Relating initial paraquat injury to final efficacy in selected weed species influenced by environmental conditions
Weed control of paraquat can be erratic and may be attributable to differing species sensitivity and/or environmental factors for which minor guidance is available on commercial labels. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to quantify selectivity of paraquat across select weed species and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 2021-04, Vol.35 (2), p.279-288 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 288 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Harre, Nick T. Duncan, Garth W. Young, Julie M. Young, Bryan G. |
description | Weed control of paraquat can be erratic and may be attributable to differing species sensitivity and/or environmental factors for which minor guidance is available on commercial labels. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to quantify selectivity of paraquat across select weed species and the influence of environmental factors. Experiments were performed under controlled conditions in the greenhouse and growth chamber. Compared with purple deadnettle (dose necessary to reduce shoot biomass by 50% = 39 g ai ha–1), waterhemp, Palmer amaranth, giant ragweed, and horseweed were 4.9, 3.3, 1.9, and 1.3 times more sensitive to paraquat, respectively. The injury progression rate over 3 d after treatment (DAT) was a more accurate predictor of final efficacy at 14 DAT than the lag phase until symptoms first appeared. For example, at the 17.5 g ha–1 dose, the injury rate of waterhemp and Palmer amaranth was, on average, 3.6 times greater than that of horseweed and purple deadnettle. The influence of various environmental factors on paraquat efficacy was weed specific. Applications made at sunrise improved control of purple deadnettle over applications at solar noon or sunset. Lower light intensities (200 or 600 µmol m–2 s–1) surrounding the time of application improved control of waterhemp and horseweed more than 1,000 µmol m–2 s–1. Day/night temperatures of 27/16 C improved horseweed and purple deadnettle control compared with day/night temperatures of 18/13 C. Though control was positively associated with injury rates in the application time of day and temperature experiments, a negative relationship was observed for waterhemp in the light-intensity experiment. Thus, although there are conditions that enhance paraquat efficacy, the specific target species must also be considered. These results advocate paraquat dose recommendations, currently based on weed height, be expanded to address sensitivity differences among weeds. Moreover, these findings contrast with paraquat labels stating temperatures of 13 C or lower do not reduce paraquat efficacy. Nomenclature: Paraquat; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson; purple deadnettle, Lamium purpureum L.; waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wet.2020.109 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2516021706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2516021706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-77b920de4fa346bc0aaa8334adb57adc8aa40d8bd7a73ac2826ac8a9d42121fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1LwzAUxYMoOKdv_gEF38TOm_Qj7aMMv2AgiIJv5Ta9lYwu2ZLU0f_ejPnsS8I555d7yWHsmsOCA5f3ewoLAeKg6hM240UBqZA5nLIZVDWkkMmvc3bh_RqAl0LAjLl3GjBo851oo4PGIdmiw92IIRrr0U1JsEmvTQyo77VCNcUg8TSQCtQle4qH35LS5GPQDyMZFa12Ssj8aGfNhkyIr5U1XVxgjb9kZz0Onq7-7jn7fHr8WL6kq7fn1-XDKm1FXYVUyrYW0FHeY5aXrQJErLIsx64tJHaqQsyhq9pOosxQiUqUGM26ywUXvKdszm6Oc7fO7kbyoVnb0cWf-EYUvATBJZSRujtSylnvHfXN1ukNuqnh0BxabWKrzaHVqOqI3x7xVltr6H_4FzSBe4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516021706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relating initial paraquat injury to final efficacy in selected weed species influenced by environmental conditions</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Harre, Nick T. ; Duncan, Garth W. ; Young, Julie M. ; Young, Bryan G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harre, Nick T. ; Duncan, Garth W. ; Young, Julie M. ; Young, Bryan G.</creatorcontrib><description>Weed control of paraquat can be erratic and may be attributable to differing species sensitivity and/or environmental factors for which minor guidance is available on commercial labels. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to quantify selectivity of paraquat across select weed species and the influence of environmental factors. Experiments were performed under controlled conditions in the greenhouse and growth chamber. Compared with purple deadnettle (dose necessary to reduce shoot biomass by 50% = 39 g ai ha–1), waterhemp, Palmer amaranth, giant ragweed, and horseweed were 4.9, 3.3, 1.9, and 1.3 times more sensitive to paraquat, respectively. The injury progression rate over 3 d after treatment (DAT) was a more accurate predictor of final efficacy at 14 DAT than the lag phase until symptoms first appeared. For example, at the 17.5 g ha–1 dose, the injury rate of waterhemp and Palmer amaranth was, on average, 3.6 times greater than that of horseweed and purple deadnettle. The influence of various environmental factors on paraquat efficacy was weed specific. Applications made at sunrise improved control of purple deadnettle over applications at solar noon or sunset. Lower light intensities (200 or 600 µmol m–2 s–1) surrounding the time of application improved control of waterhemp and horseweed more than 1,000 µmol m–2 s–1. Day/night temperatures of 27/16 C improved horseweed and purple deadnettle control compared with day/night temperatures of 18/13 C. Though control was positively associated with injury rates in the application time of day and temperature experiments, a negative relationship was observed for waterhemp in the light-intensity experiment. Thus, although there are conditions that enhance paraquat efficacy, the specific target species must also be considered. These results advocate paraquat dose recommendations, currently based on weed height, be expanded to address sensitivity differences among weeds. Moreover, these findings contrast with paraquat labels stating temperatures of 13 C or lower do not reduce paraquat efficacy. Nomenclature: Paraquat; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson; purple deadnettle, Lamium purpureum L.; waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2020.109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adjuvant ; Amaranth ; Amaranthus palmeri ; application time of day ; bipyridilium ; Controlled conditions ; Dosage ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental factors ; Growth chambers ; Herbicides ; Injuries ; Labels ; Lag phase ; Lamium purpureum ; light intensity ; Luminous intensity ; methyl-viologen ; Night ; Paraquat ; Seeds ; Selectivity ; Sensitivity ; Soybeans ; Species ; Sunset ; temperature ; Time of use ; Weed control ; Weeds ; Weibull</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2021-04, Vol.35 (2), p.279-288</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America.</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-77b920de4fa346bc0aaa8334adb57adc8aa40d8bd7a73ac2826ac8a9d42121fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-77b920de4fa346bc0aaa8334adb57adc8aa40d8bd7a73ac2826ac8a9d42121fe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7930-2444 ; 0000-0001-8373-4840</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harre, Nick T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Garth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Bryan G.</creatorcontrib><title>Relating initial paraquat injury to final efficacy in selected weed species influenced by environmental conditions</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Weed control of paraquat can be erratic and may be attributable to differing species sensitivity and/or environmental factors for which minor guidance is available on commercial labels. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to quantify selectivity of paraquat across select weed species and the influence of environmental factors. Experiments were performed under controlled conditions in the greenhouse and growth chamber. Compared with purple deadnettle (dose necessary to reduce shoot biomass by 50% = 39 g ai ha–1), waterhemp, Palmer amaranth, giant ragweed, and horseweed were 4.9, 3.3, 1.9, and 1.3 times more sensitive to paraquat, respectively. The injury progression rate over 3 d after treatment (DAT) was a more accurate predictor of final efficacy at 14 DAT than the lag phase until symptoms first appeared. For example, at the 17.5 g ha–1 dose, the injury rate of waterhemp and Palmer amaranth was, on average, 3.6 times greater than that of horseweed and purple deadnettle. The influence of various environmental factors on paraquat efficacy was weed specific. Applications made at sunrise improved control of purple deadnettle over applications at solar noon or sunset. Lower light intensities (200 or 600 µmol m–2 s–1) surrounding the time of application improved control of waterhemp and horseweed more than 1,000 µmol m–2 s–1. Day/night temperatures of 27/16 C improved horseweed and purple deadnettle control compared with day/night temperatures of 18/13 C. Though control was positively associated with injury rates in the application time of day and temperature experiments, a negative relationship was observed for waterhemp in the light-intensity experiment. Thus, although there are conditions that enhance paraquat efficacy, the specific target species must also be considered. These results advocate paraquat dose recommendations, currently based on weed height, be expanded to address sensitivity differences among weeds. Moreover, these findings contrast with paraquat labels stating temperatures of 13 C or lower do not reduce paraquat efficacy. Nomenclature: Paraquat; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson; purple deadnettle, Lamium purpureum L.; waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer</description><subject>Adjuvant</subject><subject>Amaranth</subject><subject>Amaranthus palmeri</subject><subject>application time of day</subject><subject>bipyridilium</subject><subject>Controlled conditions</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Growth chambers</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Labels</subject><subject>Lag phase</subject><subject>Lamium purpureum</subject><subject>light intensity</subject><subject>Luminous intensity</subject><subject>methyl-viologen</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>Paraquat</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sunset</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>Time of use</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>Weibull</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN1LwzAUxYMoOKdv_gEF38TOm_Qj7aMMv2AgiIJv5Ta9lYwu2ZLU0f_ejPnsS8I555d7yWHsmsOCA5f3ewoLAeKg6hM240UBqZA5nLIZVDWkkMmvc3bh_RqAl0LAjLl3GjBo851oo4PGIdmiw92IIRrr0U1JsEmvTQyo77VCNcUg8TSQCtQle4qH35LS5GPQDyMZFa12Ssj8aGfNhkyIr5U1XVxgjb9kZz0Onq7-7jn7fHr8WL6kq7fn1-XDKm1FXYVUyrYW0FHeY5aXrQJErLIsx64tJHaqQsyhq9pOosxQiUqUGM26ywUXvKdszm6Oc7fO7kbyoVnb0cWf-EYUvATBJZSRujtSylnvHfXN1ukNuqnh0BxabWKrzaHVqOqI3x7xVltr6H_4FzSBe4Q</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Harre, Nick T.</creator><creator>Duncan, Garth W.</creator><creator>Young, Julie M.</creator><creator>Young, Bryan G.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7930-2444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-4840</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Relating initial paraquat injury to final efficacy in selected weed species influenced by environmental conditions</title><author>Harre, Nick T. ; Duncan, Garth W. ; Young, Julie M. ; Young, Bryan G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b298t-77b920de4fa346bc0aaa8334adb57adc8aa40d8bd7a73ac2826ac8a9d42121fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant</topic><topic>Amaranth</topic><topic>Amaranthus palmeri</topic><topic>application time of day</topic><topic>bipyridilium</topic><topic>Controlled conditions</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Growth chambers</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Labels</topic><topic>Lag phase</topic><topic>Lamium purpureum</topic><topic>light intensity</topic><topic>Luminous intensity</topic><topic>methyl-viologen</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>Paraquat</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sunset</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>Time of use</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>Weibull</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harre, Nick T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Garth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Bryan G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harre, Nick T.</au><au>Duncan, Garth W.</au><au>Young, Julie M.</au><au>Young, Bryan G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relating initial paraquat injury to final efficacy in selected weed species influenced by environmental conditions</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>279-288</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Weed control of paraquat can be erratic and may be attributable to differing species sensitivity and/or environmental factors for which minor guidance is available on commercial labels. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to quantify selectivity of paraquat across select weed species and the influence of environmental factors. Experiments were performed under controlled conditions in the greenhouse and growth chamber. Compared with purple deadnettle (dose necessary to reduce shoot biomass by 50% = 39 g ai ha–1), waterhemp, Palmer amaranth, giant ragweed, and horseweed were 4.9, 3.3, 1.9, and 1.3 times more sensitive to paraquat, respectively. The injury progression rate over 3 d after treatment (DAT) was a more accurate predictor of final efficacy at 14 DAT than the lag phase until symptoms first appeared. For example, at the 17.5 g ha–1 dose, the injury rate of waterhemp and Palmer amaranth was, on average, 3.6 times greater than that of horseweed and purple deadnettle. The influence of various environmental factors on paraquat efficacy was weed specific. Applications made at sunrise improved control of purple deadnettle over applications at solar noon or sunset. Lower light intensities (200 or 600 µmol m–2 s–1) surrounding the time of application improved control of waterhemp and horseweed more than 1,000 µmol m–2 s–1. Day/night temperatures of 27/16 C improved horseweed and purple deadnettle control compared with day/night temperatures of 18/13 C. Though control was positively associated with injury rates in the application time of day and temperature experiments, a negative relationship was observed for waterhemp in the light-intensity experiment. Thus, although there are conditions that enhance paraquat efficacy, the specific target species must also be considered. These results advocate paraquat dose recommendations, currently based on weed height, be expanded to address sensitivity differences among weeds. Moreover, these findings contrast with paraquat labels stating temperatures of 13 C or lower do not reduce paraquat efficacy. Nomenclature: Paraquat; giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson; purple deadnettle, Lamium purpureum L.; waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2020.109</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7930-2444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-4840</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2021-04, Vol.35 (2), p.279-288 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2516021706 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Adjuvant Amaranth Amaranthus palmeri application time of day bipyridilium Controlled conditions Dosage Environmental conditions Environmental factors Growth chambers Herbicides Injuries Labels Lag phase Lamium purpureum light intensity Luminous intensity methyl-viologen Night Paraquat Seeds Selectivity Sensitivity Soybeans Species Sunset temperature Time of use Weed control Weeds Weibull |
title | Relating initial paraquat injury to final efficacy in selected weed species influenced by environmental conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T07%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relating%20initial%20paraquat%20injury%20to%20final%20efficacy%20in%20selected%20weed%20species%20influenced%20by%20environmental%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Harre,%20Nick%20T.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=279-288&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2020.109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2516021706%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516021706&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |