Comparison of yield, chemical composition and farinograph properties of common and ancient wheat grains
The chemical composition of 4 spring wheat species was analyzed: einkorn ( Triticum monococcum ) (local cv.), emmer ( Triticum dicoccon ) (Lamella cv.), spelt ( Triticum spelta ) (Wirtas cv.), and common wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) (Rospuda cv.). Mean emmer and einkorn yield was significantly lower...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European food research & technology 2021-06, Vol.247 (6), p.1525-1538 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1538 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1525 |
container_title | European food research & technology |
container_volume | 247 |
creator | Biel, Wioletta Jaroszewska, Anna Stankowski, Sławomir Sobolewska, Magdalena Kępińska-Pacelik, Jagoda |
description | The chemical composition of 4 spring wheat species was analyzed: einkorn (
Triticum monococcum
) (local cv.), emmer (
Triticum dicoccon
) (Lamella cv.), spelt (
Triticum spelta
) (Wirtas cv.), and common wheat (
Triticum aestivum
) (Rospuda cv.). Mean emmer and einkorn yield was significantly lower than that of common wheat. The analyses of the wheat grain included the content of total protein, crude ash, crude fat, crude fibre, carbohydrates, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc. The grains of the tested ancient wheats were richer in protein, lipids, crude fibre, and crude ash than the common wheat grains. The significantly highest levels of crude protein, ether extract, and crude ash were found in einkorn. As the protein concentration in the grain increased, the calcium, magnesium, and potassium levels increased, and the zinc and manganese levels decreased. Genotypic differences between the studied wheats were reflected in the concentrations of the minerals and nutrients, an observation which can be useful in further cross-linkage studies. Dough made from common wheat and spelt flour showed better performance quality classifying it to be used for bread production. In turn, flour from emmer and einkorn wheat may be intended for pastry products, due to short dough development time and constancy as well as high softening. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00217-021-03729-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2526479289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2526479289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-79d1a0d6b1382d849dec54f1f5cbee40aee0d99ef9479d7adbaadfd975c7a75c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAyEURYnRxFr9A65I3DrKx8wwLE3jV9LEja4JhUdL04ERpjH991Lb6M7NheSd8yAXoWtK7igh4j4TwqioSlSECyYrcYImtOZdxXjXnP7ehThHFzmvCWlkS-sJWs5iP-jkcww4OrzzsLG32Kyg90ZvsCnTmP3oy1gHi11BQ1wmPazwkOIAafSQ92Yh-yOkg_EQRvy1Aj3iAvuQL9GZ05sMV8dzij6eHt9nL9X87fl19jCvDG_5WAlpqSa2XVDeMdvV0oJpakddYxYANdEAxEoJTtYFFdoutLbOStEYoUvwKbo57C2_-9xCHtU6blMoTyrWsLZYrJOFYgfKpJhzAqeG5HuddooStS9UHQpVJdRPoUoUiR-kXOCwhPS3-h_rGyq7e4c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2526479289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of yield, chemical composition and farinograph properties of common and ancient wheat grains</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Biel, Wioletta ; Jaroszewska, Anna ; Stankowski, Sławomir ; Sobolewska, Magdalena ; Kępińska-Pacelik, Jagoda</creator><creatorcontrib>Biel, Wioletta ; Jaroszewska, Anna ; Stankowski, Sławomir ; Sobolewska, Magdalena ; Kępińska-Pacelik, Jagoda</creatorcontrib><description>The chemical composition of 4 spring wheat species was analyzed: einkorn (
Triticum monococcum
) (local cv.), emmer (
Triticum dicoccon
) (Lamella cv.), spelt (
Triticum spelta
) (Wirtas cv.), and common wheat (
Triticum aestivum
) (Rospuda cv.). Mean emmer and einkorn yield was significantly lower than that of common wheat. The analyses of the wheat grain included the content of total protein, crude ash, crude fat, crude fibre, carbohydrates, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc. The grains of the tested ancient wheats were richer in protein, lipids, crude fibre, and crude ash than the common wheat grains. The significantly highest levels of crude protein, ether extract, and crude ash were found in einkorn. As the protein concentration in the grain increased, the calcium, magnesium, and potassium levels increased, and the zinc and manganese levels decreased. Genotypic differences between the studied wheats were reflected in the concentrations of the minerals and nutrients, an observation which can be useful in further cross-linkage studies. Dough made from common wheat and spelt flour showed better performance quality classifying it to be used for bread production. In turn, flour from emmer and einkorn wheat may be intended for pastry products, due to short dough development time and constancy as well as high softening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-2377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00217-021-03729-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Analytical Chemistry ; Ashes ; Biotechnology ; Calcium ; Carbohydrates ; Chemical composition ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Cross-linkage ; Dough ; Flour ; Food Science ; Forestry ; Grain ; Lamella ; Lipids ; Magnesium ; Manganese ; Minerals ; Nutrients ; Original Paper ; Phosphorus ; Potassium ; Proteins ; Spring wheat ; Triticum aestivum ; Triticum dicoccum ; Triticum monococcum ; Wheat ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>European food research & technology, 2021-06, Vol.247 (6), p.1525-1538</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-79d1a0d6b1382d849dec54f1f5cbee40aee0d99ef9479d7adbaadfd975c7a75c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-79d1a0d6b1382d849dec54f1f5cbee40aee0d99ef9479d7adbaadfd975c7a75c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5925-0694 ; 0000-0001-8607-7591 ; 0000-0002-6971-1893 ; 0000-0003-1755-4125 ; 0000-0002-3385-6281</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00217-021-03729-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00217-021-03729-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biel, Wioletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaroszewska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankowski, Sławomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobolewska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kępińska-Pacelik, Jagoda</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of yield, chemical composition and farinograph properties of common and ancient wheat grains</title><title>European food research & technology</title><addtitle>Eur Food Res Technol</addtitle><description>The chemical composition of 4 spring wheat species was analyzed: einkorn (
Triticum monococcum
) (local cv.), emmer (
Triticum dicoccon
) (Lamella cv.), spelt (
Triticum spelta
) (Wirtas cv.), and common wheat (
Triticum aestivum
) (Rospuda cv.). Mean emmer and einkorn yield was significantly lower than that of common wheat. The analyses of the wheat grain included the content of total protein, crude ash, crude fat, crude fibre, carbohydrates, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc. The grains of the tested ancient wheats were richer in protein, lipids, crude fibre, and crude ash than the common wheat grains. The significantly highest levels of crude protein, ether extract, and crude ash were found in einkorn. As the protein concentration in the grain increased, the calcium, magnesium, and potassium levels increased, and the zinc and manganese levels decreased. Genotypic differences between the studied wheats were reflected in the concentrations of the minerals and nutrients, an observation which can be useful in further cross-linkage studies. Dough made from common wheat and spelt flour showed better performance quality classifying it to be used for bread production. In turn, flour from emmer and einkorn wheat may be intended for pastry products, due to short dough development time and constancy as well as high softening.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Cross-linkage</subject><subject>Dough</subject><subject>Flour</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Lamella</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Magnesium</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Spring wheat</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Triticum dicoccum</subject><subject>Triticum monococcum</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>1438-2377</issn><issn>1438-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PAyEURYnRxFr9A65I3DrKx8wwLE3jV9LEja4JhUdL04ERpjH991Lb6M7NheSd8yAXoWtK7igh4j4TwqioSlSECyYrcYImtOZdxXjXnP7ehThHFzmvCWlkS-sJWs5iP-jkcww4OrzzsLG32Kyg90ZvsCnTmP3oy1gHi11BQ1wmPazwkOIAafSQ92Yh-yOkg_EQRvy1Aj3iAvuQL9GZ05sMV8dzij6eHt9nL9X87fl19jCvDG_5WAlpqSa2XVDeMdvV0oJpakddYxYANdEAxEoJTtYFFdoutLbOStEYoUvwKbo57C2_-9xCHtU6blMoTyrWsLZYrJOFYgfKpJhzAqeG5HuddooStS9UHQpVJdRPoUoUiR-kXOCwhPS3-h_rGyq7e4c</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Biel, Wioletta</creator><creator>Jaroszewska, Anna</creator><creator>Stankowski, Sławomir</creator><creator>Sobolewska, Magdalena</creator><creator>Kępińska-Pacelik, Jagoda</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-0694</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8607-7591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-1893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1755-4125</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3385-6281</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Comparison of yield, chemical composition and farinograph properties of common and ancient wheat grains</title><author>Biel, Wioletta ; Jaroszewska, Anna ; Stankowski, Sławomir ; Sobolewska, Magdalena ; Kępińska-Pacelik, Jagoda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-79d1a0d6b1382d849dec54f1f5cbee40aee0d99ef9479d7adbaadfd975c7a75c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Cross-linkage</topic><topic>Dough</topic><topic>Flour</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Lamella</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Magnesium</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Spring wheat</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Triticum dicoccum</topic><topic>Triticum monococcum</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biel, Wioletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaroszewska, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankowski, Sławomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobolewska, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kępińska-Pacelik, Jagoda</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European food research & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biel, Wioletta</au><au>Jaroszewska, Anna</au><au>Stankowski, Sławomir</au><au>Sobolewska, Magdalena</au><au>Kępińska-Pacelik, Jagoda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of yield, chemical composition and farinograph properties of common and ancient wheat grains</atitle><jtitle>European food research & technology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Food Res Technol</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>247</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1525</spage><epage>1538</epage><pages>1525-1538</pages><issn>1438-2377</issn><eissn>1438-2385</eissn><abstract>The chemical composition of 4 spring wheat species was analyzed: einkorn (
Triticum monococcum
) (local cv.), emmer (
Triticum dicoccon
) (Lamella cv.), spelt (
Triticum spelta
) (Wirtas cv.), and common wheat (
Triticum aestivum
) (Rospuda cv.). Mean emmer and einkorn yield was significantly lower than that of common wheat. The analyses of the wheat grain included the content of total protein, crude ash, crude fat, crude fibre, carbohydrates, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc. The grains of the tested ancient wheats were richer in protein, lipids, crude fibre, and crude ash than the common wheat grains. The significantly highest levels of crude protein, ether extract, and crude ash were found in einkorn. As the protein concentration in the grain increased, the calcium, magnesium, and potassium levels increased, and the zinc and manganese levels decreased. Genotypic differences between the studied wheats were reflected in the concentrations of the minerals and nutrients, an observation which can be useful in further cross-linkage studies. Dough made from common wheat and spelt flour showed better performance quality classifying it to be used for bread production. In turn, flour from emmer and einkorn wheat may be intended for pastry products, due to short dough development time and constancy as well as high softening.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00217-021-03729-7</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5925-0694</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8607-7591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-1893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1755-4125</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3385-6281</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1438-2377 |
ispartof | European food research & technology, 2021-06, Vol.247 (6), p.1525-1538 |
issn | 1438-2377 1438-2385 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2526479289 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Analytical Chemistry Ashes Biotechnology Calcium Carbohydrates Chemical composition Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Cross-linkage Dough Flour Food Science Forestry Grain Lamella Lipids Magnesium Manganese Minerals Nutrients Original Paper Phosphorus Potassium Proteins Spring wheat Triticum aestivum Triticum dicoccum Triticum monococcum Wheat Zinc |
title | Comparison of yield, chemical composition and farinograph properties of common and ancient wheat grains |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A46%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20yield,%20chemical%20composition%20and%20farinograph%20properties%20of%20common%20and%20ancient%20wheat%20grains&rft.jtitle=European%20food%20research%20&%20technology&rft.au=Biel,%20Wioletta&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=247&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1525&rft.epage=1538&rft.pages=1525-1538&rft.issn=1438-2377&rft.eissn=1438-2385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00217-021-03729-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2526479289%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2526479289&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |