Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background

Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evolutionary ecology 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.401-412
Hauptverfasser: Mark, C. J., Painting, C. J., O’Hanlon, J. C., Holwell, G. I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 412
container_issue 3
container_start_page 401
container_title Evolutionary ecology
container_volume 35
creator Mark, C. J.
Painting, C. J.
O’Hanlon, J. C.
Holwell, G. I.
description Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects, such as leaves or twigs. Masquerading prey avoid predation by being misclassified as irrelevant parts of the environment, rather than as food. Here we assess a putative case of masquerade in the North Island lichen moth, Declana atronivea (Geometridae), an endemic New Zealand species with intricate black and white forewings that appear to resemble lichen. Lichen masquerade is a type of ‘element imitation’ in which the object being mimicked forms a common element of the environmental pattern. However, unlike discrete objects, such as leaves and twigs, lichen may be difficult to distinguish as a distinct entity. This raises the question of whether D. atronivea can be said to look like ‘a’ lichen, or whether its body colouration appears as a component of a larger patch of lichen. In this case, does the lichen resemblance function as a form of masquerade, or is it an example of background matching? Using laboratory experiments with domestic chicks ( Gallus gallus ) as predators, we investigated whether D. atronivea moths avoid predation by being misclassified as lichen. We exposed naïve and experienced chicks to D. atronivea and compared their responses, predicting that if the moths do benefit from masquerade, chicks with previous experience of lichen would take longer to attack. Our hypothesis was not supported; there was no significant difference in predator interaction regardless of prior experience, suggesting that, in the absence of a matching background, D. atronivea do not benefit from masquerading as lichen. Rather, this may be a case of context-dependent misclassification, or perhaps the forewing colouration promotes concealment through crypsis.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2525227519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714109929</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714109929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-48eb7427ff1a09eea267ef0c187323b7d73d4b78159029277fe5c4cc91811db93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u2zAMxoVhBZr-eYGeBOzsTpRsyz4GwdoOCNDLdhZkmUqUxlInKYfe-hjt6-VJqswDeht4IEB-P5LgR8gNsFtgTH5PwNqOV4xDBQyAVeILWUAjRdXVUn4lC8bbvpJtI87JRUo7xpioRbsgT2tntujpFPI20TFQHzId0KN1mdoYJnp8fcM9TugzdZPLOrvgj6_vdNLpzwGjHpE6T_MWqR4SeoM0WKpLO5ut8xs6aPO0ieHgxytyZvU-4fW_fEl-3_34tXqo1o_3P1fLdWVE0-Wq7nCQNZfWgmY9ouatRMsMdFJwMchRirEeZAdNz3jPpbTYmNqYHjqAcejFJfk2z32OoZyYstqFQ_RlpeJNCS4bOKluZ9VG71E5b0OO2pQYcXImnD5Q6ksJNbC-5yeAz4CJIaWIVj1HN-n4ooCpkwtqdkEVF9RfF5QokJihVMR-g_Hzlv9QH2cei9k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2525227519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mark, C. J. ; Painting, C. J. ; O’Hanlon, J. C. ; Holwell, G. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mark, C. J. ; Painting, C. J. ; O’Hanlon, J. C. ; Holwell, G. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects, such as leaves or twigs. Masquerading prey avoid predation by being misclassified as irrelevant parts of the environment, rather than as food. Here we assess a putative case of masquerade in the North Island lichen moth, Declana atronivea (Geometridae), an endemic New Zealand species with intricate black and white forewings that appear to resemble lichen. Lichen masquerade is a type of ‘element imitation’ in which the object being mimicked forms a common element of the environmental pattern. However, unlike discrete objects, such as leaves and twigs, lichen may be difficult to distinguish as a distinct entity. This raises the question of whether D. atronivea can be said to look like ‘a’ lichen, or whether its body colouration appears as a component of a larger patch of lichen. In this case, does the lichen resemblance function as a form of masquerade, or is it an example of background matching? Using laboratory experiments with domestic chicks ( Gallus gallus ) as predators, we investigated whether D. atronivea moths avoid predation by being misclassified as lichen. We exposed naïve and experienced chicks to D. atronivea and compared their responses, predicting that if the moths do benefit from masquerade, chicks with previous experience of lichen would take longer to attack. Our hypothesis was not supported; there was no significant difference in predator interaction regardless of prior experience, suggesting that, in the absence of a matching background, D. atronivea do not benefit from masquerading as lichen. Rather, this may be a case of context-dependent misclassification, or perhaps the forewing colouration promotes concealment through crypsis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Camouflage ; Crypsis ; Ecology ; Endemic species ; Evolutionary Biology ; Geometrid moths ; Juveniles ; Leaves ; Lichens ; Life Sciences ; Matching ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Predation ; Predators ; Prey</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary ecology, 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.401-412</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-48eb7427ff1a09eea267ef0c187323b7d73d4b78159029277fe5c4cc91811db93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-48eb7427ff1a09eea267ef0c187323b7d73d4b78159029277fe5c4cc91811db93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3151-2554</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mark, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painting, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hanlon, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holwell, G. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background</title><title>Evolutionary ecology</title><addtitle>Evol Ecol</addtitle><description>Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects, such as leaves or twigs. Masquerading prey avoid predation by being misclassified as irrelevant parts of the environment, rather than as food. Here we assess a putative case of masquerade in the North Island lichen moth, Declana atronivea (Geometridae), an endemic New Zealand species with intricate black and white forewings that appear to resemble lichen. Lichen masquerade is a type of ‘element imitation’ in which the object being mimicked forms a common element of the environmental pattern. However, unlike discrete objects, such as leaves and twigs, lichen may be difficult to distinguish as a distinct entity. This raises the question of whether D. atronivea can be said to look like ‘a’ lichen, or whether its body colouration appears as a component of a larger patch of lichen. In this case, does the lichen resemblance function as a form of masquerade, or is it an example of background matching? Using laboratory experiments with domestic chicks ( Gallus gallus ) as predators, we investigated whether D. atronivea moths avoid predation by being misclassified as lichen. We exposed naïve and experienced chicks to D. atronivea and compared their responses, predicting that if the moths do benefit from masquerade, chicks with previous experience of lichen would take longer to attack. Our hypothesis was not supported; there was no significant difference in predator interaction regardless of prior experience, suggesting that, in the absence of a matching background, D. atronivea do not benefit from masquerading as lichen. Rather, this may be a case of context-dependent misclassification, or perhaps the forewing colouration promotes concealment through crypsis.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Camouflage</subject><subject>Crypsis</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Endemic species</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Geometrid moths</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Lichens</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><issn>0269-7653</issn><issn>1573-8477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u2zAMxoVhBZr-eYGeBOzsTpRsyz4GwdoOCNDLdhZkmUqUxlInKYfe-hjt6-VJqswDeht4IEB-P5LgR8gNsFtgTH5PwNqOV4xDBQyAVeILWUAjRdXVUn4lC8bbvpJtI87JRUo7xpioRbsgT2tntujpFPI20TFQHzId0KN1mdoYJnp8fcM9TugzdZPLOrvgj6_vdNLpzwGjHpE6T_MWqR4SeoM0WKpLO5ut8xs6aPO0ieHgxytyZvU-4fW_fEl-3_34tXqo1o_3P1fLdWVE0-Wq7nCQNZfWgmY9ouatRMsMdFJwMchRirEeZAdNz3jPpbTYmNqYHjqAcejFJfk2z32OoZyYstqFQ_RlpeJNCS4bOKluZ9VG71E5b0OO2pQYcXImnD5Q6ksJNbC-5yeAz4CJIaWIVj1HN-n4ooCpkwtqdkEVF9RfF5QokJihVMR-g_Hzlv9QH2cei9k</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Mark, C. J.</creator><creator>Painting, C. J.</creator><creator>O’Hanlon, J. C.</creator><creator>Holwell, G. I.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3151-2554</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background</title><author>Mark, C. J. ; Painting, C. J. ; O’Hanlon, J. C. ; Holwell, G. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-48eb7427ff1a09eea267ef0c187323b7d73d4b78159029277fe5c4cc91811db93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Camouflage</topic><topic>Crypsis</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Endemic species</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Geometrid moths</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Lichens</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mark, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painting, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hanlon, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holwell, G. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mark, C. J.</au><au>Painting, C. J.</au><au>O’Hanlon, J. C.</au><au>Holwell, G. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary ecology</jtitle><stitle>Evol Ecol</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>401-412</pages><issn>0269-7653</issn><eissn>1573-8477</eissn><abstract>Predation places significant selection pressures on prey species and many have evolved incredible and diverse colour patterns in response. A fascinating example of such adaptive colouration and morphology is masquerade, a camouflage strategy in which organisms resemble innocuous and inedible objects, such as leaves or twigs. Masquerading prey avoid predation by being misclassified as irrelevant parts of the environment, rather than as food. Here we assess a putative case of masquerade in the North Island lichen moth, Declana atronivea (Geometridae), an endemic New Zealand species with intricate black and white forewings that appear to resemble lichen. Lichen masquerade is a type of ‘element imitation’ in which the object being mimicked forms a common element of the environmental pattern. However, unlike discrete objects, such as leaves and twigs, lichen may be difficult to distinguish as a distinct entity. This raises the question of whether D. atronivea can be said to look like ‘a’ lichen, or whether its body colouration appears as a component of a larger patch of lichen. In this case, does the lichen resemblance function as a form of masquerade, or is it an example of background matching? Using laboratory experiments with domestic chicks ( Gallus gallus ) as predators, we investigated whether D. atronivea moths avoid predation by being misclassified as lichen. We exposed naïve and experienced chicks to D. atronivea and compared their responses, predicting that if the moths do benefit from masquerade, chicks with previous experience of lichen would take longer to attack. Our hypothesis was not supported; there was no significant difference in predator interaction regardless of prior experience, suggesting that, in the absence of a matching background, D. atronivea do not benefit from masquerading as lichen. Rather, this may be a case of context-dependent misclassification, or perhaps the forewing colouration promotes concealment through crypsis.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3151-2554</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7653
ispartof Evolutionary ecology, 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.401-412
issn 0269-7653
1573-8477
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2525227519
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal Ecology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Butterflies & moths
Camouflage
Crypsis
Ecology
Endemic species
Evolutionary Biology
Geometrid moths
Juveniles
Leaves
Lichens
Life Sciences
Matching
Original Paper
Plant Sciences
Predation
Predators
Prey
title Lichen moths do not benefit from ‘element imitation’ masquerade in the absence of a matching background
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T05%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lichen%20moths%20do%20not%20benefit%20from%20%E2%80%98element%20imitation%E2%80%99%20masquerade%20in%20the%20absence%20of%20a%20matching%20background&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20ecology&rft.au=Mark,%20C.%20J.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=401-412&rft.issn=0269-7653&rft.eissn=1573-8477&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10682-021-10110-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714109929%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2525227519&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A714109929&rfr_iscdi=true