Manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood with a rice husk flake core and teak veneer reinforced with glass/carbon fiber skin
The manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood, constructed from a rice husk flake core and teak veneer as outside skins, was studied in this work. Epoxy adhesive was employed, while glass and carbon fiber, both short discontinuous and woven forms, were used as reinforcement. The impact s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioresources 2021-02, Vol.16 (1), p.1654-1673 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1673 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1654 |
container_title | Bioresources |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Meekum, Utai Wangkheeree, Waree |
description | The manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood, constructed from a rice husk flake core and teak veneer as outside skins, was studied in this work. Epoxy adhesive was employed, while glass and carbon fiber, both short discontinuous and woven forms, were used as reinforcement. The impact strength, flexural properties, and dimensional stability of the samples after prolonged water immersion were measured. At the assigned reinforcement loadings, the rice husk flake/woven woods showed mechanical superiority over the rice husk flake/short discontinuous materials, regardless of the fiber type. The reason for the greater rice husk flake/woven interfacial adhesion and laminated woven strength, compared to the rice husk flake/short discontinuous composite was investigated. The samples constructed from teak veneer laminated with woven glass or carbon fiber skin and rice husk flake or rice husk flake/30% woven glass cores had greater mechanical properties. The high shear and tensile/compression stresses of woven glass or carbon fiber laminated onto teak veneer skins were confirmed. The sandwich structure engineered wood using woven glass and carbon fiber reinforcement exhibited good dimensional stability under prolonged water immersion. Carbon fiber was the better material candidate compared to woven glass in terms of manufacturing the sandwich engineered wood presented in this work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15376/biores.16.1.1654-1673 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2519315152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2519315152</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-e7e5abc9e41ac98474b6e4b2ef16559d5619e9b074d4d1051df15f6c58d1632e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC8gS67SeJHaSJap4SUVsYG05zrh1U-xiJ1R8An-NS1mwmRlp7p3HIeQa2Ax4UYl5a33AOAMxgxR4mYGoihMygaZgWQ65OP1Xn5OLGDeMlXUBbEK-n5UbjdLDGKxbUW-oolG5bm_1msYhjIcOUnQr6xADdnTvfQp2WCdlsBrpeow9NVvVI9XpEJrcdEDV0088WGhA64wPGv9sq62Kca5VaL2jxrZJEnvrLsmZUduIV395St7u714Xj9ny5eFpcbvMdF7VQ4YVctXqBktQuqnLqmwFlm2OJr3Om44LaLBpWVV2ZQeMQ2eAG6F53YEociym5OY4dxf8x4hxkBs_BpdWypwnTMCB50kljiodfIwBjdwF-67ClwQmf7HLI3YJQoI8YJcH7MUPzk96RA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519315152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood with a rice husk flake core and teak veneer reinforced with glass/carbon fiber skin</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Meekum, Utai ; Wangkheeree, Waree</creator><creatorcontrib>Meekum, Utai ; Wangkheeree, Waree</creatorcontrib><description>The manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood, constructed from a rice husk flake core and teak veneer as outside skins, was studied in this work. Epoxy adhesive was employed, while glass and carbon fiber, both short discontinuous and woven forms, were used as reinforcement. The impact strength, flexural properties, and dimensional stability of the samples after prolonged water immersion were measured. At the assigned reinforcement loadings, the rice husk flake/woven woods showed mechanical superiority over the rice husk flake/short discontinuous materials, regardless of the fiber type. The reason for the greater rice husk flake/woven interfacial adhesion and laminated woven strength, compared to the rice husk flake/short discontinuous composite was investigated. The samples constructed from teak veneer laminated with woven glass or carbon fiber skin and rice husk flake or rice husk flake/30% woven glass cores had greater mechanical properties. The high shear and tensile/compression stresses of woven glass or carbon fiber laminated onto teak veneer skins were confirmed. The sandwich structure engineered wood using woven glass and carbon fiber reinforcement exhibited good dimensional stability under prolonged water immersion. Carbon fiber was the better material candidate compared to woven glass in terms of manufacturing the sandwich engineered wood presented in this work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-2126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15376/biores.16.1.1654-1673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raleigh: North Carolina State University</publisher><subject>Bond strength ; Carbon ; Carbon fiber reinforced plastics ; Carbon fibers ; Compression ; Dimensional stability ; Epoxy adhesives ; Epoxy resins ; Fiber reinforcement ; Flakes ; Hardwoods ; Immersion ; Impact strength ; Manufacturing ; Mechanical properties ; Raw materials ; Rice ; Sandwich structures ; Shear strength ; Submerging ; Veneers ; Water immersion ; Wood ; Wood construction</subject><ispartof>Bioresources, 2021-02, Vol.16 (1), p.1654-1673</ispartof><rights>2021. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms available at https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/about-the-journal/editorial-policies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meekum, Utai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wangkheeree, Waree</creatorcontrib><title>Manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood with a rice husk flake core and teak veneer reinforced with glass/carbon fiber skin</title><title>Bioresources</title><description>The manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood, constructed from a rice husk flake core and teak veneer as outside skins, was studied in this work. Epoxy adhesive was employed, while glass and carbon fiber, both short discontinuous and woven forms, were used as reinforcement. The impact strength, flexural properties, and dimensional stability of the samples after prolonged water immersion were measured. At the assigned reinforcement loadings, the rice husk flake/woven woods showed mechanical superiority over the rice husk flake/short discontinuous materials, regardless of the fiber type. The reason for the greater rice husk flake/woven interfacial adhesion and laminated woven strength, compared to the rice husk flake/short discontinuous composite was investigated. The samples constructed from teak veneer laminated with woven glass or carbon fiber skin and rice husk flake or rice husk flake/30% woven glass cores had greater mechanical properties. The high shear and tensile/compression stresses of woven glass or carbon fiber laminated onto teak veneer skins were confirmed. The sandwich structure engineered wood using woven glass and carbon fiber reinforcement exhibited good dimensional stability under prolonged water immersion. Carbon fiber was the better material candidate compared to woven glass in terms of manufacturing the sandwich engineered wood presented in this work.</description><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Carbon fibers</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Dimensional stability</subject><subject>Epoxy adhesives</subject><subject>Epoxy resins</subject><subject>Fiber reinforcement</subject><subject>Flakes</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Immersion</subject><subject>Impact strength</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Sandwich structures</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Submerging</subject><subject>Veneers</subject><subject>Water immersion</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood construction</subject><issn>1930-2126</issn><issn>1930-2126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC8gS67SeJHaSJap4SUVsYG05zrh1U-xiJ1R8An-NS1mwmRlp7p3HIeQa2Ax4UYl5a33AOAMxgxR4mYGoihMygaZgWQ65OP1Xn5OLGDeMlXUBbEK-n5UbjdLDGKxbUW-oolG5bm_1msYhjIcOUnQr6xADdnTvfQp2WCdlsBrpeow9NVvVI9XpEJrcdEDV0088WGhA64wPGv9sq62Kca5VaL2jxrZJEnvrLsmZUduIV395St7u714Xj9ny5eFpcbvMdF7VQ4YVctXqBktQuqnLqmwFlm2OJr3Om44LaLBpWVV2ZQeMQ2eAG6F53YEociym5OY4dxf8x4hxkBs_BpdWypwnTMCB50kljiodfIwBjdwF-67ClwQmf7HLI3YJQoI8YJcH7MUPzk96RA</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Meekum, Utai</creator><creator>Wangkheeree, Waree</creator><general>North Carolina State University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood with a rice husk flake core and teak veneer reinforced with glass/carbon fiber skin</title><author>Meekum, Utai ; Wangkheeree, Waree</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-e7e5abc9e41ac98474b6e4b2ef16559d5619e9b074d4d1051df15f6c58d1632e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Carbon fibers</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Dimensional stability</topic><topic>Epoxy adhesives</topic><topic>Epoxy resins</topic><topic>Fiber reinforcement</topic><topic>Flakes</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Immersion</topic><topic>Impact strength</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Sandwich structures</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Submerging</topic><topic>Veneers</topic><topic>Water immersion</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meekum, Utai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wangkheeree, Waree</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meekum, Utai</au><au>Wangkheeree, Waree</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood with a rice husk flake core and teak veneer reinforced with glass/carbon fiber skin</atitle><jtitle>Bioresources</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1654</spage><epage>1673</epage><pages>1654-1673</pages><issn>1930-2126</issn><eissn>1930-2126</eissn><abstract>The manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood, constructed from a rice husk flake core and teak veneer as outside skins, was studied in this work. Epoxy adhesive was employed, while glass and carbon fiber, both short discontinuous and woven forms, were used as reinforcement. The impact strength, flexural properties, and dimensional stability of the samples after prolonged water immersion were measured. At the assigned reinforcement loadings, the rice husk flake/woven woods showed mechanical superiority over the rice husk flake/short discontinuous materials, regardless of the fiber type. The reason for the greater rice husk flake/woven interfacial adhesion and laminated woven strength, compared to the rice husk flake/short discontinuous composite was investigated. The samples constructed from teak veneer laminated with woven glass or carbon fiber skin and rice husk flake or rice husk flake/30% woven glass cores had greater mechanical properties. The high shear and tensile/compression stresses of woven glass or carbon fiber laminated onto teak veneer skins were confirmed. The sandwich structure engineered wood using woven glass and carbon fiber reinforcement exhibited good dimensional stability under prolonged water immersion. Carbon fiber was the better material candidate compared to woven glass in terms of manufacturing the sandwich engineered wood presented in this work.</abstract><cop>Raleigh</cop><pub>North Carolina State University</pub><doi>10.15376/biores.16.1.1654-1673</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1930-2126 |
ispartof | Bioresources, 2021-02, Vol.16 (1), p.1654-1673 |
issn | 1930-2126 1930-2126 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2519315152 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Bond strength Carbon Carbon fiber reinforced plastics Carbon fibers Compression Dimensional stability Epoxy adhesives Epoxy resins Fiber reinforcement Flakes Hardwoods Immersion Impact strength Manufacturing Mechanical properties Raw materials Rice Sandwich structures Shear strength Submerging Veneers Water immersion Wood Wood construction |
title | Manufacturing of a sandwich structure engineered wood with a rice husk flake core and teak veneer reinforced with glass/carbon fiber skin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T06%3A28%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Manufacturing%20of%20a%20sandwich%20structure%20engineered%20wood%20with%20a%20rice%20husk%20flake%20core%20and%20teak%20veneer%20reinforced%20with%20glass/carbon%20fiber%20skin&rft.jtitle=Bioresources&rft.au=Meekum,%20Utai&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1654&rft.epage=1673&rft.pages=1654-1673&rft.issn=1930-2126&rft.eissn=1930-2126&rft_id=info:doi/10.15376/biores.16.1.1654-1673&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2519315152%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519315152&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |