Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation

We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Climatic change 2021-05, Vol.166 (1-2), Article 10
Hauptverfasser: Kanyako, Franklyn, Baker, Erin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page
container_title Climatic change
container_volume 166
creator Kanyako, Franklyn
Baker, Erin
description We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM), and then propagate uncertainty based on distributions derived from an expert elicitation study on the future cost of onshore and offshore wind energy. The share of wind energy electricity generation in 2035, without a global policy on CO2 emissions, ranges between 4% and more than triple the 2019 share of 5.3%. Under a 1.5°C cap, this range is wider, with shares up to 34%. This range of uncertainty implies the need for flexible systems and policies, allowing large amounts to be deployed if needed. We explore whether a breakthrough in wind energy could prevent the demand for natural gas as a bridge technology to a low carbon economy, and find that uncertainty in wind energy is only pertinent for medium-stringency policies, such as a $60/t carbon tax. Under this scenario, there is a 95% chance that the cost of wind energy will be low enough to lead to an immediate reduction in the share of natural gas. In contrast, under a business-as-usual scenario without a breakthrough in cost, natural gas is highly likely to continue increasing in share of electricity generation. Under a 1.5°C cap, natural gas will decrease in share regardless of wind energy cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2523913401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2523913401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-8d6d22732512445ef93b9641e0288886daecc923cd251f0a8f510a698009b443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKQzEQDaJgrf6Aq4Dr6ORxX0spvkBwYV2HNDdpU9qkJrnI_XtTr-DOWcwcZs4MZw5C1xRuKUBzlyhUrSDAKAFeMIETNKNVwwkVLZyiGdC6NAG6c3SR0vaIGlbP0PuH1yZm5XwesfJqNyaXcLA4bwy2Qx6iwTqkfGx9Od9j401cjzh4rHdur3IZb5RfG7x32a1VdsFfojOrdslc_dY5Wj4-LBfP5PXt6WVx_0o0a1ogbV_3jDWcVZQJURnb8VVXC2qAtSXqXhmtO8Z1XxgWVGsrCqru2qJ9JQSfo5vp7CGGz8GkLLdhiOWFJFnFeEe5AFpYbGLpGFKKxspDLLrjKCnIo3dy8k4W7-SPdyXPEZ-WUiGX5-Lf6X-2vgFdZXBv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2523913401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kanyako, Franklyn ; Baker, Erin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanyako, Franklyn ; Baker, Erin</creatorcontrib><description>We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM), and then propagate uncertainty based on distributions derived from an expert elicitation study on the future cost of onshore and offshore wind energy. The share of wind energy electricity generation in 2035, without a global policy on CO2 emissions, ranges between 4% and more than triple the 2019 share of 5.3%. Under a 1.5°C cap, this range is wider, with shares up to 34%. This range of uncertainty implies the need for flexible systems and policies, allowing large amounts to be deployed if needed. We explore whether a breakthrough in wind energy could prevent the demand for natural gas as a bridge technology to a low carbon economy, and find that uncertainty in wind energy is only pertinent for medium-stringency policies, such as a $60/t carbon tax. Under this scenario, there is a 95% chance that the cost of wind energy will be low enough to lead to an immediate reduction in the share of natural gas. In contrast, under a business-as-usual scenario without a breakthrough in cost, natural gas is highly likely to continue increasing in share of electricity generation. Under a 1.5°C cap, natural gas will decrease in share regardless of wind energy cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Bridges ; Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Climate models ; Cost analysis ; Costs ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electricity ; Electricity generation ; Energy ; Energy costs ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental tax ; Future ; Global climate ; Mitigation ; Natural gas ; Offshore ; Policies ; Taxation ; Uncertainty ; Uncertainty analysis ; Wind ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2021-05, Vol.166 (1-2), Article 10</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-8d6d22732512445ef93b9641e0288886daecc923cd251f0a8f510a698009b443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-8d6d22732512445ef93b9641e0288886daecc923cd251f0a8f510a698009b443</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5510-0293</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanyako, Franklyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Erin</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation</title><title>Climatic change</title><addtitle>Climatic Change</addtitle><description>We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM), and then propagate uncertainty based on distributions derived from an expert elicitation study on the future cost of onshore and offshore wind energy. The share of wind energy electricity generation in 2035, without a global policy on CO2 emissions, ranges between 4% and more than triple the 2019 share of 5.3%. Under a 1.5°C cap, this range is wider, with shares up to 34%. This range of uncertainty implies the need for flexible systems and policies, allowing large amounts to be deployed if needed. We explore whether a breakthrough in wind energy could prevent the demand for natural gas as a bridge technology to a low carbon economy, and find that uncertainty in wind energy is only pertinent for medium-stringency policies, such as a $60/t carbon tax. Under this scenario, there is a 95% chance that the cost of wind energy will be low enough to lead to an immediate reduction in the share of natural gas. In contrast, under a business-as-usual scenario without a breakthrough in cost, natural gas is highly likely to continue increasing in share of electricity generation. Under a 1.5°C cap, natural gas will decrease in share regardless of wind energy cost.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Bridges</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental tax</subject><subject>Future</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKQzEQDaJgrf6Aq4Dr6ORxX0spvkBwYV2HNDdpU9qkJrnI_XtTr-DOWcwcZs4MZw5C1xRuKUBzlyhUrSDAKAFeMIETNKNVwwkVLZyiGdC6NAG6c3SR0vaIGlbP0PuH1yZm5XwesfJqNyaXcLA4bwy2Qx6iwTqkfGx9Od9j401cjzh4rHdur3IZb5RfG7x32a1VdsFfojOrdslc_dY5Wj4-LBfP5PXt6WVx_0o0a1ogbV_3jDWcVZQJURnb8VVXC2qAtSXqXhmtO8Z1XxgWVGsrCqru2qJ9JQSfo5vp7CGGz8GkLLdhiOWFJFnFeEe5AFpYbGLpGFKKxspDLLrjKCnIo3dy8k4W7-SPdyXPEZ-WUiGX5-Lf6X-2vgFdZXBv</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Kanyako, Franklyn</creator><creator>Baker, Erin</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-0293</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation</title><author>Kanyako, Franklyn ; Baker, Erin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2780-8d6d22732512445ef93b9641e0288886daecc923cd251f0a8f510a698009b443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Bridges</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental tax</topic><topic>Future</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanyako, Franklyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Erin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanyako, Franklyn</au><au>Baker, Erin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><stitle>Climatic Change</stitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>1-2</issue><artnum>10</artnum><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><abstract>We conduct uncertainty analysis on the impacts of the future cost of wind energy on global electricity generation and the value of wind energy to climate change mitigation. We integrate data on global onshore and offshore wind energy cost and resources into the Global Climate Assessment Model (GCAM), and then propagate uncertainty based on distributions derived from an expert elicitation study on the future cost of onshore and offshore wind energy. The share of wind energy electricity generation in 2035, without a global policy on CO2 emissions, ranges between 4% and more than triple the 2019 share of 5.3%. Under a 1.5°C cap, this range is wider, with shares up to 34%. This range of uncertainty implies the need for flexible systems and policies, allowing large amounts to be deployed if needed. We explore whether a breakthrough in wind energy could prevent the demand for natural gas as a bridge technology to a low carbon economy, and find that uncertainty in wind energy is only pertinent for medium-stringency policies, such as a $60/t carbon tax. Under this scenario, there is a 95% chance that the cost of wind energy will be low enough to lead to an immediate reduction in the share of natural gas. In contrast, under a business-as-usual scenario without a breakthrough in cost, natural gas is highly likely to continue increasing in share of electricity generation. Under a 1.5°C cap, natural gas will decrease in share regardless of wind energy cost.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-0293</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0009
ispartof Climatic change, 2021-05, Vol.166 (1-2), Article 10
issn 0165-0009
1573-1480
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2523913401
source PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Atmospheric Sciences
Bridges
Carbon
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Climate change
Climate change mitigation
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Climate models
Cost analysis
Costs
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Electricity
Electricity generation
Energy
Energy costs
Environmental assessment
Environmental tax
Future
Global climate
Mitigation
Natural gas
Offshore
Policies
Taxation
Uncertainty
Uncertainty analysis
Wind
Wind power
title Uncertainty analysis of the future cost of wind energy on climate change mitigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A03%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20analysis%20of%20the%20future%20cost%20of%20wind%20energy%20on%20climate%20change%20mitigation&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=Kanyako,%20Franklyn&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=1-2&rft.artnum=10&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-021-03105-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2523913401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2523913401&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true