Forage Quantity and Quality Dynamics Due to Weathering Over the Dry Season on California Annual Rangelands
Livestock obtain forage by grazing on rangeland. In California annual rangelands, residual dry matter is commonly used to determine proper grazing levels. Rangeland forage biomass and quality can degrade dramatically during the dormant summer period. We examined 25 sites across an annual rainfall gr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rangeland ecology & management 2021-05, Vol.76 (1), p.150-156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 150 |
container_title | Rangeland ecology & management |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Larsen, Royce E. Shapero, Matthew W.K. Striby, Karl Althouse, LynneDee Meade, Daniel E. Brown, Katie Horney, Marc R. Rao, Devii R. Davy, Josh S. Rigby, Craig W. Jensen, Kevin B. Dahlgren, Randy A. |
description | Livestock obtain forage by grazing on rangeland. In California annual rangelands, residual dry matter is commonly used to determine proper grazing levels. Rangeland forage biomass and quality can degrade dramatically during the dormant summer period. We examined 25 sites across an annual rainfall gradient (183–492 mm) over 3 contrasting rainfall yr (2015–2017) that varied from 57% to 152% of average annual precipitation. Overall fractional biomass loss was 54.4% (range = 46.5–61.5%) with greater fractional losses occurring in dry years. Biomass losses were related to the amount of peak standing crop and plant composition—both a function of annual precipitation. Fractional seasonal losses from the peak standing biomass in 2015 = 962 kg/ha (61.5% seasonal; 9.7% monthly), 2016 = 1 541 kg/ha (55.0% seasonal; 8.7%monthly) and 2017 = 1 923 kg/ha (46.5% seasonal; 7.3%, monthly). Forage quality metrics were strongly affected by summer weathering processes. Crude protein concentrations decreased by 33.6%, 27.7%, and 21.0% in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. In contrast, relative concentrations of fiber and lignin (acid detergent fiber [ADF] = cellulose + lignin) and in the weathered biomass showed increases for ADF: 44.6% (2015), 32.2% (2016), and 24.1% (2017). Increased lignin varied: 3.4% in 2015, 23.9% in 2016, and 28.0% in 2017. While ADF and lignin concentrations (weathered biomass, kg/ha) increased during the weathering process, the standing stock decreased by 39.3% (ADF) and 46.6% (lignin), compared with overall weathered biomass loss of 54.4% and CP loss of 67.1%. The significant loss of aboveground biomass and forage quality as weathering processes occurred throughout the dry summer period affects livestock grazing strategies. Forage biomass and nutrient losses through the dry season should be considered when determining grazing strategies to achieve proper residual dry matter levels and nutrient supplementation regimes before the onset of the rainy season. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rama.2021.02.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2511887224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1550742421000269</els_id><sourcerecordid>2511887224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b413t-cc55f64b792e21ff1000ed285bb8c34d76b6caa73f6e3811a598dd352d456fdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9LwzAQx4soqNN_wKeAz625tGk78GVsTgVh-AsfQ5pcZ8qWzKQb7L83dT6LcHB3cJ_v9_gmyRXQDCiUN13m5VpmjDLIKMso0KPkDDiHlFNWH__MNK0KVpwm5yF0lOYlQHWWdHPn5RLJ81ba3vR7Iq0eltUwz_ZWro0KZLZF0jvygbL_RG_skix26ElcyMzvySvK4CyJNY1g67w1kkysjTLkRdolrqJquEhOWrkKePnbR8n7_O5t-pA-Le4fp5OntCkg71OlOG_LoqnGDBm0LVBKUbOaN02t8kJXZVMqKau8LTGvASQf11rnnOmCl61W-Si5PuhuvPvaYuhF57beRkvBOEBdV4wV8YodrpR3IXhsxcabtfR7AVQMmYpODJmKIVNBmYiZRuj2AGH8f2fQi6AMWoXaeFS90M78jdMD3hjnLP7H8Rtoro9Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511887224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forage Quantity and Quality Dynamics Due to Weathering Over the Dry Season on California Annual Rangelands</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Larsen, Royce E. ; Shapero, Matthew W.K. ; Striby, Karl ; Althouse, LynneDee ; Meade, Daniel E. ; Brown, Katie ; Horney, Marc R. ; Rao, Devii R. ; Davy, Josh S. ; Rigby, Craig W. ; Jensen, Kevin B. ; Dahlgren, Randy A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Royce E. ; Shapero, Matthew W.K. ; Striby, Karl ; Althouse, LynneDee ; Meade, Daniel E. ; Brown, Katie ; Horney, Marc R. ; Rao, Devii R. ; Davy, Josh S. ; Rigby, Craig W. ; Jensen, Kevin B. ; Dahlgren, Randy A.</creatorcontrib><description>Livestock obtain forage by grazing on rangeland. In California annual rangelands, residual dry matter is commonly used to determine proper grazing levels. Rangeland forage biomass and quality can degrade dramatically during the dormant summer period. We examined 25 sites across an annual rainfall gradient (183–492 mm) over 3 contrasting rainfall yr (2015–2017) that varied from 57% to 152% of average annual precipitation. Overall fractional biomass loss was 54.4% (range = 46.5–61.5%) with greater fractional losses occurring in dry years. Biomass losses were related to the amount of peak standing crop and plant composition—both a function of annual precipitation. Fractional seasonal losses from the peak standing biomass in 2015 = 962 kg/ha (61.5% seasonal; 9.7% monthly), 2016 = 1 541 kg/ha (55.0% seasonal; 8.7%monthly) and 2017 = 1 923 kg/ha (46.5% seasonal; 7.3%, monthly). Forage quality metrics were strongly affected by summer weathering processes. Crude protein concentrations decreased by 33.6%, 27.7%, and 21.0% in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. In contrast, relative concentrations of fiber and lignin (acid detergent fiber [ADF] = cellulose + lignin) and in the weathered biomass showed increases for ADF: 44.6% (2015), 32.2% (2016), and 24.1% (2017). Increased lignin varied: 3.4% in 2015, 23.9% in 2016, and 28.0% in 2017. While ADF and lignin concentrations (weathered biomass, kg/ha) increased during the weathering process, the standing stock decreased by 39.3% (ADF) and 46.6% (lignin), compared with overall weathered biomass loss of 54.4% and CP loss of 67.1%. The significant loss of aboveground biomass and forage quality as weathering processes occurred throughout the dry summer period affects livestock grazing strategies. Forage biomass and nutrient losses through the dry season should be considered when determining grazing strategies to achieve proper residual dry matter levels and nutrient supplementation regimes before the onset of the rainy season.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2021.02.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: the Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>Animal lactation ; Annual precipitation ; Annual rainfall ; Annual rangeland ; Beef cattle ; Biomass ; Biomass management ; Cellulose ; Cellulose fibers ; Dietary supplements ; Dry matter ; Dry season ; Flowers & plants ; Forage loss ; Forage nutrition ; Forage quality ; Grasses ; Grazing ; Lignin ; Livestock ; Livestock grazing ; Milk production ; Nutrient loss ; Photodegradation ; Precipitation ; Rainfall ; Rainy season ; Rangeland ; Rangelands ; Rice ; Seasons ; Soil erosion ; Standing crop ; Summer ; Weathering</subject><ispartof>Rangeland ecology & management, 2021-05, Vol.76 (1), p.150-156</ispartof><rights>2021 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021 The Society for Range Management</rights><rights>2021. The Society for Range Management</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b413t-cc55f64b792e21ff1000ed285bb8c34d76b6caa73f6e3811a598dd352d456fdc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b413t-cc55f64b792e21ff1000ed285bb8c34d76b6caa73f6e3811a598dd352d456fdc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Royce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapero, Matthew W.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Striby, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althouse, LynneDee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meade, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horney, Marc R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Devii R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davy, Josh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlgren, Randy A.</creatorcontrib><title>Forage Quantity and Quality Dynamics Due to Weathering Over the Dry Season on California Annual Rangelands</title><title>Rangeland ecology & management</title><description>Livestock obtain forage by grazing on rangeland. In California annual rangelands, residual dry matter is commonly used to determine proper grazing levels. Rangeland forage biomass and quality can degrade dramatically during the dormant summer period. We examined 25 sites across an annual rainfall gradient (183–492 mm) over 3 contrasting rainfall yr (2015–2017) that varied from 57% to 152% of average annual precipitation. Overall fractional biomass loss was 54.4% (range = 46.5–61.5%) with greater fractional losses occurring in dry years. Biomass losses were related to the amount of peak standing crop and plant composition—both a function of annual precipitation. Fractional seasonal losses from the peak standing biomass in 2015 = 962 kg/ha (61.5% seasonal; 9.7% monthly), 2016 = 1 541 kg/ha (55.0% seasonal; 8.7%monthly) and 2017 = 1 923 kg/ha (46.5% seasonal; 7.3%, monthly). Forage quality metrics were strongly affected by summer weathering processes. Crude protein concentrations decreased by 33.6%, 27.7%, and 21.0% in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. In contrast, relative concentrations of fiber and lignin (acid detergent fiber [ADF] = cellulose + lignin) and in the weathered biomass showed increases for ADF: 44.6% (2015), 32.2% (2016), and 24.1% (2017). Increased lignin varied: 3.4% in 2015, 23.9% in 2016, and 28.0% in 2017. While ADF and lignin concentrations (weathered biomass, kg/ha) increased during the weathering process, the standing stock decreased by 39.3% (ADF) and 46.6% (lignin), compared with overall weathered biomass loss of 54.4% and CP loss of 67.1%. The significant loss of aboveground biomass and forage quality as weathering processes occurred throughout the dry summer period affects livestock grazing strategies. Forage biomass and nutrient losses through the dry season should be considered when determining grazing strategies to achieve proper residual dry matter levels and nutrient supplementation regimes before the onset of the rainy season.</description><subject>Animal lactation</subject><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Annual rainfall</subject><subject>Annual rangeland</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass management</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Cellulose fibers</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Forage loss</subject><subject>Forage nutrition</subject><subject>Forage quality</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Lignin</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock grazing</subject><subject>Milk production</subject><subject>Nutrient loss</subject><subject>Photodegradation</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Rangeland</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Standing crop</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Weathering</subject><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN9LwzAQx4soqNN_wKeAz625tGk78GVsTgVh-AsfQ5pcZ8qWzKQb7L83dT6LcHB3cJ_v9_gmyRXQDCiUN13m5VpmjDLIKMso0KPkDDiHlFNWH__MNK0KVpwm5yF0lOYlQHWWdHPn5RLJ81ba3vR7Iq0eltUwz_ZWro0KZLZF0jvygbL_RG_skix26ElcyMzvySvK4CyJNY1g67w1kkysjTLkRdolrqJquEhOWrkKePnbR8n7_O5t-pA-Le4fp5OntCkg71OlOG_LoqnGDBm0LVBKUbOaN02t8kJXZVMqKau8LTGvASQf11rnnOmCl61W-Si5PuhuvPvaYuhF57beRkvBOEBdV4wV8YodrpR3IXhsxcabtfR7AVQMmYpODJmKIVNBmYiZRuj2AGH8f2fQi6AMWoXaeFS90M78jdMD3hjnLP7H8Rtoro9Y</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Larsen, Royce E.</creator><creator>Shapero, Matthew W.K.</creator><creator>Striby, Karl</creator><creator>Althouse, LynneDee</creator><creator>Meade, Daniel E.</creator><creator>Brown, Katie</creator><creator>Horney, Marc R.</creator><creator>Rao, Devii R.</creator><creator>Davy, Josh S.</creator><creator>Rigby, Craig W.</creator><creator>Jensen, Kevin B.</creator><creator>Dahlgren, Randy A.</creator><general>the Society for Range Management</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Forage Quantity and Quality Dynamics Due to Weathering Over the Dry Season on California Annual Rangelands</title><author>Larsen, Royce E. ; Shapero, Matthew W.K. ; Striby, Karl ; Althouse, LynneDee ; Meade, Daniel E. ; Brown, Katie ; Horney, Marc R. ; Rao, Devii R. ; Davy, Josh S. ; Rigby, Craig W. ; Jensen, Kevin B. ; Dahlgren, Randy A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b413t-cc55f64b792e21ff1000ed285bb8c34d76b6caa73f6e3811a598dd352d456fdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animal lactation</topic><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Annual rainfall</topic><topic>Annual rangeland</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass management</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Cellulose fibers</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Forage loss</topic><topic>Forage nutrition</topic><topic>Forage quality</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Lignin</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock grazing</topic><topic>Milk production</topic><topic>Nutrient loss</topic><topic>Photodegradation</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Rangeland</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Standing crop</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Weathering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Royce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapero, Matthew W.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Striby, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althouse, LynneDee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meade, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horney, Marc R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Devii R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davy, Josh S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlgren, Randy A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Larsen, Royce E.</au><au>Shapero, Matthew W.K.</au><au>Striby, Karl</au><au>Althouse, LynneDee</au><au>Meade, Daniel E.</au><au>Brown, Katie</au><au>Horney, Marc R.</au><au>Rao, Devii R.</au><au>Davy, Josh S.</au><au>Rigby, Craig W.</au><au>Jensen, Kevin B.</au><au>Dahlgren, Randy A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forage Quantity and Quality Dynamics Due to Weathering Over the Dry Season on California Annual Rangelands</atitle><jtitle>Rangeland ecology & management</jtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>150-156</pages><issn>1550-7424</issn><eissn>1551-5028</eissn><abstract>Livestock obtain forage by grazing on rangeland. In California annual rangelands, residual dry matter is commonly used to determine proper grazing levels. Rangeland forage biomass and quality can degrade dramatically during the dormant summer period. We examined 25 sites across an annual rainfall gradient (183–492 mm) over 3 contrasting rainfall yr (2015–2017) that varied from 57% to 152% of average annual precipitation. Overall fractional biomass loss was 54.4% (range = 46.5–61.5%) with greater fractional losses occurring in dry years. Biomass losses were related to the amount of peak standing crop and plant composition—both a function of annual precipitation. Fractional seasonal losses from the peak standing biomass in 2015 = 962 kg/ha (61.5% seasonal; 9.7% monthly), 2016 = 1 541 kg/ha (55.0% seasonal; 8.7%monthly) and 2017 = 1 923 kg/ha (46.5% seasonal; 7.3%, monthly). Forage quality metrics were strongly affected by summer weathering processes. Crude protein concentrations decreased by 33.6%, 27.7%, and 21.0% in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. In contrast, relative concentrations of fiber and lignin (acid detergent fiber [ADF] = cellulose + lignin) and in the weathered biomass showed increases for ADF: 44.6% (2015), 32.2% (2016), and 24.1% (2017). Increased lignin varied: 3.4% in 2015, 23.9% in 2016, and 28.0% in 2017. While ADF and lignin concentrations (weathered biomass, kg/ha) increased during the weathering process, the standing stock decreased by 39.3% (ADF) and 46.6% (lignin), compared with overall weathered biomass loss of 54.4% and CP loss of 67.1%. The significant loss of aboveground biomass and forage quality as weathering processes occurred throughout the dry summer period affects livestock grazing strategies. Forage biomass and nutrient losses through the dry season should be considered when determining grazing strategies to achieve proper residual dry matter levels and nutrient supplementation regimes before the onset of the rainy season.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>the Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rama.2021.02.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-7424 |
ispartof | Rangeland ecology & management, 2021-05, Vol.76 (1), p.150-156 |
issn | 1550-7424 1551-5028 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2511887224 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animal lactation Annual precipitation Annual rainfall Annual rangeland Beef cattle Biomass Biomass management Cellulose Cellulose fibers Dietary supplements Dry matter Dry season Flowers & plants Forage loss Forage nutrition Forage quality Grasses Grazing Lignin Livestock Livestock grazing Milk production Nutrient loss Photodegradation Precipitation Rainfall Rainy season Rangeland Rangelands Rice Seasons Soil erosion Standing crop Summer Weathering |
title | Forage Quantity and Quality Dynamics Due to Weathering Over the Dry Season on California Annual Rangelands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forage%20Quantity%20and%20Quality%20Dynamics%20Due%20to%20Weathering%20Over%20the%20Dry%20Season%20on%20California%20Annual%20Rangelands&rft.jtitle=Rangeland%20ecology%20&%20management&rft.au=Larsen,%20Royce%20E.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=150-156&rft.issn=1550-7424&rft.eissn=1551-5028&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rama.2021.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2511887224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511887224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1550742421000269&rfr_iscdi=true |