2.5D geophysical model of the Gällivare mining area: An integrated study to model the top 4 km of the subsurface and guide for future exploration activities

ABSTRACT Potential field and Slingram data alongside rock physical properties, drill‐core information and results from geological field mapping were used to investigate the geometry of the geological structures in the Gällivare area in regional scale. The main purpose of this study was to delineate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical Prospecting 2021-05, Vol.69 (4), p.821-841
Hauptverfasser: Tavakoli, Saman, Sarlus, Zmar, Kronsell, Ida, Bauer, Tobias E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 841
container_issue 4
container_start_page 821
container_title Geophysical Prospecting
container_volume 69
creator Tavakoli, Saman
Sarlus, Zmar
Kronsell, Ida
Bauer, Tobias E.
description ABSTRACT Potential field and Slingram data alongside rock physical properties, drill‐core information and results from geological field mapping were used to investigate the geometry of the geological structures in the Gällivare area in regional scale. The main purpose of this study was to delineate the vertical and lateral extension of the Malmberget felsic volcanic rocks, the Dundret and Vassaravaara units as well as geological structures related to the crustal‐scale Nautanen deformation zone. Furthermore, we aimed at identifying new magnetite‐hematite and sulphide mineralizations and lithologies related to the mineralizations based on the results from regional‐scale potential field modelling which are delineated with rock physical properties and borehole data. The study result indicated that the dome‐shaped Dundret gabbro extends downwards to ∼4 km depth and has its maximum depth at its centre. Hematite and magnetite assemblages occur within the top 2 km of the Dundret complex. Felsic volcanic rocks in the Malmberget area extend vertically down to a maximum depth of ∼3 km and get considerably thinner towards the west. The model for the known magnetite‐rich mineralizations in Malmberget was inferred from earlier drilling activities and was integrated into the profile models, which indicates a reasonable fit to the measured data, in particular on the magnetic anomaly; whereas the small dimensions of the modelled structures make them invisible on the Bouguer anomaly data. Additional magnetite‐rich mineralizations are suggested within the Malmberget felsic rocks. High real component and low imaginary response of the Slingram data suggests conductive zones within the Nautanen deformation zone towards the NE, which given the geology of the area in the high strain zone can indicate disseminated sulphide mineralizations. Drill‐hole data at the eastern parts of W‐E profiles agreed well with the suggested model inferred from potential field data, suggesting presence of mafic intrusions within the ∼top 1 km of the subsurface. The integrated model based on geophysical, petrophysical and geological data improved earlier understanding about the regional geometry of the key structures in the Gällivare area and indicates new magnetite‐rich and sulphide mineralization prospects which can be used as a guide for future exploration activities in the area.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2478.13077
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2514016504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2514016504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-61d0af53c27d7f4b7198634b899edd4d5ebb429d7724b6442b2b3aa01199173f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1PGzEQhq2qSKTAmetInDf4c53lhvhIK0VqheBsedd2YtisF9sbmj9T9dBfUv5YNw302rnMaPQ-70jvIHRK8JSMdU5YKQrK5WxKGJbyA5r823xEE4xJWcwwFYfoU0qPGDMsBJ-gH3QqrmFpQ7_aJt_oFtbB2BaCg7yyMH_91bZ-o6OFte98t4Rx1Bdw2YHvsl1Gna2BlAezhRze2B2YQw_898-n9btTGuo0RKcbC7ozsBy8seBCBDfkYbS33_s2jHY-dKCb7Dc-e5uO0YHTbbInb_0IPdze3F99LhZf51-uLhdFw0Qpi5IYrJ1gDZVGOl5LUs1KxutZVVljuBG2rjmtjJSU1yXntKY10xoTUlVEMseO0Nnet4_hebApq8cwxG48qaggfAxPYD6qzveqJoaUonWqj36t41YRrHZPULvI1S5y9fcJIyH2xItv7fZ_cjX_drfn_gD3TYtP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514016504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>2.5D geophysical model of the Gällivare mining area: An integrated study to model the top 4 km of the subsurface and guide for future exploration activities</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tavakoli, Saman ; Sarlus, Zmar ; Kronsell, Ida ; Bauer, Tobias E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Saman ; Sarlus, Zmar ; Kronsell, Ida ; Bauer, Tobias E.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Potential field and Slingram data alongside rock physical properties, drill‐core information and results from geological field mapping were used to investigate the geometry of the geological structures in the Gällivare area in regional scale. The main purpose of this study was to delineate the vertical and lateral extension of the Malmberget felsic volcanic rocks, the Dundret and Vassaravaara units as well as geological structures related to the crustal‐scale Nautanen deformation zone. Furthermore, we aimed at identifying new magnetite‐hematite and sulphide mineralizations and lithologies related to the mineralizations based on the results from regional‐scale potential field modelling which are delineated with rock physical properties and borehole data. The study result indicated that the dome‐shaped Dundret gabbro extends downwards to ∼4 km depth and has its maximum depth at its centre. Hematite and magnetite assemblages occur within the top 2 km of the Dundret complex. Felsic volcanic rocks in the Malmberget area extend vertically down to a maximum depth of ∼3 km and get considerably thinner towards the west. The model for the known magnetite‐rich mineralizations in Malmberget was inferred from earlier drilling activities and was integrated into the profile models, which indicates a reasonable fit to the measured data, in particular on the magnetic anomaly; whereas the small dimensions of the modelled structures make them invisible on the Bouguer anomaly data. Additional magnetite‐rich mineralizations are suggested within the Malmberget felsic rocks. High real component and low imaginary response of the Slingram data suggests conductive zones within the Nautanen deformation zone towards the NE, which given the geology of the area in the high strain zone can indicate disseminated sulphide mineralizations. Drill‐hole data at the eastern parts of W‐E profiles agreed well with the suggested model inferred from potential field data, suggesting presence of mafic intrusions within the ∼top 1 km of the subsurface. The integrated model based on geophysical, petrophysical and geological data improved earlier understanding about the regional geometry of the key structures in the Gällivare area and indicates new magnetite‐rich and sulphide mineralization prospects which can be used as a guide for future exploration activities in the area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-8025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2478</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.13077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Houten: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>2.5D Modelling ; Area ; Boreholes ; Bouguer anomalies ; Coring ; Deformation ; Depth ; Dimensions ; Drilling ; Drills ; Gabbro ; Geological data ; Geological mapping ; Geological structures ; Geology ; Geophysical investigation ; Geophysics ; Gällivare area ; Haematite ; Hematite ; Magnetic anomalies ; Magnetite ; Mineralization ; Model testing ; Physical properties ; Potential field data ; Potential fields ; Rock physical properties ; Rocks ; Slingram data ; Sulfides ; Sulphides ; Volcanic rocks</subject><ispartof>Geophysical Prospecting, 2021-05, Vol.69 (4), p.821-841</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists &amp; Engineers.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-61d0af53c27d7f4b7198634b899edd4d5ebb429d7724b6442b2b3aa01199173f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-61d0af53c27d7f4b7198634b899edd4d5ebb429d7724b6442b2b3aa01199173f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0260-5340</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2478.13077$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2478.13077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Saman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarlus, Zmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronsell, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Tobias E.</creatorcontrib><title>2.5D geophysical model of the Gällivare mining area: An integrated study to model the top 4 km of the subsurface and guide for future exploration activities</title><title>Geophysical Prospecting</title><description>ABSTRACT Potential field and Slingram data alongside rock physical properties, drill‐core information and results from geological field mapping were used to investigate the geometry of the geological structures in the Gällivare area in regional scale. The main purpose of this study was to delineate the vertical and lateral extension of the Malmberget felsic volcanic rocks, the Dundret and Vassaravaara units as well as geological structures related to the crustal‐scale Nautanen deformation zone. Furthermore, we aimed at identifying new magnetite‐hematite and sulphide mineralizations and lithologies related to the mineralizations based on the results from regional‐scale potential field modelling which are delineated with rock physical properties and borehole data. The study result indicated that the dome‐shaped Dundret gabbro extends downwards to ∼4 km depth and has its maximum depth at its centre. Hematite and magnetite assemblages occur within the top 2 km of the Dundret complex. Felsic volcanic rocks in the Malmberget area extend vertically down to a maximum depth of ∼3 km and get considerably thinner towards the west. The model for the known magnetite‐rich mineralizations in Malmberget was inferred from earlier drilling activities and was integrated into the profile models, which indicates a reasonable fit to the measured data, in particular on the magnetic anomaly; whereas the small dimensions of the modelled structures make them invisible on the Bouguer anomaly data. Additional magnetite‐rich mineralizations are suggested within the Malmberget felsic rocks. High real component and low imaginary response of the Slingram data suggests conductive zones within the Nautanen deformation zone towards the NE, which given the geology of the area in the high strain zone can indicate disseminated sulphide mineralizations. Drill‐hole data at the eastern parts of W‐E profiles agreed well with the suggested model inferred from potential field data, suggesting presence of mafic intrusions within the ∼top 1 km of the subsurface. The integrated model based on geophysical, petrophysical and geological data improved earlier understanding about the regional geometry of the key structures in the Gällivare area and indicates new magnetite‐rich and sulphide mineralization prospects which can be used as a guide for future exploration activities in the area.</description><subject>2.5D Modelling</subject><subject>Area</subject><subject>Boreholes</subject><subject>Bouguer anomalies</subject><subject>Coring</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Depth</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Drills</subject><subject>Gabbro</subject><subject>Geological data</subject><subject>Geological mapping</subject><subject>Geological structures</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysical investigation</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Gällivare area</subject><subject>Haematite</subject><subject>Hematite</subject><subject>Magnetic anomalies</subject><subject>Magnetite</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Potential field data</subject><subject>Potential fields</subject><subject>Rock physical properties</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Slingram data</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulphides</subject><subject>Volcanic rocks</subject><issn>0016-8025</issn><issn>1365-2478</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1PGzEQhq2qSKTAmetInDf4c53lhvhIK0VqheBsedd2YtisF9sbmj9T9dBfUv5YNw302rnMaPQ-70jvIHRK8JSMdU5YKQrK5WxKGJbyA5r823xEE4xJWcwwFYfoU0qPGDMsBJ-gH3QqrmFpQ7_aJt_oFtbB2BaCg7yyMH_91bZ-o6OFte98t4Rx1Bdw2YHvsl1Gna2BlAezhRze2B2YQw_898-n9btTGuo0RKcbC7ozsBy8seBCBDfkYbS33_s2jHY-dKCb7Dc-e5uO0YHTbbInb_0IPdze3F99LhZf51-uLhdFw0Qpi5IYrJ1gDZVGOl5LUs1KxutZVVljuBG2rjmtjJSU1yXntKY10xoTUlVEMseO0Nnet4_hebApq8cwxG48qaggfAxPYD6qzveqJoaUonWqj36t41YRrHZPULvI1S5y9fcJIyH2xItv7fZ_cjX_drfn_gD3TYtP</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Tavakoli, Saman</creator><creator>Sarlus, Zmar</creator><creator>Kronsell, Ida</creator><creator>Bauer, Tobias E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-5340</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>2.5D geophysical model of the Gällivare mining area: An integrated study to model the top 4 km of the subsurface and guide for future exploration activities</title><author>Tavakoli, Saman ; Sarlus, Zmar ; Kronsell, Ida ; Bauer, Tobias E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-61d0af53c27d7f4b7198634b899edd4d5ebb429d7724b6442b2b3aa01199173f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>2.5D Modelling</topic><topic>Area</topic><topic>Boreholes</topic><topic>Bouguer anomalies</topic><topic>Coring</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Depth</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Drills</topic><topic>Gabbro</topic><topic>Geological data</topic><topic>Geological mapping</topic><topic>Geological structures</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysical investigation</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Gällivare area</topic><topic>Haematite</topic><topic>Hematite</topic><topic>Magnetic anomalies</topic><topic>Magnetite</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Potential field data</topic><topic>Potential fields</topic><topic>Rock physical properties</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Slingram data</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulphides</topic><topic>Volcanic rocks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tavakoli, Saman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarlus, Zmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronsell, Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Tobias E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tavakoli, Saman</au><au>Sarlus, Zmar</au><au>Kronsell, Ida</au><au>Bauer, Tobias E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2.5D geophysical model of the Gällivare mining area: An integrated study to model the top 4 km of the subsurface and guide for future exploration activities</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical Prospecting</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>821</spage><epage>841</epage><pages>821-841</pages><issn>0016-8025</issn><eissn>1365-2478</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Potential field and Slingram data alongside rock physical properties, drill‐core information and results from geological field mapping were used to investigate the geometry of the geological structures in the Gällivare area in regional scale. The main purpose of this study was to delineate the vertical and lateral extension of the Malmberget felsic volcanic rocks, the Dundret and Vassaravaara units as well as geological structures related to the crustal‐scale Nautanen deformation zone. Furthermore, we aimed at identifying new magnetite‐hematite and sulphide mineralizations and lithologies related to the mineralizations based on the results from regional‐scale potential field modelling which are delineated with rock physical properties and borehole data. The study result indicated that the dome‐shaped Dundret gabbro extends downwards to ∼4 km depth and has its maximum depth at its centre. Hematite and magnetite assemblages occur within the top 2 km of the Dundret complex. Felsic volcanic rocks in the Malmberget area extend vertically down to a maximum depth of ∼3 km and get considerably thinner towards the west. The model for the known magnetite‐rich mineralizations in Malmberget was inferred from earlier drilling activities and was integrated into the profile models, which indicates a reasonable fit to the measured data, in particular on the magnetic anomaly; whereas the small dimensions of the modelled structures make them invisible on the Bouguer anomaly data. Additional magnetite‐rich mineralizations are suggested within the Malmberget felsic rocks. High real component and low imaginary response of the Slingram data suggests conductive zones within the Nautanen deformation zone towards the NE, which given the geology of the area in the high strain zone can indicate disseminated sulphide mineralizations. Drill‐hole data at the eastern parts of W‐E profiles agreed well with the suggested model inferred from potential field data, suggesting presence of mafic intrusions within the ∼top 1 km of the subsurface. The integrated model based on geophysical, petrophysical and geological data improved earlier understanding about the regional geometry of the key structures in the Gällivare area and indicates new magnetite‐rich and sulphide mineralization prospects which can be used as a guide for future exploration activities in the area.</abstract><cop>Houten</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2478.13077</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-5340</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-8025
ispartof Geophysical Prospecting, 2021-05, Vol.69 (4), p.821-841
issn 0016-8025
1365-2478
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2514016504
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 2.5D Modelling
Area
Boreholes
Bouguer anomalies
Coring
Deformation
Depth
Dimensions
Drilling
Drills
Gabbro
Geological data
Geological mapping
Geological structures
Geology
Geophysical investigation
Geophysics
Gällivare area
Haematite
Hematite
Magnetic anomalies
Magnetite
Mineralization
Model testing
Physical properties
Potential field data
Potential fields
Rock physical properties
Rocks
Slingram data
Sulfides
Sulphides
Volcanic rocks
title 2.5D geophysical model of the Gällivare mining area: An integrated study to model the top 4 km of the subsurface and guide for future exploration activities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A19%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2.5D%20geophysical%20model%20of%20the%20G%C3%A4llivare%20mining%20area:%20An%20integrated%20study%20to%20model%20the%20top%204%C2%A0km%20of%20the%20subsurface%20and%20guide%20for%20future%20exploration%20activities&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20Prospecting&rft.au=Tavakoli,%20Saman&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=821&rft.epage=841&rft.pages=821-841&rft.issn=0016-8025&rft.eissn=1365-2478&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2478.13077&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2514016504%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514016504&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true