Review of empirical research on university social responsibility
PurposeThis paper aims to systematically review the university social responsibility (USR) implementation from the empirical studies, which published during the period from 2004 to 2020.Design/methodology/approachThe bibliometric method has been employed to review prior empirical research on higher...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of educational management 2021-04, Vol.35 (3), p.549-563 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 563 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 549 |
container_title | International journal of educational management |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Huang, Yung-Fu Do, Manh-Hoang |
description | PurposeThis paper aims to systematically review the university social responsibility (USR) implementation from the empirical studies, which published during the period from 2004 to 2020.Design/methodology/approachThe bibliometric method has been employed to review prior empirical research on higher education social responsibility topics.FindingsThese synthesis results confirmed that USR initiatives as an excellent tool to attain sustainability and enhance university performance worldwide. Universities in developed nations underline paying more attention to the core values in the long-term; meanwhile, their counterparts in transitional countries to pay more attention to short-term activities by focusing on stakeholders.Research limitations/implicationsThe notable limitation is that in terms of the number of empirical papers employed as the data to analyze in this manuscript.Practical implicationsThis paper's findings have described the USR implementations and how well to define USR adoption from the empirical studies globally. Thus, it has theoretical implications in enriching the USR knowledge and providing useful guidance for universities, then recommend new research directions in the future for other scholars.Originality/valueThis research is an initial attempt to systematize studies on USR implementation in universities between developed countries and developing nations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IJEM-10-2020-0449 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2526825471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1292948</ericid><sourcerecordid>2526825471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-77fa847b18fa69aa00324f5ebfc360642d50bbb739284c02125b577d8174b30a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gAch4Hl1Zv9kNzelVG2pCKLgLeymG9ySJnG3rfTbm5AiCJ6GmffeDPMj5BLhBhH07Ww-faYIlAEDCkJkR2SESmqaStTHZASZRMql-DglZzGuAFBKJUbk7tXtvPtOmjJx69YHX5gqCS46E4rPpKmTbe13LkS_2SexKfygtk0dvfVVNz0nJ6Wpors41DF5f5i-TZ7o4uVxNrlf0ILzdEOVKo0WyqIuTZoZA8CZKKWzZcFTSAVbSrDWKp4xLQpgyKSVSi01KmE5GD4m18PeNjRfWxc3-arZhro7mTPJUs2kUNi5cHAVoYkxuDJvg1-bsM8R8h5U3oPqmx5U3oPqMldDxnXf__qnc2QZy4TudDjoaxdMtfx35R_2_AdnBnKs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2526825471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of empirical research on university social responsibility</title><source>Emerald Complete Journals</source><creator>Huang, Yung-Fu ; Do, Manh-Hoang</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yung-Fu ; Do, Manh-Hoang</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis paper aims to systematically review the university social responsibility (USR) implementation from the empirical studies, which published during the period from 2004 to 2020.Design/methodology/approachThe bibliometric method has been employed to review prior empirical research on higher education social responsibility topics.FindingsThese synthesis results confirmed that USR initiatives as an excellent tool to attain sustainability and enhance university performance worldwide. Universities in developed nations underline paying more attention to the core values in the long-term; meanwhile, their counterparts in transitional countries to pay more attention to short-term activities by focusing on stakeholders.Research limitations/implicationsThe notable limitation is that in terms of the number of empirical papers employed as the data to analyze in this manuscript.Practical implicationsThis paper's findings have described the USR implementations and how well to define USR adoption from the empirical studies globally. Thus, it has theoretical implications in enriching the USR knowledge and providing useful guidance for universities, then recommend new research directions in the future for other scholars.Originality/valueThis research is an initial attempt to systematize studies on USR implementation in universities between developed countries and developing nations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-354X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJEM-10-2020-0449</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Community ; Community Involvement ; Community Relations ; Competitive advantage ; Consumers ; Curriculum Design ; Developed Nations ; Developing Nations ; Education ; Educational Research ; Environment ; Ethics ; Foreign Countries ; Governance ; Guidelines ; Legal Responsibility ; Product development ; Reputation ; Reputations ; Research Methodology ; Social Responsibility ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Sustainable Development ; Universities</subject><ispartof>International journal of educational management, 2021-04, Vol.35 (3), p.549-563</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-77fa847b18fa69aa00324f5ebfc360642d50bbb739284c02125b577d8174b30a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-77fa847b18fa69aa00324f5ebfc360642d50bbb739284c02125b577d8174b30a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7616-0399 ; 0000-0002-7338-9577</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJEM-10-2020-0449/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,968,11639,27928,27929,52693</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1292948$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yung-Fu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Manh-Hoang</creatorcontrib><title>Review of empirical research on university social responsibility</title><title>International journal of educational management</title><description>PurposeThis paper aims to systematically review the university social responsibility (USR) implementation from the empirical studies, which published during the period from 2004 to 2020.Design/methodology/approachThe bibliometric method has been employed to review prior empirical research on higher education social responsibility topics.FindingsThese synthesis results confirmed that USR initiatives as an excellent tool to attain sustainability and enhance university performance worldwide. Universities in developed nations underline paying more attention to the core values in the long-term; meanwhile, their counterparts in transitional countries to pay more attention to short-term activities by focusing on stakeholders.Research limitations/implicationsThe notable limitation is that in terms of the number of empirical papers employed as the data to analyze in this manuscript.Practical implicationsThis paper's findings have described the USR implementations and how well to define USR adoption from the empirical studies globally. Thus, it has theoretical implications in enriching the USR knowledge and providing useful guidance for universities, then recommend new research directions in the future for other scholars.Originality/valueThis research is an initial attempt to systematize studies on USR implementation in universities between developed countries and developing nations.</description><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community Involvement</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Curriculum Design</subject><subject>Developed Nations</subject><subject>Developing Nations</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Legal Responsibility</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Reputation</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0951-354X</issn><issn>1758-6518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gAch4Hl1Zv9kNzelVG2pCKLgLeymG9ySJnG3rfTbm5AiCJ6GmffeDPMj5BLhBhH07Ww-faYIlAEDCkJkR2SESmqaStTHZASZRMql-DglZzGuAFBKJUbk7tXtvPtOmjJx69YHX5gqCS46E4rPpKmTbe13LkS_2SexKfygtk0dvfVVNz0nJ6Wpors41DF5f5i-TZ7o4uVxNrlf0ILzdEOVKo0WyqIuTZoZA8CZKKWzZcFTSAVbSrDWKp4xLQpgyKSVSi01KmE5GD4m18PeNjRfWxc3-arZhro7mTPJUs2kUNi5cHAVoYkxuDJvg1-bsM8R8h5U3oPqmx5U3oPqMldDxnXf__qnc2QZy4TudDjoaxdMtfx35R_2_AdnBnKs</recordid><startdate>20210420</startdate><enddate>20210420</enddate><creator>Huang, Yung-Fu</creator><creator>Do, Manh-Hoang</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-0399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7338-9577</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210420</creationdate><title>Review of empirical research on university social responsibility</title><author>Huang, Yung-Fu ; Do, Manh-Hoang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-77fa847b18fa69aa00324f5ebfc360642d50bbb739284c02125b577d8174b30a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community Involvement</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Curriculum Design</topic><topic>Developed Nations</topic><topic>Developing Nations</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Legal Responsibility</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Reputation</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yung-Fu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do, Manh-Hoang</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of educational management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Yung-Fu</au><au>Do, Manh-Hoang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1292948</ericid><atitle>Review of empirical research on university social responsibility</atitle><jtitle>International journal of educational management</jtitle><date>2021-04-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>549-563</pages><issn>0951-354X</issn><eissn>1758-6518</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis paper aims to systematically review the university social responsibility (USR) implementation from the empirical studies, which published during the period from 2004 to 2020.Design/methodology/approachThe bibliometric method has been employed to review prior empirical research on higher education social responsibility topics.FindingsThese synthesis results confirmed that USR initiatives as an excellent tool to attain sustainability and enhance university performance worldwide. Universities in developed nations underline paying more attention to the core values in the long-term; meanwhile, their counterparts in transitional countries to pay more attention to short-term activities by focusing on stakeholders.Research limitations/implicationsThe notable limitation is that in terms of the number of empirical papers employed as the data to analyze in this manuscript.Practical implicationsThis paper's findings have described the USR implementations and how well to define USR adoption from the empirical studies globally. Thus, it has theoretical implications in enriching the USR knowledge and providing useful guidance for universities, then recommend new research directions in the future for other scholars.Originality/valueThis research is an initial attempt to systematize studies on USR implementation in universities between developed countries and developing nations.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJEM-10-2020-0449</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-0399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7338-9577</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-354X |
ispartof | International journal of educational management, 2021-04, Vol.35 (3), p.549-563 |
issn | 0951-354X 1758-6518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2526825471 |
source | Emerald Complete Journals |
subjects | Community Community Involvement Community Relations Competitive advantage Consumers Curriculum Design Developed Nations Developing Nations Education Educational Research Environment Ethics Foreign Countries Governance Guidelines Legal Responsibility Product development Reputation Reputations Research Methodology Social Responsibility Stakeholders Sustainability Sustainable Development Universities |
title | Review of empirical research on university social responsibility |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T17%3A58%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20empirical%20research%20on%20university%20social%20responsibility&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20educational%20management&rft.au=Huang,%20Yung-Fu&rft.date=2021-04-20&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=549-563&rft.issn=0951-354X&rft.eissn=1758-6518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJEM-10-2020-0449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2526825471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2526825471&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1292948&rfr_iscdi=true |