Application of improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in karst groundwater quality evaluation: a case study of Cengong county
Groundwater quality is affected by various indexes, and the influence of each index on groundwater quality is fuzzy. Therefore, adopting a reasonable evaluation method can make the groundwater quality evaluation more accurate. Although fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method has great advantages in an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth science informatics 2021-06, Vol.14 (2), p.1101-1109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1101 |
container_title | Earth science informatics |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Zhang, Wenping Li, Bo Liu, Zijie Zhang, Beibei |
description | Groundwater quality is affected by various indexes, and the influence of each index on groundwater quality is fuzzy. Therefore, adopting a reasonable evaluation method can make the groundwater quality evaluation more accurate. Although fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method has great advantages in analyzing fuzzy problems, it has shortcomings in solving problems like weight calculation. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was improved by combining with the entropy weight method in this study. On basis of this, a groundwater quality evaluation model was established. At the same time, by taking the groundwater aquifer of Cambrian Gaotai formation in Cengong County, Guizhou Province as a research object and based on the water quality monitoring data of 14 boreholes there, the model was adopted to evaluate the water quality of the aquifer by combining with GIS technology. The results demonstrated the feasibility and superiority of the improved fuzzy comprehensive theory in groundwater quality evaluation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12145-021-00611-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2524031114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524031114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-a85c0e1996ac14bfd4f6b0e3c7ab82f41846959542ad2e3c924a4e573ef4baf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EElXpH2CyxBywHeeLrar4kpBYYLac5DkNpHZqO0Xpzv_GJQiYmGw_nXevfBA6p-SSEpJdOcooTyLCaERISmmUH6EZzdMw4jk9_rln8SlaONeWJKYsjRnLZ-hj2fddW0nfGo2Nwu2mt2YHNVbDfj_iyoQ3rEG7dgcYdrIbJnQDfm1q3Gr8Jq3zuLFm0PW79GDxdpBd68c_-DWWuJIOsPNDPR56VqAbo5tQMGg_nqETJTsHi-9zjl5ub55X99Hj093DavkYyZgzH8k8qQjQokhlRXmpaq7SkkBcZbLMmeI052mRFAlnsmZhXDAuOSRZDIqXUuXxHF1MueGT2wGcF69msDpUCpYwHrxQygPFJqqyxjkLSvS23Ug7CkrEwbiYjItgXHwZF4foeFpyAdYN2N_of7Y-AWt1hvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524031114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in karst groundwater quality evaluation: a case study of Cengong county</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Wenping ; Li, Bo ; Liu, Zijie ; Zhang, Beibei</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wenping ; Li, Bo ; Liu, Zijie ; Zhang, Beibei</creatorcontrib><description>Groundwater quality is affected by various indexes, and the influence of each index on groundwater quality is fuzzy. Therefore, adopting a reasonable evaluation method can make the groundwater quality evaluation more accurate. Although fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method has great advantages in analyzing fuzzy problems, it has shortcomings in solving problems like weight calculation. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was improved by combining with the entropy weight method in this study. On basis of this, a groundwater quality evaluation model was established. At the same time, by taking the groundwater aquifer of Cambrian Gaotai formation in Cengong County, Guizhou Province as a research object and based on the water quality monitoring data of 14 boreholes there, the model was adopted to evaluate the water quality of the aquifer by combining with GIS technology. The results demonstrated the feasibility and superiority of the improved fuzzy comprehensive theory in groundwater quality evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-0473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-0481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12145-021-00611-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquifers ; Boreholes ; Cambrian ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earth System Sciences ; Entropy ; Environmental monitoring ; Evaluation ; Groundwater ; Groundwater quality ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; Karst ; Ontology ; Problem solving ; Quality assessment ; Research Article ; Simulation and Modeling ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics ; Water monitoring ; Water quality ; Water quality management ; Water quality monitoring</subject><ispartof>Earth science informatics, 2021-06, Vol.14 (2), p.1101-1109</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-a85c0e1996ac14bfd4f6b0e3c7ab82f41846959542ad2e3c924a4e573ef4baf83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-a85c0e1996ac14bfd4f6b0e3c7ab82f41846959542ad2e3c924a4e573ef4baf83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3283-5999</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12145-021-00611-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12145-021-00611-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wenping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Beibei</creatorcontrib><title>Application of improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in karst groundwater quality evaluation: a case study of Cengong county</title><title>Earth science informatics</title><addtitle>Earth Sci Inform</addtitle><description>Groundwater quality is affected by various indexes, and the influence of each index on groundwater quality is fuzzy. Therefore, adopting a reasonable evaluation method can make the groundwater quality evaluation more accurate. Although fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method has great advantages in analyzing fuzzy problems, it has shortcomings in solving problems like weight calculation. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was improved by combining with the entropy weight method in this study. On basis of this, a groundwater quality evaluation model was established. At the same time, by taking the groundwater aquifer of Cambrian Gaotai formation in Cengong County, Guizhou Province as a research object and based on the water quality monitoring data of 14 boreholes there, the model was adopted to evaluate the water quality of the aquifer by combining with GIS technology. The results demonstrated the feasibility and superiority of the improved fuzzy comprehensive theory in groundwater quality evaluation.</description><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Boreholes</subject><subject>Cambrian</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earth System Sciences</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater quality</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>Karst</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Simulation and Modeling</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><subject>Water monitoring</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality management</subject><subject>Water quality monitoring</subject><issn>1865-0473</issn><issn>1865-0481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EElXpH2CyxBywHeeLrar4kpBYYLac5DkNpHZqO0Xpzv_GJQiYmGw_nXevfBA6p-SSEpJdOcooTyLCaERISmmUH6EZzdMw4jk9_rln8SlaONeWJKYsjRnLZ-hj2fddW0nfGo2Nwu2mt2YHNVbDfj_iyoQ3rEG7dgcYdrIbJnQDfm1q3Gr8Jq3zuLFm0PW79GDxdpBd68c_-DWWuJIOsPNDPR56VqAbo5tQMGg_nqETJTsHi-9zjl5ub55X99Hj093DavkYyZgzH8k8qQjQokhlRXmpaq7SkkBcZbLMmeI052mRFAlnsmZhXDAuOSRZDIqXUuXxHF1MueGT2wGcF69msDpUCpYwHrxQygPFJqqyxjkLSvS23Ug7CkrEwbiYjItgXHwZF4foeFpyAdYN2N_of7Y-AWt1hvw</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Zhang, Wenping</creator><creator>Li, Bo</creator><creator>Liu, Zijie</creator><creator>Zhang, Beibei</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-5999</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Application of improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in karst groundwater quality evaluation: a case study of Cengong county</title><author>Zhang, Wenping ; Li, Bo ; Liu, Zijie ; Zhang, Beibei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-a85c0e1996ac14bfd4f6b0e3c7ab82f41846959542ad2e3c924a4e573ef4baf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Boreholes</topic><topic>Cambrian</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earth System Sciences</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater quality</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>Karst</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Simulation and Modeling</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><topic>Water monitoring</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality management</topic><topic>Water quality monitoring</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wenping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Beibei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Earth science informatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Wenping</au><au>Li, Bo</au><au>Liu, Zijie</au><au>Zhang, Beibei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in karst groundwater quality evaluation: a case study of Cengong county</atitle><jtitle>Earth science informatics</jtitle><stitle>Earth Sci Inform</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1101</spage><epage>1109</epage><pages>1101-1109</pages><issn>1865-0473</issn><eissn>1865-0481</eissn><abstract>Groundwater quality is affected by various indexes, and the influence of each index on groundwater quality is fuzzy. Therefore, adopting a reasonable evaluation method can make the groundwater quality evaluation more accurate. Although fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method has great advantages in analyzing fuzzy problems, it has shortcomings in solving problems like weight calculation. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was improved by combining with the entropy weight method in this study. On basis of this, a groundwater quality evaluation model was established. At the same time, by taking the groundwater aquifer of Cambrian Gaotai formation in Cengong County, Guizhou Province as a research object and based on the water quality monitoring data of 14 boreholes there, the model was adopted to evaluate the water quality of the aquifer by combining with GIS technology. The results demonstrated the feasibility and superiority of the improved fuzzy comprehensive theory in groundwater quality evaluation.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12145-021-00611-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-5999</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-0473 |
ispartof | Earth science informatics, 2021-06, Vol.14 (2), p.1101-1109 |
issn | 1865-0473 1865-0481 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2524031114 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Aquifers Boreholes Cambrian Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earth System Sciences Entropy Environmental monitoring Evaluation Groundwater Groundwater quality Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) Karst Ontology Problem solving Quality assessment Research Article Simulation and Modeling Space Exploration and Astronautics Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics Water monitoring Water quality Water quality management Water quality monitoring |
title | Application of improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in karst groundwater quality evaluation: a case study of Cengong county |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T13%3A08%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20improved%20fuzzy%20comprehensive%20evaluation%20method%20in%20karst%20groundwater%20quality%20evaluation:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20Cengong%20county&rft.jtitle=Earth%20science%20informatics&rft.au=Zhang,%20Wenping&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1101&rft.epage=1109&rft.pages=1101-1109&rft.issn=1865-0473&rft.eissn=1865-0481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12145-021-00611-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524031114%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524031114&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |