Density dependence influences competition and hybridization at an invasion front
Aim Landscape and climatic change are promoting range shifts, potentially leading to competition and hybridization between formerly isolated species. However, density‐dependent interactions can impede the timely identification of associated conservation problems. The barred owl's expansion into...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diversity & distributions 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.901-912 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 912 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 901 |
container_title | Diversity & distributions |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Wood, Connor M. Kryshak, Nick Gustafson, Michaela Hofstadter, Daniel F. Hobart, Brendan K. Whitmore, Sheila A. Dotters, Brian P. Roberts, Kevin N. Keane, John J. Sawyer, Sarah C. Gutiérrez, Rocky J. Peery, M. Zachariah |
description | Aim
Landscape and climatic change are promoting range shifts, potentially leading to competition and hybridization between formerly isolated species. However, density‐dependent interactions can impede the timely identification of associated conservation problems. The barred owl's expansion into the spotted owl's range provides a natural experiment to test for density dependence in niche overlap and hybridization in the early versus late stages of a biological invasion, thus illuminating an important biogeographical process.
Location
Pacific Northwest, USA to the northern Sierra Nevada, California, USA.
Methods
In the northern Sierra Nevada, where barred owl density was low, we quantified niche overlap between barred owls and spotted owls along three axes (landscape‐scale habitat selection based on passive acoustic survey data, foraging habitat selection measured with GPS tag data, and diet measured with stable isotopes) and assessed hybridization with phenotypic data. We then compared our findings to studies on these species from the Pacific Northwest, where barred owl density is high.
Results
In the Sierra Nevada, overlap in landscape‐scale habitat selection was low (spotted owl sites also occupied by barred owls: 21%), overlap in foraging habitat selection and diet was high (Pianka's niche overlap: 0.802; stable isotope ellipse overlap: 0.52), and hybridization was common (hybrid:barred owl ratio: 0.364). In the Pacific Northwest, niche overlap was high (barred owl occupancy of spotted owl territories: 40%–95%, Pianka's niche overlap of foraging habitat selection and diet: 0.809 and 0.429) and hybridization was rare (hybrid:barred ratio: 0.061).
Main conclusions
Foraging habitat selection and diet were density‐independent and therefore predictive of the competitive exclusion of spotted owls in the Pacific Northwest that has resulted from the barred owl invasion. Landscape‐scale monitoring programmes capable of yielding systematic data on multiple species can offer an early warning of biological invasions; however, individual‐level traits such as foraging habitat selection may influence the population processes that can determine the outcome of those invasions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ddi.13240 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2513298647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27004921</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27004921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-d783f316bc826d60cee1bf1d088e5678281fff8bd0528eb629001a81bad19ee73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8AGQIjExpPWfxHFG1BaoVAkGmK0kPgtXrRNsFxQ-PQ4BNm65u6ffu5MeQpcEz0isuVJmRhjN8BGakKygacYzehxnxnla5oSfojPvtxhjxnI6QU9LsN6EPlHQgVVgG0iM1bvDMPmkafcdBBNMa5PKquS1r51R5rMalRDFiL9Xfli1a204Rye62nm4-OlT9HK3el48pJvH-_XidpM2LM9wqgrBNCO8bgTliuMGgNSaKCwE5LwQVBCttagVzqmAmtMSY1IJUleKlAAFm6Lr8W7n2rcD-CC37cHZ-FLSPCZQCp4N1M1INa713oGWnTP7yvWSYDkEJmNg8juwyM5H9sPsoP8flMvl-tdxNTq2PrTuz0ELjLOSEvYFVal2eA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513298647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Density dependence influences competition and hybridization at an invasion front</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Wood, Connor M. ; Kryshak, Nick ; Gustafson, Michaela ; Hofstadter, Daniel F. ; Hobart, Brendan K. ; Whitmore, Sheila A. ; Dotters, Brian P. ; Roberts, Kevin N. ; Keane, John J. ; Sawyer, Sarah C. ; Gutiérrez, Rocky J. ; Peery, M. Zachariah</creator><contributor>Cunningham, Susan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wood, Connor M. ; Kryshak, Nick ; Gustafson, Michaela ; Hofstadter, Daniel F. ; Hobart, Brendan K. ; Whitmore, Sheila A. ; Dotters, Brian P. ; Roberts, Kevin N. ; Keane, John J. ; Sawyer, Sarah C. ; Gutiérrez, Rocky J. ; Peery, M. Zachariah ; Cunningham, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Landscape and climatic change are promoting range shifts, potentially leading to competition and hybridization between formerly isolated species. However, density‐dependent interactions can impede the timely identification of associated conservation problems. The barred owl's expansion into the spotted owl's range provides a natural experiment to test for density dependence in niche overlap and hybridization in the early versus late stages of a biological invasion, thus illuminating an important biogeographical process.
Location
Pacific Northwest, USA to the northern Sierra Nevada, California, USA.
Methods
In the northern Sierra Nevada, where barred owl density was low, we quantified niche overlap between barred owls and spotted owls along three axes (landscape‐scale habitat selection based on passive acoustic survey data, foraging habitat selection measured with GPS tag data, and diet measured with stable isotopes) and assessed hybridization with phenotypic data. We then compared our findings to studies on these species from the Pacific Northwest, where barred owl density is high.
Results
In the Sierra Nevada, overlap in landscape‐scale habitat selection was low (spotted owl sites also occupied by barred owls: 21%), overlap in foraging habitat selection and diet was high (Pianka's niche overlap: 0.802; stable isotope ellipse overlap: 0.52), and hybridization was common (hybrid:barred owl ratio: 0.364). In the Pacific Northwest, niche overlap was high (barred owl occupancy of spotted owl territories: 40%–95%, Pianka's niche overlap of foraging habitat selection and diet: 0.809 and 0.429) and hybridization was rare (hybrid:barred ratio: 0.061).
Main conclusions
Foraging habitat selection and diet were density‐independent and therefore predictive of the competitive exclusion of spotted owls in the Pacific Northwest that has resulted from the barred owl invasion. Landscape‐scale monitoring programmes capable of yielding systematic data on multiple species can offer an early warning of biological invasions; however, individual‐level traits such as foraging habitat selection may influence the population processes that can determine the outcome of those invasions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Acoustic surveying ; Animal behavior ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; biogeography ; Climate change ; Competition ; conservation ; Density dependence ; Dependence ; Diet ; evolution ; Foraging habitats ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Habitat selection ; Habitats ; Hybridization ; Invasions ; Isotopes ; landscape transformation ; Niche overlap ; Niches ; Occupancy ; Ornithology ; Owls ; Population density ; secondary contact ; speciation ; Species ; Stable isotopes</subject><ispartof>Diversity & distributions, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.901-912</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-d783f316bc826d60cee1bf1d088e5678281fff8bd0528eb629001a81bad19ee73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-d783f316bc826d60cee1bf1d088e5678281fff8bd0528eb629001a81bad19ee73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0235-5214</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27004921$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27004921$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,25354,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27004921$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Cunningham, Susan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wood, Connor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kryshak, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofstadter, Daniel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobart, Brendan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitmore, Sheila A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dotters, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Kevin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Rocky J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peery, M. Zachariah</creatorcontrib><title>Density dependence influences competition and hybridization at an invasion front</title><title>Diversity & distributions</title><description>Aim
Landscape and climatic change are promoting range shifts, potentially leading to competition and hybridization between formerly isolated species. However, density‐dependent interactions can impede the timely identification of associated conservation problems. The barred owl's expansion into the spotted owl's range provides a natural experiment to test for density dependence in niche overlap and hybridization in the early versus late stages of a biological invasion, thus illuminating an important biogeographical process.
Location
Pacific Northwest, USA to the northern Sierra Nevada, California, USA.
Methods
In the northern Sierra Nevada, where barred owl density was low, we quantified niche overlap between barred owls and spotted owls along three axes (landscape‐scale habitat selection based on passive acoustic survey data, foraging habitat selection measured with GPS tag data, and diet measured with stable isotopes) and assessed hybridization with phenotypic data. We then compared our findings to studies on these species from the Pacific Northwest, where barred owl density is high.
Results
In the Sierra Nevada, overlap in landscape‐scale habitat selection was low (spotted owl sites also occupied by barred owls: 21%), overlap in foraging habitat selection and diet was high (Pianka's niche overlap: 0.802; stable isotope ellipse overlap: 0.52), and hybridization was common (hybrid:barred owl ratio: 0.364). In the Pacific Northwest, niche overlap was high (barred owl occupancy of spotted owl territories: 40%–95%, Pianka's niche overlap of foraging habitat selection and diet: 0.809 and 0.429) and hybridization was rare (hybrid:barred ratio: 0.061).
Main conclusions
Foraging habitat selection and diet were density‐independent and therefore predictive of the competitive exclusion of spotted owls in the Pacific Northwest that has resulted from the barred owl invasion. Landscape‐scale monitoring programmes capable of yielding systematic data on multiple species can offer an early warning of biological invasions; however, individual‐level traits such as foraging habitat selection may influence the population processes that can determine the outcome of those invasions.</description><subject>Acoustic surveying</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>biogeography</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>Density dependence</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>evolution</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Invasions</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>landscape transformation</subject><subject>Niche overlap</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Occupancy</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Owls</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>secondary contact</subject><subject>speciation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EEqUw8AGQIjExpPWfxHFG1BaoVAkGmK0kPgtXrRNsFxQ-PQ4BNm65u6ffu5MeQpcEz0isuVJmRhjN8BGakKygacYzehxnxnla5oSfojPvtxhjxnI6QU9LsN6EPlHQgVVgG0iM1bvDMPmkafcdBBNMa5PKquS1r51R5rMalRDFiL9Xfli1a204Rye62nm4-OlT9HK3el48pJvH-_XidpM2LM9wqgrBNCO8bgTliuMGgNSaKCwE5LwQVBCttagVzqmAmtMSY1IJUleKlAAFm6Lr8W7n2rcD-CC37cHZ-FLSPCZQCp4N1M1INa713oGWnTP7yvWSYDkEJmNg8juwyM5H9sPsoP8flMvl-tdxNTq2PrTuz0ELjLOSEvYFVal2eA</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Wood, Connor M.</creator><creator>Kryshak, Nick</creator><creator>Gustafson, Michaela</creator><creator>Hofstadter, Daniel F.</creator><creator>Hobart, Brendan K.</creator><creator>Whitmore, Sheila A.</creator><creator>Dotters, Brian P.</creator><creator>Roberts, Kevin N.</creator><creator>Keane, John J.</creator><creator>Sawyer, Sarah C.</creator><creator>Gutiérrez, Rocky J.</creator><creator>Peery, M. Zachariah</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0235-5214</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Density dependence influences competition and hybridization at an invasion front</title><author>Wood, Connor M. ; Kryshak, Nick ; Gustafson, Michaela ; Hofstadter, Daniel F. ; Hobart, Brendan K. ; Whitmore, Sheila A. ; Dotters, Brian P. ; Roberts, Kevin N. ; Keane, John J. ; Sawyer, Sarah C. ; Gutiérrez, Rocky J. ; Peery, M. Zachariah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-d783f316bc826d60cee1bf1d088e5678281fff8bd0528eb629001a81bad19ee73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acoustic surveying</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>biogeography</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>Density dependence</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>evolution</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Invasions</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>landscape transformation</topic><topic>Niche overlap</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Occupancy</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Owls</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>secondary contact</topic><topic>speciation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wood, Connor M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kryshak, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gustafson, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofstadter, Daniel F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobart, Brendan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitmore, Sheila A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dotters, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Kevin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Sarah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Rocky J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peery, M. Zachariah</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wood, Connor M.</au><au>Kryshak, Nick</au><au>Gustafson, Michaela</au><au>Hofstadter, Daniel F.</au><au>Hobart, Brendan K.</au><au>Whitmore, Sheila A.</au><au>Dotters, Brian P.</au><au>Roberts, Kevin N.</au><au>Keane, John J.</au><au>Sawyer, Sarah C.</au><au>Gutiérrez, Rocky J.</au><au>Peery, M. Zachariah</au><au>Cunningham, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Density dependence influences competition and hybridization at an invasion front</atitle><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>901</spage><epage>912</epage><pages>901-912</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim
Landscape and climatic change are promoting range shifts, potentially leading to competition and hybridization between formerly isolated species. However, density‐dependent interactions can impede the timely identification of associated conservation problems. The barred owl's expansion into the spotted owl's range provides a natural experiment to test for density dependence in niche overlap and hybridization in the early versus late stages of a biological invasion, thus illuminating an important biogeographical process.
Location
Pacific Northwest, USA to the northern Sierra Nevada, California, USA.
Methods
In the northern Sierra Nevada, where barred owl density was low, we quantified niche overlap between barred owls and spotted owls along three axes (landscape‐scale habitat selection based on passive acoustic survey data, foraging habitat selection measured with GPS tag data, and diet measured with stable isotopes) and assessed hybridization with phenotypic data. We then compared our findings to studies on these species from the Pacific Northwest, where barred owl density is high.
Results
In the Sierra Nevada, overlap in landscape‐scale habitat selection was low (spotted owl sites also occupied by barred owls: 21%), overlap in foraging habitat selection and diet was high (Pianka's niche overlap: 0.802; stable isotope ellipse overlap: 0.52), and hybridization was common (hybrid:barred owl ratio: 0.364). In the Pacific Northwest, niche overlap was high (barred owl occupancy of spotted owl territories: 40%–95%, Pianka's niche overlap of foraging habitat selection and diet: 0.809 and 0.429) and hybridization was rare (hybrid:barred ratio: 0.061).
Main conclusions
Foraging habitat selection and diet were density‐independent and therefore predictive of the competitive exclusion of spotted owls in the Pacific Northwest that has resulted from the barred owl invasion. Landscape‐scale monitoring programmes capable of yielding systematic data on multiple species can offer an early warning of biological invasions; however, individual‐level traits such as foraging habitat selection may influence the population processes that can determine the outcome of those invasions.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.13240</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0235-5214</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-9516 |
ispartof | Diversity & distributions, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.901-912 |
issn | 1366-9516 1472-4642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2513298647 |
source | Jstor Journals Open Access |
subjects | Acoustic surveying Animal behavior BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH biogeography Climate change Competition conservation Density dependence Dependence Diet evolution Foraging habitats Global positioning systems GPS Habitat selection Habitats Hybridization Invasions Isotopes landscape transformation Niche overlap Niches Occupancy Ornithology Owls Population density secondary contact speciation Species Stable isotopes |
title | Density dependence influences competition and hybridization at an invasion front |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T09%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Density%20dependence%20influences%20competition%20and%20hybridization%20at%20an%20invasion%20front&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Wood,%20Connor%20M.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=901&rft.epage=912&rft.pages=901-912&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.13240&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_JFNAL%3E27004921%3C/jstor_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513298647&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27004921&rfr_iscdi=true |