalities. We emphasize our differential effects, which have less potential endogeneity concerns. However, we stress that our results should not be interpreted as causal. Our results do highlight the importance of informal networks to economic development, especially in small locales. Future research may be warranted to address causality, as well as exploring the cultural aspect associated with informal networks and population size.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Economic performance</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Self employment</subject><subject>Social security</subject><issn>0022-037X</issn><issn>1548-2278</issn><issn>1548-2278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoMoOK5eel8QvLLjyUfT1Lth_RpYWHZV8C6k7clshjYZm1Tcf2_qyu4ODIGEhOecvBweQl5TWFNe8ff73qwZMLoGkOoJWdFKqJKxWj0lKwDGSuD1z-fkRYz7fK25oCuy2fqYXJqTC94MxdVsBpduC-P74iP-xiEcRvTpQ3Hpi3SDxXUYsAi22HobpvEf-5I8s2aI-Or_eUZ-fP70_fxreXH5ZXu-uSg7LqksqWpqEKhsD5VpG7Cygq5uoRFWWGhVa1XfWsl5bXqBPaiKGkqbBvoWKyEafkbe3PU9TOHXjDHpfZinHDpqVrFaUkFV9UDtzIDa5ZhpMt3oYqc3UjLKGaU8U-UJaoceJzMEj9bl5yN-fYLPq8fRdScL3h4VZCbhn7Qzc4z6GHz3CGzn6DzGvEW3u0nxjj8VvJtCjBNafZjcaKZbTUEvEugsgV4k0IsEmRf3Q9tjl8Y54sPc6oZKqPW3RZTFk_wLwDLFvxCSsFQ</recordid><startdate>20210622</startdate><enddate>20210622</enddate><creator>Callais, Justin T</creator><creator>Jahan, Israt</creator><creator>Pavlik, Jamie Bologna</creator><general>Tennessee State University College of Business</general><general>Tennessee State University</general><general>Journal of Developing Areas</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210622</creationdate><title>Institutional Quality and Development: On the Role of Informality</title><author>Callais, Justin T ; Jahan, Israt ; Pavlik, Jamie Bologna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3616-189704e8fd05ab90f650c7b094f4f0b8bf8dbf6337ad4ed0851a11990dbe54493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Economic performance</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Self employment</topic><topic>Social security</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Callais, Justin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahan, Israt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlik, Jamie Bologna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of developing areas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Callais, Justin T</au><au>Jahan, Israt</au><au>Pavlik, Jamie Bologna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional Quality and Development: On the Role of Informality</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of developing areas</jtitle><date>2021-06-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>363</epage><pages>343-363</pages><issn>0022-037X</issn><issn>1548-2278</issn><eissn>1548-2278</eissn><abstract>It is well understood that developing countries have large informal sectors. The informal sector, however, has a theoretically ambiguous effect on development. Some view informality as one aspect that comes from lacking full development, while others see informal activity as a restraint to growth. We argue that this ambiguity is because its impact is conditional on both the size of the locale and the existing institutional environment. Good institutions facilitate productive activity and voluntary exchange when informal networks are insufficient. Informal activity facilitates economic growth most effectively in smaller communities. We explore how the conditional effects vary across different population sizes. This diverges with the view that informality and formal activity are substitutes. We hypothesize that instead they can be complimentary in certain aspects. Using data from 5,505 Brazilian municipalities, we analyze the relationship between (formal) institutions, informality, and development. We use three separate measures for institutional quality: governance quality, de facto law provisions, and distribution of political power. In a previous study, these indicators were found to be positively associated with economic performance. Following the previous literature, we define the informal sector as those that do not contribute to the country's social security. In our baseline results, we find inconsistent results between the conditionality of institutional quality and informality. Only once we include the conditionality of population size do we find that formal institutions and informal production tend to be substitutable in areas with large populations, and complementary in small municipalities. We emphasize our differential effects, which have less potential endogeneity concerns. However, we stress that our results should not be interpreted as causal. Our results do highlight the importance of informal networks to economic development, especially in small locales. Future research may be warranted to address causality, as well as exploring the cultural aspect associated with informal networks and population size.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>Tennessee State University College of Business</pub><doi>10.1353/jda.2021.0068</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-037X |
ispartof | The Journal of developing areas, 2021-06, Vol.55 (3), p.343-363 |
issn | 0022-037X 1548-2278 1548-2278 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2527614185 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Ambiguity Analysis Causality Censuses Developing countries Economic development Economic growth Economic indicators Economic performance Employees Governance Informal economy Institutions LDCs Networks Political power Population Rule of law Self employment Social security |
title | Institutional Quality and Development: On the Role of Informality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T19%3A12%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20Quality%20and%20Development:%20On%20the%20Role%20of%20Informality&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20developing%20areas&rft.au=Callais,%20Justin%20T&rft.date=2021-06-22&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=363&rft.pages=343-363&rft.issn=0022-037X&rft.eissn=1548-2278&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/jda.2021.0068&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA662132113%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2527614185&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A662132113&rfr_iscdi=true |