Filtering Facepiece Respirator (N95 Respirator) Reprocessing: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a persistent shortage of personal protective equipment; therefore, a need exists for hospitals to reprocess filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), such as N95 respirators. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on effecti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2021-04, Vol.325 (13), p.1296-1317
Hauptverfasser: Schumm, Max A, Hadaya, Joseph E, Mody, Nisha, Myers, Bethany A, Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1317
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1296
container_title JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
container_volume 325
creator Schumm, Max A
Hadaya, Joseph E
Mody, Nisha
Myers, Bethany A
Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
description IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a persistent shortage of personal protective equipment; therefore, a need exists for hospitals to reprocess filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), such as N95 respirators. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on effectiveness and feasibility of different processes used for decontaminating N95 respirators. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A search of PubMed and EMBASE (through January 31, 2021) was completed for 5 types of respirator-decontaminating processes including UV irradiation, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, moist-heat incubation, microwave-generated steam, and ethylene oxide. Data were abstracted on process method, pathogen removal, mask filtration efficiency, facial fit, user safety, and processing capability. FINDINGS: Forty-two studies were included that examined 65 total types of masks. All were laboratory studies (no clinical trials), and 2 evaluated respirator performance and fit with actual clinical use of N95 respirators. Twenty-seven evaluated UV germicidal irradiation, 19 vaporized hydrogen peroxide, 9 moist-heat incubation, 10 microwave-generated steam, and 7 ethylene oxide. Forty-three types of N95 respirators were treated with UV irradiation. Doses of 1 to 2 J/cm2 effectively sterilized most pathogens on N95 respirators (>103 reduction in influenza virus [4 studies], MS2 bacteriophage [3 studies], Bacillus spores [2 studies], Escherichia virus MS2 [1 study], vesicular stomatitis virus [1 study], and Middle East respiratory syndrome virus/SARS-CoV-1 [1 study]) without degrading respirator components. Doses higher than 1.5 to 2 J/cm2 may be needed based on 2 studies demonstrating greater than 103 reduction in SARS-CoV-2. Vaporized hydrogen peroxide eradicated the pathogen in all 7 efficacy studies (>104 reduction in SARS-CoV-2 [3 studies] and >106 reduction of Bacillus and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores [4 studies]). Pressurized chamber systems with higher concentrations of hydrogen peroxide caused FFR damage (6 studies), while open-room systems did not degrade respirator components. Moist heat effectively reduced SARS-CoV-2 (2 studies), influenza virus by greater than 104 (2 studies), vesicular stomatitis virus (1 study), and Escherichia coli (1 study) and preserved filtration efficiency and facial fit for 11 N95 respirators using preheated containers/chambers at 60 °C to 85 °C (5 studies); however, diminished filtration performance was seen for the Caron incubator. Mi
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jama.2021.2531
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2514707733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2777342</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2514707733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a297t-51871f7bebd19db1fca1ccb8cba35040eb569a9ae93d391363146dd7858698d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM9LwzAUx4Mobk6vHjxIwYseWvP6mibxNoZTYSj-Ooc0TaVjtTPplP33pmwTc0ke7_N9L3wIOQWaAKVwPdeNTlKaQpIyhD0yBIYiRibFPhlSKkXMM5ENyJH3cxoOID8kA8Sc5SzDIXme1ovOuvrzI5pqY5e1NTZ6sX5ZO921Lrp8lOxffRXeS9ca632I3ETj6HXtO9vorjah9V3bn2NyUOmFtyfbe0Tep7dvk_t49nT3MBnPYp1K3sUMBIeKF7YoQZYFVEaDMYUwhUZGM2oLlksttZVYogTMEbK8LLlgIpeiFDgiF5u54T9fK-s7NW9X7jOsVCmDjFPOEQOVbCjjWu-drdTS1Y12awVU9QZVb1D1BlVvMATOt2NXRWPLP3ynLABnG6DP7bopD9uyFH8BFWZz5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514707733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Filtering Facepiece Respirator (N95 Respirator) Reprocessing: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Schumm, Max A ; Hadaya, Joseph E ; Mody, Nisha ; Myers, Bethany A ; Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda</creator><creatorcontrib>Schumm, Max A ; Hadaya, Joseph E ; Mody, Nisha ; Myers, Bethany A ; Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a persistent shortage of personal protective equipment; therefore, a need exists for hospitals to reprocess filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), such as N95 respirators. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on effectiveness and feasibility of different processes used for decontaminating N95 respirators. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A search of PubMed and EMBASE (through January 31, 2021) was completed for 5 types of respirator-decontaminating processes including UV irradiation, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, moist-heat incubation, microwave-generated steam, and ethylene oxide. Data were abstracted on process method, pathogen removal, mask filtration efficiency, facial fit, user safety, and processing capability. FINDINGS: Forty-two studies were included that examined 65 total types of masks. All were laboratory studies (no clinical trials), and 2 evaluated respirator performance and fit with actual clinical use of N95 respirators. Twenty-seven evaluated UV germicidal irradiation, 19 vaporized hydrogen peroxide, 9 moist-heat incubation, 10 microwave-generated steam, and 7 ethylene oxide. Forty-three types of N95 respirators were treated with UV irradiation. Doses of 1 to 2 J/cm2 effectively sterilized most pathogens on N95 respirators (&gt;103 reduction in influenza virus [4 studies], MS2 bacteriophage [3 studies], Bacillus spores [2 studies], Escherichia virus MS2 [1 study], vesicular stomatitis virus [1 study], and Middle East respiratory syndrome virus/SARS-CoV-1 [1 study]) without degrading respirator components. Doses higher than 1.5 to 2 J/cm2 may be needed based on 2 studies demonstrating greater than 103 reduction in SARS-CoV-2. Vaporized hydrogen peroxide eradicated the pathogen in all 7 efficacy studies (&gt;104 reduction in SARS-CoV-2 [3 studies] and &gt;106 reduction of Bacillus and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores [4 studies]). Pressurized chamber systems with higher concentrations of hydrogen peroxide caused FFR damage (6 studies), while open-room systems did not degrade respirator components. Moist heat effectively reduced SARS-CoV-2 (2 studies), influenza virus by greater than 104 (2 studies), vesicular stomatitis virus (1 study), and Escherichia coli (1 study) and preserved filtration efficiency and facial fit for 11 N95 respirators using preheated containers/chambers at 60 °C to 85 °C (5 studies); however, diminished filtration performance was seen for the Caron incubator. Microwave-generated steam (1100-W to 1800-W devices; 40 seconds to 3 minutes) effectively reduced pathogens by greater than 103 (influenza virus [2 studies], MS2 bacteriophage [3 studies], and Staphylococcus aureus [1 study]) and maintained filtration performance in 10 N95 respirators; however, damage was noted in least 1 respirator type in 4 studies. In 6 studies, ethylene oxide preserved respirator components in 16 N95 respirator types but left residual carcinogenic by-product (1 study). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, moist heat, and microwave-generated steam processing effectively sterilized N95 respirators and retained filtration performance. Ultraviolet irradiation and vaporized hydrogen peroxide damaged respirators the least. More research is needed on decontamination effectiveness for SARS-CoV-2 because few studies specifically examined this pathogen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.2531</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33656543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Bacillus ; Carcinogens ; Clinical trials ; Containers ; COVID-19 ; Decontamination ; Decontamination - methods ; E coli ; Equipment Reuse ; Ethylene Oxide ; Filtration ; Heat ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Hydrogen ; Hydrogen Peroxide ; Incubation ; Influenza ; Irradiation ; N95 Respirators - virology ; Pandemics ; Pathogens ; Performance evaluation ; Phages ; Protective equipment ; Public health ; Radiation damage ; Reduction ; Reprocessing ; Respirators ; Reviews ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Spores ; Steam ; Sterilization - economics ; Sterilization - methods ; Stomatitis ; System effectiveness ; Systematic review ; Ultraviolet radiation ; Ultraviolet Rays ; Viral diseases ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2021-04, Vol.325 (13), p.1296-1317</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Apr 6, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a297t-51871f7bebd19db1fca1ccb8cba35040eb569a9ae93d391363146dd7858698d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.2021.2531$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2021.2531$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,776,780,3327,27901,27902,76232,76235</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33656543$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schumm, Max A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadaya, Joseph E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mody, Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Bethany A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda</creatorcontrib><title>Filtering Facepiece Respirator (N95 Respirator) Reprocessing: A Systematic Review</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a persistent shortage of personal protective equipment; therefore, a need exists for hospitals to reprocess filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), such as N95 respirators. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on effectiveness and feasibility of different processes used for decontaminating N95 respirators. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A search of PubMed and EMBASE (through January 31, 2021) was completed for 5 types of respirator-decontaminating processes including UV irradiation, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, moist-heat incubation, microwave-generated steam, and ethylene oxide. Data were abstracted on process method, pathogen removal, mask filtration efficiency, facial fit, user safety, and processing capability. FINDINGS: Forty-two studies were included that examined 65 total types of masks. All were laboratory studies (no clinical trials), and 2 evaluated respirator performance and fit with actual clinical use of N95 respirators. Twenty-seven evaluated UV germicidal irradiation, 19 vaporized hydrogen peroxide, 9 moist-heat incubation, 10 microwave-generated steam, and 7 ethylene oxide. Forty-three types of N95 respirators were treated with UV irradiation. Doses of 1 to 2 J/cm2 effectively sterilized most pathogens on N95 respirators (&gt;103 reduction in influenza virus [4 studies], MS2 bacteriophage [3 studies], Bacillus spores [2 studies], Escherichia virus MS2 [1 study], vesicular stomatitis virus [1 study], and Middle East respiratory syndrome virus/SARS-CoV-1 [1 study]) without degrading respirator components. Doses higher than 1.5 to 2 J/cm2 may be needed based on 2 studies demonstrating greater than 103 reduction in SARS-CoV-2. Vaporized hydrogen peroxide eradicated the pathogen in all 7 efficacy studies (&gt;104 reduction in SARS-CoV-2 [3 studies] and &gt;106 reduction of Bacillus and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores [4 studies]). Pressurized chamber systems with higher concentrations of hydrogen peroxide caused FFR damage (6 studies), while open-room systems did not degrade respirator components. Moist heat effectively reduced SARS-CoV-2 (2 studies), influenza virus by greater than 104 (2 studies), vesicular stomatitis virus (1 study), and Escherichia coli (1 study) and preserved filtration efficiency and facial fit for 11 N95 respirators using preheated containers/chambers at 60 °C to 85 °C (5 studies); however, diminished filtration performance was seen for the Caron incubator. Microwave-generated steam (1100-W to 1800-W devices; 40 seconds to 3 minutes) effectively reduced pathogens by greater than 103 (influenza virus [2 studies], MS2 bacteriophage [3 studies], and Staphylococcus aureus [1 study]) and maintained filtration performance in 10 N95 respirators; however, damage was noted in least 1 respirator type in 4 studies. In 6 studies, ethylene oxide preserved respirator components in 16 N95 respirator types but left residual carcinogenic by-product (1 study). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, moist heat, and microwave-generated steam processing effectively sterilized N95 respirators and retained filtration performance. Ultraviolet irradiation and vaporized hydrogen peroxide damaged respirators the least. More research is needed on decontamination effectiveness for SARS-CoV-2 because few studies specifically examined this pathogen.</description><subject>Bacillus</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Containers</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Decontamination - methods</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Equipment Reuse</subject><subject>Ethylene Oxide</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Hydrogen Peroxide</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>N95 Respirators - virology</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Phages</subject><subject>Protective equipment</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Radiation damage</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Reprocessing</subject><subject>Respirators</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Spores</subject><subject>Steam</subject><subject>Sterilization - economics</subject><subject>Sterilization - methods</subject><subject>Stomatitis</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM9LwzAUx4Mobk6vHjxIwYseWvP6mibxNoZTYSj-Ooc0TaVjtTPplP33pmwTc0ke7_N9L3wIOQWaAKVwPdeNTlKaQpIyhD0yBIYiRibFPhlSKkXMM5ENyJH3cxoOID8kA8Sc5SzDIXme1ovOuvrzI5pqY5e1NTZ6sX5ZO921Lrp8lOxffRXeS9ca632I3ETj6HXtO9vorjah9V3bn2NyUOmFtyfbe0Tep7dvk_t49nT3MBnPYp1K3sUMBIeKF7YoQZYFVEaDMYUwhUZGM2oLlksttZVYogTMEbK8LLlgIpeiFDgiF5u54T9fK-s7NW9X7jOsVCmDjFPOEQOVbCjjWu-drdTS1Y12awVU9QZVb1D1BlVvMATOt2NXRWPLP3ynLABnG6DP7bopD9uyFH8BFWZz5g</recordid><startdate>20210406</startdate><enddate>20210406</enddate><creator>Schumm, Max A</creator><creator>Hadaya, Joseph E</creator><creator>Mody, Nisha</creator><creator>Myers, Bethany A</creator><creator>Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210406</creationdate><title>Filtering Facepiece Respirator (N95 Respirator) Reprocessing: A Systematic Review</title><author>Schumm, Max A ; Hadaya, Joseph E ; Mody, Nisha ; Myers, Bethany A ; Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a297t-51871f7bebd19db1fca1ccb8cba35040eb569a9ae93d391363146dd7858698d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bacillus</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Containers</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Decontamination - methods</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Equipment Reuse</topic><topic>Ethylene Oxide</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Hydrogen Peroxide</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>N95 Respirators - virology</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Phages</topic><topic>Protective equipment</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Radiation damage</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Reprocessing</topic><topic>Respirators</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Spores</topic><topic>Steam</topic><topic>Sterilization - economics</topic><topic>Sterilization - methods</topic><topic>Stomatitis</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schumm, Max A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadaya, Joseph E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mody, Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Bethany A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schumm, Max A</au><au>Hadaya, Joseph E</au><au>Mody, Nisha</au><au>Myers, Bethany A</au><au>Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Filtering Facepiece Respirator (N95 Respirator) Reprocessing: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2021-04-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>325</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1296</spage><epage>1317</epage><pages>1296-1317</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a persistent shortage of personal protective equipment; therefore, a need exists for hospitals to reprocess filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), such as N95 respirators. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on effectiveness and feasibility of different processes used for decontaminating N95 respirators. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A search of PubMed and EMBASE (through January 31, 2021) was completed for 5 types of respirator-decontaminating processes including UV irradiation, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, moist-heat incubation, microwave-generated steam, and ethylene oxide. Data were abstracted on process method, pathogen removal, mask filtration efficiency, facial fit, user safety, and processing capability. FINDINGS: Forty-two studies were included that examined 65 total types of masks. All were laboratory studies (no clinical trials), and 2 evaluated respirator performance and fit with actual clinical use of N95 respirators. Twenty-seven evaluated UV germicidal irradiation, 19 vaporized hydrogen peroxide, 9 moist-heat incubation, 10 microwave-generated steam, and 7 ethylene oxide. Forty-three types of N95 respirators were treated with UV irradiation. Doses of 1 to 2 J/cm2 effectively sterilized most pathogens on N95 respirators (&gt;103 reduction in influenza virus [4 studies], MS2 bacteriophage [3 studies], Bacillus spores [2 studies], Escherichia virus MS2 [1 study], vesicular stomatitis virus [1 study], and Middle East respiratory syndrome virus/SARS-CoV-1 [1 study]) without degrading respirator components. Doses higher than 1.5 to 2 J/cm2 may be needed based on 2 studies demonstrating greater than 103 reduction in SARS-CoV-2. Vaporized hydrogen peroxide eradicated the pathogen in all 7 efficacy studies (&gt;104 reduction in SARS-CoV-2 [3 studies] and &gt;106 reduction of Bacillus and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores [4 studies]). Pressurized chamber systems with higher concentrations of hydrogen peroxide caused FFR damage (6 studies), while open-room systems did not degrade respirator components. Moist heat effectively reduced SARS-CoV-2 (2 studies), influenza virus by greater than 104 (2 studies), vesicular stomatitis virus (1 study), and Escherichia coli (1 study) and preserved filtration efficiency and facial fit for 11 N95 respirators using preheated containers/chambers at 60 °C to 85 °C (5 studies); however, diminished filtration performance was seen for the Caron incubator. Microwave-generated steam (1100-W to 1800-W devices; 40 seconds to 3 minutes) effectively reduced pathogens by greater than 103 (influenza virus [2 studies], MS2 bacteriophage [3 studies], and Staphylococcus aureus [1 study]) and maintained filtration performance in 10 N95 respirators; however, damage was noted in least 1 respirator type in 4 studies. In 6 studies, ethylene oxide preserved respirator components in 16 N95 respirator types but left residual carcinogenic by-product (1 study). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, moist heat, and microwave-generated steam processing effectively sterilized N95 respirators and retained filtration performance. Ultraviolet irradiation and vaporized hydrogen peroxide damaged respirators the least. More research is needed on decontamination effectiveness for SARS-CoV-2 because few studies specifically examined this pathogen.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>33656543</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.2021.2531</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-7484
ispartof JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2021-04, Vol.325 (13), p.1296-1317
issn 0098-7484
1538-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2514707733
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Bacillus
Carcinogens
Clinical trials
Containers
COVID-19
Decontamination
Decontamination - methods
E coli
Equipment Reuse
Ethylene Oxide
Filtration
Heat
Hot Temperature
Humans
Hydrogen
Hydrogen Peroxide
Incubation
Influenza
Irradiation
N95 Respirators - virology
Pandemics
Pathogens
Performance evaluation
Phages
Protective equipment
Public health
Radiation damage
Reduction
Reprocessing
Respirators
Reviews
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Spores
Steam
Sterilization - economics
Sterilization - methods
Stomatitis
System effectiveness
Systematic review
Ultraviolet radiation
Ultraviolet Rays
Viral diseases
Viruses
title Filtering Facepiece Respirator (N95 Respirator) Reprocessing: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A15%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Filtering%20Facepiece%20Respirator%20(N95%20Respirator)%20Reprocessing:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Schumm,%20Max%20A&rft.date=2021-04-06&rft.volume=325&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1296&rft.epage=1317&rft.pages=1296-1317&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.2021.2531&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2514707733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514707733&rft_id=info:pmid/33656543&rft_ama_id=2777342&rfr_iscdi=true