Benchmarking Dust Emission Models in M101

We present a comparative study of four physical dust models and two single-temperature modified blackbody models by fitting them to the resolved WISE, Spitzer, and Herschel photometry of M101 (NGC 5457). Using identical data and a grid-based fitting technique, we compare the resulting dust and radia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2021-05, Vol.912 (2), p.103
Hauptverfasser: Chastenet, Jérémy, Sandstrom, Karin, Chiang, I-Da, Hensley, Brandon S., Draine, Bruce T., Gordon, Karl D., Koch, Eric W., Leroy, Adam K., Utomo, Dyas, Williams, Thomas G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 103
container_title The Astrophysical journal
container_volume 912
creator Chastenet, Jérémy
Sandstrom, Karin
Chiang, I-Da
Hensley, Brandon S.
Draine, Bruce T.
Gordon, Karl D.
Koch, Eric W.
Leroy, Adam K.
Utomo, Dyas
Williams, Thomas G.
description We present a comparative study of four physical dust models and two single-temperature modified blackbody models by fitting them to the resolved WISE, Spitzer, and Herschel photometry of M101 (NGC 5457). Using identical data and a grid-based fitting technique, we compare the resulting dust and radiation field properties derived from the models. We find that the dust mass yielded by the different models can vary by up to a factor of 3 (factor of 1.4 between physical models only), although the fits have similar quality. Despite differences in their definition of the carriers of the mid-IR aromatic features, all physical models show the same spatial variations for the abundance of that grain population. Using the well-determined metallicity gradient in M101 and resolved gas maps, we calculate an approximate upper limit on the dust mass as a function of radius. All physical dust models are found to exceed this maximum estimate over some range of galactocentric radii. We show that renormalizing the models to match the same Milky Way high-latitude cirrus spectrum and abundance constraints can reduce the dust mass differences between models and bring the total dust mass below the maximum estimate at all radii.
doi_str_mv 10.3847/1538-4357/abe942
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2524943550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524943550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-474f43bb49966fdd064151fd074fa2310255afa93f84b695fc20c28915c7a6bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKJgXb17LIgHwbovX21z1HX9gBUvCt5CmibadbepSXvw35tS0Yt4eu8NM_OYQegYwwUtWTHHnJYZo7yYq8oIRnZQ8gPtogQAWJbT4mUfHYSwHk8iRILOrkyr37bKvzfta3o9hD5dbpsQGtemD642m5A2ccOAD9GeVZtgjr7nDD3fLJ8Wd9nq8fZ-cbnKNC2hz1jBLKNVxYTIc1vXkDPMsa0h4opQDIRzZZWgtmRVLrjVBDQpBea6UHll6QydTL6ddx-DCb1cu8G38aUknDARA3GILJhY2rsQvLGy802M8SkxyLEQOaaXY3o5FRIl55Okcd2v5z_00z_oqltLgYkkUUhlV1v6Ba0La08</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524943550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benchmarking Dust Emission Models in M101</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><creator>Chastenet, Jérémy ; Sandstrom, Karin ; Chiang, I-Da ; Hensley, Brandon S. ; Draine, Bruce T. ; Gordon, Karl D. ; Koch, Eric W. ; Leroy, Adam K. ; Utomo, Dyas ; Williams, Thomas G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chastenet, Jérémy ; Sandstrom, Karin ; Chiang, I-Da ; Hensley, Brandon S. ; Draine, Bruce T. ; Gordon, Karl D. ; Koch, Eric W. ; Leroy, Adam K. ; Utomo, Dyas ; Williams, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a comparative study of four physical dust models and two single-temperature modified blackbody models by fitting them to the resolved WISE, Spitzer, and Herschel photometry of M101 (NGC 5457). Using identical data and a grid-based fitting technique, we compare the resulting dust and radiation field properties derived from the models. We find that the dust mass yielded by the different models can vary by up to a factor of 3 (factor of 1.4 between physical models only), although the fits have similar quality. Despite differences in their definition of the carriers of the mid-IR aromatic features, all physical models show the same spatial variations for the abundance of that grain population. Using the well-determined metallicity gradient in M101 and resolved gas maps, we calculate an approximate upper limit on the dust mass as a function of radius. All physical dust models are found to exceed this maximum estimate over some range of galactocentric radii. We show that renormalizing the models to match the same Milky Way high-latitude cirrus spectrum and abundance constraints can reduce the dust mass differences between models and bring the total dust mass below the maximum estimate at all radii.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Astrophysics ; Blackbody ; Comparative studies ; Dust ; Dust continuum emission ; Dust emission ; Emission analysis ; Gas-to-dust ratio ; Interstellar dust ; Metallicity ; Milky Way ; Radiation ; Spectral energy distribution</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2021-05, Vol.912 (2), p.103</ispartof><rights>2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright IOP Publishing May 01, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-474f43bb49966fdd064151fd074fa2310255afa93f84b695fc20c28915c7a6bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-474f43bb49966fdd064151fd074fa2310255afa93f84b695fc20c28915c7a6bf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0846-936X ; 0000-0002-2545-1700 ; 0000-0002-4378-8534 ; 0000-0003-2551-7148 ; 0000-0002-0012-2142 ; 0000-0001-5340-6774 ; 0000-0003-4161-2639 ; 0000-0001-7449-4638 ; 0000-0002-5235-5589 ; 0000-0001-9605-780X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abe942/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38890,53867</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abe942$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chastenet, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandstrom, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, I-Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensley, Brandon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draine, Bruce T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Karl D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Eric W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroy, Adam K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utomo, Dyas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><title>Benchmarking Dust Emission Models in M101</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><addtitle>APJ</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><description>We present a comparative study of four physical dust models and two single-temperature modified blackbody models by fitting them to the resolved WISE, Spitzer, and Herschel photometry of M101 (NGC 5457). Using identical data and a grid-based fitting technique, we compare the resulting dust and radiation field properties derived from the models. We find that the dust mass yielded by the different models can vary by up to a factor of 3 (factor of 1.4 between physical models only), although the fits have similar quality. Despite differences in their definition of the carriers of the mid-IR aromatic features, all physical models show the same spatial variations for the abundance of that grain population. Using the well-determined metallicity gradient in M101 and resolved gas maps, we calculate an approximate upper limit on the dust mass as a function of radius. All physical dust models are found to exceed this maximum estimate over some range of galactocentric radii. We show that renormalizing the models to match the same Milky Way high-latitude cirrus spectrum and abundance constraints can reduce the dust mass differences between models and bring the total dust mass below the maximum estimate at all radii.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Blackbody</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>Dust continuum emission</subject><subject>Dust emission</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Gas-to-dust ratio</subject><subject>Interstellar dust</subject><subject>Metallicity</subject><subject>Milky Way</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Spectral energy distribution</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKJgXb17LIgHwbovX21z1HX9gBUvCt5CmibadbepSXvw35tS0Yt4eu8NM_OYQegYwwUtWTHHnJYZo7yYq8oIRnZQ8gPtogQAWJbT4mUfHYSwHk8iRILOrkyr37bKvzfta3o9hD5dbpsQGtemD642m5A2ccOAD9GeVZtgjr7nDD3fLJ8Wd9nq8fZ-cbnKNC2hz1jBLKNVxYTIc1vXkDPMsa0h4opQDIRzZZWgtmRVLrjVBDQpBea6UHll6QydTL6ddx-DCb1cu8G38aUknDARA3GILJhY2rsQvLGy802M8SkxyLEQOaaXY3o5FRIl55Okcd2v5z_00z_oqltLgYkkUUhlV1v6Ba0La08</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Chastenet, Jérémy</creator><creator>Sandstrom, Karin</creator><creator>Chiang, I-Da</creator><creator>Hensley, Brandon S.</creator><creator>Draine, Bruce T.</creator><creator>Gordon, Karl D.</creator><creator>Koch, Eric W.</creator><creator>Leroy, Adam K.</creator><creator>Utomo, Dyas</creator><creator>Williams, Thomas G.</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0846-936X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2545-1700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-8534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-7148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0012-2142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5340-6774</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-2639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7449-4638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5235-5589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-780X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Benchmarking Dust Emission Models in M101</title><author>Chastenet, Jérémy ; Sandstrom, Karin ; Chiang, I-Da ; Hensley, Brandon S. ; Draine, Bruce T. ; Gordon, Karl D. ; Koch, Eric W. ; Leroy, Adam K. ; Utomo, Dyas ; Williams, Thomas G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-474f43bb49966fdd064151fd074fa2310255afa93f84b695fc20c28915c7a6bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Blackbody</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>Dust continuum emission</topic><topic>Dust emission</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Gas-to-dust ratio</topic><topic>Interstellar dust</topic><topic>Metallicity</topic><topic>Milky Way</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Spectral energy distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chastenet, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandstrom, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, I-Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensley, Brandon S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draine, Bruce T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Karl D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Eric W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroy, Adam K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utomo, Dyas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chastenet, Jérémy</au><au>Sandstrom, Karin</au><au>Chiang, I-Da</au><au>Hensley, Brandon S.</au><au>Draine, Bruce T.</au><au>Gordon, Karl D.</au><au>Koch, Eric W.</au><au>Leroy, Adam K.</au><au>Utomo, Dyas</au><au>Williams, Thomas G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benchmarking Dust Emission Models in M101</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><stitle>APJ</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>912</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><pages>103-</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><abstract>We present a comparative study of four physical dust models and two single-temperature modified blackbody models by fitting them to the resolved WISE, Spitzer, and Herschel photometry of M101 (NGC 5457). Using identical data and a grid-based fitting technique, we compare the resulting dust and radiation field properties derived from the models. We find that the dust mass yielded by the different models can vary by up to a factor of 3 (factor of 1.4 between physical models only), although the fits have similar quality. Despite differences in their definition of the carriers of the mid-IR aromatic features, all physical models show the same spatial variations for the abundance of that grain population. Using the well-determined metallicity gradient in M101 and resolved gas maps, we calculate an approximate upper limit on the dust mass as a function of radius. All physical dust models are found to exceed this maximum estimate over some range of galactocentric radii. We show that renormalizing the models to match the same Milky Way high-latitude cirrus spectrum and abundance constraints can reduce the dust mass differences between models and bring the total dust mass below the maximum estimate at all radii.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/1538-4357/abe942</doi><tpages>31</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0846-936X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2545-1700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-8534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-7148</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0012-2142</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5340-6774</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-2639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7449-4638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5235-5589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-780X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0004-637X
ispartof The Astrophysical journal, 2021-05, Vol.912 (2), p.103
issn 0004-637X
1538-4357
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2524943550
source IOP Publishing Free Content
subjects Abundance
Astrophysics
Blackbody
Comparative studies
Dust
Dust continuum emission
Dust emission
Emission analysis
Gas-to-dust ratio
Interstellar dust
Metallicity
Milky Way
Radiation
Spectral energy distribution
title Benchmarking Dust Emission Models in M101
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benchmarking%20Dust%20Emission%20Models%20in%20M101&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Chastenet,%20J%C3%A9r%C3%A9my&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=912&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.pages=103-&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/1538-4357/abe942&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E2524943550%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524943550&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true