Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation
We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Climatic change 2021-05, Vol.166 (1-2), Article 10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Climatic change |
container_volume | 166 |
creator | Kanyako, Franklyn Baker, Erin |
description | We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM), and then propagate uncertainty based on distributions derived from an expert elicitation study on the future cost of onshore and offshore wind energy. The share of wind energy electricity generation in 2035, without a global policy on CO2 emissions, ranges between 4% and more than triple the 2019 share of 5.3%. Under a 1.5°C cap, this range is wider, with shares up to 34%. This range of uncertainty implies the need for flexible systems and policies, allowing large amounts to be deployed if needed. We explore whether a breakthrough in wind energy could prevent the demand for natural gas as a bridge technology to a low carbon economy, and find that uncertainty in wind energy is only pertinent for medium-stringency policies, such as a $60/t carbon tax. Under this scenario, there is a 95% chance that the cost of wind energy will be low enough to lead to an immediate reduction in the share of natural gas. In contrast, under a business-as-usual scenario without a breakthrough in cost, natural gas is highly likely to continue increasing in share of electricity generation. Under a 1.5°C cap, natural gas will decrease in share regardless of wind energy cost. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2523913401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2523913401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-8d6d22732512445ef93b9641e0288886daecc923cd251f0a8f510a698009b443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKQzEQDaJgrf6Aq4Dr6ORxX0spvkBwYV2HNDdpU9qkJrnI_XtTr-DOWcwcZs4MZw5C1xRuKUBzlyhUrSDAKAFeMIETNKNVwwkVLZyiGdC6NAG6c3SR0vaIGlbP0PuH1yZm5XwesfJqNyaXcLA4bwy2Qx6iwTqkfGx9Od9j401cjzh4rHdur3IZb5RfG7x32a1VdsFfojOrdslc_dY5Wj4-LBfP5PXt6WVx_0o0a1ogbV_3jDWcVZQJURnb8VVXC2qAtSXqXhmtO8Z1XxgWVGsrCqru2qJ9JQSfo5vp7CGGz8GkLLdhiOWFJFnFeEe5AFpYbGLpGFKKxspDLLrjKCnIo3dy8k4W7-SPdyXPEZ-WUiGX5-Lf6X-2vgFdZXBv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2523913401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kanyako, Franklyn ; Baker, Erin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanyako, Franklyn ; Baker, Erin</creatorcontrib><description>We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM), and then propagate uncertainty based on distributions derived from an expert elicitation study on the future cost of onshore and offshore wind energy. The share of wind energy electricity generation in 2035, without a global policy on CO2 emissions, ranges between 4% and more than triple the 2019 share of 5.3%. Under a 1.5°C cap, this range is wider, with shares up to 34%. This range of uncertainty implies the need for flexible systems and policies, allowing large amounts to be deployed if needed. We explore whether a breakthrough in wind energy could prevent the demand for natural gas as a bridge technology to a low carbon economy, and find that uncertainty in wind energy is only pertinent for medium-stringency policies, such as a $60/t carbon tax. Under this scenario, there is a 95% chance that the cost of wind energy will be low enough to lead to an immediate reduction in the share of natural gas. In contrast, under a business-as-usual scenario without a breakthrough in cost, natural gas is highly likely to continue increasing in share of electricity generation. Under a 1.5°C cap, natural gas will decrease in share regardless of wind energy cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Bridges ; Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Climate models ; Cost analysis ; Costs ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electricity ; Electricity generation ; Energy ; Energy costs ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental tax ; Future ; Global climate ; Mitigation ; Natural gas ; Offshore ; Policies ; Taxation ; Uncertainty ; Uncertainty analysis ; Wind ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2021-05, Vol.166 (1-2), Article 10</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-8d6d22732512445ef93b9641e0288886daecc923cd251f0a8f510a698009b443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-8d6d22732512445ef93b9641e0288886daecc923cd251f0a8f510a698009b443</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5510-0293</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanyako, Franklyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Erin</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation</title><title>Climatic change</title><addtitle>Climatic Change</addtitle><description>We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM), and then propagate uncertainty based on distributions derived from an expert elicitation study on the future cost of onshore and offshore wind energy. The share of wind energy electricity generation in 2035, without a global policy on CO2 emissions, ranges between 4% and more than triple the 2019 share of 5.3%. Under a 1.5°C cap, this range is wider, with shares up to 34%. This range of uncertainty implies the need for flexible systems and policies, allowing large amounts to be deployed if needed. We explore whether a breakthrough in wind energy could prevent the demand for natural gas as a bridge technology to a low carbon economy, and find that uncertainty in wind energy is only pertinent for medium-stringency policies, such as a $60/t carbon tax. Under this scenario, there is a 95% chance that the cost of wind energy will be low enough to lead to an immediate reduction in the share of natural gas. In contrast, under a business-as-usual scenario without a breakthrough in cost, natural gas is highly likely to continue increasing in share of electricity generation. Under a 1.5°C cap, natural gas will decrease in share regardless of wind energy cost.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Bridges</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental tax</subject><subject>Future</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKQzEQDaJgrf6Aq4Dr6ORxX0spvkBwYV2HNDdpU9qkJrnI_XtTr-DOWcwcZs4MZw5C1xRuKUBzlyhUrSDAKAFeMIETNKNVwwkVLZyiGdC6NAG6c3SR0vaIGlbP0PuH1yZm5XwesfJqNyaXcLA4bwy2Qx6iwTqkfGx9Od9j401cjzh4rHdur3IZb5RfG7x32a1VdsFfojOrdslc_dY5Wj4-LBfP5PXt6WVx_0o0a1ogbV_3jDWcVZQJURnb8VVXC2qAtSXqXhmtO8Z1XxgWVGsrCqru2qJ9JQSfo5vp7CGGz8GkLLdhiOWFJFnFeEe5AFpYbGLpGFKKxspDLLrjKCnIo3dy8k4W7-SPdyXPEZ-WUiGX5-Lf6X-2vgFdZXBv</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Kanyako, Franklyn</creator><creator>Baker, Erin</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-0293</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation</title><author>Kanyako, Franklyn ; Baker, Erin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-8d6d22732512445ef93b9641e0288886daecc923cd251f0a8f510a698009b443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Bridges</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental tax</topic><topic>Future</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanyako, Franklyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Erin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanyako, Franklyn</au><au>Baker, Erin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><stitle>Climatic Change</stitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>1-2</issue><artnum>10</artnum><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><abstract>We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM), and then propagate uncertainty based on distributions derived from an expert elicitation study on the future cost of onshore and offshore wind energy. The share of wind energy electricity generation in 2035, without a global policy on CO2 emissions, ranges between 4% and more than triple the 2019 share of 5.3%. Under a 1.5°C cap, this range is wider, with shares up to 34%. This range of uncertainty implies the need for flexible systems and policies, allowing large amounts to be deployed if needed. We explore whether a breakthrough in wind energy could prevent the demand for natural gas as a bridge technology to a low carbon economy, and find that uncertainty in wind energy is only pertinent for medium-stringency policies, such as a $60/t carbon tax. Under this scenario, there is a 95% chance that the cost of wind energy will be low enough to lead to an immediate reduction in the share of natural gas. In contrast, under a business-as-usual scenario without a breakthrough in cost, natural gas is highly likely to continue increasing in share of electricity generation. Under a 1.5°C cap, natural gas will decrease in share regardless of wind energy cost.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-0293</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0009 |
ispartof | Climatic change, 2021-05, Vol.166 (1-2), Article 10 |
issn | 0165-0009 1573-1480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2523913401 |
source | PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Atmospheric Sciences Bridges Carbon Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Climate models Cost analysis Costs Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Electricity Electricity generation Energy Energy costs Environmental assessment Environmental tax Future Global climate Mitigation Natural gas Offshore Policies Taxation Uncertainty Uncertainty analysis Wind Wind power |
title | Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A03%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20analysis%20of%20the%20future%20cost%20of%20wind%20energy%20on%20climate%20change%20mitigation&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=Kanyako,%20Franklyn&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=1-2&rft.artnum=10&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2523913401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2523913401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |