High-resolution CubeSat imagery and machine learning for detailed snow-covered area

Snow cover affects a diverse array of physical, ecological, and societal systems. As such, the development of optical remote sensing techniques to measure snow-covered area (SCA) has enabled progress in a wide variety of research domains. However, in many cases, the spatial and temporal resolutions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing of environment 2021-06, Vol.258, p.112399, Article 112399
Hauptverfasser: Cannistra, Anthony F., Shean, David E., Cristea, Nicoleta C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 112399
container_title Remote sensing of environment
container_volume 258
creator Cannistra, Anthony F.
Shean, David E.
Cristea, Nicoleta C.
description Snow cover affects a diverse array of physical, ecological, and societal systems. As such, the development of optical remote sensing techniques to measure snow-covered area (SCA) has enabled progress in a wide variety of research domains. However, in many cases, the spatial and temporal resolutions of currently available remotely sensed SCA products are insufficient to capture SCA evolution at spatial and temporal resolutions relevant to the study of fine-scale spatially heterogeneous phenomena. We developed a convolutional neural network-based method to identify snow covered area using the ~3 m, 4-band PlanetScope optical satellite image dataset with ~daily, near-global coverage. By comparing our model performance to snow extent derived from high-resolution airborne lidar differential depth measurements and satellite platforms in two North American sites (Sierra Nevada, CA, USA and Rocky Mountains, CO, USA), we show that these emerging image archives have great potential to accurately observe snow-covered area at high spatial and temporal resolutions despite limited radiometric bandwidth and band placement. We achieve average snow classification F-Scores of 0.73 in our training basin and 0.67 in a climatically-distinct out-of-sample basin, suggesting opportunities for model transferability. We also evaluate the performance of these data in forested regions, suggesting avenues for further research. The unparalleled spatial and temporal coverage of CubeSat imagery offers an excellent opportunity for satellite remote sensing of snow, with real implications for ecological and water resource applications. •Daily, 3-m snow covered area derived from Planet Labs Inc. “PlanetScope” data.•Model-based neural network approach enabled by airborne lidar.•Derived snow covered area compares well to Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8.•Good performance in both California and Colorado, USA, suggesting transferability.•Limited performance around tree canopies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112399
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2521114324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425721001176</els_id><sourcerecordid>2521114324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e5f9b28c03c64e069e7449b7c7f2bfef6b072ea12ee2bda85bba34f75f3eb8273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuC1635atPilQx1wsCL6XVI0pMtpUtm0k727-2Y114dDrzP-XgQuie4IJhUj10RExQUU1IQQlnTXKAZqUWTY4H5JZphzHjOaSmu0U1KHcakrAWZofXSbbZ5hBT6cXDBZ4tRw1oNmdupDcRjpnyb7ZTZOg9ZDyp65zeZDTFrYVCuhzZLPvzkJhwgTo2KoG7RlVV9gru_Okdfry-fi2W--nh7XzyvcsOqesihtI2mtcHMVBxw1YDgvNHCCEu1BVtpLCgoQgGoblVdaq0Yt6K0DHRNBZujh_PcfQzfI6RBdmGMflopaUkJIZxRPqXIOWViSCmClfs4PRePkmB5cic7ObmTJ3fy7G5ins4MTOcfHESZjANvoHURzCDb4P6hfwGDIXe9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521114324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-resolution CubeSat imagery and machine learning for detailed snow-covered area</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cannistra, Anthony F. ; Shean, David E. ; Cristea, Nicoleta C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cannistra, Anthony F. ; Shean, David E. ; Cristea, Nicoleta C.</creatorcontrib><description>Snow cover affects a diverse array of physical, ecological, and societal systems. As such, the development of optical remote sensing techniques to measure snow-covered area (SCA) has enabled progress in a wide variety of research domains. However, in many cases, the spatial and temporal resolutions of currently available remotely sensed SCA products are insufficient to capture SCA evolution at spatial and temporal resolutions relevant to the study of fine-scale spatially heterogeneous phenomena. We developed a convolutional neural network-based method to identify snow covered area using the ~3 m, 4-band PlanetScope optical satellite image dataset with ~daily, near-global coverage. By comparing our model performance to snow extent derived from high-resolution airborne lidar differential depth measurements and satellite platforms in two North American sites (Sierra Nevada, CA, USA and Rocky Mountains, CO, USA), we show that these emerging image archives have great potential to accurately observe snow-covered area at high spatial and temporal resolutions despite limited radiometric bandwidth and band placement. We achieve average snow classification F-Scores of 0.73 in our training basin and 0.67 in a climatically-distinct out-of-sample basin, suggesting opportunities for model transferability. We also evaluate the performance of these data in forested regions, suggesting avenues for further research. The unparalleled spatial and temporal coverage of CubeSat imagery offers an excellent opportunity for satellite remote sensing of snow, with real implications for ecological and water resource applications. •Daily, 3-m snow covered area derived from Planet Labs Inc. “PlanetScope” data.•Model-based neural network approach enabled by airborne lidar.•Derived snow covered area compares well to Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8.•Good performance in both California and Colorado, USA, suggesting transferability.•Limited performance around tree canopies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112399</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Airborne lidar ; Airborne sensing ; Archives &amp; records ; Artificial neural networks ; Cubesat ; Depth measurement ; High resolution ; Identification methods ; Image resolution ; Learning algorithms ; Lidar ; Lidar measurements ; Machine learning ; Mountains ; Neural networks ; Performance evaluation ; Planet ; PlanetScope ; Remote sensing ; Remote sensing techniques ; Satellite imagery ; Satellites ; Seasonal snow ; Sensing techniques ; Snow ; Snow cover ; Snow covered area ; Supervised classification ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2021-06, Vol.258, p.112399, Article 112399</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e5f9b28c03c64e069e7449b7c7f2bfef6b072ea12ee2bda85bba34f75f3eb8273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e5f9b28c03c64e069e7449b7c7f2bfef6b072ea12ee2bda85bba34f75f3eb8273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425721001176$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cannistra, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shean, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristea, Nicoleta C.</creatorcontrib><title>High-resolution CubeSat imagery and machine learning for detailed snow-covered area</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>Snow cover affects a diverse array of physical, ecological, and societal systems. As such, the development of optical remote sensing techniques to measure snow-covered area (SCA) has enabled progress in a wide variety of research domains. However, in many cases, the spatial and temporal resolutions of currently available remotely sensed SCA products are insufficient to capture SCA evolution at spatial and temporal resolutions relevant to the study of fine-scale spatially heterogeneous phenomena. We developed a convolutional neural network-based method to identify snow covered area using the ~3 m, 4-band PlanetScope optical satellite image dataset with ~daily, near-global coverage. By comparing our model performance to snow extent derived from high-resolution airborne lidar differential depth measurements and satellite platforms in two North American sites (Sierra Nevada, CA, USA and Rocky Mountains, CO, USA), we show that these emerging image archives have great potential to accurately observe snow-covered area at high spatial and temporal resolutions despite limited radiometric bandwidth and band placement. We achieve average snow classification F-Scores of 0.73 in our training basin and 0.67 in a climatically-distinct out-of-sample basin, suggesting opportunities for model transferability. We also evaluate the performance of these data in forested regions, suggesting avenues for further research. The unparalleled spatial and temporal coverage of CubeSat imagery offers an excellent opportunity for satellite remote sensing of snow, with real implications for ecological and water resource applications. •Daily, 3-m snow covered area derived from Planet Labs Inc. “PlanetScope” data.•Model-based neural network approach enabled by airborne lidar.•Derived snow covered area compares well to Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8.•Good performance in both California and Colorado, USA, suggesting transferability.•Limited performance around tree canopies.</description><subject>Airborne lidar</subject><subject>Airborne sensing</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Cubesat</subject><subject>Depth measurement</subject><subject>High resolution</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Image resolution</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Lidar measurements</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Planet</subject><subject>PlanetScope</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Remote sensing techniques</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Seasonal snow</subject><subject>Sensing techniques</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><subject>Snow covered area</subject><subject>Supervised classification</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuC1635atPilQx1wsCL6XVI0pMtpUtm0k727-2Y114dDrzP-XgQuie4IJhUj10RExQUU1IQQlnTXKAZqUWTY4H5JZphzHjOaSmu0U1KHcakrAWZofXSbbZ5hBT6cXDBZ4tRw1oNmdupDcRjpnyb7ZTZOg9ZDyp65zeZDTFrYVCuhzZLPvzkJhwgTo2KoG7RlVV9gru_Okdfry-fi2W--nh7XzyvcsOqesihtI2mtcHMVBxw1YDgvNHCCEu1BVtpLCgoQgGoblVdaq0Yt6K0DHRNBZujh_PcfQzfI6RBdmGMflopaUkJIZxRPqXIOWViSCmClfs4PRePkmB5cic7ObmTJ3fy7G5ins4MTOcfHESZjANvoHURzCDb4P6hfwGDIXe9</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Cannistra, Anthony F.</creator><creator>Shean, David E.</creator><creator>Cristea, Nicoleta C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>High-resolution CubeSat imagery and machine learning for detailed snow-covered area</title><author>Cannistra, Anthony F. ; Shean, David E. ; Cristea, Nicoleta C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e5f9b28c03c64e069e7449b7c7f2bfef6b072ea12ee2bda85bba34f75f3eb8273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Airborne lidar</topic><topic>Airborne sensing</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Cubesat</topic><topic>Depth measurement</topic><topic>High resolution</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Image resolution</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Lidar measurements</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Planet</topic><topic>PlanetScope</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Remote sensing techniques</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Seasonal snow</topic><topic>Sensing techniques</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><topic>Snow covered area</topic><topic>Supervised classification</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cannistra, Anthony F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shean, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristea, Nicoleta C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cannistra, Anthony F.</au><au>Shean, David E.</au><au>Cristea, Nicoleta C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-resolution CubeSat imagery and machine learning for detailed snow-covered area</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>258</volume><spage>112399</spage><pages>112399-</pages><artnum>112399</artnum><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><abstract>Snow cover affects a diverse array of physical, ecological, and societal systems. As such, the development of optical remote sensing techniques to measure snow-covered area (SCA) has enabled progress in a wide variety of research domains. However, in many cases, the spatial and temporal resolutions of currently available remotely sensed SCA products are insufficient to capture SCA evolution at spatial and temporal resolutions relevant to the study of fine-scale spatially heterogeneous phenomena. We developed a convolutional neural network-based method to identify snow covered area using the ~3 m, 4-band PlanetScope optical satellite image dataset with ~daily, near-global coverage. By comparing our model performance to snow extent derived from high-resolution airborne lidar differential depth measurements and satellite platforms in two North American sites (Sierra Nevada, CA, USA and Rocky Mountains, CO, USA), we show that these emerging image archives have great potential to accurately observe snow-covered area at high spatial and temporal resolutions despite limited radiometric bandwidth and band placement. We achieve average snow classification F-Scores of 0.73 in our training basin and 0.67 in a climatically-distinct out-of-sample basin, suggesting opportunities for model transferability. We also evaluate the performance of these data in forested regions, suggesting avenues for further research. The unparalleled spatial and temporal coverage of CubeSat imagery offers an excellent opportunity for satellite remote sensing of snow, with real implications for ecological and water resource applications. •Daily, 3-m snow covered area derived from Planet Labs Inc. “PlanetScope” data.•Model-based neural network approach enabled by airborne lidar.•Derived snow covered area compares well to Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8.•Good performance in both California and Colorado, USA, suggesting transferability.•Limited performance around tree canopies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2021.112399</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-4257
ispartof Remote sensing of environment, 2021-06, Vol.258, p.112399, Article 112399
issn 0034-4257
1879-0704
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2521114324
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Airborne lidar
Airborne sensing
Archives & records
Artificial neural networks
Cubesat
Depth measurement
High resolution
Identification methods
Image resolution
Learning algorithms
Lidar
Lidar measurements
Machine learning
Mountains
Neural networks
Performance evaluation
Planet
PlanetScope
Remote sensing
Remote sensing techniques
Satellite imagery
Satellites
Seasonal snow
Sensing techniques
Snow
Snow cover
Snow covered area
Supervised classification
Water resources
title High-resolution CubeSat imagery and machine learning for detailed snow-covered area
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A09%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-resolution%20CubeSat%20imagery%20and%20machine%20learning%20for%20detailed%20snow-covered%20area&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Cannistra,%20Anthony%20F.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=258&rft.spage=112399&rft.pages=112399-&rft.artnum=112399&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112399&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2521114324%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521114324&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0034425721001176&rfr_iscdi=true