Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization

The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. It...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of archaeological research 2021-06, Vol.29 (2), p.153-202
1. Verfasser: Green, Adam S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 202
container_issue 2
container_start_page 153
container_title Journal of archaeological research
container_volume 29
creator Green, Adam S.
description The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. Its first excavators suggested that the Indus civilization was far more egalitarian than other early complex societies, and after nearly a century of investigation, clear evidence for a ruling class of managerial elites has yet to materialize. The conspicuous lack of political and economic inequality noted by Mohenjo-daro’s initial excavators was basically correct. This is not because the Indus civilization was not a complex society, rather, it is because there are common assumptions about distributions of wealth, hierarchies of power, specialization, and urbanism in the past that are simply incorrect. The Indus civilization reveals that a ruling class is not a prerequisite for social complexity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2519366084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48762790</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48762790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5fe641cec5064d958368d19e27780ae209f7bf7d48a3df2f9615f348a8ff9d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01LAzEQhoMoWKtnQRAKnqMz-Z6jFKvSgh56D-tuUrfUbk22B_-90RW9eZp54f3gYewC4RoB7E1GcKg4COBAqCynAzZCbSW3VpvD8oMmDmjwmJ3kvAYAcgJH7HzebjbtdjXpX8PkObUh93xe9Ck7itUmh7OfO2bL2d1y-sAXT_eP09sFr6XTPdcxGIV1qDUY1ZB20rgGKQhrHVRBAEX7Em2jXCWbKCIZ1FEW5WKkRssxuxpqd6l735dxv-72aVsWvdBI0hhwqrjE4KpTl3MK0e9S-1alD4_gv_j9wO8Lv__m91RCcgjlYt6uQvqr_jd1OaTWue_S745y1ghLID8BgWVkkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519366084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Green, Adam S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Green, Adam S.</creatorcontrib><description>The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. Its first excavators suggested that the Indus civilization was far more egalitarian than other early complex societies, and after nearly a century of investigation, clear evidence for a ruling class of managerial elites has yet to materialize. The conspicuous lack of political and economic inequality noted by Mohenjo-daro’s initial excavators was basically correct. This is not because the Indus civilization was not a complex society, rather, it is because there are common assumptions about distributions of wealth, hierarchies of power, specialization, and urbanism in the past that are simply incorrect. The Indus civilization reveals that a ruling class is not a prerequisite for social complexity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Ancient civilizations ; Anthropology ; Archaeology ; Bronze Age ; Collectivism ; Egalitarianism ; Inequality ; Social Sciences ; Social structure ; Urbanism</subject><ispartof>Journal of archaeological research, 2021-06, Vol.29 (2), p.153-202</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5fe641cec5064d958368d19e27780ae209f7bf7d48a3df2f9615f348a8ff9d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5fe641cec5064d958368d19e27780ae209f7bf7d48a3df2f9615f348a8ff9d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Green, Adam S.</creatorcontrib><title>Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization</title><title>Journal of archaeological research</title><addtitle>J Archaeol Res</addtitle><description>The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. Its first excavators suggested that the Indus civilization was far more egalitarian than other early complex societies, and after nearly a century of investigation, clear evidence for a ruling class of managerial elites has yet to materialize. The conspicuous lack of political and economic inequality noted by Mohenjo-daro’s initial excavators was basically correct. This is not because the Indus civilization was not a complex society, rather, it is because there are common assumptions about distributions of wealth, hierarchies of power, specialization, and urbanism in the past that are simply incorrect. The Indus civilization reveals that a ruling class is not a prerequisite for social complexity.</description><subject>Ancient civilizations</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Bronze Age</subject><subject>Collectivism</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Urbanism</subject><issn>1059-0161</issn><issn>1573-7756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j01LAzEQhoMoWKtnQRAKnqMz-Z6jFKvSgh56D-tuUrfUbk22B_-90RW9eZp54f3gYewC4RoB7E1GcKg4COBAqCynAzZCbSW3VpvD8oMmDmjwmJ3kvAYAcgJH7HzebjbtdjXpX8PkObUh93xe9Ck7itUmh7OfO2bL2d1y-sAXT_eP09sFr6XTPdcxGIV1qDUY1ZB20rgGKQhrHVRBAEX7Em2jXCWbKCIZ1FEW5WKkRssxuxpqd6l735dxv-72aVsWvdBI0hhwqrjE4KpTl3MK0e9S-1alD4_gv_j9wO8Lv__m91RCcgjlYt6uQvqr_jd1OaTWue_S745y1ghLID8BgWVkkg</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Green, Adam S.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Killing the Priest-King</title><author>Green, Adam S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-5fe641cec5064d958368d19e27780ae209f7bf7d48a3df2f9615f348a8ff9d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ancient civilizations</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Bronze Age</topic><topic>Collectivism</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Urbanism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Green, Adam S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of archaeological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Green, Adam S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of archaeological research</jtitle><stitle>J Archaeol Res</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>153-202</pages><issn>1059-0161</issn><eissn>1573-7756</eissn><abstract>The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. Its first excavators suggested that the Indus civilization was far more egalitarian than other early complex societies, and after nearly a century of investigation, clear evidence for a ruling class of managerial elites has yet to materialize. The conspicuous lack of political and economic inequality noted by Mohenjo-daro’s initial excavators was basically correct. This is not because the Indus civilization was not a complex society, rather, it is because there are common assumptions about distributions of wealth, hierarchies of power, specialization, and urbanism in the past that are simply incorrect. The Indus civilization reveals that a ruling class is not a prerequisite for social complexity.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9</doi><tpages>50</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-0161
ispartof Journal of archaeological research, 2021-06, Vol.29 (2), p.153-202
issn 1059-0161
1573-7756
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2519366084
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Ancient civilizations
Anthropology
Archaeology
Bronze Age
Collectivism
Egalitarianism
Inequality
Social Sciences
Social structure
Urbanism
title Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A39%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Killing%20the%20Priest-King:%20Addressing%20Egalitarianism%20in%20the%20Indus%20Civilization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20archaeological%20research&rft.au=Green,%20Adam%20S.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=153-202&rft.issn=1059-0161&rft.eissn=1573-7756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48762790%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519366084&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48762790&rfr_iscdi=true