Geochemistry of sands from the Huatabampo and Altata beaches, Gulf of California, Mexico

Grain size, heavy minerals, mineralogical, and geochemical analyses were undertaken on the sand samples from Huatabampo (HB) and Altata (AA) beaches to infer palaeoweathering conditions and source rock characteristics. The mean grain size of HB and AA sands is fine‐grained and fine‐ to medium‐graine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geological journal (Chichester, England) England), 2021-05, Vol.56 (5), p.2398-2417
Hauptverfasser: Madhavaraju, Jayagopal, Armstrong‐Altrin, John S., Pillai, Rahul B., Pi‐Puig, Teresa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2417
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2398
container_title Geological journal (Chichester, England)
container_volume 56
creator Madhavaraju, Jayagopal
Armstrong‐Altrin, John S.
Pillai, Rahul B.
Pi‐Puig, Teresa
description Grain size, heavy minerals, mineralogical, and geochemical analyses were undertaken on the sand samples from Huatabampo (HB) and Altata (AA) beaches to infer palaeoweathering conditions and source rock characteristics. The mean grain size of HB and AA sands is fine‐grained and fine‐ to medium‐grained, respectively. Magnetite and hypersthene are the common heavy minerals identified in HB sands, whereas magnetite and ilmenite are the dominant heavy minerals in AA sands. HB sands have a high proportion of quartz and plagioclase followed by K‐feldspar and zeolite. Quartz is the dominant mineral in the AA sands, followed by plagioclase and K‐feldspar. Geochemically, the sand samples from HB are classified as wacke, whereas AA sands are classified as wacke and arkose. In chondrite‐normalised REE plot, HB and AA sands show LREE enriched and HREE depleted pattern with negative Eu anomaly. Chemical index of alteration (CIA), plagioclase index of alteration (PIA) values and Th/U ratios of HB and AA sands suggest a low intensity of chemical weathering in the source area. The tectonic discriminant function diagram suggestsan arc setting for HB sands, whereas a rift setting for AA sands. The chondrite‐normalised REE patterns, Eu anomaly, Al2O3/TiO2 ratio, trace elemental ratios, discriminant function, and ternary diagrams suggest that the HB and AA sands were dominantly derived from felsic source rocks. The comparison of REE patterns of HB and AA sands with the source rocks exposed near to the study area suggest that the central granites of Laramide plutonic rocks exposed in Sonora were contributing sediments to the HB beach, whereas AA sands received sediments mainly from the felsic Francisco gneiss in the western Sonobari Complex of Sinaloa.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/gj.3864
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2520681537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2520681537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-970d84ade226f13bd79d5b28c798ed183d7f3c01c59e6376023920221a9457713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFOwzAQRC0EEqUgfsESBw40ZW0ncXysKkhBRVxA4mY5id0mSupiJ4L8PS7lyml3tW9mpEHomsCcAND7TTNnWRqfoAkBISICLD5FEwBOw57AObrwvgEgBGIyQR-5tuVWd7Xv3YitwV7tKo-Nsx3utxqvBtWrQnV7i8MDL9o-3LjQKoj8DOdDaw6qpWprY92uVjP8or_r0l6iM6Nar6_-5hS9Pz68LVfR-jV_Wi7WUUkzEUeCQ5XFqtKUpoawouKiSgqalVxkuiIZq7hhJZAyETplPAXKBAVKiRJxwjlhU3Rz9N07-zlo38vGDm4XIiVNKKQZSRgP1O2RKp313mkj967ulBslAXmoTW4aeagtkHdH8qtu9fgfJvPnX_oH8MBqmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2520681537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geochemistry of sands from the Huatabampo and Altata beaches, Gulf of California, Mexico</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Madhavaraju, Jayagopal ; Armstrong‐Altrin, John S. ; Pillai, Rahul B. ; Pi‐Puig, Teresa</creator><creatorcontrib>Madhavaraju, Jayagopal ; Armstrong‐Altrin, John S. ; Pillai, Rahul B. ; Pi‐Puig, Teresa</creatorcontrib><description>Grain size, heavy minerals, mineralogical, and geochemical analyses were undertaken on the sand samples from Huatabampo (HB) and Altata (AA) beaches to infer palaeoweathering conditions and source rock characteristics. The mean grain size of HB and AA sands is fine‐grained and fine‐ to medium‐grained, respectively. Magnetite and hypersthene are the common heavy minerals identified in HB sands, whereas magnetite and ilmenite are the dominant heavy minerals in AA sands. HB sands have a high proportion of quartz and plagioclase followed by K‐feldspar and zeolite. Quartz is the dominant mineral in the AA sands, followed by plagioclase and K‐feldspar. Geochemically, the sand samples from HB are classified as wacke, whereas AA sands are classified as wacke and arkose. In chondrite‐normalised REE plot, HB and AA sands show LREE enriched and HREE depleted pattern with negative Eu anomaly. Chemical index of alteration (CIA), plagioclase index of alteration (PIA) values and Th/U ratios of HB and AA sands suggest a low intensity of chemical weathering in the source area. The tectonic discriminant function diagram suggestsan arc setting for HB sands, whereas a rift setting for AA sands. The chondrite‐normalised REE patterns, Eu anomaly, Al2O3/TiO2 ratio, trace elemental ratios, discriminant function, and ternary diagrams suggest that the HB and AA sands were dominantly derived from felsic source rocks. The comparison of REE patterns of HB and AA sands with the source rocks exposed near to the study area suggest that the central granites of Laramide plutonic rocks exposed in Sonora were contributing sediments to the HB beach, whereas AA sands received sediments mainly from the felsic Francisco gneiss in the western Sonobari Complex of Sinaloa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0072-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gj.3864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aluminum oxide ; beach sands ; Beaches ; Discriminant analysis ; Feldspars ; Geochemistry ; Gneiss ; Grain size ; Gulf of California ; Heavy minerals ; Ilmenite ; Magnetite ; Mexico ; Minerals ; Particle size ; Plagioclase ; provenance ; Quartz ; Ratios ; Rock ; Rocks ; Sand ; Sediment ; Sediments ; Tectonics ; Titanium dioxide ; Zeolites</subject><ispartof>Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2021-05, Vol.56 (5), p.2398-2417</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-970d84ade226f13bd79d5b28c798ed183d7f3c01c59e6376023920221a9457713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-970d84ade226f13bd79d5b28c798ed183d7f3c01c59e6376023920221a9457713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0283-8881 ; 0000-0003-3910-5195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fgj.3864$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fgj.3864$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madhavaraju, Jayagopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong‐Altrin, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillai, Rahul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pi‐Puig, Teresa</creatorcontrib><title>Geochemistry of sands from the Huatabampo and Altata beaches, Gulf of California, Mexico</title><title>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</title><description>Grain size, heavy minerals, mineralogical, and geochemical analyses were undertaken on the sand samples from Huatabampo (HB) and Altata (AA) beaches to infer palaeoweathering conditions and source rock characteristics. The mean grain size of HB and AA sands is fine‐grained and fine‐ to medium‐grained, respectively. Magnetite and hypersthene are the common heavy minerals identified in HB sands, whereas magnetite and ilmenite are the dominant heavy minerals in AA sands. HB sands have a high proportion of quartz and plagioclase followed by K‐feldspar and zeolite. Quartz is the dominant mineral in the AA sands, followed by plagioclase and K‐feldspar. Geochemically, the sand samples from HB are classified as wacke, whereas AA sands are classified as wacke and arkose. In chondrite‐normalised REE plot, HB and AA sands show LREE enriched and HREE depleted pattern with negative Eu anomaly. Chemical index of alteration (CIA), plagioclase index of alteration (PIA) values and Th/U ratios of HB and AA sands suggest a low intensity of chemical weathering in the source area. The tectonic discriminant function diagram suggestsan arc setting for HB sands, whereas a rift setting for AA sands. The chondrite‐normalised REE patterns, Eu anomaly, Al2O3/TiO2 ratio, trace elemental ratios, discriminant function, and ternary diagrams suggest that the HB and AA sands were dominantly derived from felsic source rocks. The comparison of REE patterns of HB and AA sands with the source rocks exposed near to the study area suggest that the central granites of Laramide plutonic rocks exposed in Sonora were contributing sediments to the HB beach, whereas AA sands received sediments mainly from the felsic Francisco gneiss in the western Sonobari Complex of Sinaloa.</description><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>beach sands</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Feldspars</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Gneiss</subject><subject>Grain size</subject><subject>Gulf of California</subject><subject>Heavy minerals</subject><subject>Ilmenite</subject><subject>Magnetite</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Plagioclase</subject><subject>provenance</subject><subject>Quartz</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Rock</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Titanium dioxide</subject><subject>Zeolites</subject><issn>0072-1050</issn><issn>1099-1034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFOwzAQRC0EEqUgfsESBw40ZW0ncXysKkhBRVxA4mY5id0mSupiJ4L8PS7lyml3tW9mpEHomsCcAND7TTNnWRqfoAkBISICLD5FEwBOw57AObrwvgEgBGIyQR-5tuVWd7Xv3YitwV7tKo-Nsx3utxqvBtWrQnV7i8MDL9o-3LjQKoj8DOdDaw6qpWprY92uVjP8or_r0l6iM6Nar6_-5hS9Pz68LVfR-jV_Wi7WUUkzEUeCQ5XFqtKUpoawouKiSgqalVxkuiIZq7hhJZAyETplPAXKBAVKiRJxwjlhU3Rz9N07-zlo38vGDm4XIiVNKKQZSRgP1O2RKp313mkj967ulBslAXmoTW4aeagtkHdH8qtu9fgfJvPnX_oH8MBqmA</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Madhavaraju, Jayagopal</creator><creator>Armstrong‐Altrin, John S.</creator><creator>Pillai, Rahul B.</creator><creator>Pi‐Puig, Teresa</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-8881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-5195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Geochemistry of sands from the Huatabampo and Altata beaches, Gulf of California, Mexico</title><author>Madhavaraju, Jayagopal ; Armstrong‐Altrin, John S. ; Pillai, Rahul B. ; Pi‐Puig, Teresa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2894-970d84ade226f13bd79d5b28c798ed183d7f3c01c59e6376023920221a9457713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>beach sands</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Feldspars</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Gneiss</topic><topic>Grain size</topic><topic>Gulf of California</topic><topic>Heavy minerals</topic><topic>Ilmenite</topic><topic>Magnetite</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Plagioclase</topic><topic>provenance</topic><topic>Quartz</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Rock</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Titanium dioxide</topic><topic>Zeolites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madhavaraju, Jayagopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong‐Altrin, John S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillai, Rahul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pi‐Puig, Teresa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madhavaraju, Jayagopal</au><au>Armstrong‐Altrin, John S.</au><au>Pillai, Rahul B.</au><au>Pi‐Puig, Teresa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geochemistry of sands from the Huatabampo and Altata beaches, Gulf of California, Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2398</spage><epage>2417</epage><pages>2398-2417</pages><issn>0072-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1034</eissn><abstract>Grain size, heavy minerals, mineralogical, and geochemical analyses were undertaken on the sand samples from Huatabampo (HB) and Altata (AA) beaches to infer palaeoweathering conditions and source rock characteristics. The mean grain size of HB and AA sands is fine‐grained and fine‐ to medium‐grained, respectively. Magnetite and hypersthene are the common heavy minerals identified in HB sands, whereas magnetite and ilmenite are the dominant heavy minerals in AA sands. HB sands have a high proportion of quartz and plagioclase followed by K‐feldspar and zeolite. Quartz is the dominant mineral in the AA sands, followed by plagioclase and K‐feldspar. Geochemically, the sand samples from HB are classified as wacke, whereas AA sands are classified as wacke and arkose. In chondrite‐normalised REE plot, HB and AA sands show LREE enriched and HREE depleted pattern with negative Eu anomaly. Chemical index of alteration (CIA), plagioclase index of alteration (PIA) values and Th/U ratios of HB and AA sands suggest a low intensity of chemical weathering in the source area. The tectonic discriminant function diagram suggestsan arc setting for HB sands, whereas a rift setting for AA sands. The chondrite‐normalised REE patterns, Eu anomaly, Al2O3/TiO2 ratio, trace elemental ratios, discriminant function, and ternary diagrams suggest that the HB and AA sands were dominantly derived from felsic source rocks. The comparison of REE patterns of HB and AA sands with the source rocks exposed near to the study area suggest that the central granites of Laramide plutonic rocks exposed in Sonora were contributing sediments to the HB beach, whereas AA sands received sediments mainly from the felsic Francisco gneiss in the western Sonobari Complex of Sinaloa.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/gj.3864</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-8881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-5195</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0072-1050
ispartof Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2021-05, Vol.56 (5), p.2398-2417
issn 0072-1050
1099-1034
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2520681537
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aluminum oxide
beach sands
Beaches
Discriminant analysis
Feldspars
Geochemistry
Gneiss
Grain size
Gulf of California
Heavy minerals
Ilmenite
Magnetite
Mexico
Minerals
Particle size
Plagioclase
provenance
Quartz
Ratios
Rock
Rocks
Sand
Sediment
Sediments
Tectonics
Titanium dioxide
Zeolites
title Geochemistry of sands from the Huatabampo and Altata beaches, Gulf of California, Mexico
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T20%3A51%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geochemistry%20of%20sands%20from%20the%20Huatabampo%20and%20Altata%20beaches,%20Gulf%20of%20California,%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Geological%20journal%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Madhavaraju,%20Jayagopal&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2398&rft.epage=2417&rft.pages=2398-2417&rft.issn=0072-1050&rft.eissn=1099-1034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gj.3864&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2520681537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2520681537&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true