Public Support for Policies to Reduce School Shootings: A Moral-Altruistic Model
Objectives: The recurring mass murder of students in schools has sparked an intense debate about how best to increase school safety. Because public opinion weighs heavily in this debate, we examine public views on how best to prevent school shootings. We theorize that three moral-altruistic factors...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of research in crime and delinquency 2021-05, Vol.58 (3), p.269-305 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 305 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 269 |
container_title | The journal of research in crime and delinquency |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Burton, Alexander L. Pickett, Justin T. Jonson, Cheryl Lero Cullen, Francis T. Burton, Velmer S. |
description | Objectives:
The recurring mass murder of students in schools has sparked an intense debate about how best to increase school safety. Because public opinion weighs heavily in this debate, we examine public views on how best to prevent school shootings. We theorize that three moral-altruistic factors are likely to be broadly relevant to public opinion on school safety policies: moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear.
Methods:
We commissioned YouGov to survey 1,100 Americans to explore support for a range of gun control and school programming policies and willingness to pay for school target hardening. We test the ability of a moral-altruistic model to explain public opinion, while controlling for the major predictors of gun control attitudes found in the social sciences.
Results:
The public strongly supports policies that restrict who can access guns, expand school anti-bullying and counseling programs, and target-harden schools. While many factors influence attitudes toward gun-related policies specifically, moral-altruistic factors significantly increase support for all three types of school safety policies.
Conclusions:
The public favors a comprehensive policy response and is willing to pay for it. Support for prevention efforts reflects moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0022427820953202 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2515012212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0022427820953202</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2515012212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-834183f77781a329b5bb3179392e3bc0921770c62aab9ba16ed4275f9b2562fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFKAzEQDaJgrd49BjxHk0mz2XgrRavQYrEK3pYkm61b1mZNsgf_3pQKguAcZmDemzczD6FLRq8Zk_KGUoAJyBKoEhwoHKEREwKI5OztGI32MNnjp-gsxi3NAWUxQqvVYLrW4vXQ9z4k3PiAVz53Whdx8vjZ1YN1eG3fve_wOufU7jbxFk_x0gfdkWmXwtDGlDWWvnbdOTppdBfdxU8do9f7u5fZA1k8zR9n0wWxnKpESj5hJW-klCXTHJQRxnAmFVfguLFUQX6K2gK0NspoVrg6Xy8aZUAU0NR8jK4Oun3wn4OLqdr6IezyygoEE5QBMMgsemDZ4GMMrqn60H7o8FUxWu19q_76lkfIYSTqjfsV_Zf_DSENars</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2515012212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public Support for Policies to Reduce School Shootings: A Moral-Altruistic Model</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Burton, Alexander L. ; Pickett, Justin T. ; Jonson, Cheryl Lero ; Cullen, Francis T. ; Burton, Velmer S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burton, Alexander L. ; Pickett, Justin T. ; Jonson, Cheryl Lero ; Cullen, Francis T. ; Burton, Velmer S.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives:
The recurring mass murder of students in schools has sparked an intense debate about how best to increase school safety. Because public opinion weighs heavily in this debate, we examine public views on how best to prevent school shootings. We theorize that three moral-altruistic factors are likely to be broadly relevant to public opinion on school safety policies: moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear.
Methods:
We commissioned YouGov to survey 1,100 Americans to explore support for a range of gun control and school programming policies and willingness to pay for school target hardening. We test the ability of a moral-altruistic model to explain public opinion, while controlling for the major predictors of gun control attitudes found in the social sciences.
Results:
The public strongly supports policies that restrict who can access guns, expand school anti-bullying and counseling programs, and target-harden schools. While many factors influence attitudes toward gun-related policies specifically, moral-altruistic factors significantly increase support for all three types of school safety policies.
Conclusions:
The public favors a comprehensive policy response and is willing to pay for it. Support for prevention efforts reflects moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-731X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022427820953202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Anger ; Attitudes ; Bullying ; Counseling ; Crime ; Debates ; Fear & phobias ; Fear of crime ; Firearm laws & regulations ; Firearms ; Gun Control ; Gun violence ; Mass murders ; Prevention programs ; Public opinion ; Public schools ; Safety ; School Policy ; School safety ; School violence ; Schools ; Shootings ; Social attitudes ; Social sciences ; Student health services ; Weapons ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>The journal of research in crime and delinquency, 2021-05, Vol.58 (3), p.269-305</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-834183f77781a329b5bb3179392e3bc0921770c62aab9ba16ed4275f9b2562fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-834183f77781a329b5bb3179392e3bc0921770c62aab9ba16ed4275f9b2562fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3060-5695</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022427820953202$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022427820953202$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,33753,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burton, Alexander L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Justin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonson, Cheryl Lero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Francis T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Velmer S.</creatorcontrib><title>Public Support for Policies to Reduce School Shootings: A Moral-Altruistic Model</title><title>The journal of research in crime and delinquency</title><description>Objectives:
The recurring mass murder of students in schools has sparked an intense debate about how best to increase school safety. Because public opinion weighs heavily in this debate, we examine public views on how best to prevent school shootings. We theorize that three moral-altruistic factors are likely to be broadly relevant to public opinion on school safety policies: moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear.
Methods:
We commissioned YouGov to survey 1,100 Americans to explore support for a range of gun control and school programming policies and willingness to pay for school target hardening. We test the ability of a moral-altruistic model to explain public opinion, while controlling for the major predictors of gun control attitudes found in the social sciences.
Results:
The public strongly supports policies that restrict who can access guns, expand school anti-bullying and counseling programs, and target-harden schools. While many factors influence attitudes toward gun-related policies specifically, moral-altruistic factors significantly increase support for all three types of school safety policies.
Conclusions:
The public favors a comprehensive policy response and is willing to pay for it. Support for prevention efforts reflects moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Bullying</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Fear & phobias</subject><subject>Fear of crime</subject><subject>Firearm laws & regulations</subject><subject>Firearms</subject><subject>Gun Control</subject><subject>Gun violence</subject><subject>Mass murders</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>School Policy</subject><subject>School safety</subject><subject>School violence</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Shootings</subject><subject>Social attitudes</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Student health services</subject><subject>Weapons</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0022-4278</issn><issn>1552-731X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMFKAzEQDaJgrd49BjxHk0mz2XgrRavQYrEK3pYkm61b1mZNsgf_3pQKguAcZmDemzczD6FLRq8Zk_KGUoAJyBKoEhwoHKEREwKI5OztGI32MNnjp-gsxi3NAWUxQqvVYLrW4vXQ9z4k3PiAVz53Whdx8vjZ1YN1eG3fve_wOufU7jbxFk_x0gfdkWmXwtDGlDWWvnbdOTppdBfdxU8do9f7u5fZA1k8zR9n0wWxnKpESj5hJW-klCXTHJQRxnAmFVfguLFUQX6K2gK0NspoVrg6Xy8aZUAU0NR8jK4Oun3wn4OLqdr6IezyygoEE5QBMMgsemDZ4GMMrqn60H7o8FUxWu19q_76lkfIYSTqjfsV_Zf_DSENars</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Burton, Alexander L.</creator><creator>Pickett, Justin T.</creator><creator>Jonson, Cheryl Lero</creator><creator>Cullen, Francis T.</creator><creator>Burton, Velmer S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-5695</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Public Support for Policies to Reduce School Shootings: A Moral-Altruistic Model</title><author>Burton, Alexander L. ; Pickett, Justin T. ; Jonson, Cheryl Lero ; Cullen, Francis T. ; Burton, Velmer S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-834183f77781a329b5bb3179392e3bc0921770c62aab9ba16ed4275f9b2562fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Bullying</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Fear & phobias</topic><topic>Fear of crime</topic><topic>Firearm laws & regulations</topic><topic>Firearms</topic><topic>Gun Control</topic><topic>Gun violence</topic><topic>Mass murders</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>School Policy</topic><topic>School safety</topic><topic>School violence</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Shootings</topic><topic>Social attitudes</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Student health services</topic><topic>Weapons</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burton, Alexander L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Justin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonson, Cheryl Lero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Francis T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Velmer S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The journal of research in crime and delinquency</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burton, Alexander L.</au><au>Pickett, Justin T.</au><au>Jonson, Cheryl Lero</au><au>Cullen, Francis T.</au><au>Burton, Velmer S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public Support for Policies to Reduce School Shootings: A Moral-Altruistic Model</atitle><jtitle>The journal of research in crime and delinquency</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>269-305</pages><issn>0022-4278</issn><eissn>1552-731X</eissn><abstract>Objectives:
The recurring mass murder of students in schools has sparked an intense debate about how best to increase school safety. Because public opinion weighs heavily in this debate, we examine public views on how best to prevent school shootings. We theorize that three moral-altruistic factors are likely to be broadly relevant to public opinion on school safety policies: moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear.
Methods:
We commissioned YouGov to survey 1,100 Americans to explore support for a range of gun control and school programming policies and willingness to pay for school target hardening. We test the ability of a moral-altruistic model to explain public opinion, while controlling for the major predictors of gun control attitudes found in the social sciences.
Results:
The public strongly supports policies that restrict who can access guns, expand school anti-bullying and counseling programs, and target-harden schools. While many factors influence attitudes toward gun-related policies specifically, moral-altruistic factors significantly increase support for all three types of school safety policies.
Conclusions:
The public favors a comprehensive policy response and is willing to pay for it. Support for prevention efforts reflects moral intuitions about harm, anger about school crime, and altruistic fear.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022427820953202</doi><tpages>37</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-5695</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4278 |
ispartof | The journal of research in crime and delinquency, 2021-05, Vol.58 (3), p.269-305 |
issn | 0022-4278 1552-731X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2515012212 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Altruism Anger Attitudes Bullying Counseling Crime Debates Fear & phobias Fear of crime Firearm laws & regulations Firearms Gun Control Gun violence Mass murders Prevention programs Public opinion Public schools Safety School Policy School safety School violence Schools Shootings Social attitudes Social sciences Student health services Weapons Willingness to pay |
title | Public Support for Policies to Reduce School Shootings: A Moral-Altruistic Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A33%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20Support%20for%20Policies%20to%20Reduce%20School%20Shootings:%20A%20Moral-Altruistic%20Model&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20research%20in%20crime%20and%20delinquency&rft.au=Burton,%20Alexander%20L.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=269-305&rft.issn=0022-4278&rft.eissn=1552-731X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022427820953202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2515012212%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2515012212&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022427820953202&rfr_iscdi=true |