Antibiotic prophylaxis for mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a comparison of three versus four doses penicillin V

Aim Compare two regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of surgical site infection (SSI) following mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Materials and methods In total, 176 patients were included. Two antibiotic regimens were administered intravenously....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery 2021-05, Vol.14 (2), p.135-139
Hauptverfasser: Pedersen, T.Ø., Haaberg, V., Løes, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue 2
container_start_page 135
container_title Oral surgery
container_volume 14
creator Pedersen, T.Ø.
Haaberg, V.
Løes, S.
description Aim Compare two regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of surgical site infection (SSI) following mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Materials and methods In total, 176 patients were included. Two antibiotic regimens were administered intravenously. The first 114 patients were given penicillin V (PcV) in three doses every 8 h (PcV3‐group), and the next 62 patients were given PcV in four doses every 6 h (PcV4‐group). The same surgical protocol was followed for all patients. Development of SSI was registered at follow‐up 2 months and 1 year after surgery. Results A significant reduction in the rate of SSI was found in the PcV4 group compared to the PcV3‐group (P = 0.012). The infection rates were 4.8% and 19.3% respectively. A higher prevalence of SSI was found when mandibular wisdom teeth were present, but this was not statistically significant. There were no correlations between gender, age, intraoperative bleeding and operation time and the development of SSI. None of the patients developed severe infection. Conclusion The infection rate was significantly reduced when PcV was administered in four doses, suggesting that an extended regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial when performing mandibular advancement with BSSO.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ors.12557
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2527429187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2527429187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2077-1b6017222bb190c39bc3ec01bef33ee9c2b4c1b363840f569bb1f1ead7a9ac2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqWw4A8ssWLR1nYebthVFS8JqRIvsYtsZ0JdOXGwnZZ8Bb-MSxA7ZjMjzZm5MzeKzgmekhAzY92U0DRlB9GIsJROaDJ_O_yrGTmOTpzbYJxRkmaj6GvReCWU8Uqi1pp23Wv-qRyqjEU1b0olOs0t4uWWNxJqaDzaKb9GQmnuwXKNHH9X3u-LViuPjPNgvKn7K8SRNHXLrXKmQaZCfm0B0Bas6_YCnUWlceBQC42SSmvVoNfT6Kji2sHZbx5HLzfXz8u7ycPq9n65eJhIihmbEJFhwiilQpAcyzgXMgaJiYAqjgFySUUiiYizeJ7gKs3ywFUEeMl4zkMzHkcXw97w9EcHzhebcFATJAuaUpbQnMxZoC4HSlrjnIWqaK2que0Lgou930Xwu_jxO7Czgd0pDf3_YLF6fBomvgF0PIZH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2527429187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibiotic prophylaxis for mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a comparison of three versus four doses penicillin V</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Pedersen, T.Ø. ; Haaberg, V. ; Løes, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, T.Ø. ; Haaberg, V. ; Løes, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Compare two regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of surgical site infection (SSI) following mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Materials and methods In total, 176 patients were included. Two antibiotic regimens were administered intravenously. The first 114 patients were given penicillin V (PcV) in three doses every 8 h (PcV3‐group), and the next 62 patients were given PcV in four doses every 6 h (PcV4‐group). The same surgical protocol was followed for all patients. Development of SSI was registered at follow‐up 2 months and 1 year after surgery. Results A significant reduction in the rate of SSI was found in the PcV4 group compared to the PcV3‐group (P = 0.012). The infection rates were 4.8% and 19.3% respectively. A higher prevalence of SSI was found when mandibular wisdom teeth were present, but this was not statistically significant. There were no correlations between gender, age, intraoperative bleeding and operation time and the development of SSI. None of the patients developed severe infection. Conclusion The infection rate was significantly reduced when PcV was administered in four doses, suggesting that an extended regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial when performing mandibular advancement with BSSO.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-2471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-248X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ors.12557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edinburgh: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>antibiotic prophylaxes ; Antibiotics ; Disease prevention ; Infections ; Mandible ; mandibular advancement ; orthognathic surgery ; Osteotomy ; Penicillin ; Penicillin V ; Prophylaxis ; sagittal split osteotomy ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; surgical site infection ; Surgical site infections</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, 2021-05, Vol.14 (2), p.135-139</ispartof><rights>2020 The British Association of Oral Surgeons and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The British Association of Oral Surgeons and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2077-1b6017222bb190c39bc3ec01bef33ee9c2b4c1b363840f569bb1f1ead7a9ac2b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9463-3076</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fors.12557$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fors.12557$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, T.Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaberg, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Løes, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Antibiotic prophylaxis for mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a comparison of three versus four doses penicillin V</title><title>Oral surgery</title><description>Aim Compare two regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of surgical site infection (SSI) following mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Materials and methods In total, 176 patients were included. Two antibiotic regimens were administered intravenously. The first 114 patients were given penicillin V (PcV) in three doses every 8 h (PcV3‐group), and the next 62 patients were given PcV in four doses every 6 h (PcV4‐group). The same surgical protocol was followed for all patients. Development of SSI was registered at follow‐up 2 months and 1 year after surgery. Results A significant reduction in the rate of SSI was found in the PcV4 group compared to the PcV3‐group (P = 0.012). The infection rates were 4.8% and 19.3% respectively. A higher prevalence of SSI was found when mandibular wisdom teeth were present, but this was not statistically significant. There were no correlations between gender, age, intraoperative bleeding and operation time and the development of SSI. None of the patients developed severe infection. Conclusion The infection rate was significantly reduced when PcV was administered in four doses, suggesting that an extended regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial when performing mandibular advancement with BSSO.</description><subject>antibiotic prophylaxes</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>mandibular advancement</subject><subject>orthognathic surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Penicillin V</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>sagittal split osteotomy</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgical site infection</subject><subject>Surgical site infections</subject><issn>1752-2471</issn><issn>1752-248X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqWw4A8ssWLR1nYebthVFS8JqRIvsYtsZ0JdOXGwnZZ8Bb-MSxA7ZjMjzZm5MzeKzgmekhAzY92U0DRlB9GIsJROaDJ_O_yrGTmOTpzbYJxRkmaj6GvReCWU8Uqi1pp23Wv-qRyqjEU1b0olOs0t4uWWNxJqaDzaKb9GQmnuwXKNHH9X3u-LViuPjPNgvKn7K8SRNHXLrXKmQaZCfm0B0Bas6_YCnUWlceBQC42SSmvVoNfT6Kji2sHZbx5HLzfXz8u7ycPq9n65eJhIihmbEJFhwiilQpAcyzgXMgaJiYAqjgFySUUiiYizeJ7gKs3ywFUEeMl4zkMzHkcXw97w9EcHzhebcFATJAuaUpbQnMxZoC4HSlrjnIWqaK2que0Lgou930Xwu_jxO7Czgd0pDf3_YLF6fBomvgF0PIZH</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Pedersen, T.Ø.</creator><creator>Haaberg, V.</creator><creator>Løes, S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-3076</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Antibiotic prophylaxis for mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a comparison of three versus four doses penicillin V</title><author>Pedersen, T.Ø. ; Haaberg, V. ; Løes, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2077-1b6017222bb190c39bc3ec01bef33ee9c2b4c1b363840f569bb1f1ead7a9ac2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>antibiotic prophylaxes</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>mandibular advancement</topic><topic>orthognathic surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Penicillin V</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>sagittal split osteotomy</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgical site infection</topic><topic>Surgical site infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, T.Ø.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaberg, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Løes, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pedersen, T.Ø.</au><au>Haaberg, V.</au><au>Løes, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibiotic prophylaxis for mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a comparison of three versus four doses penicillin V</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>135-139</pages><issn>1752-2471</issn><eissn>1752-248X</eissn><abstract>Aim Compare two regimens of antibiotic prophylaxis on the development of surgical site infection (SSI) following mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Materials and methods In total, 176 patients were included. Two antibiotic regimens were administered intravenously. The first 114 patients were given penicillin V (PcV) in three doses every 8 h (PcV3‐group), and the next 62 patients were given PcV in four doses every 6 h (PcV4‐group). The same surgical protocol was followed for all patients. Development of SSI was registered at follow‐up 2 months and 1 year after surgery. Results A significant reduction in the rate of SSI was found in the PcV4 group compared to the PcV3‐group (P = 0.012). The infection rates were 4.8% and 19.3% respectively. A higher prevalence of SSI was found when mandibular wisdom teeth were present, but this was not statistically significant. There were no correlations between gender, age, intraoperative bleeding and operation time and the development of SSI. None of the patients developed severe infection. Conclusion The infection rate was significantly reduced when PcV was administered in four doses, suggesting that an extended regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial when performing mandibular advancement with BSSO.</abstract><cop>Edinburgh</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ors.12557</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-3076</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-2471
ispartof Oral surgery, 2021-05, Vol.14 (2), p.135-139
issn 1752-2471
1752-248X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2527429187
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects antibiotic prophylaxes
Antibiotics
Disease prevention
Infections
Mandible
mandibular advancement
orthognathic surgery
Osteotomy
Penicillin
Penicillin V
Prophylaxis
sagittal split osteotomy
Statistical analysis
Surgery
surgical site infection
Surgical site infections
title Antibiotic prophylaxis for mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a comparison of three versus four doses penicillin V
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibiotic%20prophylaxis%20for%20mandibular%20advancement%20with%20bilateral%20sagittal%20split%20osteotomy:%20a%20comparison%20of%20three%20versus%20four%20doses%20penicillin%20V&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery&rft.au=Pedersen,%20T.%C3%98.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=135-139&rft.issn=1752-2471&rft.eissn=1752-248X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ors.12557&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2527429187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2527429187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true