What factors increase the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds?
Biodiversity impacts caused by alien species can be severe, including those caused by alien birds. In order to protect native birds, we aimed to identify factors that influence their vulnerability to the impacts of alien birds. We first reviewed the literature to identify native bird species sustain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecography (Copenhagen) 2021-05, Vol.44 (5), p.727-739 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 739 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 727 |
container_title | Ecography (Copenhagen) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Evans, Thomas Jeschke, Jonathan M. Liu, Chunlong Redding, David W. Şekercioğlu, Çağan H. Blackburn, Tim M. |
description | Biodiversity impacts caused by alien species can be severe, including those caused by alien birds. In order to protect native birds, we aimed to identify factors that influence their vulnerability to the impacts of alien birds. We first reviewed the literature to identify native bird species sustaining such impacts. We then assigned impact severity scores to each native bird species, depending on the severity of the impacts sustained, and performed two types of analyses. First, we used contingency table tests to examine the distribution of impacts across their severity, type and location, and across native bird orders. Second, we used mixed‐effects models to test factors hypothesised to influence the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds.
Ground‐nesting shorebirds and seabirds were more prone to impacts through predation, while cavity‐nesting woodpeckers and parrots were more prone to impacts through competition. Native bird species were more vulnerable when they occupied islands, warm regions, regions with climatic conditions similar to those in the native range of the invading alien species, and when they were physically smaller than the invading alien species. To a lesser extent, they were also vulnerable when they shared habitat preferences with the invading alien species.
By considering the number and type of native bird species affected by alien birds, we demonstrate predation impacts to be more widespread than previously indicated, but also that damaging predation impacts may be underreported. We identify vulnerable orders of native birds, which may require conservation interventions; characteristics of native birds that increase their vulnerability, which may be used to inform risk assessments; and regions where native birds are most vulnerable, which may direct management interventions. The impacts sustained by native birds may be going unnoticed in many regions of the world: there is a clear need to identify and manage them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ecog.05000 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2520779321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710754607</galeid><sourcerecordid>A710754607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-c6acc4a88f6b364a13d16a93a927c626b7a9cb48fe2b4d840f9b278ec8fe39563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP8GCN2HrJLubbE5SSq1CoRf_HEM2TdqU7aYmaaXf3rTr2ZnDwMzvvYGH0D2GEU71pJVbjaACgAs0wBQgh6pml2gAHGjOKg7X6CaEDQAmnNYD9Pm1ljEzUkXnQ2Y75bUMOotrnR32bae9bGxr4zFzJutktAedNdYvQxbdGbLbXdKG01m2Vnf99fkWXRnZBn33N4fo42X6PnnN54vZ22Q8z1XBKM0VlUqVsq4NbQpaSlwsMZW8kJwwRQltmOSqKWujSVMu6xIMbwirtUqbgle0GKKH3nfn3fdehyg2bu-79FKQigBjvCA4UaOeWslWC9sZF71UqZd6a5XrtLFpP2YYWFVSYEnw2AuUdyF4bcTO2630R4FBnIIWp6DFOegE4x7-SS7Hf0gxnSxmmDCgxS-mlH_N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2520779321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What factors increase the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds?</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Evans, Thomas ; Jeschke, Jonathan M. ; Liu, Chunlong ; Redding, David W. ; Şekercioğlu, Çağan H. ; Blackburn, Tim M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Thomas ; Jeschke, Jonathan M. ; Liu, Chunlong ; Redding, David W. ; Şekercioğlu, Çağan H. ; Blackburn, Tim M.</creatorcontrib><description>Biodiversity impacts caused by alien species can be severe, including those caused by alien birds. In order to protect native birds, we aimed to identify factors that influence their vulnerability to the impacts of alien birds. We first reviewed the literature to identify native bird species sustaining such impacts. We then assigned impact severity scores to each native bird species, depending on the severity of the impacts sustained, and performed two types of analyses. First, we used contingency table tests to examine the distribution of impacts across their severity, type and location, and across native bird orders. Second, we used mixed‐effects models to test factors hypothesised to influence the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds.
Ground‐nesting shorebirds and seabirds were more prone to impacts through predation, while cavity‐nesting woodpeckers and parrots were more prone to impacts through competition. Native bird species were more vulnerable when they occupied islands, warm regions, regions with climatic conditions similar to those in the native range of the invading alien species, and when they were physically smaller than the invading alien species. To a lesser extent, they were also vulnerable when they shared habitat preferences with the invading alien species.
By considering the number and type of native bird species affected by alien birds, we demonstrate predation impacts to be more widespread than previously indicated, but also that damaging predation impacts may be underreported. We identify vulnerable orders of native birds, which may require conservation interventions; characteristics of native birds that increase their vulnerability, which may be used to inform risk assessments; and regions where native birds are most vulnerable, which may direct management interventions. The impacts sustained by native birds may be going unnoticed in many regions of the world: there is a clear need to identify and manage them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-7590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0587</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05000</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>alien species ; Analysis ; Aquatic birds ; Biodiversity ; Bird impact ; Birds ; Cavity nesting ; Climatic conditions ; Contingency ; EICAT ; Habitat preferences ; Impact damage ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Native species ; Nesting ; ornithology ; Parrots ; Predation ; Protection and preservation ; Risk assessment ; seabirds ; shorebirds ; Statistical analysis ; Threatened species ; Wildlife conservation ; woodpeckers</subject><ispartof>Ecography (Copenhagen), 2021-05, Vol.44 (5), p.727-739</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Ecography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-c6acc4a88f6b364a13d16a93a927c626b7a9cb48fe2b4d840f9b278ec8fe39563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-c6acc4a88f6b364a13d16a93a927c626b7a9cb48fe2b4d840f9b278ec8fe39563</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0152-2663 ; 0000-0002-3376-4555 ; 0000-0002-7528-2773 ; 0000-0003-3328-4217 ; 0000-0001-8615-1798 ; 0000-0003-3193-0377</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecog.05000$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecog.05000$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeschke, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chunlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redding, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şekercioğlu, Çağan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackburn, Tim M.</creatorcontrib><title>What factors increase the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds?</title><title>Ecography (Copenhagen)</title><description>Biodiversity impacts caused by alien species can be severe, including those caused by alien birds. In order to protect native birds, we aimed to identify factors that influence their vulnerability to the impacts of alien birds. We first reviewed the literature to identify native bird species sustaining such impacts. We then assigned impact severity scores to each native bird species, depending on the severity of the impacts sustained, and performed two types of analyses. First, we used contingency table tests to examine the distribution of impacts across their severity, type and location, and across native bird orders. Second, we used mixed‐effects models to test factors hypothesised to influence the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds.
Ground‐nesting shorebirds and seabirds were more prone to impacts through predation, while cavity‐nesting woodpeckers and parrots were more prone to impacts through competition. Native bird species were more vulnerable when they occupied islands, warm regions, regions with climatic conditions similar to those in the native range of the invading alien species, and when they were physically smaller than the invading alien species. To a lesser extent, they were also vulnerable when they shared habitat preferences with the invading alien species.
By considering the number and type of native bird species affected by alien birds, we demonstrate predation impacts to be more widespread than previously indicated, but also that damaging predation impacts may be underreported. We identify vulnerable orders of native birds, which may require conservation interventions; characteristics of native birds that increase their vulnerability, which may be used to inform risk assessments; and regions where native birds are most vulnerable, which may direct management interventions. The impacts sustained by native birds may be going unnoticed in many regions of the world: there is a clear need to identify and manage them.</description><subject>alien species</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bird impact</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cavity nesting</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Contingency</subject><subject>EICAT</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Impact damage</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>ornithology</subject><subject>Parrots</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>seabirds</subject><subject>shorebirds</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>woodpeckers</subject><issn>0906-7590</issn><issn>1600-0587</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP8GCN2HrJLubbE5SSq1CoRf_HEM2TdqU7aYmaaXf3rTr2ZnDwMzvvYGH0D2GEU71pJVbjaACgAs0wBQgh6pml2gAHGjOKg7X6CaEDQAmnNYD9Pm1ljEzUkXnQ2Y75bUMOotrnR32bae9bGxr4zFzJutktAedNdYvQxbdGbLbXdKG01m2Vnf99fkWXRnZBn33N4fo42X6PnnN54vZ22Q8z1XBKM0VlUqVsq4NbQpaSlwsMZW8kJwwRQltmOSqKWujSVMu6xIMbwirtUqbgle0GKKH3nfn3fdehyg2bu-79FKQigBjvCA4UaOeWslWC9sZF71UqZd6a5XrtLFpP2YYWFVSYEnw2AuUdyF4bcTO2630R4FBnIIWp6DFOegE4x7-SS7Hf0gxnSxmmDCgxS-mlH_N</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Evans, Thomas</creator><creator>Jeschke, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>Liu, Chunlong</creator><creator>Redding, David W.</creator><creator>Şekercioğlu, Çağan H.</creator><creator>Blackburn, Tim M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0152-2663</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3376-4555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7528-2773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3328-4217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8615-1798</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3193-0377</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>What factors increase the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds?</title><author>Evans, Thomas ; Jeschke, Jonathan M. ; Liu, Chunlong ; Redding, David W. ; Şekercioğlu, Çağan H. ; Blackburn, Tim M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-c6acc4a88f6b364a13d16a93a927c626b7a9cb48fe2b4d840f9b278ec8fe39563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>alien species</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bird impact</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cavity nesting</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Contingency</topic><topic>EICAT</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Impact damage</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>ornithology</topic><topic>Parrots</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>seabirds</topic><topic>shorebirds</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>woodpeckers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeschke, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chunlong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redding, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Şekercioğlu, Çağan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackburn, Tim M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Thomas</au><au>Jeschke, Jonathan M.</au><au>Liu, Chunlong</au><au>Redding, David W.</au><au>Şekercioğlu, Çağan H.</au><au>Blackburn, Tim M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What factors increase the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds?</atitle><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>727</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>727-739</pages><issn>0906-7590</issn><eissn>1600-0587</eissn><abstract>Biodiversity impacts caused by alien species can be severe, including those caused by alien birds. In order to protect native birds, we aimed to identify factors that influence their vulnerability to the impacts of alien birds. We first reviewed the literature to identify native bird species sustaining such impacts. We then assigned impact severity scores to each native bird species, depending on the severity of the impacts sustained, and performed two types of analyses. First, we used contingency table tests to examine the distribution of impacts across their severity, type and location, and across native bird orders. Second, we used mixed‐effects models to test factors hypothesised to influence the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds.
Ground‐nesting shorebirds and seabirds were more prone to impacts through predation, while cavity‐nesting woodpeckers and parrots were more prone to impacts through competition. Native bird species were more vulnerable when they occupied islands, warm regions, regions with climatic conditions similar to those in the native range of the invading alien species, and when they were physically smaller than the invading alien species. To a lesser extent, they were also vulnerable when they shared habitat preferences with the invading alien species.
By considering the number and type of native bird species affected by alien birds, we demonstrate predation impacts to be more widespread than previously indicated, but also that damaging predation impacts may be underreported. We identify vulnerable orders of native birds, which may require conservation interventions; characteristics of native birds that increase their vulnerability, which may be used to inform risk assessments; and regions where native birds are most vulnerable, which may direct management interventions. The impacts sustained by native birds may be going unnoticed in many regions of the world: there is a clear need to identify and manage them.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ecog.05000</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0152-2663</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3376-4555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7528-2773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3328-4217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8615-1798</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3193-0377</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0906-7590 |
ispartof | Ecography (Copenhagen), 2021-05, Vol.44 (5), p.727-739 |
issn | 0906-7590 1600-0587 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2520779321 |
source | Wiley Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | alien species Analysis Aquatic birds Biodiversity Bird impact Birds Cavity nesting Climatic conditions Contingency EICAT Habitat preferences Impact damage Indigenous species Introduced species Native species Nesting ornithology Parrots Predation Protection and preservation Risk assessment seabirds shorebirds Statistical analysis Threatened species Wildlife conservation woodpeckers |
title | What factors increase the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A06%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20factors%20increase%20the%20vulnerability%20of%20native%20birds%20to%20the%20impacts%20of%20alien%20birds?&rft.jtitle=Ecography%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Evans,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=727&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=727-739&rft.issn=0906-7590&rft.eissn=1600-0587&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecog.05000&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA710754607%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2520779321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A710754607&rfr_iscdi=true |