How emotional are emoji?: Exploring the effect of emotional valence on the processing of emoji stimuli

Emoji are vastly becoming an integral part of everyday communication, yet little is understood about the extent to which these are processed emotionally. Previous research shows that there is a processing advantage for emotionally-valenced words over neutral ones, therefore if emoji are indeed emoti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers in human behavior 2021-03, Vol.116, p.106648, Article 106648
Hauptverfasser: Kaye, Linda K., Rodriguez-Cuadrado, Sara, Malone, Stephanie A., Wall, Helen J., Gaunt, Elizabeth, Mulvey, Ashleigh L., Graham, Charlotte
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106648
container_title Computers in human behavior
container_volume 116
creator Kaye, Linda K.
Rodriguez-Cuadrado, Sara
Malone, Stephanie A.
Wall, Helen J.
Gaunt, Elizabeth
Mulvey, Ashleigh L.
Graham, Charlotte
description Emoji are vastly becoming an integral part of everyday communication, yet little is understood about the extent to which these are processed emotionally. Previous research shows that there is a processing advantage for emotionally-valenced words over neutral ones, therefore if emoji are indeed emotional, one could expect an equivalent processing advantage. In the Pilot Study, participants (N = 44) completed a lexical decision task to explore accuracy and response latency of word, face and emoji stimuli. This stimuli varied in emotional valence (positive vs. neutral). Main effects were found for stimuli type and valence on both accuracy and latency, although the interaction for accuracy was not significant. That is, there were processing advantages of positively-valenced stimuli over neutral ones, across all stimuli types. Also, faces and emoji were processed significantly more quickly than words, and latencies between face and emoji stimuli, irrespective of valence were largely equivalent. The Main Study recruited 33 participants to undertake a modified and extended version of the lexical decision task, which included three valence conditions (positive, negative and neutral) per stimuli type. Although no main effects were found for accuracy, there was a significant main effect found for stimuli but not for valence on latency. Namely, that word stimuli irrespective of valence were processed significantly more slowly than face or emoji stimuli. There was not a significant interaction between stimuli and valence, however. Therefore, overall although there was partial support for a processing advantage of emoji stimuli, this was not replicated across the studies reported here, suggesting additional work may be needed to corroborate further evidence. •Some evidence of a processing advantage of positively-valenced stimuli over neutral ones.•Emoji may be processed emotionally to some extent.•Emoji may be processed in an equivalent way as face stimuli.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106648
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2518775512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0747563220303952</els_id><sourcerecordid>2518775512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e5d5c1fe11d4b848a60ca9d7588ed9d9e26b14738d9ef45d5d0323d23c4a50fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAYRS0EEqXwA9giMaf4ETsODAhVhSJVYoHZcvygjtI42GmBf49DGJiY7M8617rfAeASwQWCiF03C7WtFxjicWas4EdghnhJ8pJV-BjMYFmUOWUEn4KzGBsIIaWQzYBd-4_M7PzgfCfbTAYzTo27u8lWn33rg-vesmGbXq01asi8_UMfZGs6ZTLf_SB98MrEOCYmrHFZHNxu37pzcGJlG83F7zkHrw-rl-U63zw_Pi3vN7kijA-5oZoqZA1Cuqh5wSWDSla6pJwbXenKYFajoiQ8XW2RYA0JJhoTVUgKbU3m4Gr6N3V535s4iMbvQ-oaBabJR0kpwolCE6WCjzEYK_rgdjJ8CQTFqFM0IukUo04x6UyZ2yljUv2DM0FE5cbttQtJjNDe_ZP-Bj__fcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518775512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How emotional are emoji?: Exploring the effect of emotional valence on the processing of emoji stimuli</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kaye, Linda K. ; Rodriguez-Cuadrado, Sara ; Malone, Stephanie A. ; Wall, Helen J. ; Gaunt, Elizabeth ; Mulvey, Ashleigh L. ; Graham, Charlotte</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Linda K. ; Rodriguez-Cuadrado, Sara ; Malone, Stephanie A. ; Wall, Helen J. ; Gaunt, Elizabeth ; Mulvey, Ashleigh L. ; Graham, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><description>Emoji are vastly becoming an integral part of everyday communication, yet little is understood about the extent to which these are processed emotionally. Previous research shows that there is a processing advantage for emotionally-valenced words over neutral ones, therefore if emoji are indeed emotional, one could expect an equivalent processing advantage. In the Pilot Study, participants (N = 44) completed a lexical decision task to explore accuracy and response latency of word, face and emoji stimuli. This stimuli varied in emotional valence (positive vs. neutral). Main effects were found for stimuli type and valence on both accuracy and latency, although the interaction for accuracy was not significant. That is, there were processing advantages of positively-valenced stimuli over neutral ones, across all stimuli types. Also, faces and emoji were processed significantly more quickly than words, and latencies between face and emoji stimuli, irrespective of valence were largely equivalent. The Main Study recruited 33 participants to undertake a modified and extended version of the lexical decision task, which included three valence conditions (positive, negative and neutral) per stimuli type. Although no main effects were found for accuracy, there was a significant main effect found for stimuli but not for valence on latency. Namely, that word stimuli irrespective of valence were processed significantly more slowly than face or emoji stimuli. There was not a significant interaction between stimuli and valence, however. Therefore, overall although there was partial support for a processing advantage of emoji stimuli, this was not replicated across the studies reported here, suggesting additional work may be needed to corroborate further evidence. •Some evidence of a processing advantage of positively-valenced stimuli over neutral ones.•Emoji may be processed emotionally to some extent.•Emoji may be processed in an equivalent way as face stimuli.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0747-5632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Emoji ; Emotional icons ; Emotional valence ; Equivalence ; Faces ; Lexical decision ; Stimuli ; Words</subject><ispartof>Computers in human behavior, 2021-03, Vol.116, p.106648, Article 106648</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e5d5c1fe11d4b848a60ca9d7588ed9d9e26b14738d9ef45d5d0323d23c4a50fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e5d5c1fe11d4b848a60ca9d7588ed9d9e26b14738d9ef45d5d0323d23c4a50fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106648$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Cuadrado, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, Helen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunt, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulvey, Ashleigh L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><title>How emotional are emoji?: Exploring the effect of emotional valence on the processing of emoji stimuli</title><title>Computers in human behavior</title><description>Emoji are vastly becoming an integral part of everyday communication, yet little is understood about the extent to which these are processed emotionally. Previous research shows that there is a processing advantage for emotionally-valenced words over neutral ones, therefore if emoji are indeed emotional, one could expect an equivalent processing advantage. In the Pilot Study, participants (N = 44) completed a lexical decision task to explore accuracy and response latency of word, face and emoji stimuli. This stimuli varied in emotional valence (positive vs. neutral). Main effects were found for stimuli type and valence on both accuracy and latency, although the interaction for accuracy was not significant. That is, there were processing advantages of positively-valenced stimuli over neutral ones, across all stimuli types. Also, faces and emoji were processed significantly more quickly than words, and latencies between face and emoji stimuli, irrespective of valence were largely equivalent. The Main Study recruited 33 participants to undertake a modified and extended version of the lexical decision task, which included three valence conditions (positive, negative and neutral) per stimuli type. Although no main effects were found for accuracy, there was a significant main effect found for stimuli but not for valence on latency. Namely, that word stimuli irrespective of valence were processed significantly more slowly than face or emoji stimuli. There was not a significant interaction between stimuli and valence, however. Therefore, overall although there was partial support for a processing advantage of emoji stimuli, this was not replicated across the studies reported here, suggesting additional work may be needed to corroborate further evidence. •Some evidence of a processing advantage of positively-valenced stimuli over neutral ones.•Emoji may be processed emotionally to some extent.•Emoji may be processed in an equivalent way as face stimuli.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Emoji</subject><subject>Emotional icons</subject><subject>Emotional valence</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Faces</subject><subject>Lexical decision</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0747-5632</issn><issn>1873-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAYRS0EEqXwA9giMaf4ETsODAhVhSJVYoHZcvygjtI42GmBf49DGJiY7M8617rfAeASwQWCiF03C7WtFxjicWas4EdghnhJ8pJV-BjMYFmUOWUEn4KzGBsIIaWQzYBd-4_M7PzgfCfbTAYzTo27u8lWn33rg-vesmGbXq01asi8_UMfZGs6ZTLf_SB98MrEOCYmrHFZHNxu37pzcGJlG83F7zkHrw-rl-U63zw_Pi3vN7kijA-5oZoqZA1Cuqh5wSWDSla6pJwbXenKYFajoiQ8XW2RYA0JJhoTVUgKbU3m4Gr6N3V535s4iMbvQ-oaBabJR0kpwolCE6WCjzEYK_rgdjJ8CQTFqFM0IukUo04x6UyZ2yljUv2DM0FE5cbttQtJjNDe_ZP-Bj__fcI</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Kaye, Linda K.</creator><creator>Rodriguez-Cuadrado, Sara</creator><creator>Malone, Stephanie A.</creator><creator>Wall, Helen J.</creator><creator>Gaunt, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Mulvey, Ashleigh L.</creator><creator>Graham, Charlotte</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>How emotional are emoji?: Exploring the effect of emotional valence on the processing of emoji stimuli</title><author>Kaye, Linda K. ; Rodriguez-Cuadrado, Sara ; Malone, Stephanie A. ; Wall, Helen J. ; Gaunt, Elizabeth ; Mulvey, Ashleigh L. ; Graham, Charlotte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e5d5c1fe11d4b848a60ca9d7588ed9d9e26b14738d9ef45d5d0323d23c4a50fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Emoji</topic><topic>Emotional icons</topic><topic>Emotional valence</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Faces</topic><topic>Lexical decision</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Linda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Cuadrado, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, Helen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunt, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulvey, Ashleigh L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaye, Linda K.</au><au>Rodriguez-Cuadrado, Sara</au><au>Malone, Stephanie A.</au><au>Wall, Helen J.</au><au>Gaunt, Elizabeth</au><au>Mulvey, Ashleigh L.</au><au>Graham, Charlotte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How emotional are emoji?: Exploring the effect of emotional valence on the processing of emoji stimuli</atitle><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>116</volume><spage>106648</spage><pages>106648-</pages><artnum>106648</artnum><issn>0747-5632</issn><eissn>1873-7692</eissn><abstract>Emoji are vastly becoming an integral part of everyday communication, yet little is understood about the extent to which these are processed emotionally. Previous research shows that there is a processing advantage for emotionally-valenced words over neutral ones, therefore if emoji are indeed emotional, one could expect an equivalent processing advantage. In the Pilot Study, participants (N = 44) completed a lexical decision task to explore accuracy and response latency of word, face and emoji stimuli. This stimuli varied in emotional valence (positive vs. neutral). Main effects were found for stimuli type and valence on both accuracy and latency, although the interaction for accuracy was not significant. That is, there were processing advantages of positively-valenced stimuli over neutral ones, across all stimuli types. Also, faces and emoji were processed significantly more quickly than words, and latencies between face and emoji stimuli, irrespective of valence were largely equivalent. The Main Study recruited 33 participants to undertake a modified and extended version of the lexical decision task, which included three valence conditions (positive, negative and neutral) per stimuli type. Although no main effects were found for accuracy, there was a significant main effect found for stimuli but not for valence on latency. Namely, that word stimuli irrespective of valence were processed significantly more slowly than face or emoji stimuli. There was not a significant interaction between stimuli and valence, however. Therefore, overall although there was partial support for a processing advantage of emoji stimuli, this was not replicated across the studies reported here, suggesting additional work may be needed to corroborate further evidence. •Some evidence of a processing advantage of positively-valenced stimuli over neutral ones.•Emoji may be processed emotionally to some extent.•Emoji may be processed in an equivalent way as face stimuli.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chb.2020.106648</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0747-5632
ispartof Computers in human behavior, 2021-03, Vol.116, p.106648, Article 106648
issn 0747-5632
1873-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2518775512
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Accuracy
Emoji
Emotional icons
Emotional valence
Equivalence
Faces
Lexical decision
Stimuli
Words
title How emotional are emoji?: Exploring the effect of emotional valence on the processing of emoji stimuli
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A51%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20emotional%20are%20emoji?:%20Exploring%20the%20effect%20of%20emotional%20valence%20on%20the%20processing%20of%20emoji%20stimuli&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Kaye,%20Linda%20K.&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=116&rft.spage=106648&rft.pages=106648-&rft.artnum=106648&rft.issn=0747-5632&rft.eissn=1873-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106648&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2518775512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518775512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0747563220303952&rfr_iscdi=true