Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background
Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evolutionary ecology 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.401-412 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 412 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 401 |
container_title | Evolutionary ecology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Mark, C. J. Painting, C. J. O’Hanlon, J. C. Holwell, G. I. |
description | Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects, such as leaves or twigs. Masquerading prey avoid predation by being misclassified as irrelevant parts of the environment, rather than as food. Here we assess a putative case of masquerade in the North Island lichen moth,
Declana atronivea
(Geometridae), an endemic New Zealand species with intricate black and white forewings that appear to resemble lichen. Lichen masquerade is a type of ‘element imitation’ in which the object being mimicked forms a common element of the environmental pattern. However, unlike discrete objects, such as leaves and twigs, lichen may be difficult to distinguish as a distinct entity. This raises the question of whether
D. atronivea
can be said to look like ‘a’ lichen, or whether its body colouration appears as a component of a larger patch of lichen. In this case, does the lichen resemblance function as a form of masquerade, or is it an example of background matching? Using laboratory experiments with domestic chicks (
Gallus gallus
) as predators, we investigated whether
D. atronivea
moths avoid predation by being misclassified as lichen. We exposed naïve and experienced chicks to
D. atronivea
and compared their responses, predicting that if the moths do benefit from masquerade, chicks with previous experience of lichen would take longer to attack. Our hypothesis was not supported; there was no significant difference in predator interaction regardless of prior experience, suggesting that, in the absence of a matching background,
D. atronivea
do not benefit from masquerading as lichen. Rather, this may be a case of context-dependent misclassification, or perhaps the forewing colouration promotes concealment through crypsis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2525227519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714109929</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714109929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-48eb7427ff1a09eea267ef0c187323b7d73d4b78159029277fe5c4cc91811db93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u2zAMxoVhBZr-eYGeBOzsTpRsyz4GwdoOCNDLdhZkmUqUxlInKYfe-hjt6-VJqswDeht4IEB-P5LgR8gNsFtgTH5PwNqOV4xDBQyAVeILWUAjRdXVUn4lC8bbvpJtI87JRUo7xpioRbsgT2tntujpFPI20TFQHzId0KN1mdoYJnp8fcM9TugzdZPLOrvgj6_vdNLpzwGjHpE6T_MWqR4SeoM0WKpLO5ut8xs6aPO0ieHgxytyZvU-4fW_fEl-3_34tXqo1o_3P1fLdWVE0-Wq7nCQNZfWgmY9ouatRMsMdFJwMchRirEeZAdNz3jPpbTYmNqYHjqAcejFJfk2z32OoZyYstqFQ_RlpeJNCS4bOKluZ9VG71E5b0OO2pQYcXImnD5Q6ksJNbC-5yeAz4CJIaWIVj1HN-n4ooCpkwtqdkEVF9RfF5QokJihVMR-g_Hzlv9QH2cei9k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2525227519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mark, C. J. ; Painting, C. J. ; O’Hanlon, J. C. ; Holwell, G. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mark, C. J. ; Painting, C. J. ; O’Hanlon, J. C. ; Holwell, G. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects, such as leaves or twigs. Masquerading prey avoid predation by being misclassified as irrelevant parts of the environment, rather than as food. Here we assess a putative case of masquerade in the North Island lichen moth,
Declana atronivea
(Geometridae), an endemic New Zealand species with intricate black and white forewings that appear to resemble lichen. Lichen masquerade is a type of ‘element imitation’ in which the object being mimicked forms a common element of the environmental pattern. However, unlike discrete objects, such as leaves and twigs, lichen may be difficult to distinguish as a distinct entity. This raises the question of whether
D. atronivea
can be said to look like ‘a’ lichen, or whether its body colouration appears as a component of a larger patch of lichen. In this case, does the lichen resemblance function as a form of masquerade, or is it an example of background matching? Using laboratory experiments with domestic chicks (
Gallus gallus
) as predators, we investigated whether
D. atronivea
moths avoid predation by being misclassified as lichen. We exposed naïve and experienced chicks to
D. atronivea
and compared their responses, predicting that if the moths do benefit from masquerade, chicks with previous experience of lichen would take longer to attack. Our hypothesis was not supported; there was no significant difference in predator interaction regardless of prior experience, suggesting that, in the absence of a matching background,
D. atronivea
do not benefit from masquerading as lichen. Rather, this may be a case of context-dependent misclassification, or perhaps the forewing colouration promotes concealment through crypsis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies & moths ; Camouflage ; Crypsis ; Ecology ; Endemic species ; Evolutionary Biology ; Geometrid moths ; Juveniles ; Leaves ; Lichens ; Life Sciences ; Matching ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Predation ; Predators ; Prey</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary ecology, 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.401-412</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-48eb7427ff1a09eea267ef0c187323b7d73d4b78159029277fe5c4cc91811db93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-48eb7427ff1a09eea267ef0c187323b7d73d4b78159029277fe5c4cc91811db93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3151-2554</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mark, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painting, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hanlon, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holwell, G. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background</title><title>Evolutionary ecology</title><addtitle>Evol Ecol</addtitle><description>Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects, such as leaves or twigs. Masquerading prey avoid predation by being misclassified as irrelevant parts of the environment, rather than as food. Here we assess a putative case of masquerade in the North Island lichen moth,
Declana atronivea
(Geometridae), an endemic New Zealand species with intricate black and white forewings that appear to resemble lichen. Lichen masquerade is a type of ‘element imitation’ in which the object being mimicked forms a common element of the environmental pattern. However, unlike discrete objects, such as leaves and twigs, lichen may be difficult to distinguish as a distinct entity. This raises the question of whether
D. atronivea
can be said to look like ‘a’ lichen, or whether its body colouration appears as a component of a larger patch of lichen. In this case, does the lichen resemblance function as a form of masquerade, or is it an example of background matching? Using laboratory experiments with domestic chicks (
Gallus gallus
) as predators, we investigated whether
D. atronivea
moths avoid predation by being misclassified as lichen. We exposed naïve and experienced chicks to
D. atronivea
and compared their responses, predicting that if the moths do benefit from masquerade, chicks with previous experience of lichen would take longer to attack. Our hypothesis was not supported; there was no significant difference in predator interaction regardless of prior experience, suggesting that, in the absence of a matching background,
D. atronivea
do not benefit from masquerading as lichen. Rather, this may be a case of context-dependent misclassification, or perhaps the forewing colouration promotes concealment through crypsis.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Camouflage</subject><subject>Crypsis</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endemic species</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Geometrid moths</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Lichens</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><issn>0269-7653</issn><issn>1573-8477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u2zAMxoVhBZr-eYGeBOzsTpRsyz4GwdoOCNDLdhZkmUqUxlInKYfe-hjt6-VJqswDeht4IEB-P5LgR8gNsFtgTH5PwNqOV4xDBQyAVeILWUAjRdXVUn4lC8bbvpJtI87JRUo7xpioRbsgT2tntujpFPI20TFQHzId0KN1mdoYJnp8fcM9TugzdZPLOrvgj6_vdNLpzwGjHpE6T_MWqR4SeoM0WKpLO5ut8xs6aPO0ieHgxytyZvU-4fW_fEl-3_34tXqo1o_3P1fLdWVE0-Wq7nCQNZfWgmY9ouatRMsMdFJwMchRirEeZAdNz3jPpbTYmNqYHjqAcejFJfk2z32OoZyYstqFQ_RlpeJNCS4bOKluZ9VG71E5b0OO2pQYcXImnD5Q6ksJNbC-5yeAz4CJIaWIVj1HN-n4ooCpkwtqdkEVF9RfF5QokJihVMR-g_Hzlv9QH2cei9k</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Mark, C. J.</creator><creator>Painting, C. J.</creator><creator>O’Hanlon, J. C.</creator><creator>Holwell, G. I.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3151-2554</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background</title><author>Mark, C. J. ; Painting, C. J. ; O’Hanlon, J. C. ; Holwell, G. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-48eb7427ff1a09eea267ef0c187323b7d73d4b78159029277fe5c4cc91811db93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Camouflage</topic><topic>Crypsis</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endemic species</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Geometrid moths</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Lichens</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mark, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painting, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hanlon, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holwell, G. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mark, C. J.</au><au>Painting, C. J.</au><au>O’Hanlon, J. C.</au><au>Holwell, G. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary ecology</jtitle><stitle>Evol Ecol</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>401-412</pages><issn>0269-7653</issn><eissn>1573-8477</eissn><abstract>Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects, such as leaves or twigs. Masquerading prey avoid predation by being misclassified as irrelevant parts of the environment, rather than as food. Here we assess a putative case of masquerade in the North Island lichen moth,
Declana atronivea
(Geometridae), an endemic New Zealand species with intricate black and white forewings that appear to resemble lichen. Lichen masquerade is a type of ‘element imitation’ in which the object being mimicked forms a common element of the environmental pattern. However, unlike discrete objects, such as leaves and twigs, lichen may be difficult to distinguish as a distinct entity. This raises the question of whether
D. atronivea
can be said to look like ‘a’ lichen, or whether its body colouration appears as a component of a larger patch of lichen. In this case, does the lichen resemblance function as a form of masquerade, or is it an example of background matching? Using laboratory experiments with domestic chicks (
Gallus gallus
) as predators, we investigated whether
D. atronivea
moths avoid predation by being misclassified as lichen. We exposed naïve and experienced chicks to
D. atronivea
and compared their responses, predicting that if the moths do benefit from masquerade, chicks with previous experience of lichen would take longer to attack. Our hypothesis was not supported; there was no significant difference in predator interaction regardless of prior experience, suggesting that, in the absence of a matching background,
D. atronivea
do not benefit from masquerading as lichen. Rather, this may be a case of context-dependent misclassification, or perhaps the forewing colouration promotes concealment through crypsis.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3151-2554</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-7653 |
ispartof | Evolutionary ecology, 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.401-412 |
issn | 0269-7653 1573-8477 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2525227519 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal Ecology Biomedical and Life Sciences Butterflies & moths Camouflage Crypsis Ecology Endemic species Evolutionary Biology Geometrid moths Juveniles Leaves Lichens Life Sciences Matching Original Paper Plant Sciences Predation Predators Prey |
title | Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T05%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lichen%20moths%20do%20not%20benefit%20from%20%E2%80%98element%20imitation%E2%80%99%20masquerade%20in%20the%20absence%20of%20a%20matching%20background&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20ecology&rft.au=Mark,%20C.%20J.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=401-412&rft.issn=0269-7653&rft.eissn=1573-8477&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714109929%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2525227519&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A714109929&rfr_iscdi=true |