Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization
The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. It...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of archaeological research 2021-06, Vol.29 (2), p.153-202 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 202 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Journal of archaeological research |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Green, Adam S. |
description | The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. Its first excavators suggested that the Indus civilization was far more egalitarian than other early complex societies, and after nearly a century of investigation, clear evidence for a ruling class of managerial elites has yet to materialize. The conspicuous lack of political and economic inequality noted by Mohenjo-daro’s initial excavators was basically correct. This is not because the Indus civilization was not a complex society, rather, it is because there are common assumptions about distributions of wealth, hierarchies of power, specialization, and urbanism in the past that are simply incorrect. The Indus civilization reveals that a ruling class is not a prerequisite for social complexity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2519366084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48762790</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48762790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5fe641cec5064d958368d19e27780ae209f7bf7d48a3df2f9615f348a8ff9d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01LAzEQhoMoWKtnQRAKnqMz-Z6jFKvSgh56D-tuUrfUbk22B_-90RW9eZp54f3gYewC4RoB7E1GcKg4COBAqCynAzZCbSW3VpvD8oMmDmjwmJ3kvAYAcgJH7HzebjbtdjXpX8PkObUh93xe9Ck7itUmh7OfO2bL2d1y-sAXT_eP09sFr6XTPdcxGIV1qDUY1ZB20rgGKQhrHVRBAEX7Em2jXCWbKCIZ1FEW5WKkRssxuxpqd6l735dxv-72aVsWvdBI0hhwqrjE4KpTl3MK0e9S-1alD4_gv_j9wO8Lv__m91RCcgjlYt6uQvqr_jd1OaTWue_S745y1ghLID8BgWVkkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519366084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Green, Adam S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Green, Adam S.</creatorcontrib><description>The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. Its first excavators suggested that the Indus civilization was far more egalitarian than other early complex societies, and after nearly a century of investigation, clear evidence for a ruling class of managerial elites has yet to materialize. The conspicuous lack of political and economic inequality noted by Mohenjo-daro’s initial excavators was basically correct. This is not because the Indus civilization was not a complex society, rather, it is because there are common assumptions about distributions of wealth, hierarchies of power, specialization, and urbanism in the past that are simply incorrect. The Indus civilization reveals that a ruling class is not a prerequisite for social complexity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Ancient civilizations ; Anthropology ; Archaeology ; Bronze Age ; Collectivism ; Egalitarianism ; Inequality ; Social Sciences ; Social structure ; Urbanism</subject><ispartof>Journal of archaeological research, 2021-06, Vol.29 (2), p.153-202</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5fe641cec5064d958368d19e27780ae209f7bf7d48a3df2f9615f348a8ff9d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5fe641cec5064d958368d19e27780ae209f7bf7d48a3df2f9615f348a8ff9d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Green, Adam S.</creatorcontrib><title>Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization</title><title>Journal of archaeological research</title><addtitle>J Archaeol Res</addtitle><description>The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. Its first excavators suggested that the Indus civilization was far more egalitarian than other early complex societies, and after nearly a century of investigation, clear evidence for a ruling class of managerial elites has yet to materialize. The conspicuous lack of political and economic inequality noted by Mohenjo-daro’s initial excavators was basically correct. This is not because the Indus civilization was not a complex society, rather, it is because there are common assumptions about distributions of wealth, hierarchies of power, specialization, and urbanism in the past that are simply incorrect. The Indus civilization reveals that a ruling class is not a prerequisite for social complexity.</description><subject>Ancient civilizations</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Bronze Age</subject><subject>Collectivism</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Urbanism</subject><issn>1059-0161</issn><issn>1573-7756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j01LAzEQhoMoWKtnQRAKnqMz-Z6jFKvSgh56D-tuUrfUbk22B_-90RW9eZp54f3gYewC4RoB7E1GcKg4COBAqCynAzZCbSW3VpvD8oMmDmjwmJ3kvAYAcgJH7HzebjbtdjXpX8PkObUh93xe9Ck7itUmh7OfO2bL2d1y-sAXT_eP09sFr6XTPdcxGIV1qDUY1ZB20rgGKQhrHVRBAEX7Em2jXCWbKCIZ1FEW5WKkRssxuxpqd6l735dxv-72aVsWvdBI0hhwqrjE4KpTl3MK0e9S-1alD4_gv_j9wO8Lv__m91RCcgjlYt6uQvqr_jd1OaTWue_S745y1ghLID8BgWVkkg</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Green, Adam S.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Killing the Priest-King</title><author>Green, Adam S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5fe641cec5064d958368d19e27780ae209f7bf7d48a3df2f9615f348a8ff9d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ancient civilizations</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Bronze Age</topic><topic>Collectivism</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Urbanism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Green, Adam S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of archaeological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Green, Adam S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of archaeological research</jtitle><stitle>J Archaeol Res</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>153-202</pages><issn>1059-0161</issn><eissn>1573-7756</eissn><abstract>The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. Its first excavators suggested that the Indus civilization was far more egalitarian than other early complex societies, and after nearly a century of investigation, clear evidence for a ruling class of managerial elites has yet to materialize. The conspicuous lack of political and economic inequality noted by Mohenjo-daro’s initial excavators was basically correct. This is not because the Indus civilization was not a complex society, rather, it is because there are common assumptions about distributions of wealth, hierarchies of power, specialization, and urbanism in the past that are simply incorrect. The Indus civilization reveals that a ruling class is not a prerequisite for social complexity.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9</doi><tpages>50</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-0161 |
ispartof | Journal of archaeological research, 2021-06, Vol.29 (2), p.153-202 |
issn | 1059-0161 1573-7756 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2519366084 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Ancient civilizations Anthropology Archaeology Bronze Age Collectivism Egalitarianism Inequality Social Sciences Social structure Urbanism |
title | Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A39%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Killing%20the%20Priest-King:%20Addressing%20Egalitarianism%20in%20the%20Indus%20Civilization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20archaeological%20research&rft.au=Green,%20Adam%20S.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=153-202&rft.issn=1059-0161&rft.eissn=1573-7756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48762790%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519366084&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48762790&rfr_iscdi=true |