Hedonic and eudaimonic motives to pursue well-being in three samples of youth
Motives for hedonia (pleasure, fun) and eudaimonia (living life to one’s potential) underlie the universal pursuit of well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2001). Yet, little is known about these motives in youth, despite their relevance for children and adolescents and the importance of understanding the de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Motivation and emotion 2021-06, Vol.45 (3), p.312-326 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 326 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 312 |
container_title | Motivation and emotion |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Gentzler, Amy L. DeLong, Katy L. Palmer, Cara A. Huta, Veronika |
description | Motives for hedonia (pleasure, fun) and eudaimonia (living life to one’s potential) underlie the universal pursuit of well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2001). Yet, little is known about these motives in youth, despite their relevance for children and adolescents and the importance of understanding the development of well-being motives. In three samples of youth (
N
s = 76, 152, and 142), we examined age differences in motives and tested hypotheses about how hedonic and eudaimonic motives would relate to several social and affective outcomes. Results showed some evidence for age differences (i.e. hedonic motives were higher in a sample of children aged 7–12 years compared to adolescents aged 14–18 years, and eudaimonic motives were positively correlated with age in 12–18 year olds). Consistent with hypotheses, hedonic motives related to both positive (fewer depressive symptoms, more frequent positive interpersonal events) and negative outcomes (e.g. less empathy and self-control), whereas eudaimonic motives were only associated with positive outcomes (e.g. greater well-being, self-control, empathy, self-worth, friendship closeness). Interactions between motives also indicated that hedonic motives may be more problematic when youth less frequently seek out eudaimonia. These studies offer novel and important information on the pursuit of well-being in youth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11031-021-09882-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2527360774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2527360774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5dfcc176267b8bd9de074d6f5891ac16b4e01eae7d7cc3028744a06f7df9321e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Bz9F8NWmPsqgrrHjRc0ib6W6XtqlJq-y_N24Fbx6GYeB534EHoWtGbxml-i4yRgUjlKcp8pwTdYIWLNOCKCXlKVpQJhXRXBTn6CLGPaUpxrIFelmD831TYds7DJOzTXc8Oz82nxDx6PEwhTgB_oK2JSU0_RY3PR53AQBH2w1tonyND34ad5forLZthKvfvUTvjw9vqzXZvD49r-43pBKsGEnm6qpiWnGly7x0hQOqpVN1lhfMVkyVEigDC9rpqhKU51pKS1WtXV0IzkAs0c3cOwT_MUEczd5PoU8vDc-4FopqLRPFZ6oKPsYAtRlC09lwMIyaH21m1maSNnPUZlQKiTkUE9xvIfxV_5P6BqtScBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2527360774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hedonic and eudaimonic motives to pursue well-being in three samples of youth</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gentzler, Amy L. ; DeLong, Katy L. ; Palmer, Cara A. ; Huta, Veronika</creator><creatorcontrib>Gentzler, Amy L. ; DeLong, Katy L. ; Palmer, Cara A. ; Huta, Veronika</creatorcontrib><description>Motives for hedonia (pleasure, fun) and eudaimonia (living life to one’s potential) underlie the universal pursuit of well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2001). Yet, little is known about these motives in youth, despite their relevance for children and adolescents and the importance of understanding the development of well-being motives. In three samples of youth (
N
s = 76, 152, and 142), we examined age differences in motives and tested hypotheses about how hedonic and eudaimonic motives would relate to several social and affective outcomes. Results showed some evidence for age differences (i.e. hedonic motives were higher in a sample of children aged 7–12 years compared to adolescents aged 14–18 years, and eudaimonic motives were positively correlated with age in 12–18 year olds). Consistent with hypotheses, hedonic motives related to both positive (fewer depressive symptoms, more frequent positive interpersonal events) and negative outcomes (e.g. less empathy and self-control), whereas eudaimonic motives were only associated with positive outcomes (e.g. greater well-being, self-control, empathy, self-worth, friendship closeness). Interactions between motives also indicated that hedonic motives may be more problematic when youth less frequently seek out eudaimonia. These studies offer novel and important information on the pursuit of well-being in youth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-7239</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11031-021-09882-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Age differences ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Clinical Psychology ; Closeness ; Empathy ; Hypotheses ; Mental depression ; Negative events ; Original Paper ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Pleasure ; Positive life events ; Psychology ; Self control ; Selfworth ; Well being ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Motivation and emotion, 2021-06, Vol.45 (3), p.312-326</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5dfcc176267b8bd9de074d6f5891ac16b4e01eae7d7cc3028744a06f7df9321e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5dfcc176267b8bd9de074d6f5891ac16b4e01eae7d7cc3028744a06f7df9321e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2354-6351</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11031-021-09882-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11031-021-09882-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27923,27924,30998,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gentzler, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLong, Katy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Cara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huta, Veronika</creatorcontrib><title>Hedonic and eudaimonic motives to pursue well-being in three samples of youth</title><title>Motivation and emotion</title><addtitle>Motiv Emot</addtitle><description>Motives for hedonia (pleasure, fun) and eudaimonia (living life to one’s potential) underlie the universal pursuit of well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2001). Yet, little is known about these motives in youth, despite their relevance for children and adolescents and the importance of understanding the development of well-being motives. In three samples of youth (
N
s = 76, 152, and 142), we examined age differences in motives and tested hypotheses about how hedonic and eudaimonic motives would relate to several social and affective outcomes. Results showed some evidence for age differences (i.e. hedonic motives were higher in a sample of children aged 7–12 years compared to adolescents aged 14–18 years, and eudaimonic motives were positively correlated with age in 12–18 year olds). Consistent with hypotheses, hedonic motives related to both positive (fewer depressive symptoms, more frequent positive interpersonal events) and negative outcomes (e.g. less empathy and self-control), whereas eudaimonic motives were only associated with positive outcomes (e.g. greater well-being, self-control, empathy, self-worth, friendship closeness). Interactions between motives also indicated that hedonic motives may be more problematic when youth less frequently seek out eudaimonia. These studies offer novel and important information on the pursuit of well-being in youth.</description><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Closeness</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Negative events</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Pleasure</subject><subject>Positive life events</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Selfworth</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0146-7239</issn><issn>1573-6644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Bz9F8NWmPsqgrrHjRc0ib6W6XtqlJq-y_N24Fbx6GYeB534EHoWtGbxml-i4yRgUjlKcp8pwTdYIWLNOCKCXlKVpQJhXRXBTn6CLGPaUpxrIFelmD831TYds7DJOzTXc8Oz82nxDx6PEwhTgB_oK2JSU0_RY3PR53AQBH2w1tonyND34ad5forLZthKvfvUTvjw9vqzXZvD49r-43pBKsGEnm6qpiWnGly7x0hQOqpVN1lhfMVkyVEigDC9rpqhKU51pKS1WtXV0IzkAs0c3cOwT_MUEczd5PoU8vDc-4FopqLRPFZ6oKPsYAtRlC09lwMIyaH21m1maSNnPUZlQKiTkUE9xvIfxV_5P6BqtScBc</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Gentzler, Amy L.</creator><creator>DeLong, Katy L.</creator><creator>Palmer, Cara A.</creator><creator>Huta, Veronika</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-6351</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Hedonic and eudaimonic motives to pursue well-being in three samples of youth</title><author>Gentzler, Amy L. ; DeLong, Katy L. ; Palmer, Cara A. ; Huta, Veronika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5dfcc176267b8bd9de074d6f5891ac16b4e01eae7d7cc3028744a06f7df9321e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Closeness</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Negative events</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Pleasure</topic><topic>Positive life events</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Selfworth</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gentzler, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLong, Katy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Cara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huta, Veronika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Motivation and emotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gentzler, Amy L.</au><au>DeLong, Katy L.</au><au>Palmer, Cara A.</au><au>Huta, Veronika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hedonic and eudaimonic motives to pursue well-being in three samples of youth</atitle><jtitle>Motivation and emotion</jtitle><stitle>Motiv Emot</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>312-326</pages><issn>0146-7239</issn><eissn>1573-6644</eissn><abstract>Motives for hedonia (pleasure, fun) and eudaimonia (living life to one’s potential) underlie the universal pursuit of well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2001). Yet, little is known about these motives in youth, despite their relevance for children and adolescents and the importance of understanding the development of well-being motives. In three samples of youth (
N
s = 76, 152, and 142), we examined age differences in motives and tested hypotheses about how hedonic and eudaimonic motives would relate to several social and affective outcomes. Results showed some evidence for age differences (i.e. hedonic motives were higher in a sample of children aged 7–12 years compared to adolescents aged 14–18 years, and eudaimonic motives were positively correlated with age in 12–18 year olds). Consistent with hypotheses, hedonic motives related to both positive (fewer depressive symptoms, more frequent positive interpersonal events) and negative outcomes (e.g. less empathy and self-control), whereas eudaimonic motives were only associated with positive outcomes (e.g. greater well-being, self-control, empathy, self-worth, friendship closeness). Interactions between motives also indicated that hedonic motives may be more problematic when youth less frequently seek out eudaimonia. These studies offer novel and important information on the pursuit of well-being in youth.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11031-021-09882-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-6351</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-7239 |
ispartof | Motivation and emotion, 2021-06, Vol.45 (3), p.312-326 |
issn | 0146-7239 1573-6644 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2527360774 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Age differences Behavioral Science and Psychology Clinical Psychology Closeness Empathy Hypotheses Mental depression Negative events Original Paper Personality and Social Psychology Pleasure Positive life events Psychology Self control Selfworth Well being Youth |
title | Hedonic and eudaimonic motives to pursue well-being in three samples of youth |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A12%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hedonic%20and%20eudaimonic%20motives%20to%20pursue%20well-being%20in%20three%20samples%20of%20youth&rft.jtitle=Motivation%20and%20emotion&rft.au=Gentzler,%20Amy%20L.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=312-326&rft.issn=0146-7239&rft.eissn=1573-6644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11031-021-09882-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2527360774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2527360774&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |