Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings
This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archivaria 2016-10, Vol.82 (1), p.111-136 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 136 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 111 |
container_title | Archivaria |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Dryden, Jean |
description | This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or interests other than copyright may be at issue. Referencing the data available on their websites, the study looks at copyright ownership and the conditions imposed on copies for users. The study reveals a wide range of practices across institutions and internal inconsistencies within a single repository’s practice. From a legal perspective, certain practices are somewhat problematic, although they may not pose a great legal risk. More significantly, by confusing users and inappropriately restricting access and use, some archives are compromising their core mission to make their holdings available. These institutions’ policies and practices for making copies for users need review to ensure that they are comprehensive, internally consistent, and up to date. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_proje</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2518885940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2518885940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p730-dfed5fda086433e4fe774b3e7e0648a5a43e204e1202be058871401e69d58c973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRMNT-hwWfA7PZ2ZsvWoPaQkDQvodcJro1JrHbCP57tyg6LwNnPs4czglLhMtkqhHcKUtACptqp_CcLUPwNWRSo3IgE3bz5MPbF7-dgx8ohOsrvglhpsD9wAvf0BD1F56Pk4_a2PHVvnn1n1XP12PfxlO4YGdd1Qda_u4F297fbfN1Wjw-bPJVkU5GQtp21KqurcBqlJKwI2OwlmQINNpKVSgpAySRQVYTKGuNQBCkXats44xcsMsf22k_fsR8h3I3zvshfiwzJay1yiFECv-oHTWH9znQP6itAYvl87GaYzNCQxyl5DfB21Wr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518885940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dryden, Jean</creator><creatorcontrib>Dryden, Jean</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or interests other than copyright may be at issue. Referencing the data available on their websites, the study looks at copyright ownership and the conditions imposed on copies for users. The study reveals a wide range of practices across institutions and internal inconsistencies within a single repository’s practice. From a legal perspective, certain practices are somewhat problematic, although they may not pose a great legal risk. More significantly, by confusing users and inappropriately restricting access and use, some archives are compromising their core mission to make their holdings available. These institutions’ policies and practices for making copies for users need review to ensure that they are comprehensive, internally consistent, and up to date.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0318-6954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1923-6409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: Association of Canadian Archivists</publisher><subject>Archives & records</subject><ispartof>Archivaria, 2016-10, Vol.82 (1), p.111-136</ispartof><rights>@The Author</rights><rights>2016. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/about</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dryden, Jean</creatorcontrib><title>Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings</title><title>Archivaria</title><description>This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or interests other than copyright may be at issue. Referencing the data available on their websites, the study looks at copyright ownership and the conditions imposed on copies for users. The study reveals a wide range of practices across institutions and internal inconsistencies within a single repository’s practice. From a legal perspective, certain practices are somewhat problematic, although they may not pose a great legal risk. More significantly, by confusing users and inappropriately restricting access and use, some archives are compromising their core mission to make their holdings available. These institutions’ policies and practices for making copies for users need review to ensure that they are comprehensive, internally consistent, and up to date.</description><subject>Archives & records</subject><issn>0318-6954</issn><issn>1923-6409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRMNT-hwWfA7PZ2ZsvWoPaQkDQvodcJro1JrHbCP57tyg6LwNnPs4czglLhMtkqhHcKUtACptqp_CcLUPwNWRSo3IgE3bz5MPbF7-dgx8ohOsrvglhpsD9wAvf0BD1F56Pk4_a2PHVvnn1n1XP12PfxlO4YGdd1Qda_u4F297fbfN1Wjw-bPJVkU5GQtp21KqurcBqlJKwI2OwlmQINNpKVSgpAySRQVYTKGuNQBCkXats44xcsMsf22k_fsR8h3I3zvshfiwzJay1yiFECv-oHTWH9znQP6itAYvl87GaYzNCQxyl5DfB21Wr</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Dryden, Jean</creator><general>Association of Canadian Archivists</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings</title><author>Dryden, Jean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p730-dfed5fda086433e4fe774b3e7e0648a5a43e204e1202be058871401e69d58c973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Archives & records</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dryden, Jean</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archivaria</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dryden, Jean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings</atitle><jtitle>Archivaria</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>111-136</pages><issn>0318-6954</issn><eissn>1923-6409</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the policies and practices of Canada’s national, provincial, and territorial archives when they are making copies for users. In many cases, these repositories attempt to control further uses under the rubric of copyright, even though they may not be the rights holders and/or interests other than copyright may be at issue. Referencing the data available on their websites, the study looks at copyright ownership and the conditions imposed on copies for users. The study reveals a wide range of practices across institutions and internal inconsistencies within a single repository’s practice. From a legal perspective, certain practices are somewhat problematic, although they may not pose a great legal risk. More significantly, by confusing users and inappropriately restricting access and use, some archives are compromising their core mission to make their holdings available. These institutions’ policies and practices for making copies for users need review to ensure that they are comprehensive, internally consistent, and up to date.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>Association of Canadian Archivists</pub><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0318-6954 |
ispartof | Archivaria, 2016-10, Vol.82 (1), p.111-136 |
issn | 0318-6954 1923-6409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2518885940 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Archives & records |
title | Risky Business?: Issues in Licensing Copies of Archival Holdings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_proje&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risky%20Business?:%20Issues%20in%20Licensing%20Copies%20of%20Archival%20Holdings&rft.jtitle=Archivaria&rft.au=Dryden,%20Jean&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=111-136&rft.issn=0318-6954&rft.eissn=1923-6409&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_proje%3E2518885940%3C/proquest_proje%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518885940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |