Effect of liquid probiotic administration on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens
Administration of antibiotic as feed additive in animal nutrition has been highly concerned due to adverse effect of antibiotic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate administration of liquid probiotic on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens. Totally 10...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2021-02, Vol.667 (1), p.12026 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 12026 |
| container_title | IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science |
| container_volume | 667 |
| creator | Wahyudi, I Zammiluni Ilham Khairi, F Tarman, A Wajizah, S Samadi |
| description | Administration of antibiotic as feed additive in animal nutrition has been highly concerned due to adverse effect of antibiotic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate administration of liquid probiotic on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens. Totally 100 mixed sex commercial chickens were randomly distributed to four various treatment groups. Each treatment was administrated various concentration of liquid probiotic in the water (P1=control, P2= 1.0 % of liquid probiotic, P3= 1.5 % of liquid probiotic, and P4= 2.0 % of liquid probiotic) in the drinking water. Broiler chickens were fed commercial feed. Parameters evaluated in this study were broilers performances body weight (BW), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and water consumption (WTC) for 4 weeks. The results of the study showed that administration of probiotics was no significantly different (P>0.05) on animal performances (BW, FI and FCR) but significantly different on WTC. Drumstick as part of carcass significantly improved (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1755-1315/667/1/012026 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2512972258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2512972258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-448c81f6100a94d27a611bd39391867a17c7d683a4be7e5d74adedb1ed4e72243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQQIMoWKt_QQJeXZtJskn2KKV-QMGLnkM2yWrq7qZNtgfBH29KpTAwA_NmhnkI3QJ5AKLUAmRdV8CgXgghF7AgQAkVZ2h2apyfaiIv0VXOG0KE5KyZod9V13k74djhPuz2weFtim2IU7DYuCGMIU_JTCGOuMTWpy6mwYzW53tsTbImZ2xGhz9D2_sJ2y-TjJ18KmPBZhxGbOMw-GSD6XGbYuh9KlSw337M1-iiM332N_95jj6eVu_Ll2r99vy6fFxXliomKs6VVdAJIMQ03FFpBEDrWMMaUEIakFY6oZjhrZe-dpIb510L3nEvKeVsju6Oe8tvu73Pk97EfRrLSU1roE2BalUocaRsijkn3-ltCoNJPxqIPpjWB4n6IFQX0xr00TT7A0TSc00</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2512972258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of liquid probiotic administration on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><creator>Wahyudi, I ; Zammiluni ; Ilham ; Khairi, F ; Tarman, A ; Wajizah, S ; Samadi</creator><creatorcontrib>Wahyudi, I ; Zammiluni ; Ilham ; Khairi, F ; Tarman, A ; Wajizah, S ; Samadi</creatorcontrib><description>Administration of antibiotic as feed additive in animal nutrition has been highly concerned due to adverse effect of antibiotic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate administration of liquid probiotic on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens. Totally 100 mixed sex commercial chickens were randomly distributed to four various treatment groups. Each treatment was administrated various concentration of liquid probiotic in the water (P1=control, P2= 1.0 % of liquid probiotic, P3= 1.5 % of liquid probiotic, and P4= 2.0 % of liquid probiotic) in the drinking water. Broiler chickens were fed commercial feed. Parameters evaluated in this study were broilers performances body weight (BW), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and water consumption (WTC) for 4 weeks. The results of the study showed that administration of probiotics was no significantly different (P>0.05) on animal performances (BW, FI and FCR) but significantly different on WTC. Drumstick as part of carcass significantly improved (P<0.05) by administration of liquid probiotics. In conclusion administration of liquid probiotics in broiler had no negative effects on animal performance, carcass and giblet characteristics and it can be applied as alternative feed additives as replacement of antibiotics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/667/1/012026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Additives ; Animal nutrition ; Antibiotics ; Body weight ; Carcasses ; Chickens ; Conversion ratio ; Drinking water ; Feed additives ; Feed conversion ; Feeds ; Food additives ; Nutrition ; Poultry ; Probiotics ; Water consumption</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2021-02, Vol.667 (1), p.12026</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-448c81f6100a94d27a611bd39391867a17c7d683a4be7e5d74adedb1ed4e72243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-448c81f6100a94d27a611bd39391867a17c7d683a4be7e5d74adedb1ed4e72243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wahyudi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammiluni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khairi, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarman, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wajizah, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samadi</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of liquid probiotic administration on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens</title><title>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</title><description>Administration of antibiotic as feed additive in animal nutrition has been highly concerned due to adverse effect of antibiotic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate administration of liquid probiotic on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens. Totally 100 mixed sex commercial chickens were randomly distributed to four various treatment groups. Each treatment was administrated various concentration of liquid probiotic in the water (P1=control, P2= 1.0 % of liquid probiotic, P3= 1.5 % of liquid probiotic, and P4= 2.0 % of liquid probiotic) in the drinking water. Broiler chickens were fed commercial feed. Parameters evaluated in this study were broilers performances body weight (BW), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and water consumption (WTC) for 4 weeks. The results of the study showed that administration of probiotics was no significantly different (P>0.05) on animal performances (BW, FI and FCR) but significantly different on WTC. Drumstick as part of carcass significantly improved (P<0.05) by administration of liquid probiotics. In conclusion administration of liquid probiotics in broiler had no negative effects on animal performance, carcass and giblet characteristics and it can be applied as alternative feed additives as replacement of antibiotics.</description><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Animal nutrition</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Conversion ratio</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Feed conversion</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Food additives</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><issn>1755-1307</issn><issn>1755-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQQIMoWKt_QQJeXZtJskn2KKV-QMGLnkM2yWrq7qZNtgfBH29KpTAwA_NmhnkI3QJ5AKLUAmRdV8CgXgghF7AgQAkVZ2h2apyfaiIv0VXOG0KE5KyZod9V13k74djhPuz2weFtim2IU7DYuCGMIU_JTCGOuMTWpy6mwYzW53tsTbImZ2xGhz9D2_sJ2y-TjJ18KmPBZhxGbOMw-GSD6XGbYuh9KlSw337M1-iiM332N_95jj6eVu_Ll2r99vy6fFxXliomKs6VVdAJIMQ03FFpBEDrWMMaUEIakFY6oZjhrZe-dpIb510L3nEvKeVsju6Oe8tvu73Pk97EfRrLSU1roE2BalUocaRsijkn3-ltCoNJPxqIPpjWB4n6IFQX0xr00TT7A0TSc00</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Wahyudi, I</creator><creator>Zammiluni</creator><creator>Ilham</creator><creator>Khairi, F</creator><creator>Tarman, A</creator><creator>Wajizah, S</creator><creator>Samadi</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Effect of liquid probiotic administration on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens</title><author>Wahyudi, I ; Zammiluni ; Ilham ; Khairi, F ; Tarman, A ; Wajizah, S ; Samadi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2836-448c81f6100a94d27a611bd39391867a17c7d683a4be7e5d74adedb1ed4e72243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Animal nutrition</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Conversion ratio</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Feed conversion</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Food additives</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wahyudi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zammiluni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khairi, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarman, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wajizah, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samadi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wahyudi, I</au><au>Zammiluni</au><au>Ilham</au><au>Khairi, F</au><au>Tarman, A</au><au>Wajizah, S</au><au>Samadi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of liquid probiotic administration on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>667</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12026</spage><pages>12026-</pages><issn>1755-1307</issn><eissn>1755-1315</eissn><abstract>Administration of antibiotic as feed additive in animal nutrition has been highly concerned due to adverse effect of antibiotic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate administration of liquid probiotic on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens. Totally 100 mixed sex commercial chickens were randomly distributed to four various treatment groups. Each treatment was administrated various concentration of liquid probiotic in the water (P1=control, P2= 1.0 % of liquid probiotic, P3= 1.5 % of liquid probiotic, and P4= 2.0 % of liquid probiotic) in the drinking water. Broiler chickens were fed commercial feed. Parameters evaluated in this study were broilers performances body weight (BW), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and water consumption (WTC) for 4 weeks. The results of the study showed that administration of probiotics was no significantly different (P>0.05) on animal performances (BW, FI and FCR) but significantly different on WTC. Drumstick as part of carcass significantly improved (P<0.05) by administration of liquid probiotics. In conclusion administration of liquid probiotics in broiler had no negative effects on animal performance, carcass and giblet characteristics and it can be applied as alternative feed additives as replacement of antibiotics.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1755-1315/667/1/012026</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1755-1307 |
| ispartof | IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 2021-02, Vol.667 (1), p.12026 |
| issn | 1755-1307 1755-1315 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2512972258 |
| source | IOP Publishing Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra |
| subjects | Additives Animal nutrition Antibiotics Body weight Carcasses Chickens Conversion ratio Drinking water Feed additives Feed conversion Feeds Food additives Nutrition Poultry Probiotics Water consumption |
| title | Effect of liquid probiotic administration on performances, carcass and giblet characteristics in commercial broiler chickens |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A34%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20liquid%20probiotic%20administration%20on%20performances,%20carcass%20and%20giblet%20characteristics%20in%20commercial%20broiler%20chickens&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Earth%20and%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Wahyudi,%20I&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=667&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12026&rft.pages=12026-&rft.issn=1755-1307&rft.eissn=1755-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1755-1315/667/1/012026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2512972258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2512972258&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |