Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review
Human activities have led to a massive increase in CO 2 emissions as a primary greenhouse gas that is contributing to climate change with higher than 1 ∘ C global warming than that of the pre-industrial level. We evaluate the three major technologies that are utilised for carbon capture: pre-combust...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental chemistry letters 2021-04, Vol.19 (2), p.797-849 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 849 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 797 |
| container_title | Environmental chemistry letters |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Osman, Ahmed I. Hefny, Mahmoud Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A. Elgarahy, Ahmed M. Rooney, David W. |
| description | Human activities have led to a massive increase in
CO
2
emissions as a primary greenhouse gas that is contributing to climate change with higher than
1
∘
C
global warming than that of the pre-industrial level. We evaluate the three major technologies that are utilised for carbon capture: pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxyfuel combustion. We review the advances in carbon capture, storage and utilisation. We compare carbon uptake technologies with techniques of carbon dioxide separation. Monoethanolamine is the most common carbon sorbent; yet it requires a high regeneration energy of 3.5 GJ per tonne of
CO
2
. Alternatively, recent advances in sorbent technology reveal novel solvents such as a modulated amine blend with lower regeneration energy of 2.17 GJ per tonne of
CO
2
. Graphene-type materials show
CO
2
adsorption capacity of 0.07 mol/g, which is 10 times higher than that of specific types of activated carbon, zeolites and metal–organic frameworks.
CO
2
geosequestration provides an efficient and long-term strategy for storing the captured
CO
2
in geological formations with a global storage capacity factor at a Gt-scale within operational timescales. Regarding the utilisation route, currently, the gross global utilisation of
CO
2
is lower than 200 million tonnes per year, which is roughly negligible compared with the extent of global anthropogenic
CO
2
emissions, which is higher than 32,000 million tonnes per year. Herein, we review different
CO
2
utilisation methods such as direct routes, i.e. beverage carbonation, food packaging and oil recovery, chemical industries and fuels. Moreover, we investigated additional
CO
2
utilisation for base-load power generation, seasonal energy storage, and district cooling and cryogenic direct air
CO
2
capture using geothermal energy. Through bibliometric mapping, we identified the research gap in the literature within this field which requires future investigations, for instance, designing new and stable ionic liquids, pore size and selectivity of metal–organic frameworks and enhancing the adsorption capacity of novel solvents. Moreover, areas such as techno-economic evaluation of novel solvents, process design and dynamic simulation require further effort as well as research and development before pilot- and commercial-scale trials. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2513420570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2513420570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-92d4a4a50231b5d850e4f740f15b2d108f835e453d63aaa539e2ae7762c5ff1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKcFz9GZnWzSepPiPygooudlkkxqSk3q7qbitze1ojdP78G89wZ-Sp0inCNAfhEQCDEBAwkgEiW0p0aYISSUZbj_6y0dqqMQlgDG5MaM1OOTlNJGzdWG21KCblpdsi-6raxj70WH2HleiOa20n1sVk3g2Az3KOVr2626RSPhUrP2smnk41gd1LwKcvKjY_Vyc_08u0vmD7f3s6t5UlJGMZmaKuWULRjCwlYTC5LWeQo12sJUCJN6QlZSS1VGzGxpKoYlzzNT2rrGgsbqbLe79t17LyG6Zdf7dnjpjEVKDdgchpTZpUrfheCldmvfvLH_dAhuS87tyLmBnPsm52go0a4UhnC7EP83_U_rC7_CcHU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513420570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review</title><source>SpringerLink_现刊</source><creator>Osman, Ahmed I. ; Hefny, Mahmoud ; Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A. ; Elgarahy, Ahmed M. ; Rooney, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Osman, Ahmed I. ; Hefny, Mahmoud ; Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A. ; Elgarahy, Ahmed M. ; Rooney, David W.</creatorcontrib><description>Human activities have led to a massive increase in
CO
2
emissions as a primary greenhouse gas that is contributing to climate change with higher than
1
∘
C
global warming than that of the pre-industrial level. We evaluate the three major technologies that are utilised for carbon capture: pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxyfuel combustion. We review the advances in carbon capture, storage and utilisation. We compare carbon uptake technologies with techniques of carbon dioxide separation. Monoethanolamine is the most common carbon sorbent; yet it requires a high regeneration energy of 3.5 GJ per tonne of
CO
2
. Alternatively, recent advances in sorbent technology reveal novel solvents such as a modulated amine blend with lower regeneration energy of 2.17 GJ per tonne of
CO
2
. Graphene-type materials show
CO
2
adsorption capacity of 0.07 mol/g, which is 10 times higher than that of specific types of activated carbon, zeolites and metal–organic frameworks.
CO
2
geosequestration provides an efficient and long-term strategy for storing the captured
CO
2
in geological formations with a global storage capacity factor at a Gt-scale within operational timescales. Regarding the utilisation route, currently, the gross global utilisation of
CO
2
is lower than 200 million tonnes per year, which is roughly negligible compared with the extent of global anthropogenic
CO
2
emissions, which is higher than 32,000 million tonnes per year. Herein, we review different
CO
2
utilisation methods such as direct routes, i.e. beverage carbonation, food packaging and oil recovery, chemical industries and fuels. Moreover, we investigated additional
CO
2
utilisation for base-load power generation, seasonal energy storage, and district cooling and cryogenic direct air
CO
2
capture using geothermal energy. Through bibliometric mapping, we identified the research gap in the literature within this field which requires future investigations, for instance, designing new and stable ionic liquids, pore size and selectivity of metal–organic frameworks and enhancing the adsorption capacity of novel solvents. Moreover, areas such as techno-economic evaluation of novel solvents, process design and dynamic simulation require further effort as well as research and development before pilot- and commercial-scale trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1610-3653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1610-3661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Adsorption ; Amines ; Analytical Chemistry ; Anthropogenic factors ; Bibliometrics ; Capacity factor ; Carbon capture and storage ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbonation ; Climate change ; Combustion ; Cryogenic cooling ; District cooling ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Economic analysis ; Ecotoxicology ; Electric power generation ; Energy storage ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Food packaging ; Food packaging industry ; Geochemistry ; Geothermal energy ; Global warming ; Graphene ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Human influences ; Industry ; Liquids ; Metals ; Oil recovery ; Pollution ; Pore size ; Porosity ; R&D ; Regeneration (biological) ; Research & development ; Review ; Reviews ; Selectivity ; Solvents ; Sorbents ; Storage capacity ; Storage conditions ; Technology assessment ; Uptake ; Zeolites</subject><ispartof>Environmental chemistry letters, 2021-04, Vol.19 (2), p.797-849</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-92d4a4a50231b5d850e4f740f15b2d108f835e453d63aaa539e2ae7762c5ff1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-92d4a4a50231b5d850e4f740f15b2d108f835e453d63aaa539e2ae7762c5ff1b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2788-7839</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osman, Ahmed I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hefny, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elgarahy, Ahmed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, David W.</creatorcontrib><title>Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review</title><title>Environmental chemistry letters</title><addtitle>Environ Chem Lett</addtitle><description>Human activities have led to a massive increase in
CO
2
emissions as a primary greenhouse gas that is contributing to climate change with higher than
1
∘
C
global warming than that of the pre-industrial level. We evaluate the three major technologies that are utilised for carbon capture: pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxyfuel combustion. We review the advances in carbon capture, storage and utilisation. We compare carbon uptake technologies with techniques of carbon dioxide separation. Monoethanolamine is the most common carbon sorbent; yet it requires a high regeneration energy of 3.5 GJ per tonne of
CO
2
. Alternatively, recent advances in sorbent technology reveal novel solvents such as a modulated amine blend with lower regeneration energy of 2.17 GJ per tonne of
CO
2
. Graphene-type materials show
CO
2
adsorption capacity of 0.07 mol/g, which is 10 times higher than that of specific types of activated carbon, zeolites and metal–organic frameworks.
CO
2
geosequestration provides an efficient and long-term strategy for storing the captured
CO
2
in geological formations with a global storage capacity factor at a Gt-scale within operational timescales. Regarding the utilisation route, currently, the gross global utilisation of
CO
2
is lower than 200 million tonnes per year, which is roughly negligible compared with the extent of global anthropogenic
CO
2
emissions, which is higher than 32,000 million tonnes per year. Herein, we review different
CO
2
utilisation methods such as direct routes, i.e. beverage carbonation, food packaging and oil recovery, chemical industries and fuels. Moreover, we investigated additional
CO
2
utilisation for base-load power generation, seasonal energy storage, and district cooling and cryogenic direct air
CO
2
capture using geothermal energy. Through bibliometric mapping, we identified the research gap in the literature within this field which requires future investigations, for instance, designing new and stable ionic liquids, pore size and selectivity of metal–organic frameworks and enhancing the adsorption capacity of novel solvents. Moreover, areas such as techno-economic evaluation of novel solvents, process design and dynamic simulation require further effort as well as research and development before pilot- and commercial-scale trials.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Amines</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Capacity factor</subject><subject>Carbon capture and storage</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbonation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Cryogenic cooling</subject><subject>District cooling</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Food packaging</subject><subject>Food packaging industry</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geothermal energy</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Liquids</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Oil recovery</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pore size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Regeneration (biological)</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Sorbents</subject><subject>Storage capacity</subject><subject>Storage conditions</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Zeolites</subject><issn>1610-3653</issn><issn>1610-3661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gKcFz9GZnWzSepPiPygooudlkkxqSk3q7qbitze1ojdP78G89wZ-Sp0inCNAfhEQCDEBAwkgEiW0p0aYISSUZbj_6y0dqqMQlgDG5MaM1OOTlNJGzdWG21KCblpdsi-6raxj70WH2HleiOa20n1sVk3g2Az3KOVr2626RSPhUrP2smnk41gd1LwKcvKjY_Vyc_08u0vmD7f3s6t5UlJGMZmaKuWULRjCwlYTC5LWeQo12sJUCJN6QlZSS1VGzGxpKoYlzzNT2rrGgsbqbLe79t17LyG6Zdf7dnjpjEVKDdgchpTZpUrfheCldmvfvLH_dAhuS87tyLmBnPsm52go0a4UhnC7EP83_U_rC7_CcHU</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Osman, Ahmed I.</creator><creator>Hefny, Mahmoud</creator><creator>Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A.</creator><creator>Elgarahy, Ahmed M.</creator><creator>Rooney, David W.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2788-7839</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review</title><author>Osman, Ahmed I. ; Hefny, Mahmoud ; Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A. ; Elgarahy, Ahmed M. ; Rooney, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-92d4a4a50231b5d850e4f740f15b2d108f835e453d63aaa539e2ae7762c5ff1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Amines</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Capacity factor</topic><topic>Carbon capture and storage</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbonation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Cryogenic cooling</topic><topic>District cooling</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Food packaging</topic><topic>Food packaging industry</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geothermal energy</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Liquids</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Oil recovery</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pore size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Regeneration (biological)</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Sorbents</topic><topic>Storage capacity</topic><topic>Storage conditions</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Zeolites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osman, Ahmed I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hefny, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elgarahy, Ahmed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, David W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental chemistry letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osman, Ahmed I.</au><au>Hefny, Mahmoud</au><au>Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A.</au><au>Elgarahy, Ahmed M.</au><au>Rooney, David W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review</atitle><jtitle>Environmental chemistry letters</jtitle><stitle>Environ Chem Lett</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>797</spage><epage>849</epage><pages>797-849</pages><issn>1610-3653</issn><eissn>1610-3661</eissn><abstract>Human activities have led to a massive increase in
CO
2
emissions as a primary greenhouse gas that is contributing to climate change with higher than
1
∘
C
global warming than that of the pre-industrial level. We evaluate the three major technologies that are utilised for carbon capture: pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxyfuel combustion. We review the advances in carbon capture, storage and utilisation. We compare carbon uptake technologies with techniques of carbon dioxide separation. Monoethanolamine is the most common carbon sorbent; yet it requires a high regeneration energy of 3.5 GJ per tonne of
CO
2
. Alternatively, recent advances in sorbent technology reveal novel solvents such as a modulated amine blend with lower regeneration energy of 2.17 GJ per tonne of
CO
2
. Graphene-type materials show
CO
2
adsorption capacity of 0.07 mol/g, which is 10 times higher than that of specific types of activated carbon, zeolites and metal–organic frameworks.
CO
2
geosequestration provides an efficient and long-term strategy for storing the captured
CO
2
in geological formations with a global storage capacity factor at a Gt-scale within operational timescales. Regarding the utilisation route, currently, the gross global utilisation of
CO
2
is lower than 200 million tonnes per year, which is roughly negligible compared with the extent of global anthropogenic
CO
2
emissions, which is higher than 32,000 million tonnes per year. Herein, we review different
CO
2
utilisation methods such as direct routes, i.e. beverage carbonation, food packaging and oil recovery, chemical industries and fuels. Moreover, we investigated additional
CO
2
utilisation for base-load power generation, seasonal energy storage, and district cooling and cryogenic direct air
CO
2
capture using geothermal energy. Through bibliometric mapping, we identified the research gap in the literature within this field which requires future investigations, for instance, designing new and stable ionic liquids, pore size and selectivity of metal–organic frameworks and enhancing the adsorption capacity of novel solvents. Moreover, areas such as techno-economic evaluation of novel solvents, process design and dynamic simulation require further effort as well as research and development before pilot- and commercial-scale trials.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3</doi><tpages>53</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2788-7839</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1610-3653 |
| ispartof | Environmental chemistry letters, 2021-04, Vol.19 (2), p.797-849 |
| issn | 1610-3653 1610-3661 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2513420570 |
| source | SpringerLink_现刊 |
| subjects | Activated carbon Adsorption Amines Analytical Chemistry Anthropogenic factors Bibliometrics Capacity factor Carbon capture and storage Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emissions Carbon sequestration Carbonation Climate change Combustion Cryogenic cooling District cooling Earth and Environmental Science Economic analysis Ecotoxicology Electric power generation Energy storage Environment Environmental Chemistry Food packaging Food packaging industry Geochemistry Geothermal energy Global warming Graphene Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Human influences Industry Liquids Metals Oil recovery Pollution Pore size Porosity R&D Regeneration (biological) Research & development Review Reviews Selectivity Solvents Sorbents Storage capacity Storage conditions Technology assessment Uptake Zeolites |
| title | Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A02%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recent%20advances%20in%20carbon%20capture%20storage%20and%20utilisation%20technologies:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20chemistry%20letters&rft.au=Osman,%20Ahmed%20I.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=797&rft.epage=849&rft.pages=797-849&rft.issn=1610-3653&rft.eissn=1610-3661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2513420570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513420570&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |