Strength grading of northern hardwood species for structural engineered wood products: Identification of the relevant indicating properties
Strength grading of hardwoods is a prerequisite to use them in structural engineered wood products. However, hardwood strength grading is considerably less developed than it is for softwood species. Previous study has shown that white ash and yellow birch are promising species for the manufacture of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioresources 2020-11, Vol.15 (4), p.8813-8832 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8832 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 8813 |
container_title | Bioresources |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Morin-Bernard, Alexandre Blanchet, Pierre Dagenais, Christian Achim, Alexis |
description | Strength grading of hardwoods is a prerequisite to use them in structural engineered wood products. However, hardwood strength grading is considerably less developed than it is for softwood species. Previous study has shown that white ash and yellow birch are promising species for the manufacture of glued-laminated timber. However, no strength grading procedure dedicated to hardwoods is available in Canada. The objective of this study was to identify the relevant indicating properties for predicting the ultimate tensile strength of the investigated species. A model selection approach allowed to identify the most performing models and to compare, for each species, the relative impact of the indicating properties. The indicating properties included in the final models were the density of the specimens, the dynamic modulus of elasticity, the sinus of the maximum local grain deviation (SGDmax) as well as the knot area index (KAI), derived from the knot area ratio. The final models revealed important differences between the two species, indicating that it may be relevant to grade them separately to ensure the most efficient utilization of the resource. The coefficients of determination between the actual and model predicted UTS were 0.82 for white ash and 0.78 for yellow birch. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15376/biores.15.4.8813-8832 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2519352700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2519352700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-2f5ccc74ef5f60323973e9edaa616716eea685161dfca644a151cff9270cfc703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhCMEEqXwCsgS5xQ7TpyEG6r4qVSJA3C2jL1uXRW7rB0Qz8BL47QcOO2uZnZG-oriktEZa3grrt9cQIj5mNWzrmO87DpeHRUT1nNaVqwSx__20-Isxg2ldccZnRQ_zwnBr9KarFAZ51ckWOIDpjWgJ2uF5isEQ-IOtINIbEASEw46Dai2JH86D4BgyN62w2CyFm_IwoBPzjqtkgt-DM2JBGELn8on4rzZS7kv_-wAU04_L06s2ka4-JvT4vX-7mX-WC6fHhbz22Wpq46nsrKN1rqtwTZWUF7xvuXQg1FKMNEyAaBE1zDBjNVK1LViDdPW9lVLtdUt5dPi6pCbqz8GiEluwoA-V8qqyaCa7Bxd4uDSGGJEsHKH7l3ht2RU7sHLA_h8yFqO4OUInv8CrvV9DQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519352700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strength grading of northern hardwood species for structural engineered wood products: Identification of the relevant indicating properties</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Morin-Bernard, Alexandre ; Blanchet, Pierre ; Dagenais, Christian ; Achim, Alexis</creator><creatorcontrib>Morin-Bernard, Alexandre ; Blanchet, Pierre ; Dagenais, Christian ; Achim, Alexis</creatorcontrib><description>Strength grading of hardwoods is a prerequisite to use them in structural engineered wood products. However, hardwood strength grading is considerably less developed than it is for softwood species. Previous study has shown that white ash and yellow birch are promising species for the manufacture of glued-laminated timber. However, no strength grading procedure dedicated to hardwoods is available in Canada. The objective of this study was to identify the relevant indicating properties for predicting the ultimate tensile strength of the investigated species. A model selection approach allowed to identify the most performing models and to compare, for each species, the relative impact of the indicating properties. The indicating properties included in the final models were the density of the specimens, the dynamic modulus of elasticity, the sinus of the maximum local grain deviation (SGDmax) as well as the knot area index (KAI), derived from the knot area ratio. The final models revealed important differences between the two species, indicating that it may be relevant to grade them separately to ensure the most efficient utilization of the resource. The coefficients of determination between the actual and model predicted UTS were 0.82 for white ash and 0.78 for yellow birch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15376/biores.15.4.8813-8832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: North Carolina State University</publisher><subject>Ashes ; Betula alleghaniensis ; Fraxinus americana ; Glulam ; Hardwoods ; Knots ; Mechanical properties ; Softwoods ; Species ; Storage modulus ; Tensile strength ; Timber ; Timber (structural) ; Ultimate tensile strength ; Wood ; Wood products</subject><ispartof>Bioresources, 2020-11, Vol.15 (4), p.8813-8832</ispartof><rights>2020. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms available at https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/about-the-journal/editorial-policies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-2f5ccc74ef5f60323973e9edaa616716eea685161dfca644a151cff9270cfc703</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morin-Bernard, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchet, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagenais, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achim, Alexis</creatorcontrib><title>Strength grading of northern hardwood species for structural engineered wood products: Identification of the relevant indicating properties</title><title>Bioresources</title><description>Strength grading of hardwoods is a prerequisite to use them in structural engineered wood products. However, hardwood strength grading is considerably less developed than it is for softwood species. Previous study has shown that white ash and yellow birch are promising species for the manufacture of glued-laminated timber. However, no strength grading procedure dedicated to hardwoods is available in Canada. The objective of this study was to identify the relevant indicating properties for predicting the ultimate tensile strength of the investigated species. A model selection approach allowed to identify the most performing models and to compare, for each species, the relative impact of the indicating properties. The indicating properties included in the final models were the density of the specimens, the dynamic modulus of elasticity, the sinus of the maximum local grain deviation (SGDmax) as well as the knot area index (KAI), derived from the knot area ratio. The final models revealed important differences between the two species, indicating that it may be relevant to grade them separately to ensure the most efficient utilization of the resource. The coefficients of determination between the actual and model predicted UTS were 0.82 for white ash and 0.78 for yellow birch.</description><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Betula alleghaniensis</subject><subject>Fraxinus americana</subject><subject>Glulam</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Knots</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Softwoods</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Storage modulus</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Timber (structural)</subject><subject>Ultimate tensile strength</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood products</subject><issn>1930-2126</issn><issn>1930-2126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1OwzAQhCMEEqXwCsgS5xQ7TpyEG6r4qVSJA3C2jL1uXRW7rB0Qz8BL47QcOO2uZnZG-oriktEZa3grrt9cQIj5mNWzrmO87DpeHRUT1nNaVqwSx__20-Isxg2ldccZnRQ_zwnBr9KarFAZ51ckWOIDpjWgJ2uF5isEQ-IOtINIbEASEw46Dai2JH86D4BgyN62w2CyFm_IwoBPzjqtkgt-DM2JBGELn8on4rzZS7kv_-wAU04_L06s2ka4-JvT4vX-7mX-WC6fHhbz22Wpq46nsrKN1rqtwTZWUF7xvuXQg1FKMNEyAaBE1zDBjNVK1LViDdPW9lVLtdUt5dPi6pCbqz8GiEluwoA-V8qqyaCa7Bxd4uDSGGJEsHKH7l3ht2RU7sHLA_h8yFqO4OUInv8CrvV9DQ</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Morin-Bernard, Alexandre</creator><creator>Blanchet, Pierre</creator><creator>Dagenais, Christian</creator><creator>Achim, Alexis</creator><general>North Carolina State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Strength grading of northern hardwood species for structural engineered wood products: Identification of the relevant indicating properties</title><author>Morin-Bernard, Alexandre ; Blanchet, Pierre ; Dagenais, Christian ; Achim, Alexis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-2f5ccc74ef5f60323973e9edaa616716eea685161dfca644a151cff9270cfc703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Betula alleghaniensis</topic><topic>Fraxinus americana</topic><topic>Glulam</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Knots</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Softwoods</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Storage modulus</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Timber (structural)</topic><topic>Ultimate tensile strength</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morin-Bernard, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchet, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagenais, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achim, Alexis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morin-Bernard, Alexandre</au><au>Blanchet, Pierre</au><au>Dagenais, Christian</au><au>Achim, Alexis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strength grading of northern hardwood species for structural engineered wood products: Identification of the relevant indicating properties</atitle><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>8813</spage><epage>8832</epage><pages>8813-8832</pages><issn>1930-2126</issn><eissn>1930-2126</eissn><abstract>Strength grading of hardwoods is a prerequisite to use them in structural engineered wood products. However, hardwood strength grading is considerably less developed than it is for softwood species. Previous study has shown that white ash and yellow birch are promising species for the manufacture of glued-laminated timber. However, no strength grading procedure dedicated to hardwoods is available in Canada. The objective of this study was to identify the relevant indicating properties for predicting the ultimate tensile strength of the investigated species. A model selection approach allowed to identify the most performing models and to compare, for each species, the relative impact of the indicating properties. The indicating properties included in the final models were the density of the specimens, the dynamic modulus of elasticity, the sinus of the maximum local grain deviation (SGDmax) as well as the knot area index (KAI), derived from the knot area ratio. The final models revealed important differences between the two species, indicating that it may be relevant to grade them separately to ensure the most efficient utilization of the resource. The coefficients of determination between the actual and model predicted UTS were 0.82 for white ash and 0.78 for yellow birch.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>North Carolina State University</pub><doi>10.15376/biores.15.4.8813-8832</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1930-2126 |
ispartof | Bioresources, 2020-11, Vol.15 (4), p.8813-8832 |
issn | 1930-2126 1930-2126 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2519352700 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Ashes Betula alleghaniensis Fraxinus americana Glulam Hardwoods Knots Mechanical properties Softwoods Species Storage modulus Tensile strength Timber Timber (structural) Ultimate tensile strength Wood Wood products |
title | Strength grading of northern hardwood species for structural engineered wood products: Identification of the relevant indicating properties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T02%3A00%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strength%20grading%20of%20northern%20hardwood%20species%20for%20structural%20engineered%20wood%20products:%20Identification%20of%20the%20relevant%20indicating%20properties&rft.jtitle=Bioresources&rft.au=Morin-Bernard,%20Alexandre&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=8813&rft.epage=8832&rft.pages=8813-8832&rft.issn=1930-2126&rft.eissn=1930-2126&rft_id=info:doi/10.15376/biores.15.4.8813-8832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2519352700%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519352700&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |