The approaches used to make change decisions and the influencing determinants

PurposeThis study aimed for the examination of the change decision-making approaches utilised by academic library directors and the identification and explanation of the determinants of the utilised approaches.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected from a survey. The content analysis was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Library management 2020-04, Vol.41 (4/5), p.269-277
1. Verfasser: Yi, Zhixian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 277
container_issue 4/5
container_start_page 269
container_title Library management
container_volume 41
creator Yi, Zhixian
description PurposeThis study aimed for the examination of the change decision-making approaches utilised by academic library directors and the identification and explanation of the determinants of the utilised approaches.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected from a survey. The content analysis was utilised to analyse the qualitative data. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data.FindingsThe findings resulted in the identification of the approaches used to make change decisions and three categories of determinants. Directors actually utilised multiple and dual approaches more than single approaches to make change decisions. The determinants of number of library branches, number of subordinates, total years of directorship and years of present position played a significant role in the utilised approaches to making change decisions. However, the findings demonstrate that the determinants of age, gender, library size, library type, number of different positions, total years of library service and education level were not significant determinants of the utilised approaches to making change decisions.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation is that the results of this study are not applicable and generalisable to academic libraries beyond this classification using in this study.Practical implicationsThe change decision-making approaches and the identified determinants will be useful and valuable for leaders and managers to make better decisions while managing change in the digital age.Originality/valueThe identification of the approaches and determinants provides information professionals with new knowledge and enables them to reflect the determinants of the utilised approaches and to make better change decisions in a given situation.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/LM-03-2020-0050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2526100346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2526100346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-955a2926a7f0479ce59576b3994a5ad3ca0b5ccd2d554f3db24f78e8f1f3bec63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb1PwzAQxS0EEqUws0ZiNj1_xcmIKr6kVCxlthzn3KY0TrGTgf-eVGVBQkxveO93d3pHyC2De8agWFQrCoJy4EABFJyRGdOqoLrk7JzMgElBFePyklyltAMAzriYkdV6i5k9HGJv3RZTNiZssqHPOvuBmdvasMGsQdemtg8ps2EyJ6ANfj9icG3YTO6AsWuDDUO6Jhfe7hPe_OicvD89rpcvtHp7fl0-VNQJkQ-0VMrykudWe5C6dKhKpfNalKW0yjbCWaiVcw1vlJJeNDWXXhdYeOZFjS4Xc3J3mjvd_TliGsyuH2OYVhqueM4AhPw_JQXTOteTzsnilHKxTymiN4fYdjZ-GQbm2KypVgaEOTZrjs1OxP2JwA6j3Td_AL9eIb4BULx4JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2431776724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The approaches used to make change decisions and the influencing determinants</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Yi, Zhixian</creator><creatorcontrib>Yi, Zhixian</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThis study aimed for the examination of the change decision-making approaches utilised by academic library directors and the identification and explanation of the determinants of the utilised approaches.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected from a survey. The content analysis was utilised to analyse the qualitative data. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data.FindingsThe findings resulted in the identification of the approaches used to make change decisions and three categories of determinants. Directors actually utilised multiple and dual approaches more than single approaches to make change decisions. The determinants of number of library branches, number of subordinates, total years of directorship and years of present position played a significant role in the utilised approaches to making change decisions. However, the findings demonstrate that the determinants of age, gender, library size, library type, number of different positions, total years of library service and education level were not significant determinants of the utilised approaches to making change decisions.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation is that the results of this study are not applicable and generalisable to academic libraries beyond this classification using in this study.Practical implicationsThe change decision-making approaches and the identified determinants will be useful and valuable for leaders and managers to make better decisions while managing change in the digital age.Originality/valueThe identification of the approaches and determinants provides information professionals with new knowledge and enables them to reflect the determinants of the utilised approaches and to make better change decisions in a given situation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-5124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/LM-03-2020-0050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Academic libraries ; Chief librarians ; Classification ; Collection development ; Collection development policies ; Collection management ; Content analysis ; Decision making ; Demographics ; Dependent variables ; Directors ; Human capital ; Human resources ; Hypotheses ; Independent variables ; Library collections ; Management of change ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Library management, 2020-04, Vol.41 (4/5), p.269-277</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-955a2926a7f0479ce59576b3994a5ad3ca0b5ccd2d554f3db24f78e8f1f3bec63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-955a2926a7f0479ce59576b3994a5ad3ca0b5ccd2d554f3db24f78e8f1f3bec63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8371-3908</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LM-03-2020-0050/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,27901,27902,52664</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yi, Zhixian</creatorcontrib><title>The approaches used to make change decisions and the influencing determinants</title><title>Library management</title><description>PurposeThis study aimed for the examination of the change decision-making approaches utilised by academic library directors and the identification and explanation of the determinants of the utilised approaches.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected from a survey. The content analysis was utilised to analyse the qualitative data. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data.FindingsThe findings resulted in the identification of the approaches used to make change decisions and three categories of determinants. Directors actually utilised multiple and dual approaches more than single approaches to make change decisions. The determinants of number of library branches, number of subordinates, total years of directorship and years of present position played a significant role in the utilised approaches to making change decisions. However, the findings demonstrate that the determinants of age, gender, library size, library type, number of different positions, total years of library service and education level were not significant determinants of the utilised approaches to making change decisions.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation is that the results of this study are not applicable and generalisable to academic libraries beyond this classification using in this study.Practical implicationsThe change decision-making approaches and the identified determinants will be useful and valuable for leaders and managers to make better decisions while managing change in the digital age.Originality/valueThe identification of the approaches and determinants provides information professionals with new knowledge and enables them to reflect the determinants of the utilised approaches and to make better change decisions in a given situation.</description><subject>Academic libraries</subject><subject>Chief librarians</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Collection development</subject><subject>Collection development policies</subject><subject>Collection management</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Dependent variables</subject><subject>Directors</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Library collections</subject><subject>Management of change</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0143-5124</issn><issn>1758-7921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kb1PwzAQxS0EEqUws0ZiNj1_xcmIKr6kVCxlthzn3KY0TrGTgf-eVGVBQkxveO93d3pHyC2De8agWFQrCoJy4EABFJyRGdOqoLrk7JzMgElBFePyklyltAMAzriYkdV6i5k9HGJv3RZTNiZssqHPOvuBmdvasMGsQdemtg8ps2EyJ6ANfj9icG3YTO6AsWuDDUO6Jhfe7hPe_OicvD89rpcvtHp7fl0-VNQJkQ-0VMrykudWe5C6dKhKpfNalKW0yjbCWaiVcw1vlJJeNDWXXhdYeOZFjS4Xc3J3mjvd_TliGsyuH2OYVhqueM4AhPw_JQXTOteTzsnilHKxTymiN4fYdjZ-GQbm2KypVgaEOTZrjs1OxP2JwA6j3Td_AL9eIb4BULx4JQ</recordid><startdate>20200414</startdate><enddate>20200414</enddate><creator>Yi, Zhixian</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-3908</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200414</creationdate><title>The approaches used to make change decisions and the influencing determinants</title><author>Yi, Zhixian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-955a2926a7f0479ce59576b3994a5ad3ca0b5ccd2d554f3db24f78e8f1f3bec63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic libraries</topic><topic>Chief librarians</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Collection development</topic><topic>Collection development policies</topic><topic>Collection management</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Dependent variables</topic><topic>Directors</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Library collections</topic><topic>Management of change</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yi, Zhixian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Library management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yi, Zhixian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The approaches used to make change decisions and the influencing determinants</atitle><jtitle>Library management</jtitle><date>2020-04-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4/5</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>269-277</pages><issn>0143-5124</issn><eissn>1758-7921</eissn><abstract>PurposeThis study aimed for the examination of the change decision-making approaches utilised by academic library directors and the identification and explanation of the determinants of the utilised approaches.Design/methodology/approachThe data were collected from a survey. The content analysis was utilised to analyse the qualitative data. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data.FindingsThe findings resulted in the identification of the approaches used to make change decisions and three categories of determinants. Directors actually utilised multiple and dual approaches more than single approaches to make change decisions. The determinants of number of library branches, number of subordinates, total years of directorship and years of present position played a significant role in the utilised approaches to making change decisions. However, the findings demonstrate that the determinants of age, gender, library size, library type, number of different positions, total years of library service and education level were not significant determinants of the utilised approaches to making change decisions.Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation is that the results of this study are not applicable and generalisable to academic libraries beyond this classification using in this study.Practical implicationsThe change decision-making approaches and the identified determinants will be useful and valuable for leaders and managers to make better decisions while managing change in the digital age.Originality/valueThe identification of the approaches and determinants provides information professionals with new knowledge and enables them to reflect the determinants of the utilised approaches and to make better change decisions in a given situation.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/LM-03-2020-0050</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-3908</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-5124
ispartof Library management, 2020-04, Vol.41 (4/5), p.269-277
issn 0143-5124
1758-7921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2526100346
source Emerald Journals
subjects Academic libraries
Chief librarians
Classification
Collection development
Collection development policies
Collection management
Content analysis
Decision making
Demographics
Dependent variables
Directors
Human capital
Human resources
Hypotheses
Independent variables
Library collections
Management of change
Trends
title The approaches used to make change decisions and the influencing determinants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A42%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20approaches%20used%20to%20make%20change%20decisions%20and%20the%20influencing%20determinants&rft.jtitle=Library%20management&rft.au=Yi,%20Zhixian&rft.date=2020-04-14&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4/5&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=269-277&rft.issn=0143-5124&rft.eissn=1758-7921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/LM-03-2020-0050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2526100346%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2431776724&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true