Resolving Land-Use Conflicts over Indonesia’s Customary Forests: One Map, Power Contestations and Social Justice
Indonesia’s One Map Policy aims to produce a standardized and single map which can clarify and provide a consistent record of land tenure with a view to resolving land-use conflicts in the forestry sector. The implementation of this policy has faced many challenges, including contestations over land...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contemporary Southeast Asia 2020-12, Vol.42 (3), p.372-397 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 397 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 372 |
container_title | Contemporary Southeast Asia |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | NUHIDAYAH, LAELY DAVIES, PETER J. ALAM, SHAWKAT |
description | Indonesia’s One Map Policy aims to produce a standardized and single map which can clarify and provide a consistent record of land tenure with a view to resolving land-use conflicts in the forestry sector. The implementation of this policy has faced many challenges, including contestations over land ownership, uncertainty over the status of indigenous customary lands and other procedural obstacles associated with generating a single master map. While significant parts of Indonesia’s forests are owned and managed by indigenous peoples, this has not always been uniformly recognized across different legal jurisdictions. This is slowly changing following a 2012 Constitutional Court decision to formally recognize customary indigenous lands and forests. Despite this ruling, obstacles remain in rectifying past practices and decisions as well as streamlining the complex array of forestry governance arrangements currently applied throughout Indonesia. This article suggests the resolution of land-use conflicts within the forestry sector must be premised on principles of forest sustainability, which must include addressing the social justice concerns of indigenous peoples and local communities as well as improving their capacity to manage customary forests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1355/cs42-3c |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2524414449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A646530028</galeid><jstor_id>26996201</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A646530028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-18132da8bf4e6d0adbc3b1d957497de63ffb7c66e653a6425494894e3a2fa6ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9q2zAYxcXYYFk39gQDwy7GLtzpn2XpMpi1C03X0qysd0KRPxkHx-oku2x3fY2-3p5kCiktgTCCLgTid87Hp3MQek_wMWFF8cVGTnNmX6AJKRXLqeQ3L9EEE6ryUpU3r9GbGFcYYyExnqDpFUTf3bV9k81NX-fXEbLK965r7RAzfwchm_W17yG25u_9Q8yqMQ5-bcKf7MQHiEN8i14500V493gfoeuTrz-qb_n84nRWTee5LZQaciIJo7WRS8dB1NjUS8uWpFZFyVVZg2DOLUsrBIiCGcFpwRWXigMz1BlhgB2hj1vf2-B_jWmyXvkx9GmkpgXlnHDO1TPVmA502zs_BGPXbbR6KnjyxpjKROV7qAZ6CKZLy7o2Pe_wx3v4dGpYt3av4POOIDED_B4aM8aozy5nB7OzxffD2fOfB7PydP6_D3lkre86aECnIKuLXf7TlrfBxxjA6dvQblqhCdabGupqwalmNpH8KbYV2GE9RnhOrpRMEKkXm6pumkpx8seUJtmHrWyV6hae3KlQSlBM2D94XOLa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524414449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resolving Land-Use Conflicts over Indonesia’s Customary Forests: One Map, Power Contestations and Social Justice</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>NUHIDAYAH, LAELY ; DAVIES, PETER J. ; ALAM, SHAWKAT</creator><creatorcontrib>NUHIDAYAH, LAELY ; DAVIES, PETER J. ; ALAM, SHAWKAT ; Researcher at the Research Center for Society and Culture, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PMB-LIPI), Jakarta, Indonesia</creatorcontrib><description>Indonesia’s One Map Policy aims to produce a standardized and single map which can clarify and provide a consistent record of land tenure with a view to resolving land-use conflicts in the forestry sector. The implementation of this policy has faced many challenges, including contestations over land ownership, uncertainty over the status of indigenous customary lands and other procedural obstacles associated with generating a single master map. While significant parts of Indonesia’s forests are owned and managed by indigenous peoples, this has not always been uniformly recognized across different legal jurisdictions. This is slowly changing following a 2012 Constitutional Court decision to formally recognize customary indigenous lands and forests. Despite this ruling, obstacles remain in rectifying past practices and decisions as well as streamlining the complex array of forestry governance arrangements currently applied throughout Indonesia. This article suggests the resolution of land-use conflicts within the forestry sector must be premised on principles of forest sustainability, which must include addressing the social justice concerns of indigenous peoples and local communities as well as improving their capacity to manage customary forests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0129-797X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1793-284X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1355/cs42-3c</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute</publisher><subject>Community ; Constitutional courts ; Court decisions ; Criminal justice policy ; Emission standards ; Forestry ; Forests ; Forests and forestry ; Governance ; Indigenous peoples ; Land ownership ; Land tenure ; Land use ; Land use controls ; Land use planning ; Native peoples ; Ownership ; Planning ; Plantations ; Politics ; Presidents ; Procedural justice ; Social justice ; Social power ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2020-12, Vol.42 (3), p.372-397</ispartof><rights>2020 ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute</rights><rights>Copyright © ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS)</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS)</rights><rights>Copyright ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute Dec 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-18132da8bf4e6d0adbc3b1d957497de63ffb7c66e653a6425494894e3a2fa6ae3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26996201$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26996201$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12843,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>NUHIDAYAH, LAELY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIES, PETER J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALAM, SHAWKAT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Researcher at the Research Center for Society and Culture, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PMB-LIPI), Jakarta, Indonesia</creatorcontrib><title>Resolving Land-Use Conflicts over Indonesia’s Customary Forests: One Map, Power Contestations and Social Justice</title><title>Contemporary Southeast Asia</title><addtitle>Contemporary Southeast Asia</addtitle><description>Indonesia’s One Map Policy aims to produce a standardized and single map which can clarify and provide a consistent record of land tenure with a view to resolving land-use conflicts in the forestry sector. The implementation of this policy has faced many challenges, including contestations over land ownership, uncertainty over the status of indigenous customary lands and other procedural obstacles associated with generating a single master map. While significant parts of Indonesia’s forests are owned and managed by indigenous peoples, this has not always been uniformly recognized across different legal jurisdictions. This is slowly changing following a 2012 Constitutional Court decision to formally recognize customary indigenous lands and forests. Despite this ruling, obstacles remain in rectifying past practices and decisions as well as streamlining the complex array of forestry governance arrangements currently applied throughout Indonesia. This article suggests the resolution of land-use conflicts within the forestry sector must be premised on principles of forest sustainability, which must include addressing the social justice concerns of indigenous peoples and local communities as well as improving their capacity to manage customary forests.</description><subject>Community</subject><subject>Constitutional courts</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Criminal justice policy</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Forests and forestry</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Land ownership</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use controls</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Procedural justice</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Social power</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0129-797X</issn><issn>1793-284X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt9q2zAYxcXYYFk39gQDwy7GLtzpn2XpMpi1C03X0qysd0KRPxkHx-oku2x3fY2-3p5kCiktgTCCLgTid87Hp3MQek_wMWFF8cVGTnNmX6AJKRXLqeQ3L9EEE6ryUpU3r9GbGFcYYyExnqDpFUTf3bV9k81NX-fXEbLK965r7RAzfwchm_W17yG25u_9Q8yqMQ5-bcKf7MQHiEN8i14500V493gfoeuTrz-qb_n84nRWTee5LZQaciIJo7WRS8dB1NjUS8uWpFZFyVVZg2DOLUsrBIiCGcFpwRWXigMz1BlhgB2hj1vf2-B_jWmyXvkx9GmkpgXlnHDO1TPVmA502zs_BGPXbbR6KnjyxpjKROV7qAZ6CKZLy7o2Pe_wx3v4dGpYt3av4POOIDED_B4aM8aozy5nB7OzxffD2fOfB7PydP6_D3lkre86aECnIKuLXf7TlrfBxxjA6dvQblqhCdabGupqwalmNpH8KbYV2GE9RnhOrpRMEKkXm6pumkpx8seUJtmHrWyV6hae3KlQSlBM2D94XOLa</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>NUHIDAYAH, LAELY</creator><creator>DAVIES, PETER J.</creator><creator>ALAM, SHAWKAT</creator><general>ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute</general><general>ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute</general><general>Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IMW</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Resolving Land-Use Conflicts over Indonesia’s Customary Forests</title><author>NUHIDAYAH, LAELY ; DAVIES, PETER J. ; ALAM, SHAWKAT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-18132da8bf4e6d0adbc3b1d957497de63ffb7c66e653a6425494894e3a2fa6ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Community</topic><topic>Constitutional courts</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Criminal justice policy</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Forests and forestry</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Land ownership</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use controls</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Procedural justice</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Social power</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NUHIDAYAH, LAELY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIES, PETER J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALAM, SHAWKAT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Researcher at the Research Center for Society and Culture, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PMB-LIPI), Jakarta, Indonesia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: World History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Contemporary Southeast Asia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NUHIDAYAH, LAELY</au><au>DAVIES, PETER J.</au><au>ALAM, SHAWKAT</au><aucorp>Researcher at the Research Center for Society and Culture, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PMB-LIPI), Jakarta, Indonesia</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resolving Land-Use Conflicts over Indonesia’s Customary Forests: One Map, Power Contestations and Social Justice</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary Southeast Asia</jtitle><addtitle>Contemporary Southeast Asia</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>372</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>372-397</pages><issn>0129-797X</issn><eissn>1793-284X</eissn><abstract>Indonesia’s One Map Policy aims to produce a standardized and single map which can clarify and provide a consistent record of land tenure with a view to resolving land-use conflicts in the forestry sector. The implementation of this policy has faced many challenges, including contestations over land ownership, uncertainty over the status of indigenous customary lands and other procedural obstacles associated with generating a single master map. While significant parts of Indonesia’s forests are owned and managed by indigenous peoples, this has not always been uniformly recognized across different legal jurisdictions. This is slowly changing following a 2012 Constitutional Court decision to formally recognize customary indigenous lands and forests. Despite this ruling, obstacles remain in rectifying past practices and decisions as well as streamlining the complex array of forestry governance arrangements currently applied throughout Indonesia. This article suggests the resolution of land-use conflicts within the forestry sector must be premised on principles of forest sustainability, which must include addressing the social justice concerns of indigenous peoples and local communities as well as improving their capacity to manage customary forests.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute</pub><doi>10.1355/cs42-3c</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0129-797X |
ispartof | Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2020-12, Vol.42 (3), p.372-397 |
issn | 0129-797X 1793-284X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2524414449 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Community Constitutional courts Court decisions Criminal justice policy Emission standards Forestry Forests Forests and forestry Governance Indigenous peoples Land ownership Land tenure Land use Land use controls Land use planning Native peoples Ownership Planning Plantations Politics Presidents Procedural justice Social justice Social power Uncertainty |
title | Resolving Land-Use Conflicts over Indonesia’s Customary Forests: One Map, Power Contestations and Social Justice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A44%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resolving%20Land-Use%20Conflicts%20over%20Indonesia%E2%80%99s%20Customary%20Forests:%20One%20Map,%20Power%20Contestations%20and%20Social%20Justice&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20Southeast%20Asia&rft.au=NUHIDAYAH,%20LAELY&rft.aucorp=Researcher%20at%20the%20Research%20Center%20for%20Society%20and%20Culture,%20Indonesian%20Institute%20of%20Sciences%20(PMB-LIPI),%20Jakarta,%20Indonesia&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=372&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=372-397&rft.issn=0129-797X&rft.eissn=1793-284X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1355/cs42-3c&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA646530028%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524414449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A646530028&rft_jstor_id=26996201&rfr_iscdi=true |