Infant pacifier sanitization and risk of challenge-proven food allergy: A cohort study

Environmental microbial exposure plays a role in immune system development and susceptibility to food allergy. We sought to investigate whether infant pacifier use during the first postnatal year, with further consideration of sanitization, alters the risk of food allergy by age 1 year. The birth co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2021-05, Vol.147 (5), p.1823-1829.e11
Hauptverfasser: Soriano, Victoria X., Koplin, Jennifer J., Forrester, Mike, Peters, Rachel L., O’Hely, Martin, Dharmage, Shyamali C., Wright, Rosemary, Ranganathan, Sarath, Burgner, David, Thompson, Kristie, Dwyer, Terence, Vuillerman, Peter, Ponsonby, Anne-Louise
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1829.e11
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1823
container_title Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
container_volume 147
creator Soriano, Victoria X.
Koplin, Jennifer J.
Forrester, Mike
Peters, Rachel L.
O’Hely, Martin
Dharmage, Shyamali C.
Wright, Rosemary
Ranganathan, Sarath
Burgner, David
Thompson, Kristie
Dwyer, Terence
Vuillerman, Peter
Ponsonby, Anne-Louise
description Environmental microbial exposure plays a role in immune system development and susceptibility to food allergy. We sought to investigate whether infant pacifier use during the first postnatal year, with further consideration of sanitization, alters the risk of food allergy by age 1 year. The birth cohort recruited pregnant mothers at under 28 weeks’ gestation in southeast Australia, with 894 families followed up when infants turned 1 year. Infants were excluded if born under 32 weeks, with a serious illness, major congenital malformation, or genetic disease. Questionnaire data, collected at recruitment and infant ages 1, 6, and 12 months, included pacifier use and pacifier sanitization (defined as the joint exposure of a pacifier and cleaning methods). Challenge-proven food allergy was assessed at 12 months. Any pacifier use at 6 months was associated with food allergy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.61), but not pacifier use at other ages. This overall association was driven by the joint exposure of pacifier-antiseptic use (adjusted odds ratio, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.10-21.18) compared with no pacifier use. Using pacifiers without antiseptic at 6 months was not associated with food allergy. Among pacifier users, antiseptic cleaning was still associated with food allergy (adjusted odds ratio, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.18-10.77) compared with no antiseptic use. Furthermore, persistent and repeated antiseptic use over the first 6 months was associated with higher food allergy risk (P = .029). This is the first report of a pacifier-antiseptic combination being associated with a higher risk of subsequent food allergy. Future work should investigate underlying biological pathways. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2522052143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091674921002219</els_id><sourcerecordid>2522052143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fda85cdee799c3a1fc1897c0f271dc5b748729ad63ab1f3afaf746828ad1f50e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKQzEQhoMotlZfwIUEXJ-ay7nkiJtSvBQKbhSXIc2lzbFNanJOoT6Nz-KTmdLqUhgYZvjnn5kPgEuMhhjh8qYZNkLaIUEED1EKSo5AH6O6ykpGimPQR6jGWVnldQ-cxdigVFNWn4IepQwjVpR98DZxRrgWrpOTsTrAKJxt7adorXdQOAWDje_QGygXYrnUbq6zdfAb7aDxXsFdL8y3t3D0_SX9wocWxrZT23NwYsQy6otDHoDXh_uX8VM2fX6cjEfTTFKWt5lRghVSaV3VtaQCG4lZXUlkSIWVLGZVzipSC1VSMcOGCiNMlafvmFDYFEjTAbje-6ajPjodW974Lri0kpOCEFQQnNOkInuVDD7GoA1fB7sSYcsx4juWvOE7lnzHkqMUlKShq4N1N1tp9TfyCy8J7vYCnR7cJHg8Squd1MoGLVuuvP3P_weqEIbM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2522052143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infant pacifier sanitization and risk of challenge-proven food allergy: A cohort study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Soriano, Victoria X. ; Koplin, Jennifer J. ; Forrester, Mike ; Peters, Rachel L. ; O’Hely, Martin ; Dharmage, Shyamali C. ; Wright, Rosemary ; Ranganathan, Sarath ; Burgner, David ; Thompson, Kristie ; Dwyer, Terence ; Vuillerman, Peter ; Ponsonby, Anne-Louise</creator><creatorcontrib>Soriano, Victoria X. ; Koplin, Jennifer J. ; Forrester, Mike ; Peters, Rachel L. ; O’Hely, Martin ; Dharmage, Shyamali C. ; Wright, Rosemary ; Ranganathan, Sarath ; Burgner, David ; Thompson, Kristie ; Dwyer, Terence ; Vuillerman, Peter ; Ponsonby, Anne-Louise ; BIS Investigator Group</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental microbial exposure plays a role in immune system development and susceptibility to food allergy. We sought to investigate whether infant pacifier use during the first postnatal year, with further consideration of sanitization, alters the risk of food allergy by age 1 year. The birth cohort recruited pregnant mothers at under 28 weeks’ gestation in southeast Australia, with 894 families followed up when infants turned 1 year. Infants were excluded if born under 32 weeks, with a serious illness, major congenital malformation, or genetic disease. Questionnaire data, collected at recruitment and infant ages 1, 6, and 12 months, included pacifier use and pacifier sanitization (defined as the joint exposure of a pacifier and cleaning methods). Challenge-proven food allergy was assessed at 12 months. Any pacifier use at 6 months was associated with food allergy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.61), but not pacifier use at other ages. This overall association was driven by the joint exposure of pacifier-antiseptic use (adjusted odds ratio, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.10-21.18) compared with no pacifier use. Using pacifiers without antiseptic at 6 months was not associated with food allergy. Among pacifier users, antiseptic cleaning was still associated with food allergy (adjusted odds ratio, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.18-10.77) compared with no antiseptic use. Furthermore, persistent and repeated antiseptic use over the first 6 months was associated with higher food allergy risk (P = .029). This is the first report of a pacifier-antiseptic combination being associated with a higher risk of subsequent food allergy. Future work should investigate underlying biological pathways. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33810856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>antiseptic ; Babies ; birth cohort ; Cohort analysis ; Congenital defects ; Country of birth ; Drinking water ; dummy ; Food allergies ; food allergy ; Gestation ; Immune system ; Infants ; Methods ; microbial exposure ; Microbiota ; Mothers ; Pacifier ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Pregnancy ; sanitization ; Socioeconomic factors ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2021-05, Vol.147 (5), p.1823-1829.e11</ispartof><rights>2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fda85cdee799c3a1fc1897c0f271dc5b748729ad63ab1f3afaf746828ad1f50e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fda85cdee799c3a1fc1897c0f271dc5b748729ad63ab1f3afaf746828ad1f50e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674921002219$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33810856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soriano, Victoria X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koplin, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Rachel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hely, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dharmage, Shyamali C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranganathan, Sarath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, Terence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuillerman, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponsonby, Anne-Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIS Investigator Group</creatorcontrib><title>Infant pacifier sanitization and risk of challenge-proven food allergy: A cohort study</title><title>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</title><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><description>Environmental microbial exposure plays a role in immune system development and susceptibility to food allergy. We sought to investigate whether infant pacifier use during the first postnatal year, with further consideration of sanitization, alters the risk of food allergy by age 1 year. The birth cohort recruited pregnant mothers at under 28 weeks’ gestation in southeast Australia, with 894 families followed up when infants turned 1 year. Infants were excluded if born under 32 weeks, with a serious illness, major congenital malformation, or genetic disease. Questionnaire data, collected at recruitment and infant ages 1, 6, and 12 months, included pacifier use and pacifier sanitization (defined as the joint exposure of a pacifier and cleaning methods). Challenge-proven food allergy was assessed at 12 months. Any pacifier use at 6 months was associated with food allergy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.61), but not pacifier use at other ages. This overall association was driven by the joint exposure of pacifier-antiseptic use (adjusted odds ratio, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.10-21.18) compared with no pacifier use. Using pacifiers without antiseptic at 6 months was not associated with food allergy. Among pacifier users, antiseptic cleaning was still associated with food allergy (adjusted odds ratio, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.18-10.77) compared with no antiseptic use. Furthermore, persistent and repeated antiseptic use over the first 6 months was associated with higher food allergy risk (P = .029). This is the first report of a pacifier-antiseptic combination being associated with a higher risk of subsequent food allergy. Future work should investigate underlying biological pathways. [Display omitted]</description><subject>antiseptic</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>birth cohort</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Congenital defects</subject><subject>Country of birth</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>dummy</subject><subject>Food allergies</subject><subject>food allergy</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>microbial exposure</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Pacifier</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>sanitization</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0091-6749</issn><issn>1097-6825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKQzEQhoMotlZfwIUEXJ-ay7nkiJtSvBQKbhSXIc2lzbFNanJOoT6Nz-KTmdLqUhgYZvjnn5kPgEuMhhjh8qYZNkLaIUEED1EKSo5AH6O6ykpGimPQR6jGWVnldQ-cxdigVFNWn4IepQwjVpR98DZxRrgWrpOTsTrAKJxt7adorXdQOAWDje_QGygXYrnUbq6zdfAb7aDxXsFdL8y3t3D0_SX9wocWxrZT23NwYsQy6otDHoDXh_uX8VM2fX6cjEfTTFKWt5lRghVSaV3VtaQCG4lZXUlkSIWVLGZVzipSC1VSMcOGCiNMlafvmFDYFEjTAbje-6ajPjodW974Lri0kpOCEFQQnNOkInuVDD7GoA1fB7sSYcsx4juWvOE7lnzHkqMUlKShq4N1N1tp9TfyCy8J7vYCnR7cJHg8Squd1MoGLVuuvP3P_weqEIbM</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Soriano, Victoria X.</creator><creator>Koplin, Jennifer J.</creator><creator>Forrester, Mike</creator><creator>Peters, Rachel L.</creator><creator>O’Hely, Martin</creator><creator>Dharmage, Shyamali C.</creator><creator>Wright, Rosemary</creator><creator>Ranganathan, Sarath</creator><creator>Burgner, David</creator><creator>Thompson, Kristie</creator><creator>Dwyer, Terence</creator><creator>Vuillerman, Peter</creator><creator>Ponsonby, Anne-Louise</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Infant pacifier sanitization and risk of challenge-proven food allergy: A cohort study</title><author>Soriano, Victoria X. ; Koplin, Jennifer J. ; Forrester, Mike ; Peters, Rachel L. ; O’Hely, Martin ; Dharmage, Shyamali C. ; Wright, Rosemary ; Ranganathan, Sarath ; Burgner, David ; Thompson, Kristie ; Dwyer, Terence ; Vuillerman, Peter ; Ponsonby, Anne-Louise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fda85cdee799c3a1fc1897c0f271dc5b748729ad63ab1f3afaf746828ad1f50e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>antiseptic</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>birth cohort</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Congenital defects</topic><topic>Country of birth</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>dummy</topic><topic>Food allergies</topic><topic>food allergy</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>microbial exposure</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Pacifier</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>sanitization</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soriano, Victoria X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koplin, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Rachel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hely, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dharmage, Shyamali C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranganathan, Sarath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgner, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwyer, Terence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuillerman, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponsonby, Anne-Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BIS Investigator Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soriano, Victoria X.</au><au>Koplin, Jennifer J.</au><au>Forrester, Mike</au><au>Peters, Rachel L.</au><au>O’Hely, Martin</au><au>Dharmage, Shyamali C.</au><au>Wright, Rosemary</au><au>Ranganathan, Sarath</au><au>Burgner, David</au><au>Thompson, Kristie</au><au>Dwyer, Terence</au><au>Vuillerman, Peter</au><au>Ponsonby, Anne-Louise</au><aucorp>BIS Investigator Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infant pacifier sanitization and risk of challenge-proven food allergy: A cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>147</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1823</spage><epage>1829.e11</epage><pages>1823-1829.e11</pages><issn>0091-6749</issn><eissn>1097-6825</eissn><abstract>Environmental microbial exposure plays a role in immune system development and susceptibility to food allergy. We sought to investigate whether infant pacifier use during the first postnatal year, with further consideration of sanitization, alters the risk of food allergy by age 1 year. The birth cohort recruited pregnant mothers at under 28 weeks’ gestation in southeast Australia, with 894 families followed up when infants turned 1 year. Infants were excluded if born under 32 weeks, with a serious illness, major congenital malformation, or genetic disease. Questionnaire data, collected at recruitment and infant ages 1, 6, and 12 months, included pacifier use and pacifier sanitization (defined as the joint exposure of a pacifier and cleaning methods). Challenge-proven food allergy was assessed at 12 months. Any pacifier use at 6 months was associated with food allergy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.61), but not pacifier use at other ages. This overall association was driven by the joint exposure of pacifier-antiseptic use (adjusted odds ratio, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.10-21.18) compared with no pacifier use. Using pacifiers without antiseptic at 6 months was not associated with food allergy. Among pacifier users, antiseptic cleaning was still associated with food allergy (adjusted odds ratio, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.18-10.77) compared with no antiseptic use. Furthermore, persistent and repeated antiseptic use over the first 6 months was associated with higher food allergy risk (P = .029). This is the first report of a pacifier-antiseptic combination being associated with a higher risk of subsequent food allergy. Future work should investigate underlying biological pathways. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33810856</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.032</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6749
ispartof Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2021-05, Vol.147 (5), p.1823-1829.e11
issn 0091-6749
1097-6825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2522052143
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects antiseptic
Babies
birth cohort
Cohort analysis
Congenital defects
Country of birth
Drinking water
dummy
Food allergies
food allergy
Gestation
Immune system
Infants
Methods
microbial exposure
Microbiota
Mothers
Pacifier
Parents & parenting
Pregnancy
sanitization
Socioeconomic factors
Variables
title Infant pacifier sanitization and risk of challenge-proven food allergy: A cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infant%20pacifier%20sanitization%20and%20risk%20of%20challenge-proven%20food%20allergy:%20A%C2%A0cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20clinical%20immunology&rft.au=Soriano,%20Victoria%20X.&rft.aucorp=BIS%20Investigator%20Group&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=147&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1823&rft.epage=1829.e11&rft.pages=1823-1829.e11&rft.issn=0091-6749&rft.eissn=1097-6825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2522052143%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2522052143&rft_id=info:pmid/33810856&rft_els_id=S0091674921002219&rfr_iscdi=true