Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle
Aim Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diversity & distributions 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.857-872 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 872 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 857 |
container_title | Diversity & distributions |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Feng, Jiawei Sun, Yifei Li, Hailong Xiao, Yuqi Zhang, Dandan Smith, James L. D. Ge, Jianping Wang, Tianming |
description | Aim
Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation efforts. We tested the relative influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on mammalian species richness and occupancy in temperate forests in Northeast Asia.
Location
Northeast China.
Methods
Camera‐trapping data and multispecies occupancy models were used to estimate the species richness of a terrestrial mammal community in a working landscape and assess community‐, group‐, and species‐specific responses to natural and anthropogenic features while accounting for imperfect detection. Species were grouped based on body size, diet and activity pattern.
Results
We deployed 138 cameras and photographed 21 mammalian species over 22,976 trap days across the China–Russia border. Both natural and anthropogenic correlates varied in their importance in predicting the presence of different animals. Vegetation cover and cattle were found to have significantly positive and negative influences on community‐level mammalian occupancy, respectively. The positive relationship with vegetation cover was most evident for large or diurnal species; the negative relationship with cattle was most evident for diurnal and wild ungulate species. Large species occupancy was also negatively associated with human settlements. The predicted richness across each station varied from 5 to 14 unique species, and species had a mean occupancy probability of 0.45 (95% credible interval = 0.09–0.86). Species richness was generally the lowest in livestock grazing areas and close to human settlements. Human influence is more important than the influences of vegetation and environmental variables.
Main conclusions
Our results highlight that livestock grazing was the primary human disturbance that had a negative impact on species occupancy and richness. Multispecies occupancy models helped to identify drivers of biodiversity declines and will inform conservation strategies in human‐dominated landscapes in Northeast Asian forests. We suggest that landscape conservation planning seeks to maximize forest protection and ecosystem services such as biodiversity and carbon storage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ddi.13237 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2513298265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27004918</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27004918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3197-bb40baf494a3135bd83c57872c0040876a295eff404e7dc985ab3d6b3da0eb813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EEmU58ABIljhxSOs1To5Vy1KpggucrYnjUFfZsFOhvD2GADcsjWzNfL9n5kfoipI5jWdRlm5OOePqCM2oUCwRqWDH8c3TNMklTU_RWQh7Qgjnks1QtQzBhuDaN9xA00CNQ2-NswF7Z3ZtLGFoS9wZc-ihNSN2LQb81PlhZyEMeBkctHiwTW89DBZXnbcxHXbgbYmLERsYhtpeoJMK6mAvf-5z9Hp_97J6TLbPD5vVcpsYTnOVFIUgBVQiF8Apl0WZcSNVppghRJBMpcByaatKEGFVafJMQsHLNAYQW2SUn6Ob6d_ed--HOInedwffxpaayehLnrFURup2oozvQvC20r13DfhRU6K_bNTRRv1tY2QXE_vhajv-D-r1evOruJ4U-zB0_k_BVNwhpxn_BO7dff8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513298265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Feng, Jiawei ; Sun, Yifei ; Li, Hailong ; Xiao, Yuqi ; Zhang, Dandan ; Smith, James L. D. ; Ge, Jianping ; Wang, Tianming</creator><contributor>Real, Raimundo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jiawei ; Sun, Yifei ; Li, Hailong ; Xiao, Yuqi ; Zhang, Dandan ; Smith, James L. D. ; Ge, Jianping ; Wang, Tianming ; Real, Raimundo</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation efforts. We tested the relative influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on mammalian species richness and occupancy in temperate forests in Northeast Asia.
Location
Northeast China.
Methods
Camera‐trapping data and multispecies occupancy models were used to estimate the species richness of a terrestrial mammal community in a working landscape and assess community‐, group‐, and species‐specific responses to natural and anthropogenic features while accounting for imperfect detection. Species were grouped based on body size, diet and activity pattern.
Results
We deployed 138 cameras and photographed 21 mammalian species over 22,976 trap days across the China–Russia border. Both natural and anthropogenic correlates varied in their importance in predicting the presence of different animals. Vegetation cover and cattle were found to have significantly positive and negative influences on community‐level mammalian occupancy, respectively. The positive relationship with vegetation cover was most evident for large or diurnal species; the negative relationship with cattle was most evident for diurnal and wild ungulate species. Large species occupancy was also negatively associated with human settlements. The predicted richness across each station varied from 5 to 14 unique species, and species had a mean occupancy probability of 0.45 (95% credible interval = 0.09–0.86). Species richness was generally the lowest in livestock grazing areas and close to human settlements. Human influence is more important than the influences of vegetation and environmental variables.
Main conclusions
Our results highlight that livestock grazing was the primary human disturbance that had a negative impact on species occupancy and richness. Multispecies occupancy models helped to identify drivers of biodiversity declines and will inform conservation strategies in human‐dominated landscapes in Northeast Asian forests. We suggest that landscape conservation planning seeks to maximize forest protection and ecosystem services such as biodiversity and carbon storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Activity patterns ; Animal behavior ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiversity ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Body size ; camera trapping ; Cameras ; Carbon sequestration ; Cattle ; cattle grazing ; China ; community occupancy ; Conservation ; Diurnal ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystem services ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest protection ; Forests ; Grazing ; hierarchical modelling ; Human influences ; Human settlements ; Landscape ; Landscape preservation ; Livestock ; Livestock grazing ; Mammals ; Model testing ; National parks ; Occupancy ; Species richness ; Sustainability ; Sustainable ecosystems ; Temperate forests ; Terrestrial environments ; Vegetation ; Vegetation cover ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Diversity & distributions, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.857-872</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3197-bb40baf494a3135bd83c57872c0040876a295eff404e7dc985ab3d6b3da0eb813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3197-bb40baf494a3135bd83c57872c0040876a295eff404e7dc985ab3d6b3da0eb813</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3370-0209</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27004918$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27004918$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,25354,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27004918$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Real, Raimundo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jiawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yuqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, James L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Jianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tianming</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle</title><title>Diversity & distributions</title><description>Aim
Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation efforts. We tested the relative influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on mammalian species richness and occupancy in temperate forests in Northeast Asia.
Location
Northeast China.
Methods
Camera‐trapping data and multispecies occupancy models were used to estimate the species richness of a terrestrial mammal community in a working landscape and assess community‐, group‐, and species‐specific responses to natural and anthropogenic features while accounting for imperfect detection. Species were grouped based on body size, diet and activity pattern.
Results
We deployed 138 cameras and photographed 21 mammalian species over 22,976 trap days across the China–Russia border. Both natural and anthropogenic correlates varied in their importance in predicting the presence of different animals. Vegetation cover and cattle were found to have significantly positive and negative influences on community‐level mammalian occupancy, respectively. The positive relationship with vegetation cover was most evident for large or diurnal species; the negative relationship with cattle was most evident for diurnal and wild ungulate species. Large species occupancy was also negatively associated with human settlements. The predicted richness across each station varied from 5 to 14 unique species, and species had a mean occupancy probability of 0.45 (95% credible interval = 0.09–0.86). Species richness was generally the lowest in livestock grazing areas and close to human settlements. Human influence is more important than the influences of vegetation and environmental variables.
Main conclusions
Our results highlight that livestock grazing was the primary human disturbance that had a negative impact on species occupancy and richness. Multispecies occupancy models helped to identify drivers of biodiversity declines and will inform conservation strategies in human‐dominated landscapes in Northeast Asian forests. We suggest that landscape conservation planning seeks to maximize forest protection and ecosystem services such as biodiversity and carbon storage.</description><subject>Activity patterns</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>camera trapping</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>cattle grazing</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>community occupancy</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest protection</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>hierarchical modelling</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock grazing</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Occupancy</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable ecosystems</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EEmU58ABIljhxSOs1To5Vy1KpggucrYnjUFfZsFOhvD2GADcsjWzNfL9n5kfoipI5jWdRlm5OOePqCM2oUCwRqWDH8c3TNMklTU_RWQh7Qgjnks1QtQzBhuDaN9xA00CNQ2-NswF7Z3ZtLGFoS9wZc-ihNSN2LQb81PlhZyEMeBkctHiwTW89DBZXnbcxHXbgbYmLERsYhtpeoJMK6mAvf-5z9Hp_97J6TLbPD5vVcpsYTnOVFIUgBVQiF8Apl0WZcSNVppghRJBMpcByaatKEGFVafJMQsHLNAYQW2SUn6Ob6d_ed--HOInedwffxpaayehLnrFURup2oozvQvC20r13DfhRU6K_bNTRRv1tY2QXE_vhajv-D-r1evOruJ4U-zB0_k_BVNwhpxn_BO7dff8</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Feng, Jiawei</creator><creator>Sun, Yifei</creator><creator>Li, Hailong</creator><creator>Xiao, Yuqi</creator><creator>Zhang, Dandan</creator><creator>Smith, James L. D.</creator><creator>Ge, Jianping</creator><creator>Wang, Tianming</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3370-0209</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle</title><author>Feng, Jiawei ; Sun, Yifei ; Li, Hailong ; Xiao, Yuqi ; Zhang, Dandan ; Smith, James L. D. ; Ge, Jianping ; Wang, Tianming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3197-bb40baf494a3135bd83c57872c0040876a295eff404e7dc985ab3d6b3da0eb813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activity patterns</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>camera trapping</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>cattle grazing</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>community occupancy</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest protection</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>hierarchical modelling</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock grazing</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Occupancy</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable ecosystems</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jiawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yuqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, James L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Jianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tianming</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feng, Jiawei</au><au>Sun, Yifei</au><au>Li, Hailong</au><au>Xiao, Yuqi</au><au>Zhang, Dandan</au><au>Smith, James L. D.</au><au>Ge, Jianping</au><au>Wang, Tianming</au><au>Real, Raimundo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle</atitle><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>857</spage><epage>872</epage><pages>857-872</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim
Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation efforts. We tested the relative influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on mammalian species richness and occupancy in temperate forests in Northeast Asia.
Location
Northeast China.
Methods
Camera‐trapping data and multispecies occupancy models were used to estimate the species richness of a terrestrial mammal community in a working landscape and assess community‐, group‐, and species‐specific responses to natural and anthropogenic features while accounting for imperfect detection. Species were grouped based on body size, diet and activity pattern.
Results
We deployed 138 cameras and photographed 21 mammalian species over 22,976 trap days across the China–Russia border. Both natural and anthropogenic correlates varied in their importance in predicting the presence of different animals. Vegetation cover and cattle were found to have significantly positive and negative influences on community‐level mammalian occupancy, respectively. The positive relationship with vegetation cover was most evident for large or diurnal species; the negative relationship with cattle was most evident for diurnal and wild ungulate species. Large species occupancy was also negatively associated with human settlements. The predicted richness across each station varied from 5 to 14 unique species, and species had a mean occupancy probability of 0.45 (95% credible interval = 0.09–0.86). Species richness was generally the lowest in livestock grazing areas and close to human settlements. Human influence is more important than the influences of vegetation and environmental variables.
Main conclusions
Our results highlight that livestock grazing was the primary human disturbance that had a negative impact on species occupancy and richness. Multispecies occupancy models helped to identify drivers of biodiversity declines and will inform conservation strategies in human‐dominated landscapes in Northeast Asian forests. We suggest that landscape conservation planning seeks to maximize forest protection and ecosystem services such as biodiversity and carbon storage.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.13237</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3370-0209</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-9516 |
ispartof | Diversity & distributions, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.857-872 |
issn | 1366-9516 1472-4642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2513298265 |
source | Jstor Journals Open Access |
subjects | Activity patterns Animal behavior Anthropogenic factors Biodiversity BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH Body size camera trapping Cameras Carbon sequestration Cattle cattle grazing China community occupancy Conservation Diurnal Ecosystem management Ecosystem services Forest conservation Forest ecosystems Forest protection Forests Grazing hierarchical modelling Human influences Human settlements Landscape Landscape preservation Livestock Livestock grazing Mammals Model testing National parks Occupancy Species richness Sustainability Sustainable ecosystems Temperate forests Terrestrial environments Vegetation Vegetation cover Wildlife Wildlife conservation Wildlife management |
title | Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A48%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20mammal%20species%20richness%20and%20occupancy%20in%20a%20Northeast%20Asian%20temperate%20forest%20shared%20by%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Feng,%20Jiawei&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=857&rft.epage=872&rft.pages=857-872&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.13237&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_JFNAL%3E27004918%3C/jstor_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513298265&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27004918&rfr_iscdi=true |