A health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from coal-fired boilers and its case analysis

A novel health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from five groups of coal-fired boilers is built based on AHP. In our assessment model, some important factors are taken into account, including the number from uncontrolled emission, and mass from uncontrolled emission, the particle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2021-02, Vol.675 (1), p.12013
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Xin, Zhao, Zhifeng, Miao, Shanshan, Li, Huiyi, Zhu, Wenkun, Yu, Qiang, Huang, Ying, Wang, Jingjie, Sun, Hao, Ma, Xiaochun, Guo, Qixing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12013
container_title IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science
container_volume 675
creator Guo, Xin
Zhao, Zhifeng
Miao, Shanshan
Li, Huiyi
Zhu, Wenkun
Yu, Qiang
Huang, Ying
Wang, Jingjie
Sun, Hao
Ma, Xiaochun
Guo, Qixing
description A novel health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from five groups of coal-fired boilers is built based on AHP. In our assessment model, some important factors are taken into account, including the number from uncontrolled emission, and mass from uncontrolled emission, the particle size distribution of Rosin-Rammler function of fine particles, and the total content of toxic chemical compositions (including Cr, V, Mn, Ni, Pb, Cd, As, Se, Hg, OC and EC). By calculation, PM 2.5 from the industrial grate-fired boilers are much more harmful to human health than those from the other types of coal-fired boilers, which is not recommended to choose grate-fired burners as a burner of a new boiler or a modification boiler. PM 2.5 from industrial fluidized-bed boilers are more harmful to human health than that of utility CFB boilers; PM 2.5 from the large-capacity utility pulverized coal boilers (⩾450MW) are more harmful to human health than those from the small-capacity utility pulverized coal boilers (
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1755-1315/675/1/012013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2512972605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2512972605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2853-3157d2bb38f3c719e7d1cd791a2af6d2349dd7ba5e9c3b45868250b367b1d6a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoWnaVyiCnl1rpUiyjyH0DwK9tGchW6vGwbFSrXNon74OKTnNDjsMw8fYPYhHEFVVgtW6AAW6NFaXUAqQAtQFm50fl-db2Gt2Q7QVwtiFqmdsu-Qb9P244Rv_63PgngiJdjiMfJcC9jxFHrsB-d7nsWt7JP6FA2Y_YuAxpx1vk--L2OXJN6nrMRP3Q-DdSLz1hJPx_Q91dMuuou8J7_51zj6fnz5Wr8X6_eVttVwXray0Kqa9NsimUVVUrYUabYA22Bq89NEEqRZ1CLbxGutWNQtdmUpq0ShjGwjGg5qzh1PvPqfvA9LotumQpxHkpAZZW2mEnlLmlGpzIsoY3T53O59_HAh35OqOyNwRn5u4OnAnruoPHfFrkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2512972605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from coal-fired boilers and its case analysis</title><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Guo, Xin ; Zhao, Zhifeng ; Miao, Shanshan ; Li, Huiyi ; Zhu, Wenkun ; Yu, Qiang ; Huang, Ying ; Wang, Jingjie ; Sun, Hao ; Ma, Xiaochun ; Guo, Qixing</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xin ; Zhao, Zhifeng ; Miao, Shanshan ; Li, Huiyi ; Zhu, Wenkun ; Yu, Qiang ; Huang, Ying ; Wang, Jingjie ; Sun, Hao ; Ma, Xiaochun ; Guo, Qixing</creatorcontrib><description>A novel health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from five groups of coal-fired boilers is built based on AHP. In our assessment model, some important factors are taken into account, including the number from uncontrolled emission, and mass from uncontrolled emission, the particle size distribution of Rosin-Rammler function of fine particles, and the total content of toxic chemical compositions (including Cr, V, Mn, Ni, Pb, Cd, As, Se, Hg, OC and EC). By calculation, PM 2.5 from the industrial grate-fired boilers are much more harmful to human health than those from the other types of coal-fired boilers, which is not recommended to choose grate-fired burners as a burner of a new boiler or a modification boiler. PM 2.5 from industrial fluidized-bed boilers are more harmful to human health than that of utility CFB boilers; PM 2.5 from the large-capacity utility pulverized coal boilers (⩾450MW) are more harmful to human health than those from the small-capacity utility pulverized coal boilers (&lt;450MW). It is necessary to install a high performance dust removal device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/675/1/012013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Boilers ; Cadmium ; Chemical composition ; Coal ; Emission ; Emissions ; Fluidized beds ; Hazard assessment ; Health hazards ; Lead ; Manganese ; Mercury (metal) ; Nickel ; Particle size distribution ; Particulate matter ; Pulverized coal ; Rosin ; Selenium ; Size distribution</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2021-02, Vol.675 (1), p.12013</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2853-3157d2bb38f3c719e7d1cd791a2af6d2349dd7ba5e9c3b45868250b367b1d6a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2853-3157d2bb38f3c719e7d1cd791a2af6d2349dd7ba5e9c3b45868250b367b1d6a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Shanshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Huiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenkun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaochun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Qixing</creatorcontrib><title>A health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from coal-fired boilers and its case analysis</title><title>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</title><description>A novel health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from five groups of coal-fired boilers is built based on AHP. In our assessment model, some important factors are taken into account, including the number from uncontrolled emission, and mass from uncontrolled emission, the particle size distribution of Rosin-Rammler function of fine particles, and the total content of toxic chemical compositions (including Cr, V, Mn, Ni, Pb, Cd, As, Se, Hg, OC and EC). By calculation, PM 2.5 from the industrial grate-fired boilers are much more harmful to human health than those from the other types of coal-fired boilers, which is not recommended to choose grate-fired burners as a burner of a new boiler or a modification boiler. PM 2.5 from industrial fluidized-bed boilers are more harmful to human health than that of utility CFB boilers; PM 2.5 from the large-capacity utility pulverized coal boilers (⩾450MW) are more harmful to human health than those from the small-capacity utility pulverized coal boilers (&lt;450MW). It is necessary to install a high performance dust removal device.</description><subject>Boilers</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Fluidized beds</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Mercury (metal)</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Pulverized coal</subject><subject>Rosin</subject><subject>Selenium</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><issn>1755-1307</issn><issn>1755-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1qwzAQhEVpoWnaVyiCnl1rpUiyjyH0DwK9tGchW6vGwbFSrXNon74OKTnNDjsMw8fYPYhHEFVVgtW6AAW6NFaXUAqQAtQFm50fl-db2Gt2Q7QVwtiFqmdsu-Qb9P244Rv_63PgngiJdjiMfJcC9jxFHrsB-d7nsWt7JP6FA2Y_YuAxpx1vk--L2OXJN6nrMRP3Q-DdSLz1hJPx_Q91dMuuou8J7_51zj6fnz5Wr8X6_eVttVwXray0Kqa9NsimUVVUrYUabYA22Bq89NEEqRZ1CLbxGutWNQtdmUpq0ShjGwjGg5qzh1PvPqfvA9LotumQpxHkpAZZW2mEnlLmlGpzIsoY3T53O59_HAh35OqOyNwRn5u4OnAnruoPHfFrkw</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Guo, Xin</creator><creator>Zhao, Zhifeng</creator><creator>Miao, Shanshan</creator><creator>Li, Huiyi</creator><creator>Zhu, Wenkun</creator><creator>Yu, Qiang</creator><creator>Huang, Ying</creator><creator>Wang, Jingjie</creator><creator>Sun, Hao</creator><creator>Ma, Xiaochun</creator><creator>Guo, Qixing</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>A health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from coal-fired boilers and its case analysis</title><author>Guo, Xin ; Zhao, Zhifeng ; Miao, Shanshan ; Li, Huiyi ; Zhu, Wenkun ; Yu, Qiang ; Huang, Ying ; Wang, Jingjie ; Sun, Hao ; Ma, Xiaochun ; Guo, Qixing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2853-3157d2bb38f3c719e7d1cd791a2af6d2349dd7ba5e9c3b45868250b367b1d6a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Boilers</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Fluidized beds</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Mercury (metal)</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Pulverized coal</topic><topic>Rosin</topic><topic>Selenium</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zhifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Shanshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Huiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Wenkun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaochun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Qixing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Xin</au><au>Zhao, Zhifeng</au><au>Miao, Shanshan</au><au>Li, Huiyi</au><au>Zhu, Wenkun</au><au>Yu, Qiang</au><au>Huang, Ying</au><au>Wang, Jingjie</au><au>Sun, Hao</au><au>Ma, Xiaochun</au><au>Guo, Qixing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from coal-fired boilers and its case analysis</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>675</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12013</spage><pages>12013-</pages><issn>1755-1307</issn><eissn>1755-1315</eissn><abstract>A novel health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from five groups of coal-fired boilers is built based on AHP. In our assessment model, some important factors are taken into account, including the number from uncontrolled emission, and mass from uncontrolled emission, the particle size distribution of Rosin-Rammler function of fine particles, and the total content of toxic chemical compositions (including Cr, V, Mn, Ni, Pb, Cd, As, Se, Hg, OC and EC). By calculation, PM 2.5 from the industrial grate-fired boilers are much more harmful to human health than those from the other types of coal-fired boilers, which is not recommended to choose grate-fired burners as a burner of a new boiler or a modification boiler. PM 2.5 from industrial fluidized-bed boilers are more harmful to human health than that of utility CFB boilers; PM 2.5 from the large-capacity utility pulverized coal boilers (⩾450MW) are more harmful to human health than those from the small-capacity utility pulverized coal boilers (&lt;450MW). It is necessary to install a high performance dust removal device.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1755-1315/675/1/012013</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-1307
ispartof IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2021-02, Vol.675 (1), p.12013
issn 1755-1307
1755-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2512972605
source Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Boilers
Cadmium
Chemical composition
Coal
Emission
Emissions
Fluidized beds
Hazard assessment
Health hazards
Lead
Manganese
Mercury (metal)
Nickel
Particle size distribution
Particulate matter
Pulverized coal
Rosin
Selenium
Size distribution
title A health hazard assessment model of fine particles generated from coal-fired boilers and its case analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A30%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20health%20hazard%20assessment%20model%20of%20fine%20particles%20generated%20from%20coal-fired%20boilers%20and%20its%20case%20analysis&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Earth%20and%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Guo,%20Xin&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=675&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12013&rft.pages=12013-&rft.issn=1755-1307&rft.eissn=1755-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1755-1315/675/1/012013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2512972605%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2512972605&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true