Cyclic loading test of lightly reinforced concrete wall piers with slit dampers in RC frames
•We proposed to install steel dampers in the slits between the lightly reinforced concrete wall piers and RC frames.•The rigidly connected lightly reinforced concrete walls lost their strength in a brittle manner.•The use of steel dampers enabled the wall piers to contribute moderate strength to the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering structures 2021-06, Vol.236, p.112099, Article 112099 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 112099 |
container_title | Engineering structures |
container_volume | 236 |
creator | Maida, Yusuke Sakata, Hiroyasu Qu, Zhe Maegawa, Toshio Suzuki, Hiro |
description | •We proposed to install steel dampers in the slits between the lightly reinforced concrete wall piers and RC frames.•The rigidly connected lightly reinforced concrete walls lost their strength in a brittle manner.•The use of steel dampers enabled the wall piers to contribute moderate strength to the RC frame in a ductile manner.•The damper deformation was greater when it was at the bottom of the wall pier.•The damage to the wall piers can be further suppressed by improving the strength design.
Lightly reinforced concrete (LRC) walls have been widely used in reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Japan as partitions and enclosure walls. Despite their contributions of considerable strength and stiffness to the structural system, they are generally classified as nonstructural elements and are not considered in seismic design. In recent decades, the use of slits around LRC walls to separate them from primary structures has become a common practice in Japan to avoid premature cracking and to minimize their detrimental effects on the seismic performance of buildings. However, this complete separation has also been thought to weaken the seismic resistance of the building, especially in terms of strength. In this study, we propose to install miniature steel dampers in the slits to form a controlled semirigid connection between the LRC wall piers and RC frames in residential buildings. The connection is hypothesized to provide additional lateral strength and energy dissipation capacity to the primary structure while mitigating the cracking of the LRC wall piers. We conducted quasi-static cyclic loading tests on four half-scaled specimens of a single-span RC frame and an LRC wall pier. In the different specimens, the wall piers were separated by a slit, rigidly connected to the frame or equipped with slit dampers to compare their seismic performance. While the rigidly connected LRC wall pier lost its strength and sustained successive damage prior to achieving a 1/200 story drift ratio, the use of miniature steel dampers enabled the wall piers to contribute moderate strength to the RC frame in a ductile manner and to remain essentially intact prior to a 1/200 story drift ratio. At the same story drift, the damper deformation was approximately 60% greater when it was placed at the mid-height than when it was at the bottom of the wall pier. However, the stud connection for the mid-height damper sustained severe damage and concrete cone failure. Thus, correctly designing |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112099 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2521651280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029621002492</els_id><sourcerecordid>2521651280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-34dbce0f5095f3c5ba6f0125a1c7b59d0686420a0b7a8a57da7ec3a9b47c65cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKefwYDPrTdp07SPo_gPBoLomxDSNNlSurYmmWPf3oyKrz5dOJxzLueH0C2BlAAp7rtUDxsf3F6FlAIlKSEUquoMLUjJs4RnNDtHCyA5SYBWxSW68r4DAFqWsECf9VH1VuF-lK0dNjhoH_BocG8329AfsdN2MKNTusVqHJTTQeOD7Hs8We08Ptiwxb63AbdyN50UO-C3Ghsnd9pfowsje69vfu8SfTw-vNfPyfr16aVerROVlTwkWd42SoNhUDGTKdbIwgChTBLFG1a1UJRFTkFCw2UpGW8l1yqTVZNzVTClsiW6m3snN37t4wLRjXs3xJeCMkoKRmgJ0cVnl3Kj904bMTm7k-4oCIgTStGJP5TihFLMKGNyNSd1HPEdhwuvrB4iFOt09Laj_bfjB1RigiY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521651280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cyclic loading test of lightly reinforced concrete wall piers with slit dampers in RC frames</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Maida, Yusuke ; Sakata, Hiroyasu ; Qu, Zhe ; Maegawa, Toshio ; Suzuki, Hiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Maida, Yusuke ; Sakata, Hiroyasu ; Qu, Zhe ; Maegawa, Toshio ; Suzuki, Hiro</creatorcontrib><description>•We proposed to install steel dampers in the slits between the lightly reinforced concrete wall piers and RC frames.•The rigidly connected lightly reinforced concrete walls lost their strength in a brittle manner.•The use of steel dampers enabled the wall piers to contribute moderate strength to the RC frame in a ductile manner.•The damper deformation was greater when it was at the bottom of the wall pier.•The damage to the wall piers can be further suppressed by improving the strength design.
Lightly reinforced concrete (LRC) walls have been widely used in reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Japan as partitions and enclosure walls. Despite their contributions of considerable strength and stiffness to the structural system, they are generally classified as nonstructural elements and are not considered in seismic design. In recent decades, the use of slits around LRC walls to separate them from primary structures has become a common practice in Japan to avoid premature cracking and to minimize their detrimental effects on the seismic performance of buildings. However, this complete separation has also been thought to weaken the seismic resistance of the building, especially in terms of strength. In this study, we propose to install miniature steel dampers in the slits to form a controlled semirigid connection between the LRC wall piers and RC frames in residential buildings. The connection is hypothesized to provide additional lateral strength and energy dissipation capacity to the primary structure while mitigating the cracking of the LRC wall piers. We conducted quasi-static cyclic loading tests on four half-scaled specimens of a single-span RC frame and an LRC wall pier. In the different specimens, the wall piers were separated by a slit, rigidly connected to the frame or equipped with slit dampers to compare their seismic performance. While the rigidly connected LRC wall pier lost its strength and sustained successive damage prior to achieving a 1/200 story drift ratio, the use of miniature steel dampers enabled the wall piers to contribute moderate strength to the RC frame in a ductile manner and to remain essentially intact prior to a 1/200 story drift ratio. At the same story drift, the damper deformation was approximately 60% greater when it was placed at the mid-height than when it was at the bottom of the wall pier. However, the stud connection for the mid-height damper sustained severe damage and concrete cone failure. Thus, correctly designing the stud group under combined shear and bending actions is challenging. Component tests on individual dampers were also conducted to show that the overstrength due to strain hardening could exceed two. Better control of the damage to the LRC wall piers requires full consideration of the significant strain hardening effect of the dampers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amino acid sequence ; Buildings ; Combined shear and bending ; Concrete ; Concrete construction ; Cracking (fracturing) ; Cyclic loads ; Drift ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake dampers ; Earthquake resistance ; Energy dissipation ; Lightly reinforced concrete wall ; Nonstructural component ; Nonstructural members ; Piers ; Reinforced concrete ; Reinforcing steels ; Residential areas ; Residential buildings ; Seismic activity ; Seismic design ; Seismic response ; Semi-rigid connections ; Slit ; Slit steel damper ; Slits ; Stiffness ; Strain hardening ; Walls</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2021-06, Vol.236, p.112099, Article 112099</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-34dbce0f5095f3c5ba6f0125a1c7b59d0686420a0b7a8a57da7ec3a9b47c65cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-34dbce0f5095f3c5ba6f0125a1c7b59d0686420a0b7a8a57da7ec3a9b47c65cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029621002492$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maida, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakata, Hiroyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maegawa, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Hiro</creatorcontrib><title>Cyclic loading test of lightly reinforced concrete wall piers with slit dampers in RC frames</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•We proposed to install steel dampers in the slits between the lightly reinforced concrete wall piers and RC frames.•The rigidly connected lightly reinforced concrete walls lost their strength in a brittle manner.•The use of steel dampers enabled the wall piers to contribute moderate strength to the RC frame in a ductile manner.•The damper deformation was greater when it was at the bottom of the wall pier.•The damage to the wall piers can be further suppressed by improving the strength design.
Lightly reinforced concrete (LRC) walls have been widely used in reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Japan as partitions and enclosure walls. Despite their contributions of considerable strength and stiffness to the structural system, they are generally classified as nonstructural elements and are not considered in seismic design. In recent decades, the use of slits around LRC walls to separate them from primary structures has become a common practice in Japan to avoid premature cracking and to minimize their detrimental effects on the seismic performance of buildings. However, this complete separation has also been thought to weaken the seismic resistance of the building, especially in terms of strength. In this study, we propose to install miniature steel dampers in the slits to form a controlled semirigid connection between the LRC wall piers and RC frames in residential buildings. The connection is hypothesized to provide additional lateral strength and energy dissipation capacity to the primary structure while mitigating the cracking of the LRC wall piers. We conducted quasi-static cyclic loading tests on four half-scaled specimens of a single-span RC frame and an LRC wall pier. In the different specimens, the wall piers were separated by a slit, rigidly connected to the frame or equipped with slit dampers to compare their seismic performance. While the rigidly connected LRC wall pier lost its strength and sustained successive damage prior to achieving a 1/200 story drift ratio, the use of miniature steel dampers enabled the wall piers to contribute moderate strength to the RC frame in a ductile manner and to remain essentially intact prior to a 1/200 story drift ratio. At the same story drift, the damper deformation was approximately 60% greater when it was placed at the mid-height than when it was at the bottom of the wall pier. However, the stud connection for the mid-height damper sustained severe damage and concrete cone failure. Thus, correctly designing the stud group under combined shear and bending actions is challenging. Component tests on individual dampers were also conducted to show that the overstrength due to strain hardening could exceed two. Better control of the damage to the LRC wall piers requires full consideration of the significant strain hardening effect of the dampers.</description><subject>Amino acid sequence</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Combined shear and bending</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Concrete construction</subject><subject>Cracking (fracturing)</subject><subject>Cyclic loads</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake dampers</subject><subject>Earthquake resistance</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Lightly reinforced concrete wall</subject><subject>Nonstructural component</subject><subject>Nonstructural members</subject><subject>Piers</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Reinforcing steels</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Residential buildings</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Semi-rigid connections</subject><subject>Slit</subject><subject>Slit steel damper</subject><subject>Slits</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Strain hardening</subject><subject>Walls</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKefwYDPrTdp07SPo_gPBoLomxDSNNlSurYmmWPf3oyKrz5dOJxzLueH0C2BlAAp7rtUDxsf3F6FlAIlKSEUquoMLUjJs4RnNDtHCyA5SYBWxSW68r4DAFqWsECf9VH1VuF-lK0dNjhoH_BocG8329AfsdN2MKNTusVqHJTTQeOD7Hs8We08Ptiwxb63AbdyN50UO-C3Ghsnd9pfowsje69vfu8SfTw-vNfPyfr16aVerROVlTwkWd42SoNhUDGTKdbIwgChTBLFG1a1UJRFTkFCw2UpGW8l1yqTVZNzVTClsiW6m3snN37t4wLRjXs3xJeCMkoKRmgJ0cVnl3Kj904bMTm7k-4oCIgTStGJP5TihFLMKGNyNSd1HPEdhwuvrB4iFOt09Laj_bfjB1RigiY</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Maida, Yusuke</creator><creator>Sakata, Hiroyasu</creator><creator>Qu, Zhe</creator><creator>Maegawa, Toshio</creator><creator>Suzuki, Hiro</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Cyclic loading test of lightly reinforced concrete wall piers with slit dampers in RC frames</title><author>Maida, Yusuke ; Sakata, Hiroyasu ; Qu, Zhe ; Maegawa, Toshio ; Suzuki, Hiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-34dbce0f5095f3c5ba6f0125a1c7b59d0686420a0b7a8a57da7ec3a9b47c65cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amino acid sequence</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Combined shear and bending</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Concrete construction</topic><topic>Cracking (fracturing)</topic><topic>Cyclic loads</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake dampers</topic><topic>Earthquake resistance</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Lightly reinforced concrete wall</topic><topic>Nonstructural component</topic><topic>Nonstructural members</topic><topic>Piers</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Reinforcing steels</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Residential buildings</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Semi-rigid connections</topic><topic>Slit</topic><topic>Slit steel damper</topic><topic>Slits</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Strain hardening</topic><topic>Walls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maida, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakata, Hiroyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maegawa, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Hiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maida, Yusuke</au><au>Sakata, Hiroyasu</au><au>Qu, Zhe</au><au>Maegawa, Toshio</au><au>Suzuki, Hiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cyclic loading test of lightly reinforced concrete wall piers with slit dampers in RC frames</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>236</volume><spage>112099</spage><pages>112099-</pages><artnum>112099</artnum><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><abstract>•We proposed to install steel dampers in the slits between the lightly reinforced concrete wall piers and RC frames.•The rigidly connected lightly reinforced concrete walls lost their strength in a brittle manner.•The use of steel dampers enabled the wall piers to contribute moderate strength to the RC frame in a ductile manner.•The damper deformation was greater when it was at the bottom of the wall pier.•The damage to the wall piers can be further suppressed by improving the strength design.
Lightly reinforced concrete (LRC) walls have been widely used in reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Japan as partitions and enclosure walls. Despite their contributions of considerable strength and stiffness to the structural system, they are generally classified as nonstructural elements and are not considered in seismic design. In recent decades, the use of slits around LRC walls to separate them from primary structures has become a common practice in Japan to avoid premature cracking and to minimize their detrimental effects on the seismic performance of buildings. However, this complete separation has also been thought to weaken the seismic resistance of the building, especially in terms of strength. In this study, we propose to install miniature steel dampers in the slits to form a controlled semirigid connection between the LRC wall piers and RC frames in residential buildings. The connection is hypothesized to provide additional lateral strength and energy dissipation capacity to the primary structure while mitigating the cracking of the LRC wall piers. We conducted quasi-static cyclic loading tests on four half-scaled specimens of a single-span RC frame and an LRC wall pier. In the different specimens, the wall piers were separated by a slit, rigidly connected to the frame or equipped with slit dampers to compare their seismic performance. While the rigidly connected LRC wall pier lost its strength and sustained successive damage prior to achieving a 1/200 story drift ratio, the use of miniature steel dampers enabled the wall piers to contribute moderate strength to the RC frame in a ductile manner and to remain essentially intact prior to a 1/200 story drift ratio. At the same story drift, the damper deformation was approximately 60% greater when it was placed at the mid-height than when it was at the bottom of the wall pier. However, the stud connection for the mid-height damper sustained severe damage and concrete cone failure. Thus, correctly designing the stud group under combined shear and bending actions is challenging. Component tests on individual dampers were also conducted to show that the overstrength due to strain hardening could exceed two. Better control of the damage to the LRC wall piers requires full consideration of the significant strain hardening effect of the dampers.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112099</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-0296 |
ispartof | Engineering structures, 2021-06, Vol.236, p.112099, Article 112099 |
issn | 0141-0296 1873-7323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2521651280 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Amino acid sequence Buildings Combined shear and bending Concrete Concrete construction Cracking (fracturing) Cyclic loads Drift Earthquake damage Earthquake dampers Earthquake resistance Energy dissipation Lightly reinforced concrete wall Nonstructural component Nonstructural members Piers Reinforced concrete Reinforcing steels Residential areas Residential buildings Seismic activity Seismic design Seismic response Semi-rigid connections Slit Slit steel damper Slits Stiffness Strain hardening Walls |
title | Cyclic loading test of lightly reinforced concrete wall piers with slit dampers in RC frames |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A45%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cyclic%20loading%20test%20of%20lightly%20reinforced%20concrete%20wall%20piers%20with%20slit%20dampers%20in%20RC%20frames&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Maida,%20Yusuke&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=236&rft.spage=112099&rft.pages=112099-&rft.artnum=112099&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2521651280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521651280&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029621002492&rfr_iscdi=true |