Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle

Aim Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.857-872
Hauptverfasser: Feng, Jiawei, Sun, Yifei, Li, Hailong, Xiao, Yuqi, Zhang, Dandan, Smith, James L. D., Ge, Jianping, Wang, Tianming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 872
container_issue 5
container_start_page 857
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 27
creator Feng, Jiawei
Sun, Yifei
Li, Hailong
Xiao, Yuqi
Zhang, Dandan
Smith, James L. D.
Ge, Jianping
Wang, Tianming
description Aim Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation efforts. We tested the relative influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on mammalian species richness and occupancy in temperate forests in Northeast Asia. Location Northeast China. Methods Camera‐trapping data and multispecies occupancy models were used to estimate the species richness of a terrestrial mammal community in a working landscape and assess community‐, group‐, and species‐specific responses to natural and anthropogenic features while accounting for imperfect detection. Species were grouped based on body size, diet and activity pattern. Results We deployed 138 cameras and photographed 21 mammalian species over 22,976 trap days across the China–Russia border. Both natural and anthropogenic correlates varied in their importance in predicting the presence of different animals. Vegetation cover and cattle were found to have significantly positive and negative influences on community‐level mammalian occupancy, respectively. The positive relationship with vegetation cover was most evident for large or diurnal species; the negative relationship with cattle was most evident for diurnal and wild ungulate species. Large species occupancy was also negatively associated with human settlements. The predicted richness across each station varied from 5 to 14 unique species, and species had a mean occupancy probability of 0.45 (95% credible interval = 0.09–0.86). Species richness was generally the lowest in livestock grazing areas and close to human settlements. Human influence is more important than the influences of vegetation and environmental variables. Main conclusions Our results highlight that livestock grazing was the primary human disturbance that had a negative impact on species occupancy and richness. Multispecies occupancy models helped to identify drivers of biodiversity declines and will inform conservation strategies in human‐dominated landscapes in Northeast Asian forests. We suggest that landscape conservation planning seeks to maximize forest protection and ecosystem services such as biodiversity and carbon storage.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ddi.13237
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2513298265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27004918</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27004918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3197-bb40baf494a3135bd83c57872c0040876a295eff404e7dc985ab3d6b3da0eb813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EEmU58ABIljhxSOs1To5Vy1KpggucrYnjUFfZsFOhvD2GADcsjWzNfL9n5kfoipI5jWdRlm5OOePqCM2oUCwRqWDH8c3TNMklTU_RWQh7Qgjnks1QtQzBhuDaN9xA00CNQ2-NswF7Z3ZtLGFoS9wZc-ihNSN2LQb81PlhZyEMeBkctHiwTW89DBZXnbcxHXbgbYmLERsYhtpeoJMK6mAvf-5z9Hp_97J6TLbPD5vVcpsYTnOVFIUgBVQiF8Apl0WZcSNVppghRJBMpcByaatKEGFVafJMQsHLNAYQW2SUn6Ob6d_ed--HOInedwffxpaayehLnrFURup2oozvQvC20r13DfhRU6K_bNTRRv1tY2QXE_vhajv-D-r1evOruJ4U-zB0_k_BVNwhpxn_BO7dff8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513298265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Feng, Jiawei ; Sun, Yifei ; Li, Hailong ; Xiao, Yuqi ; Zhang, Dandan ; Smith, James L. D. ; Ge, Jianping ; Wang, Tianming</creator><contributor>Real, Raimundo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jiawei ; Sun, Yifei ; Li, Hailong ; Xiao, Yuqi ; Zhang, Dandan ; Smith, James L. D. ; Ge, Jianping ; Wang, Tianming ; Real, Raimundo</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation efforts. We tested the relative influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on mammalian species richness and occupancy in temperate forests in Northeast Asia. Location Northeast China. Methods Camera‐trapping data and multispecies occupancy models were used to estimate the species richness of a terrestrial mammal community in a working landscape and assess community‐, group‐, and species‐specific responses to natural and anthropogenic features while accounting for imperfect detection. Species were grouped based on body size, diet and activity pattern. Results We deployed 138 cameras and photographed 21 mammalian species over 22,976 trap days across the China–Russia border. Both natural and anthropogenic correlates varied in their importance in predicting the presence of different animals. Vegetation cover and cattle were found to have significantly positive and negative influences on community‐level mammalian occupancy, respectively. The positive relationship with vegetation cover was most evident for large or diurnal species; the negative relationship with cattle was most evident for diurnal and wild ungulate species. Large species occupancy was also negatively associated with human settlements. The predicted richness across each station varied from 5 to 14 unique species, and species had a mean occupancy probability of 0.45 (95% credible interval = 0.09–0.86). Species richness was generally the lowest in livestock grazing areas and close to human settlements. Human influence is more important than the influences of vegetation and environmental variables. Main conclusions Our results highlight that livestock grazing was the primary human disturbance that had a negative impact on species occupancy and richness. Multispecies occupancy models helped to identify drivers of biodiversity declines and will inform conservation strategies in human‐dominated landscapes in Northeast Asian forests. We suggest that landscape conservation planning seeks to maximize forest protection and ecosystem services such as biodiversity and carbon storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Activity patterns ; Animal behavior ; Anthropogenic factors ; Biodiversity ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Body size ; camera trapping ; Cameras ; Carbon sequestration ; Cattle ; cattle grazing ; China ; community occupancy ; Conservation ; Diurnal ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystem services ; Forest conservation ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest protection ; Forests ; Grazing ; hierarchical modelling ; Human influences ; Human settlements ; Landscape ; Landscape preservation ; Livestock ; Livestock grazing ; Mammals ; Model testing ; National parks ; Occupancy ; Species richness ; Sustainability ; Sustainable ecosystems ; Temperate forests ; Terrestrial environments ; Vegetation ; Vegetation cover ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.857-872</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3197-bb40baf494a3135bd83c57872c0040876a295eff404e7dc985ab3d6b3da0eb813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3197-bb40baf494a3135bd83c57872c0040876a295eff404e7dc985ab3d6b3da0eb813</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3370-0209</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27004918$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27004918$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,25354,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27004918$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Real, Raimundo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jiawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yuqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, James L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Jianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tianming</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><description>Aim Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation efforts. We tested the relative influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on mammalian species richness and occupancy in temperate forests in Northeast Asia. Location Northeast China. Methods Camera‐trapping data and multispecies occupancy models were used to estimate the species richness of a terrestrial mammal community in a working landscape and assess community‐, group‐, and species‐specific responses to natural and anthropogenic features while accounting for imperfect detection. Species were grouped based on body size, diet and activity pattern. Results We deployed 138 cameras and photographed 21 mammalian species over 22,976 trap days across the China–Russia border. Both natural and anthropogenic correlates varied in their importance in predicting the presence of different animals. Vegetation cover and cattle were found to have significantly positive and negative influences on community‐level mammalian occupancy, respectively. The positive relationship with vegetation cover was most evident for large or diurnal species; the negative relationship with cattle was most evident for diurnal and wild ungulate species. Large species occupancy was also negatively associated with human settlements. The predicted richness across each station varied from 5 to 14 unique species, and species had a mean occupancy probability of 0.45 (95% credible interval = 0.09–0.86). Species richness was generally the lowest in livestock grazing areas and close to human settlements. Human influence is more important than the influences of vegetation and environmental variables. Main conclusions Our results highlight that livestock grazing was the primary human disturbance that had a negative impact on species occupancy and richness. Multispecies occupancy models helped to identify drivers of biodiversity declines and will inform conservation strategies in human‐dominated landscapes in Northeast Asian forests. We suggest that landscape conservation planning seeks to maximize forest protection and ecosystem services such as biodiversity and carbon storage.</description><subject>Activity patterns</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>camera trapping</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>cattle grazing</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>community occupancy</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest protection</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>hierarchical modelling</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock grazing</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Occupancy</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable ecosystems</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQhi0EEmU58ABIljhxSOs1To5Vy1KpggucrYnjUFfZsFOhvD2GADcsjWzNfL9n5kfoipI5jWdRlm5OOePqCM2oUCwRqWDH8c3TNMklTU_RWQh7Qgjnks1QtQzBhuDaN9xA00CNQ2-NswF7Z3ZtLGFoS9wZc-ihNSN2LQb81PlhZyEMeBkctHiwTW89DBZXnbcxHXbgbYmLERsYhtpeoJMK6mAvf-5z9Hp_97J6TLbPD5vVcpsYTnOVFIUgBVQiF8Apl0WZcSNVppghRJBMpcByaatKEGFVafJMQsHLNAYQW2SUn6Ob6d_ed--HOInedwffxpaayehLnrFURup2oozvQvC20r13DfhRU6K_bNTRRv1tY2QXE_vhajv-D-r1evOruJ4U-zB0_k_BVNwhpxn_BO7dff8</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Feng, Jiawei</creator><creator>Sun, Yifei</creator><creator>Li, Hailong</creator><creator>Xiao, Yuqi</creator><creator>Zhang, Dandan</creator><creator>Smith, James L. D.</creator><creator>Ge, Jianping</creator><creator>Wang, Tianming</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3370-0209</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle</title><author>Feng, Jiawei ; Sun, Yifei ; Li, Hailong ; Xiao, Yuqi ; Zhang, Dandan ; Smith, James L. D. ; Ge, Jianping ; Wang, Tianming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3197-bb40baf494a3135bd83c57872c0040876a295eff404e7dc985ab3d6b3da0eb813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activity patterns</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>camera trapping</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>cattle grazing</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>community occupancy</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest protection</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>hierarchical modelling</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock grazing</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Occupancy</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable ecosystems</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jiawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yuqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, James L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Jianping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tianming</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feng, Jiawei</au><au>Sun, Yifei</au><au>Li, Hailong</au><au>Xiao, Yuqi</au><au>Zhang, Dandan</au><au>Smith, James L. D.</au><au>Ge, Jianping</au><au>Wang, Tianming</au><au>Real, Raimundo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>857</spage><epage>872</epage><pages>857-872</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim Asian forests are becoming increasingly degraded and fragmented by the extensive intensification of anthropogenic activities; these activities threaten wildlife and ecosystem sustainability. Facing a defaunation crisis, managers need more information on species assemblages to guide conservation efforts. We tested the relative influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on mammalian species richness and occupancy in temperate forests in Northeast Asia. Location Northeast China. Methods Camera‐trapping data and multispecies occupancy models were used to estimate the species richness of a terrestrial mammal community in a working landscape and assess community‐, group‐, and species‐specific responses to natural and anthropogenic features while accounting for imperfect detection. Species were grouped based on body size, diet and activity pattern. Results We deployed 138 cameras and photographed 21 mammalian species over 22,976 trap days across the China–Russia border. Both natural and anthropogenic correlates varied in their importance in predicting the presence of different animals. Vegetation cover and cattle were found to have significantly positive and negative influences on community‐level mammalian occupancy, respectively. The positive relationship with vegetation cover was most evident for large or diurnal species; the negative relationship with cattle was most evident for diurnal and wild ungulate species. Large species occupancy was also negatively associated with human settlements. The predicted richness across each station varied from 5 to 14 unique species, and species had a mean occupancy probability of 0.45 (95% credible interval = 0.09–0.86). Species richness was generally the lowest in livestock grazing areas and close to human settlements. Human influence is more important than the influences of vegetation and environmental variables. Main conclusions Our results highlight that livestock grazing was the primary human disturbance that had a negative impact on species occupancy and richness. Multispecies occupancy models helped to identify drivers of biodiversity declines and will inform conservation strategies in human‐dominated landscapes in Northeast Asian forests. We suggest that landscape conservation planning seeks to maximize forest protection and ecosystem services such as biodiversity and carbon storage.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.13237</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3370-0209</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2021-05, Vol.27 (5), p.857-872
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2513298265
source Jstor Journals Open Access
subjects Activity patterns
Animal behavior
Anthropogenic factors
Biodiversity
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
Body size
camera trapping
Cameras
Carbon sequestration
Cattle
cattle grazing
China
community occupancy
Conservation
Diurnal
Ecosystem management
Ecosystem services
Forest conservation
Forest ecosystems
Forest protection
Forests
Grazing
hierarchical modelling
Human influences
Human settlements
Landscape
Landscape preservation
Livestock
Livestock grazing
Mammals
Model testing
National parks
Occupancy
Species richness
Sustainability
Sustainable ecosystems
Temperate forests
Terrestrial environments
Vegetation
Vegetation cover
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife management
title Assessing mammal species richness and occupancy in a Northeast Asian temperate forest shared by cattle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A48%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20mammal%20species%20richness%20and%20occupancy%20in%20a%20Northeast%20Asian%20temperate%20forest%20shared%20by%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Feng,%20Jiawei&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=857&rft.epage=872&rft.pages=857-872&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.13237&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_JFNAL%3E27004918%3C/jstor_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513298265&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27004918&rfr_iscdi=true