Comparative Analysis of Performance for Two Kinds of Automated Vehicle Storage/Retrieval Systems
The quicker responding time of orders demands a more efficient order fulfilment system in the distribution centre. The automated vehicle storage/retrieval system(AVS/RS) has been widely used in recent years due to its flexibility and high efficiency. The AVS/RS has two mechanical structures – one is...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ji xie gong cheng xue bao 2020-01, Vol.56 (20), p.255 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | chi |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 20 |
| container_start_page | 255 |
| container_title | Ji xie gong cheng xue bao |
| container_volume | 56 |
| creator | Qin, Caiyun Wu, Yingying Wu, Yaohua Liu, Ziwei |
| description | The quicker responding time of orders demands a more efficient order fulfilment system in the distribution centre. The automated vehicle storage/retrieval system(AVS/RS) has been widely used in recent years due to its flexibility and high efficiency. The AVS/RS has two mechanical structures – one is based on cross-aisle shuttles and another is based on a ring-shaped conveyor. Both of above systems can fulfill the orders rapidly,however,there are differences in two aspects including the system throughput and order cycle time which makes the warehouse manager hard to make decision when choosing the systems. Based on the above reasons,this paper compares the performance differences of two kinds of AVS/RS. The open queuing network models of two systems are built,and then the system throughput and order cycle time are calculated. The open queuing network models are verified by simulation. The performance of the two systems are compared. The results show that the system throughput is related to the number of tiers |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2515133395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2515133395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25151333953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcEKwjAQBXNQUNR_WPAsto1p9SiiCF7EFq8a261GkqZmU8W_t4gf4OkNzMDrsH4gkmQSx_O4x0ZE6hKEPEoiIWZ9dl5ZU0snvXoiLCup36QIbAl7dKV1RlY5QguQvSzsVFV85bLx1kiPBRzxpnKNkHrr5BWnB_RO4VNqSN_k0dCQdUupCUe_HbDxZp2ttpPa2UeD5E9327j2mE6RCEXIOV8I_l_1AStlRTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2515133395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Performance for Two Kinds of Automated Vehicle Storage/Retrieval Systems</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Qin, Caiyun ; Wu, Yingying ; Wu, Yaohua ; Liu, Ziwei</creator><creatorcontrib>Qin, Caiyun ; Wu, Yingying ; Wu, Yaohua ; Liu, Ziwei</creatorcontrib><description>The quicker responding time of orders demands a more efficient order fulfilment system in the distribution centre. The automated vehicle storage/retrieval system(AVS/RS) has been widely used in recent years due to its flexibility and high efficiency. The AVS/RS has two mechanical structures – one is based on cross-aisle shuttles and another is based on a ring-shaped conveyor. Both of above systems can fulfill the orders rapidly,however,there are differences in two aspects including the system throughput and order cycle time which makes the warehouse manager hard to make decision when choosing the systems. Based on the above reasons,this paper compares the performance differences of two kinds of AVS/RS. The open queuing network models of two systems are built,and then the system throughput and order cycle time are calculated. The open queuing network models are verified by simulation. The performance of the two systems are compared. The results show that the system throughput is related to the number of tiers</description><identifier>ISSN: 0577-6686</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>Beijing: Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (CMES)</publisher><subject>Automation ; Cycle time ; Distribution centers ; Model testing ; Retrieval</subject><ispartof>Ji xie gong cheng xue bao, 2020-01, Vol.56 (20), p.255</ispartof><rights>Copyright Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (CMES) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qin, Caiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yaohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ziwei</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Performance for Two Kinds of Automated Vehicle Storage/Retrieval Systems</title><title>Ji xie gong cheng xue bao</title><description>The quicker responding time of orders demands a more efficient order fulfilment system in the distribution centre. The automated vehicle storage/retrieval system(AVS/RS) has been widely used in recent years due to its flexibility and high efficiency. The AVS/RS has two mechanical structures – one is based on cross-aisle shuttles and another is based on a ring-shaped conveyor. Both of above systems can fulfill the orders rapidly,however,there are differences in two aspects including the system throughput and order cycle time which makes the warehouse manager hard to make decision when choosing the systems. Based on the above reasons,this paper compares the performance differences of two kinds of AVS/RS. The open queuing network models of two systems are built,and then the system throughput and order cycle time are calculated. The open queuing network models are verified by simulation. The performance of the two systems are compared. The results show that the system throughput is related to the number of tiers</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Cycle time</subject><subject>Distribution centers</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Retrieval</subject><issn>0577-6686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjcEKwjAQBXNQUNR_WPAsto1p9SiiCF7EFq8a261GkqZmU8W_t4gf4OkNzMDrsH4gkmQSx_O4x0ZE6hKEPEoiIWZ9dl5ZU0snvXoiLCup36QIbAl7dKV1RlY5QguQvSzsVFV85bLx1kiPBRzxpnKNkHrr5BWnB_RO4VNqSN_k0dCQdUupCUe_HbDxZp2ttpPa2UeD5E9327j2mE6RCEXIOV8I_l_1AStlRTg</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Qin, Caiyun</creator><creator>Wu, Yingying</creator><creator>Wu, Yaohua</creator><creator>Liu, Ziwei</creator><general>Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (CMES)</general><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Performance for Two Kinds of Automated Vehicle Storage/Retrieval Systems</title><author>Qin, Caiyun ; Wu, Yingying ; Wu, Yaohua ; Liu, Ziwei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25151333953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Cycle time</topic><topic>Distribution centers</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Retrieval</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qin, Caiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yaohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ziwei</creatorcontrib><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ji xie gong cheng xue bao</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qin, Caiyun</au><au>Wu, Yingying</au><au>Wu, Yaohua</au><au>Liu, Ziwei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Performance for Two Kinds of Automated Vehicle Storage/Retrieval Systems</atitle><jtitle>Ji xie gong cheng xue bao</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>255</spage><pages>255-</pages><issn>0577-6686</issn><abstract>The quicker responding time of orders demands a more efficient order fulfilment system in the distribution centre. The automated vehicle storage/retrieval system(AVS/RS) has been widely used in recent years due to its flexibility and high efficiency. The AVS/RS has two mechanical structures – one is based on cross-aisle shuttles and another is based on a ring-shaped conveyor. Both of above systems can fulfill the orders rapidly,however,there are differences in two aspects including the system throughput and order cycle time which makes the warehouse manager hard to make decision when choosing the systems. Based on the above reasons,this paper compares the performance differences of two kinds of AVS/RS. The open queuing network models of two systems are built,and then the system throughput and order cycle time are calculated. The open queuing network models are verified by simulation. The performance of the two systems are compared. The results show that the system throughput is related to the number of tiers</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (CMES)</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0577-6686 |
| ispartof | Ji xie gong cheng xue bao, 2020-01, Vol.56 (20), p.255 |
| issn | 0577-6686 |
| language | chi |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2515133395 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Automation Cycle time Distribution centers Model testing Retrieval |
| title | Comparative Analysis of Performance for Two Kinds of Automated Vehicle Storage/Retrieval Systems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-06T12%3A14%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Performance%20for%20Two%20Kinds%20of%20Automated%20Vehicle%20Storage/Retrieval%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Ji%20xie%20gong%20cheng%20xue%20bao&rft.au=Qin,%20Caiyun&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=255&rft.pages=255-&rft.issn=0577-6686&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2515133395%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2515133395&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |