Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings

This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archivaria 2016-10, Vol.82 (1), p.111-136
1. Verfasser: Dryden, Jean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
container_title Archivaria
container_volume 82
creator Dryden, Jean
description This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or interests other than copyright may be at issue. Referencing the data available on their websites, the study looks at copyright ownership and the conditions imposed on copies for users. The study reveals a wide range of practices across institutions and internal inconsistencies within a single repository’s practice. From a legal perspective, certain practices are somewhat problematic, although they may not pose a great legal risk. More significantly, by confusing users and inappropriately restricting access and use, some archives are compromising their core mission to make their holdings available. These institutions’ policies and practices for making copies for users need review to ensure that they are comprehensive, internally consistent, and up to date.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_proje</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2518885940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2518885940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p730-dfed5fda086433e4fe774b3e7e0648a5a43e204e1202be058871401e69d58c973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRMNT-hwWfA7PZ2ZsvWoPaQkDQvodcJro1JrHbCP57tyg6LwNnPs4czglLhMtkqhHcKUtACptqp_CcLUPwNWRSo3IgE3bz5MPbF7-dgx8ohOsrvglhpsD9wAvf0BD1F56Pk4_a2PHVvnn1n1XP12PfxlO4YGdd1Qda_u4F297fbfN1Wjw-bPJVkU5GQtp21KqurcBqlJKwI2OwlmQINNpKVSgpAySRQVYTKGuNQBCkXats44xcsMsf22k_fsR8h3I3zvshfiwzJay1yiFECv-oHTWH9znQP6itAYvl87GaYzNCQxyl5DfB21Wr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518885940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dryden, Jean</creator><creatorcontrib>Dryden, Jean</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or interests other than copyright may be at issue. Referencing the data available on their websites, the study looks at copyright ownership and the conditions imposed on copies for users. The study reveals a wide range of practices across institutions and internal inconsistencies within a single repository’s practice. From a legal perspective, certain practices are somewhat problematic, although they may not pose a great legal risk. More significantly, by confusing users and inappropriately restricting access and use, some archives are compromising their core mission to make their holdings available. These institutions’ policies and practices for making copies for users need review to ensure that they are comprehensive, internally consistent, and up to date.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0318-6954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1923-6409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Association of Canadian Archivists</publisher><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><ispartof>Archivaria, 2016-10, Vol.82 (1), p.111-136</ispartof><rights>@The Author</rights><rights>2016. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/about</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dryden, Jean</creatorcontrib><title>Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings</title><title>Archivaria</title><description>This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or interests other than copyright may be at issue. Referencing the data available on their websites, the study looks at copyright ownership and the conditions imposed on copies for users. The study reveals a wide range of practices across institutions and internal inconsistencies within a single repository’s practice. From a legal perspective, certain practices are somewhat problematic, although they may not pose a great legal risk. More significantly, by confusing users and inappropriately restricting access and use, some archives are compromising their core mission to make their holdings available. These institutions’ policies and practices for making copies for users need review to ensure that they are comprehensive, internally consistent, and up to date.</description><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><issn>0318-6954</issn><issn>1923-6409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRMNT-hwWfA7PZ2ZsvWoPaQkDQvodcJro1JrHbCP57tyg6LwNnPs4czglLhMtkqhHcKUtACptqp_CcLUPwNWRSo3IgE3bz5MPbF7-dgx8ohOsrvglhpsD9wAvf0BD1F56Pk4_a2PHVvnn1n1XP12PfxlO4YGdd1Qda_u4F297fbfN1Wjw-bPJVkU5GQtp21KqurcBqlJKwI2OwlmQINNpKVSgpAySRQVYTKGuNQBCkXats44xcsMsf22k_fsR8h3I3zvshfiwzJay1yiFECv-oHTWH9znQP6itAYvl87GaYzNCQxyl5DfB21Wr</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Dryden, Jean</creator><general>Association of Canadian Archivists</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings</title><author>Dryden, Jean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p730-dfed5fda086433e4fe774b3e7e0648a5a43e204e1202be058871401e69d58c973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dryden, Jean</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archivaria</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dryden, Jean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings</atitle><jtitle>Archivaria</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>111-136</pages><issn>0318-6954</issn><eissn>1923-6409</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or interests other than copyright may be at issue. Referencing the data available on their websites, the study looks at copyright ownership and the conditions imposed on copies for users. The study reveals a wide range of practices across institutions and internal inconsistencies within a single repository’s practice. From a legal perspective, certain practices are somewhat problematic, although they may not pose a great legal risk. More significantly, by confusing users and inappropriately restricting access and use, some archives are compromising their core mission to make their holdings available. These institutions’ policies and practices for making copies for users need review to ensure that they are comprehensive, internally consistent, and up to date.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Association of Canadian Archivists</pub><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0318-6954
ispartof Archivaria, 2016-10, Vol.82 (1), p.111-136
issn 0318-6954
1923-6409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2518885940
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Archives & records
title Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_proje&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risky%20Business?:%20Issues%20in%20Licensing%20Copies%20of%20Archival%20Holdings&rft.jtitle=Archivaria&rft.au=Dryden,%20Jean&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=111-136&rft.issn=0318-6954&rft.eissn=1923-6409&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_proje%3E2518885940%3C/proquest_proje%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518885940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true