Moment capacity of back-to-back cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened holes, un-stiffened holes, and plain webs

•A new generation of back-to-back CFS channels with edge-stiffened holes is examined.•Results from an experimental regime and elasto-plastic finite element are reported.•A parametric study involving 70 FE models was conducted.•Edge stiffened hole-channels can outperform plain channels in terms of mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering structures 2021-05, Vol.235, p.112042, Article 112042
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Boshan, Roy, Krishanu, Fang, Zhiyuan, Uzzaman, Asraf, Raftery, Gary, Lim, James B.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 112042
container_title Engineering structures
container_volume 235
creator Chen, Boshan
Roy, Krishanu
Fang, Zhiyuan
Uzzaman, Asraf
Raftery, Gary
Lim, James B.P.
description •A new generation of back-to-back CFS channels with edge-stiffened holes is examined.•Results from an experimental regime and elasto-plastic finite element are reported.•A parametric study involving 70 FE models was conducted.•Edge stiffened hole-channels can outperform plain channels in terms of moment capacity. The use of cold-formed steel (CFS) back-to-back channels as floor joists is increasing steadily, and such beams often include un-stiffened holes for installation of services, which reduces their flexural strength due to the reduced web area. A new generation of CFS channels with edge-stiffened holes has been widely used. However, no research has been undertaken to understand the effects of composite actions on moment capacity of such built-up beams. In this paper, fourteen new experiments are reported on back-to-back channels with various hole spacing, which were tested under four-point loading. Finite-element models were also established and validated with the experiments. Upon validation, a parametric study involving 63 FEMs was conducted to investigate the effects of beam length, diameter of hole, stiffener length and fillet radius. The test results show that for back-to-back channels with five edge-stiffened holes, the moment capacity increased by 15.4%, compared to that of a plain channel. For comparison, the same section with un-stiffened holes had a 15.1% reduction in moment capacity. Test results also show that distortional buckling was the predominant failure mode for all cases. The test and FE results were compared against the design moment capacities predicted by the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) and Australian and New Zealand Standards (AS/NZS) for plain channels. For channels with holes, design procedure was proposed by Moen and Schafer. It is revealed that these equations are conservative by around 23% and 49% for CFS channels with un-stiffened and edge-stiffened holes, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2527606721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029621001929</els_id><sourcerecordid>2527606721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-be32832e79f28b2531a564a3330a52e5ff57a350d331971bdfdf8f1bbb965f413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWB-_wYBbU_PovJal-IKKG12HTHLTpk6TmmSs_fdOqbhx4erA5TvnwofQFaNjRll5uxqDX6Qce53HnHI2ZozTCT9CI1ZXglSCi2M0omzCCOVNeYrOUlpRSnld0xH6eg5r8BlrtVHa5R0OFrdKv5McyD6xDp0hNsQ1GJwyQIf1UnkPXcJbl5cYzAJIys5a8AOyDB2kG9z7vzflDd50ynm8hTZdoBOrugSXP3mO3u7vXmePZP7y8DSbzokWDc-kBcFrwaFqLK9bXgiminKihBBUFRwKa4tKiYIaIVhTsdZYY2vL2rZtysJOmDhH14fdTQwfPaQsV6GPfngpecGrkpYV31PVgdIxpBTByk10axV3klG51yxX8lez3GuWB81Dc3poDkbg00GUSTvwGoyLMLAmuH83vgHqHos7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2527606721</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moment capacity of back-to-back cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened holes, un-stiffened holes, and plain webs</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chen, Boshan ; Roy, Krishanu ; Fang, Zhiyuan ; Uzzaman, Asraf ; Raftery, Gary ; Lim, James B.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Boshan ; Roy, Krishanu ; Fang, Zhiyuan ; Uzzaman, Asraf ; Raftery, Gary ; Lim, James B.P.</creatorcontrib><description>•A new generation of back-to-back CFS channels with edge-stiffened holes is examined.•Results from an experimental regime and elasto-plastic finite element are reported.•A parametric study involving 70 FE models was conducted.•Edge stiffened hole-channels can outperform plain channels in terms of moment capacity. The use of cold-formed steel (CFS) back-to-back channels as floor joists is increasing steadily, and such beams often include un-stiffened holes for installation of services, which reduces their flexural strength due to the reduced web area. A new generation of CFS channels with edge-stiffened holes has been widely used. However, no research has been undertaken to understand the effects of composite actions on moment capacity of such built-up beams. In this paper, fourteen new experiments are reported on back-to-back channels with various hole spacing, which were tested under four-point loading. Finite-element models were also established and validated with the experiments. Upon validation, a parametric study involving 63 FEMs was conducted to investigate the effects of beam length, diameter of hole, stiffener length and fillet radius. The test results show that for back-to-back channels with five edge-stiffened holes, the moment capacity increased by 15.4%, compared to that of a plain channel. For comparison, the same section with un-stiffened holes had a 15.1% reduction in moment capacity. Test results also show that distortional buckling was the predominant failure mode for all cases. The test and FE results were compared against the design moment capacities predicted by the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) and Australian and New Zealand Standards (AS/NZS) for plain channels. For channels with holes, design procedure was proposed by Moen and Schafer. It is revealed that these equations are conservative by around 23% and 49% for CFS channels with un-stiffened and edge-stiffened holes, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Back-to-back channels ; Channels ; Cold working ; Cold-formed steel ; Diameters ; Edge-stiffened holes ; Failure modes ; Finite element analysis ; Finite element method ; Flexural strength ; Joists ; Mathematical models ; Moment capacity ; Steel ; Steel structures ; Un-stiffened holes ; Webs (structural)</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2021-05, Vol.235, p.112042, Article 112042</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 15, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-be32832e79f28b2531a564a3330a52e5ff57a350d331971bdfdf8f1bbb965f413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-be32832e79f28b2531a564a3330a52e5ff57a350d331971bdfdf8f1bbb965f413</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1186-5221</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029621001929$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Boshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Krishanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhiyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzzaman, Asraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raftery, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, James B.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Moment capacity of back-to-back cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened holes, un-stiffened holes, and plain webs</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•A new generation of back-to-back CFS channels with edge-stiffened holes is examined.•Results from an experimental regime and elasto-plastic finite element are reported.•A parametric study involving 70 FE models was conducted.•Edge stiffened hole-channels can outperform plain channels in terms of moment capacity. The use of cold-formed steel (CFS) back-to-back channels as floor joists is increasing steadily, and such beams often include un-stiffened holes for installation of services, which reduces their flexural strength due to the reduced web area. A new generation of CFS channels with edge-stiffened holes has been widely used. However, no research has been undertaken to understand the effects of composite actions on moment capacity of such built-up beams. In this paper, fourteen new experiments are reported on back-to-back channels with various hole spacing, which were tested under four-point loading. Finite-element models were also established and validated with the experiments. Upon validation, a parametric study involving 63 FEMs was conducted to investigate the effects of beam length, diameter of hole, stiffener length and fillet radius. The test results show that for back-to-back channels with five edge-stiffened holes, the moment capacity increased by 15.4%, compared to that of a plain channel. For comparison, the same section with un-stiffened holes had a 15.1% reduction in moment capacity. Test results also show that distortional buckling was the predominant failure mode for all cases. The test and FE results were compared against the design moment capacities predicted by the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) and Australian and New Zealand Standards (AS/NZS) for plain channels. For channels with holes, design procedure was proposed by Moen and Schafer. It is revealed that these equations are conservative by around 23% and 49% for CFS channels with un-stiffened and edge-stiffened holes, respectively.</description><subject>Back-to-back channels</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Cold working</subject><subject>Cold-formed steel</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Edge-stiffened holes</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>Joists</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Moment capacity</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Steel structures</subject><subject>Un-stiffened holes</subject><subject>Webs (structural)</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWB-_wYBbU_PovJal-IKKG12HTHLTpk6TmmSs_fdOqbhx4erA5TvnwofQFaNjRll5uxqDX6Qce53HnHI2ZozTCT9CI1ZXglSCi2M0omzCCOVNeYrOUlpRSnld0xH6eg5r8BlrtVHa5R0OFrdKv5McyD6xDp0hNsQ1GJwyQIf1UnkPXcJbl5cYzAJIys5a8AOyDB2kG9z7vzflDd50ynm8hTZdoBOrugSXP3mO3u7vXmePZP7y8DSbzokWDc-kBcFrwaFqLK9bXgiminKihBBUFRwKa4tKiYIaIVhTsdZYY2vL2rZtysJOmDhH14fdTQwfPaQsV6GPfngpecGrkpYV31PVgdIxpBTByk10axV3klG51yxX8lez3GuWB81Dc3poDkbg00GUSTvwGoyLMLAmuH83vgHqHos7</recordid><startdate>20210515</startdate><enddate>20210515</enddate><creator>Chen, Boshan</creator><creator>Roy, Krishanu</creator><creator>Fang, Zhiyuan</creator><creator>Uzzaman, Asraf</creator><creator>Raftery, Gary</creator><creator>Lim, James B.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1186-5221</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210515</creationdate><title>Moment capacity of back-to-back cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened holes, un-stiffened holes, and plain webs</title><author>Chen, Boshan ; Roy, Krishanu ; Fang, Zhiyuan ; Uzzaman, Asraf ; Raftery, Gary ; Lim, James B.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-be32832e79f28b2531a564a3330a52e5ff57a350d331971bdfdf8f1bbb965f413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Back-to-back channels</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Cold working</topic><topic>Cold-formed steel</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Edge-stiffened holes</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>Joists</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Moment capacity</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Steel structures</topic><topic>Un-stiffened holes</topic><topic>Webs (structural)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Boshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Krishanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhiyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzzaman, Asraf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raftery, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, James B.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Boshan</au><au>Roy, Krishanu</au><au>Fang, Zhiyuan</au><au>Uzzaman, Asraf</au><au>Raftery, Gary</au><au>Lim, James B.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moment capacity of back-to-back cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened holes, un-stiffened holes, and plain webs</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2021-05-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>235</volume><spage>112042</spage><pages>112042-</pages><artnum>112042</artnum><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><abstract>•A new generation of back-to-back CFS channels with edge-stiffened holes is examined.•Results from an experimental regime and elasto-plastic finite element are reported.•A parametric study involving 70 FE models was conducted.•Edge stiffened hole-channels can outperform plain channels in terms of moment capacity. The use of cold-formed steel (CFS) back-to-back channels as floor joists is increasing steadily, and such beams often include un-stiffened holes for installation of services, which reduces their flexural strength due to the reduced web area. A new generation of CFS channels with edge-stiffened holes has been widely used. However, no research has been undertaken to understand the effects of composite actions on moment capacity of such built-up beams. In this paper, fourteen new experiments are reported on back-to-back channels with various hole spacing, which were tested under four-point loading. Finite-element models were also established and validated with the experiments. Upon validation, a parametric study involving 63 FEMs was conducted to investigate the effects of beam length, diameter of hole, stiffener length and fillet radius. The test results show that for back-to-back channels with five edge-stiffened holes, the moment capacity increased by 15.4%, compared to that of a plain channel. For comparison, the same section with un-stiffened holes had a 15.1% reduction in moment capacity. Test results also show that distortional buckling was the predominant failure mode for all cases. The test and FE results were compared against the design moment capacities predicted by the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) and Australian and New Zealand Standards (AS/NZS) for plain channels. For channels with holes, design procedure was proposed by Moen and Schafer. It is revealed that these equations are conservative by around 23% and 49% for CFS channels with un-stiffened and edge-stiffened holes, respectively.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112042</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1186-5221</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0296
ispartof Engineering structures, 2021-05, Vol.235, p.112042, Article 112042
issn 0141-0296
1873-7323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2527606721
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Back-to-back channels
Channels
Cold working
Cold-formed steel
Diameters
Edge-stiffened holes
Failure modes
Finite element analysis
Finite element method
Flexural strength
Joists
Mathematical models
Moment capacity
Steel
Steel structures
Un-stiffened holes
Webs (structural)
title Moment capacity of back-to-back cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened holes, un-stiffened holes, and plain webs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A21%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moment%20capacity%20of%20back-to-back%20cold-formed%20steel%20channels%20with%20edge-stiffened%20holes,%20un-stiffened%20holes,%20and%20plain%20webs&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Chen,%20Boshan&rft.date=2021-05-15&rft.volume=235&rft.spage=112042&rft.pages=112042-&rft.artnum=112042&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2527606721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2527606721&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029621001929&rfr_iscdi=true