Effectiveness of Public Support for Business Innovation from EU Funds: Case Study in Slovakia
Effective public support of innovations, research and development represents one of the priorities of the European Union (EU). The aim of this paper was to examine the effectiveness of one such public programme – public support for business innovation from EU funds in Slovakia – by using selected qu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy 2021-06, Vol.14 (1), p.261-283 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 283 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 261 |
| container_title | NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Pisár, Peter Ďurčeková, Ina Křápek, Milan |
| description | Effective public support of innovations, research and development represents one of the priorities of the European Union (EU). The aim of this paper was to examine the effectiveness of one such public programme – public support for business innovation from EU funds in Slovakia – by using selected quasi-experimental design methods on the example of the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Economic Growth for the programming period 2007 – 2013. The value added of this paper is the fact that we use the method proposed and used by the European Commission and Slovak national authorities. The “difference-in-differences” method is used to compare the changes in value added of supported firms before and after the intervention in comparison to firms that did not receive support. The results suggest that the public support from selected calls of the evaluated operational programme was effective and delivered improvements not only in the field of innovativeness and competitiveness, but also in the area of employment. The evaluated call was much more effective compared to other calls of the programme evaluated by other authors. The responses from the management body suggest that the core success factors were the contents of the call and timing. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2478/nispa-2021-0010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2526403667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2526403667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-71abe4364c967cf764b83b83dd29006e3abfff96a3d3e208dd223da78ce74a5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgqT17DXhem68mu4IHLa0WCgq1RwnZ3URSt5s12VT6702toBeHgXnMvPcGHgCXGF0TJvJxa0OnMoIIzhDC6AQMMKV5xigqTv_gczAKYYNSUSJyNhmA15kxuurtTrc6BOgMfI5lYyu4il3nfA-N8_A-Bvt9XrSt26neuhYa77Zwtobz2NbhBk5V0HDVx3oPbQtXTaK9W3UBzoxqgh79zCFYz2cv08ds-fSwmN4ts4py1mcCq1KzBKuCi8oIzsqcpq5rUiDENVWlMabgitZUE5SnPaG1EnmlBVOTkg7B1dG38-4j6tDLjYu-TS8lmRDOEOVcJNb4yKq8C8FrIztvt8rvJUbyEKP8jlEeYpSHGJPi9qj4VE2vfa3ffNwn8Gv_jxIzTDimX7ckesA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2526403667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Public Support for Business Innovation from EU Funds: Case Study in Slovakia</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sciendo</source><creator>Pisár, Peter ; Ďurčeková, Ina ; Křápek, Milan</creator><creatorcontrib>Pisár, Peter ; Ďurčeková, Ina ; Křápek, Milan</creatorcontrib><description>Effective public support of innovations, research and development represents one of the priorities of the European Union (EU). The aim of this paper was to examine the effectiveness of one such public programme – public support for business innovation from EU funds in Slovakia – by using selected quasi-experimental design methods on the example of the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Economic Growth for the programming period 2007 – 2013. The value added of this paper is the fact that we use the method proposed and used by the European Commission and Slovak national authorities. The “difference-in-differences” method is used to compare the changes in value added of supported firms before and after the intervention in comparison to firms that did not receive support. The results suggest that the public support from selected calls of the evaluated operational programme was effective and delivered improvements not only in the field of innovativeness and competitiveness, but also in the area of employment. The evaluated call was much more effective compared to other calls of the programme evaluated by other authors. The responses from the management body suggest that the core success factors were the contents of the call and timing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1338-4309</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1337-9038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1338-4309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/nispa-2021-0010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bratislava: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Business ; Case studies ; Competition ; Competitiveness ; Economic growth ; Employment ; EU funds ; Innovations ; Intervention ; operational programme competitiveness and Economic Growth ; Public opinion ; Public support for business innovation ; Quasi-experimental methods ; R&D ; Research & development ; Value ; Value added</subject><ispartof>NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy, 2021-06, Vol.14 (1), p.261-283</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-71abe4364c967cf764b83b83dd29006e3abfff96a3d3e208dd223da78ce74a5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-71abe4364c967cf764b83b83dd29006e3abfff96a3d3e208dd223da78ce74a5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/nispa-2021-0010$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/nispa-2021-0010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,12832,27911,27912,75919,75920</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pisár, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ďurčeková, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Křápek, Milan</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Public Support for Business Innovation from EU Funds: Case Study in Slovakia</title><title>NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy</title><description>Effective public support of innovations, research and development represents one of the priorities of the European Union (EU). The aim of this paper was to examine the effectiveness of one such public programme – public support for business innovation from EU funds in Slovakia – by using selected quasi-experimental design methods on the example of the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Economic Growth for the programming period 2007 – 2013. The value added of this paper is the fact that we use the method proposed and used by the European Commission and Slovak national authorities. The “difference-in-differences” method is used to compare the changes in value added of supported firms before and after the intervention in comparison to firms that did not receive support. The results suggest that the public support from selected calls of the evaluated operational programme was effective and delivered improvements not only in the field of innovativeness and competitiveness, but also in the area of employment. The evaluated call was much more effective compared to other calls of the programme evaluated by other authors. The responses from the management body suggest that the core success factors were the contents of the call and timing.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>EU funds</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>operational programme competitiveness and Economic Growth</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public support for business innovation</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Value</subject><subject>Value added</subject><issn>1338-4309</issn><issn>1337-9038</issn><issn>1338-4309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgqT17DXhem68mu4IHLa0WCgq1RwnZ3URSt5s12VT6702toBeHgXnMvPcGHgCXGF0TJvJxa0OnMoIIzhDC6AQMMKV5xigqTv_gczAKYYNSUSJyNhmA15kxuurtTrc6BOgMfI5lYyu4il3nfA-N8_A-Bvt9XrSt26neuhYa77Zwtobz2NbhBk5V0HDVx3oPbQtXTaK9W3UBzoxqgh79zCFYz2cv08ds-fSwmN4ts4py1mcCq1KzBKuCi8oIzsqcpq5rUiDENVWlMabgitZUE5SnPaG1EnmlBVOTkg7B1dG38-4j6tDLjYu-TS8lmRDOEOVcJNb4yKq8C8FrIztvt8rvJUbyEKP8jlEeYpSHGJPi9qj4VE2vfa3ffNwn8Gv_jxIzTDimX7ckesA</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Pisár, Peter</creator><creator>Ďurčeková, Ina</creator><creator>Křápek, Milan</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Public Support for Business Innovation from EU Funds: Case Study in Slovakia</title><author>Pisár, Peter ; Ďurčeková, Ina ; Křápek, Milan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-71abe4364c967cf764b83b83dd29006e3abfff96a3d3e208dd223da78ce74a5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>EU funds</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>operational programme competitiveness and Economic Growth</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public support for business innovation</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Value</topic><topic>Value added</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pisár, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ďurčeková, Ina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Křápek, Milan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pisár, Peter</au><au>Ďurčeková, Ina</au><au>Křápek, Milan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Public Support for Business Innovation from EU Funds: Case Study in Slovakia</atitle><jtitle>NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>261-283</pages><issn>1338-4309</issn><issn>1337-9038</issn><eissn>1338-4309</eissn><abstract>Effective public support of innovations, research and development represents one of the priorities of the European Union (EU). The aim of this paper was to examine the effectiveness of one such public programme – public support for business innovation from EU funds in Slovakia – by using selected quasi-experimental design methods on the example of the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Economic Growth for the programming period 2007 – 2013. The value added of this paper is the fact that we use the method proposed and used by the European Commission and Slovak national authorities. The “difference-in-differences” method is used to compare the changes in value added of supported firms before and after the intervention in comparison to firms that did not receive support. The results suggest that the public support from selected calls of the evaluated operational programme was effective and delivered improvements not only in the field of innovativeness and competitiveness, but also in the area of employment. The evaluated call was much more effective compared to other calls of the programme evaluated by other authors. The responses from the management body suggest that the core success factors were the contents of the call and timing.</abstract><cop>Bratislava</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/nispa-2021-0010</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1338-4309 |
| ispartof | NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy, 2021-06, Vol.14 (1), p.261-283 |
| issn | 1338-4309 1337-9038 1338-4309 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2526403667 |
| source | De Gruyter Open Access Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sciendo |
| subjects | Business Case studies Competition Competitiveness Economic growth Employment EU funds Innovations Intervention operational programme competitiveness and Economic Growth Public opinion Public support for business innovation Quasi-experimental methods R&D Research & development Value Value added |
| title | Effectiveness of Public Support for Business Innovation from EU Funds: Case Study in Slovakia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A35%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Public%20Support%20for%20Business%20Innovation%20from%20EU%20Funds:%20Case%20Study%20in%20Slovakia&rft.jtitle=NISPAcee%20journal%20of%20public%20administration%20and%20policy&rft.au=Pis%C3%A1r,%20Peter&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=261-283&rft.issn=1338-4309&rft.eissn=1338-4309&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/nispa-2021-0010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2526403667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2526403667&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |