Facilitation and biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships in crop production systems and their role in sustainable farming
We review the need for increasing agricultural sustainability, how this can in part be delivered by positive biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) effects, the role within these of plant–plant facilitation, and how a better understanding of this role may help to deliver sustainable crop (particularl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of ecology 2021-05, Vol.109 (5), p.2054-2067 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2067 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2054 |
container_title | The Journal of ecology |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Brooker, Rob W. George, Tim S. Homulle, Zohralyn Karley, Alison J. Newton, Adrian C. Pakeman, Robin J. Schöb, Christian Wright, Alexandra |
description | We review the need for increasing agricultural sustainability, how this can in part be delivered by positive biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) effects, the role within these of plant–plant facilitation, and how a better understanding of this role may help to deliver sustainable crop (particularly arable) production systems.
Major challenges facing intensive arable production include overall declines in biodiversity, poor soil structure and health, nutrient and soil particle run‐off, high greenhouse gas emissions, and increasing costs of synthetic inputs including herbicides, pesticides and fertilisers.
Biodiversity–ecosystem function effects have the potential to deliver win–wins for arable food production, whereby enhanced biodiversity is associated with ‘good outcomes’ for farming sustainability, albeit sometimes through negative BEF effects for some components of the system. Although it can be difficult to separate explicitly from niche differentiation, evidence indicates facilitation can be a key component of these BEF effects.
Explicit recognition of facilitation's role brings benefits to developing sustainable crop systems. First, it allows us to link fundamental ecological studies on the evolution of facilitation to the selection of traits that can enhance functioning in crop mixtures. Second, it provides us with analytical frameworks which can be used to bring structure and testable hypotheses to data derived from multiple (often independent) crop trials.
Before concrete guidance can be provided to the agricultural sector as to how facilitation might be enhanced in crop systems, challenges exist with respect to quantifying facilitation, understanding the traits that maximise facilitation and integrating these traits into breeding programmes, components of an approach we suggest could be termed ‘Functional Ecological Selection’.
Synthesis. Ultimately, better integration between ecologists and crop scientists will be essential in harnessing the benefits of ecological knowledge for developing more sustainable agriculture. We need to focus on understanding the mechanistic basis of strong facilitative interactions in crop systems and using this information to select and breed for improved combinations of genotypes and species as part of the Functional Ecological Selection approach.
We review the need for increasing agricultural sustainability, how this can be partly delivered by positive biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) effects, the role within |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2745.13592 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2525572477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2525572477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3562-5d6ab1ad900c85fe0252938721c63c9c44f658eb63480b747dfd54c0c7f251903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9PwyAAxYnRxDk9e23i0XQDWkp7NM38lyVe9EwoBcfSwYRW05t-Br-hn0S6LrsqF_7k9x6PBwCXCM5QGHOUZCTGNCUzlJACH4HJ4eQYTCDEOIYppafgzPs1hDCjBE7A1y0XutEtb7U1ETd1VGlb63fpvG77n89vKazvfSs3keqM2FFONjvcr_TWR9pEwtlttHW27kZgFPidXbuS2kXONnIgfedbrg2vwlZxt9Hm9RycKN54ebGfp-DldvFc3sfLp7uH8mYZi4RkOCZ1xivE6wJCkRMlISa4SHKKkcgSUYg0VRnJZZUlaQ4rmtJa1SQVUFCFCSpgMgVXo28I-tZJ37K17ZwJV7JgRQjFoZ1AzUcqvMl7JxXbOr3hrmcIsqFnNrTKhlbZrueguB4VH7KyygstjZAH1VA0okVCcFhBFOj8_3S5_5fSdqYNUrKX6kb2f-Vij4tyDPgL4MKjhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2525572477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Facilitation and biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships in crop production systems and their role in sustainable farming</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Brooker, Rob W. ; George, Tim S. ; Homulle, Zohralyn ; Karley, Alison J. ; Newton, Adrian C. ; Pakeman, Robin J. ; Schöb, Christian ; Wright, Alexandra</creator><contributor>Wright, Alexandra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brooker, Rob W. ; George, Tim S. ; Homulle, Zohralyn ; Karley, Alison J. ; Newton, Adrian C. ; Pakeman, Robin J. ; Schöb, Christian ; Wright, Alexandra ; Wright, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><description>We review the need for increasing agricultural sustainability, how this can in part be delivered by positive biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) effects, the role within these of plant–plant facilitation, and how a better understanding of this role may help to deliver sustainable crop (particularly arable) production systems.
Major challenges facing intensive arable production include overall declines in biodiversity, poor soil structure and health, nutrient and soil particle run‐off, high greenhouse gas emissions, and increasing costs of synthetic inputs including herbicides, pesticides and fertilisers.
Biodiversity–ecosystem function effects have the potential to deliver win–wins for arable food production, whereby enhanced biodiversity is associated with ‘good outcomes’ for farming sustainability, albeit sometimes through negative BEF effects for some components of the system. Although it can be difficult to separate explicitly from niche differentiation, evidence indicates facilitation can be a key component of these BEF effects.
Explicit recognition of facilitation's role brings benefits to developing sustainable crop systems. First, it allows us to link fundamental ecological studies on the evolution of facilitation to the selection of traits that can enhance functioning in crop mixtures. Second, it provides us with analytical frameworks which can be used to bring structure and testable hypotheses to data derived from multiple (often independent) crop trials.
Before concrete guidance can be provided to the agricultural sector as to how facilitation might be enhanced in crop systems, challenges exist with respect to quantifying facilitation, understanding the traits that maximise facilitation and integrating these traits into breeding programmes, components of an approach we suggest could be termed ‘Functional Ecological Selection’.
Synthesis. Ultimately, better integration between ecologists and crop scientists will be essential in harnessing the benefits of ecological knowledge for developing more sustainable agriculture. We need to focus on understanding the mechanistic basis of strong facilitative interactions in crop systems and using this information to select and breed for improved combinations of genotypes and species as part of the Functional Ecological Selection approach.
We review the need for increasing agricultural sustainability, how this can be partly delivered by positive biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) effects, the role within these of plant facilitation, and how better understanding of this role may help to deliver sustainable crop production systems. We also explore how ecological approaches such as the Stress Gradient Hypothesis can help deliver this goal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Agricultural development ; Agricultural industry ; Agricultural production ; Arable land ; Biodiversity ; biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships ; Breeding ; Components ; crop breeding ; Crop production ; Crop production systems ; Crops ; Ecological studies ; Ecologists ; Ecology ; Ecosystem assessment ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Farming ; Fertilizers ; Food production ; functional ecological selection ; Genotypes ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Herbicides ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; pest and disease resistance ; Pesticides ; Plant Sciences ; plant–plant facilitation ; review ; Science & Technology ; Soil ; soil nutrients ; Soil structure ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; sustainable crop production</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2021-05, Vol.109 (5), p.2054-2067</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>69</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000617935200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3562-5d6ab1ad900c85fe0252938721c63c9c44f658eb63480b747dfd54c0c7f251903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3562-5d6ab1ad900c85fe0252938721c63c9c44f658eb63480b747dfd54c0c7f251903</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6248-4133 ; 0000-0002-0252-2086 ; 0000-0003-0303-6706 ; 0000-0003-3231-2159 ; 0000-0003-4472-2286 ; 0000-0002-7014-0071</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2745.13592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2745.13592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,27933,27934,39267,45583,45584,46418,46842</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Wright, Alexandra</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brooker, Rob W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Tim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homulle, Zohralyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karley, Alison J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Adrian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakeman, Robin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöb, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><title>Facilitation and biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships in crop production systems and their role in sustainable farming</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><addtitle>J ECOL</addtitle><description>We review the need for increasing agricultural sustainability, how this can in part be delivered by positive biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) effects, the role within these of plant–plant facilitation, and how a better understanding of this role may help to deliver sustainable crop (particularly arable) production systems.
Major challenges facing intensive arable production include overall declines in biodiversity, poor soil structure and health, nutrient and soil particle run‐off, high greenhouse gas emissions, and increasing costs of synthetic inputs including herbicides, pesticides and fertilisers.
Biodiversity–ecosystem function effects have the potential to deliver win–wins for arable food production, whereby enhanced biodiversity is associated with ‘good outcomes’ for farming sustainability, albeit sometimes through negative BEF effects for some components of the system. Although it can be difficult to separate explicitly from niche differentiation, evidence indicates facilitation can be a key component of these BEF effects.
Explicit recognition of facilitation's role brings benefits to developing sustainable crop systems. First, it allows us to link fundamental ecological studies on the evolution of facilitation to the selection of traits that can enhance functioning in crop mixtures. Second, it provides us with analytical frameworks which can be used to bring structure and testable hypotheses to data derived from multiple (often independent) crop trials.
Before concrete guidance can be provided to the agricultural sector as to how facilitation might be enhanced in crop systems, challenges exist with respect to quantifying facilitation, understanding the traits that maximise facilitation and integrating these traits into breeding programmes, components of an approach we suggest could be termed ‘Functional Ecological Selection’.
Synthesis. Ultimately, better integration between ecologists and crop scientists will be essential in harnessing the benefits of ecological knowledge for developing more sustainable agriculture. We need to focus on understanding the mechanistic basis of strong facilitative interactions in crop systems and using this information to select and breed for improved combinations of genotypes and species as part of the Functional Ecological Selection approach.
We review the need for increasing agricultural sustainability, how this can be partly delivered by positive biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) effects, the role within these of plant facilitation, and how better understanding of this role may help to deliver sustainable crop production systems. We also explore how ecological approaches such as the Stress Gradient Hypothesis can help deliver this goal.</description><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>crop breeding</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop production systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Ecological studies</subject><subject>Ecologists</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>functional ecological selection</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>pest and disease resistance</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>plant–plant facilitation</subject><subject>review</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil structure</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>sustainable crop production</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9PwyAAxYnRxDk9e23i0XQDWkp7NM38lyVe9EwoBcfSwYRW05t-Br-hn0S6LrsqF_7k9x6PBwCXCM5QGHOUZCTGNCUzlJACH4HJ4eQYTCDEOIYppafgzPs1hDCjBE7A1y0XutEtb7U1ETd1VGlb63fpvG77n89vKazvfSs3keqM2FFONjvcr_TWR9pEwtlttHW27kZgFPidXbuS2kXONnIgfedbrg2vwlZxt9Hm9RycKN54ebGfp-DldvFc3sfLp7uH8mYZi4RkOCZ1xivE6wJCkRMlISa4SHKKkcgSUYg0VRnJZZUlaQ4rmtJa1SQVUFCFCSpgMgVXo28I-tZJ37K17ZwJV7JgRQjFoZ1AzUcqvMl7JxXbOr3hrmcIsqFnNrTKhlbZrueguB4VH7KyygstjZAH1VA0okVCcFhBFOj8_3S5_5fSdqYNUrKX6kb2f-Vij4tyDPgL4MKjhg</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Brooker, Rob W.</creator><creator>George, Tim S.</creator><creator>Homulle, Zohralyn</creator><creator>Karley, Alison J.</creator><creator>Newton, Adrian C.</creator><creator>Pakeman, Robin J.</creator><creator>Schöb, Christian</creator><creator>Wright, Alexandra</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6248-4133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0252-2086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0303-6706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-2159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-2286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7014-0071</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Facilitation and biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships in crop production systems and their role in sustainable farming</title><author>Brooker, Rob W. ; George, Tim S. ; Homulle, Zohralyn ; Karley, Alison J. ; Newton, Adrian C. ; Pakeman, Robin J. ; Schöb, Christian ; Wright, Alexandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3562-5d6ab1ad900c85fe0252938721c63c9c44f658eb63480b747dfd54c0c7f251903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>crop breeding</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop production systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Ecological studies</topic><topic>Ecologists</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>functional ecological selection</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>pest and disease resistance</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>plant–plant facilitation</topic><topic>review</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil structure</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>sustainable crop production</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brooker, Rob W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Tim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homulle, Zohralyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karley, Alison J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Adrian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pakeman, Robin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöb, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brooker, Rob W.</au><au>George, Tim S.</au><au>Homulle, Zohralyn</au><au>Karley, Alison J.</au><au>Newton, Adrian C.</au><au>Pakeman, Robin J.</au><au>Schöb, Christian</au><au>Wright, Alexandra</au><au>Wright, Alexandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Facilitation and biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships in crop production systems and their role in sustainable farming</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><stitle>J ECOL</stitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2054</spage><epage>2067</epage><pages>2054-2067</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><abstract>We review the need for increasing agricultural sustainability, how this can in part be delivered by positive biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) effects, the role within these of plant–plant facilitation, and how a better understanding of this role may help to deliver sustainable crop (particularly arable) production systems.
Major challenges facing intensive arable production include overall declines in biodiversity, poor soil structure and health, nutrient and soil particle run‐off, high greenhouse gas emissions, and increasing costs of synthetic inputs including herbicides, pesticides and fertilisers.
Biodiversity–ecosystem function effects have the potential to deliver win–wins for arable food production, whereby enhanced biodiversity is associated with ‘good outcomes’ for farming sustainability, albeit sometimes through negative BEF effects for some components of the system. Although it can be difficult to separate explicitly from niche differentiation, evidence indicates facilitation can be a key component of these BEF effects.
Explicit recognition of facilitation's role brings benefits to developing sustainable crop systems. First, it allows us to link fundamental ecological studies on the evolution of facilitation to the selection of traits that can enhance functioning in crop mixtures. Second, it provides us with analytical frameworks which can be used to bring structure and testable hypotheses to data derived from multiple (often independent) crop trials.
Before concrete guidance can be provided to the agricultural sector as to how facilitation might be enhanced in crop systems, challenges exist with respect to quantifying facilitation, understanding the traits that maximise facilitation and integrating these traits into breeding programmes, components of an approach we suggest could be termed ‘Functional Ecological Selection’.
Synthesis. Ultimately, better integration between ecologists and crop scientists will be essential in harnessing the benefits of ecological knowledge for developing more sustainable agriculture. We need to focus on understanding the mechanistic basis of strong facilitative interactions in crop systems and using this information to select and breed for improved combinations of genotypes and species as part of the Functional Ecological Selection approach.
We review the need for increasing agricultural sustainability, how this can be partly delivered by positive biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) effects, the role within these of plant facilitation, and how better understanding of this role may help to deliver sustainable crop production systems. We also explore how ecological approaches such as the Stress Gradient Hypothesis can help deliver this goal.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2745.13592</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6248-4133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0252-2086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0303-6706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-2159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-2286</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7014-0071</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0477 |
ispartof | The Journal of ecology, 2021-05, Vol.109 (5), p.2054-2067 |
issn | 0022-0477 1365-2745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2525572477 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Agricultural development Agricultural industry Agricultural production Arable land Biodiversity biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships Breeding Components crop breeding Crop production Crop production systems Crops Ecological studies Ecologists Ecology Ecosystem assessment Ecosystems Environmental Sciences & Ecology Farming Fertilizers Food production functional ecological selection Genotypes Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Herbicides Life Sciences & Biomedicine pest and disease resistance Pesticides Plant Sciences plant–plant facilitation review Science & Technology Soil soil nutrients Soil structure Sustainability Sustainable agriculture sustainable crop production |
title | Facilitation and biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships in crop production systems and their role in sustainable farming |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T18%3A47%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Facilitation%20and%20biodiversity%E2%80%93ecosystem%20function%20relationships%20in%20crop%20production%20systems%20and%20their%20role%20in%20sustainable%20farming&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Brooker,%20Rob%20W.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2054&rft.epage=2067&rft.pages=2054-2067&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2745.13592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2525572477%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2525572477&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |